Obsession With Central Bank Action Is Unhealthy But Typical

|
 |  Includes: FEU, FEZ, FXE, IEV
by: Gary Tanashian

The great question revolving around Greece is now answered. It remained unanswered when the opening of last week's newsletter was written. Here is how one writer was trying to deal with these and other questions over the weekend:

Obsession With Central Bank Action is Unhealthy, But Typical

"We're seeing some positive sentiment return on account of a few things: the prospect of coordinated intervention in the event of a sloppy Greek election, or outright victory of an anti austerity party," such as Syriza, said Andrew Wilkinson, chief economic strategist at Miller Tabak & Co. -MarketWatch

NFTRH has been managing what I believe could be a pivot to a coming intermediate bullish phase in the broad markets. For several weeks now my response to the Ticker Sense sentiment poll has been 'Bullish' http://is.gd/IX10GL. This has been largely due to markets' [previous] proximity to important support, pervasively bearish sentiment, an over bought/over owned US dollar and the 'Sitting Democrat' election year cycle.

A potential 'QE' component is part of the analysis because as I have taken pains to illustrate, a deflationary environment has reset the entire casino from its former 'inflation expectations' stance of a year ago to one that is on pins and needles about Greece, Spain and Europe in general, as the US economy continues to steadily grind out signs of economic deceleration and China's growth has slowed from unsustainable hyper levels.

There was going to be no overt Central Bank action amid a rising prices/costs backdrop and 'off with their (the inflators') heads!' sentiment among the public. Against the current backdrop, there could be. But again, a watched QE pot may not boil on demand.

So let's try to break down the scenarios that could be in play as markets open on Monday, after the Greek election has come and gone.

Scenario 1: Pro-Austerity, Pro-Euro Forces Win, Order Maintained

Is it possible that markets could react negatively to this news? Have they really been rallying on the prospect of an asymmetrical disaster and inflationary response? It is likely that policy makers, especially in the US, would stand down in the very short-term on this news and the market would be left on its own.

Rather than the thrills and spills of cataclysm and official response, we would be left with an economy that is grinding and decelerating (Empire Manufacturing was the headline disappointment last week), but all would appear 'normal' (whatever that word means in levered up modern markets) at least.

The Fed meets on June 19-20 and I think it would be foolish for a writer to try to pick apart all the different moving parts that are in play and come up with some kind of a forecast. But if Scenario 1 carries the day we are back to the normal plan, which sees the inflators being 'drawn out' of hiding by economic events that steadily continue toward our 'economic contraction' scenario that comes against a backdrop of inflation fears being little more than a distant memory.

This is the favored scenario for the ongoing analysis that sees general gold mining fundamentals marching higher in the form of rising gold-commodities ratios ('real' price of gold or RPG) as the economy continues to contract. If the gold mining sector gets hit as QE cultists abandon ship, this could present another buying opportunity for one of the few sectors that benefit fundamentally from the counter cycle.

Scenario 2: Anti-Austerity Forces Win, Greece to [Renege] on Obligations and Leave the European Union

Asymmetry would immediately come to the fore, with emotions running high and all eyes on Spain, Italy and any other 'next dominoes' that could tumble. Words like contagion and crisis would go global and go into hyper drive. All of this would be against a backdrop of already slowing economic activity. Policy makers would be compelled to act.

There is no telling what could happen to gold in this scenario. Gold is simply a much hyped, much obsessed upon anchor to monetary sense; to simplicity, as opposed to the violently thrashing thing that Keynesian geniuses have created for us over the many fiat decades of credit and debt creation.

Would Ben Bernanke be fiddling around with yield curve manipulation (Operation Twist) in this scenario or would he go full steroidal with massive purchases of long-term Treasury bonds without the sneaky window dressing of selling short-term ones? If the mission is 'increase money supply in a compelling manner for all the world to see', he will be a man and tell the world "I am Ben Bernanke and I am here to inflate, as has been my Raison d'être since I first made headlines in my speech entitled Deflation: Making Sure "It" Doesn't Happen Here http://is.gd/q2NIub."

The US Fed would also have the cover of being 'coordinated' with other global inflators and acting for the good of all against the contagion in Europe.

What's It All Mean?

If I knew, I would not be writing you today because my riches and power would be beyond imagination. Instead, we are stuck in a failing system, you and I. The system is broken and is run by people who make it more broken with every policy response.

Inflation has been the problem since gold was finally and completely sent to the wilderness in the early 70's. It is just that the degrading process takes longer to play out than the 70's gold bugs (and possibly even the current era's newly minted gold bugs) might have ever dreamed possible.

In short, whether the world blows up or order is maintained, the system is suffering from the leverage of credit/debt-based policy that came before. Personally, I vote for stability and maintenance of the illusion for now. I vote for Greek Austerity and continued market management along the current course.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

Additional disclosure: No positions were mentioned in this article.