Not All Is Green in Alt. Energy ETF Land 16 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
By Murray Coleman
No matter what you call it—clean technologies or alternative energy—ETFs are flocking to the market. Apparently, so are venture capitalists.
In a new report released by Dow Jones VentureSource, VC capitalists last year plowed a record $3 billion into alternative energy businesses. The number of deals shot up to 221 in 2007.
And most of those are with companies in the product development stage.
While the vast majority were in the U.S., Europe saw a fair amount of activity. China's VC-reach actually fell, though.
What's this mean to investors? Probably nothing right now. Green is everywhere and it's not surprising the venture vultures are circling. But how much should it make up of your portfolio? Perhaps a better question is whether so-called green ETFs even need to be in your allocation.
They're certainly not for those with weak stomachs. Look at PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy (AMEX: PBW). After gaining nearly 60% last year, it's down more than 23% in 2008. But energy as a whole is down pretty significantly this year.
So let's be fair. What's being called alternative energy covers a lot of ground. Take, for example, First Trust ISE Water (NYSE: FIW). It's down this year, but not out. Although FIW has lost a bit more than 4% so far, that's still more than two full percentage points from the broader stock market.
A leading performer this year in its portfolio is a Latin American sanitation provider. Flowserve Corp. (FLS) is up 15% and some change, and Lindsay Manufacturing (LNN) has gained 13%-plus.
The top holdings for PBW include Cree Inc. (CREE) and Applied Materials. (AMAT) Both are up by double digits this year. But aren't those computer manufacturers? I guess they're going green ... which begs the question, if everyone's going that way, why not wait until really big established names get into the field? Won't they basically buy up all of the smaller competitors?
Related Articles
|































This article has 16 comments:
Another example is Apple (AAPL). Classified 'computer hardware' as this is the most important revenue component. Though AAPL dropped the word 'computer' from its name and the iPod and iPhone are better known and sell more units than the computers division, total revenue is less.
Another example is Elbit Medical Imaging (EMITF). Until GE bought segments of the business Elbit was classified 'health care'. Though Elbit still dribbles in 'health care', it is now classified as 'real estate' as the majority of revenue is from shopping malls in India (not even Israel!).
See CREE classification here:
www.crossprofit.com/vi...
See AMAT classification here:
www.crossprofit.com/vi...
Maybe one day CREE and AMAT will be 'computer hardware', but not today.
CrossProfit
scott
growthportfolio.ning.c...
And I wasn't making a statement as much as asking a question. It's one that I keep hearing in many circles.
Oh, and I agree with all of you who think I'm an idiot. There's no debate along that score. That's one reason why I read Seeking Alpha and enjoy learning from its readers and contributors. Good catch and please don't give up on me yet!
-- Murray Coleman
He who knows not and knows that he knows not can learn, teach him.
He who knows not and knows not that he knows not is a fool, shun him.
He who knows and knows he knows is wise, follow him.
The writer of the article asked if they were and didn't state that they were computer manufacturers.
I like his writing and hopes he writes more.
off topic
Tao your mother must be related to Lao Tzu, who you are quoting. The most wisdom in the fewest words ever written, IMO. I'm referring to the Tao te Ching of course. Good choice to quote from.