Ambac, MBIA: The Shorting Game is Over 10 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Some facts that "experts" miss and shorters should know: Ambac (ABK) and MBIA (MBI) insured bonds have never in their history traded equal to natural triple A bonds. They always traded at double A levels, in both the tax exempt and taxable markets. Ask any trader. The holding companies have never been rated triple A.
The stress case scenarios that the rating agencies use are in fact depression (1930s style) scenarios. Simple put, at any point in time, a triple A financial guaranty insurer must have minimum capital equal to 100% of depression losses at a 99.9% probability with an extra 20-30% capital cushion thrown in for good measure. No one who understands the business has ever suggested that the insurer would necessarily maintain a triple A rating during or after a depression.
Credit ratings are simply an informed opinion as to the likelihood of getting paid in full on time in a very stressed environment, with triple As the most likely survivors. Read the rating agency credit rating definitions, and then read the raters' rating methodologies for financial guarantee insurers. Default assumptions for categories of risk can change, but the fundamental approach has remained the same for more than 30 years.
The unprecedented speed and magnitude of home price declines in certain housing markets is a natural result of the unprecedented speed and magnitude of the immediately preceding price appreciation that was fueled, in large part, by the collapse of mortgage under-writing standards beginning in 2004. Those depreciating markets are well on their way to reaching price levels consistent with current personal income levels, which has been, and always will be, the fundamental driver of residential real estate values.
There will be blood, but the patient will recover faster than many think; unless we have a depression, in which case I would rather be holding Ambac or MBIA insured debt than uninsured A rated debt. Is that not the fundamental reason why investors have been giving up a little yield in exchange for insurance protection during the last 34 years?
Disclosure: The author, now retired, was employed by Ambac from 1982 to 2000.
Related Articles
|
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Authors with the largestSee all
increase in followers
in the last 7 days
Fastest Climbers » -
Top Commenters
Top commenters,See all
as ranked by their peers
Top Commenters » -
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most active
Instabloggers.-
1
TraderMark
-
2
Don Dion
-
3
Cliff Wachtel
-
4
Mike Havrilla
-
5
James Quinn
Top Instabloggers » -
1
-
Top StockTalkers
TopSee all
StockTalkers.
Top StockTalkers »
This article has 10 comments:
Thanks for the post and good luck with your new blog. It's always interesting to get some perspective from the "inside", so to speak.
Hopefully, you will continue to shed light on what is happening
throughout the sector and perhaps answer questions that may
arise from time to time.
Thank you very much for bringing some sanity to the matter!
Captain Gary,
Great comment! I am with you bro!
"In religion and politics people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second-hand, and without examination, from authorities who have not themselves examined the questions at issue but have taken them at second-hand from other non-examiners, whose opinions about them were not worth a brass farthing.
Mark Twain
Now as a reasonable person I'm not going to blame this economic downturn or correction entirely on our current administration. There are way to many factors that lead to situations such as this. However, i doubt that a few politicins expressing their opinions about whether or not this is a recession have much to do with it at all.