Rumor: Sprint to Spinoff Nextel 21 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
A curious rumour surfaced today a couple of hours before the close, saying Sprint Nextel Corp (NYSE:S) has hired Morgan Stanley and initiated director Ralph V. Whitworth's plan to spin-off Nextel.
According to the rumour it could and must be viewed as huge positive for S. Spin-off announcement 'expected' in 2-4 weeks.
Considering Sprint Nextel (NYSE:S) has been subject to various chatter (both positive and negative), I wanted to highlight some very insightful feedback from a NCN member. He notes:
Both iDEN and CDMA subscriber losses have been huge... this was a stupid deal in the first place and unwinding Nextel now at a depressed price makes no sense. I think they should hold on until the market conditions improve and the company shows solid subscriber growth. Not sure if this is a concession that the Q-chat feature on Rev-A (QCOM product) is not viable technologically. Either way, this is not going to solve CDMA business of Sprint at all. Sprint should have just spend billions on improving coverage like VZW did in the late 1990s/early 2000s. It's paying huge dividends. Sprint is scr*w*d for sure.
Notablecalls: Couldn't agree more.
Related Articles
|






















This article has 21 comments:
If Sprint spins of Nextel, I'll eat my boxers.
For indirect local dealers like me, hearing that Sprint would pull the plug and release Nextel back into the hands of someone who actually knew & cared about the wireless industry would be a welcome relief.
Sprint will eventually turn itself around or be purchased in totallity or sold off in parts. If things dont even out by the 3rd and 4th quarter then I think we will see a Google, or a consortium of companies buy them out. Sprint has too much valuable spectrum for this to not occur. In addition everyone forgets that as bad as it is they still have over 52/53 million subscribers. I wouldn't get out the Kleenex for Sprint just yet.
I recently met business customer with workers scattered across several states with Nextel with push to talk and group talk. When Sprint took over he add computers and air cards to all his people. Big account for Sprint. Sprint trying to moving Nextel to its network screwed up. Service turned bad, hours on phone, prices incorrect, network up and down. I heard yesterday they have shut down Sprint Service. In talking with the nuts and bolts of the organization, techicians, engineers, and customer service, they are lost trying to be everything to everyone. As one told me, Nextel is a different product for a different market. Sprint needs to separate it wireless for the kids and its wireless for the business.
Stock will hit $4.10 be action is taken to get it right.
First of all, the promise of synergy-savings touted to the investors, through the possibly of combining existing sites; was at the least, an uneducated promise, and at the most an out-and-out lie. In either case, it was unexcusable. In my opinion, Sprint, for too long, depended on its ability to cast a spell over the public, convincing them to part with hard earned cash for a promise in the future they couldn't deliver.
Telecom is no longer an elusive, little understood hobby for the wealthy. It is a potentially high-profit business, that should support a world that wants everything now and with as little of hassle as possible. Its development is dependent on educated landlords, tower owners, zoning officials, and consultants; all looking to get a piece of the pie. Let's face it, towers are vertical real-estate, and prime property sells/leases at prime rates to the wireless carriers.
Second, some or many of the legacy Sprint persons, came from the landline business. Some had over 30 years experience. That puts them back to the days prior to deregulation...when you didn't have ANY choice in picking your landline company. Remember the old Bell commercials "We may be the only telephone company in the area, but we try not to act like it." In a business where your customers are pretty much locked into the service, there isn't much incentive for the management to be concerned with customer satisfaction.
On the other hand, the legacy Nextel persons help build a wireless network, during the boom of the industry. They knew the importance of delivering a top-notch service including customer satisfaction. There was a commitment to give the best was to get the best. Nextel was pricey compared to the competition, yet they had the LOWEST churn rate in the business. Business counted on them, and they delivered on their promises.
Third, the Nextel company, with its approximately 26,000 employees, depended on each member of their team to make this promise happen, up to and including the CEO. Sprint on the other hand, brought to the table nearly double that amount of employees, many in executive positions who seemed to have rehearsed hundreds of different excuses as to why it couldn't be fixed, instead of creative solutions that got business done.
One of the things that struck me most during this time was management's ability to pigeon-hole a problem and refuse to take it to the Director or VP level. These were not small issues and involved departments outside of the area department managers territory. I can only imagine that if information wasn't going up, then it wasn't coming down either. Too many hidden agendas from people trying to stay one step ahead of the lay-offs I suppose. In any case, I know for sure, that even two and 1/2 years later, some of those problems have never been rectified and will only add to the flailing company's problems.
I was part of the Nextel team. A group of people who cared enough to be of service to the public, and deliver quality, value, and commitment to the communities we served. It personally sickens me to see that my many years of hard work was so callously mismanaged down the drain by a group of highly paid executives who don't much care about the company as they do their own ego and pocketbooks.
I don't know that there is much hope for a solution that will be win-win for anyone. Hard to hang on to hope when public opinion doesn't support the CEO's actions for the long haul road. Good luck Dan. I hope you can weed out the snakes, stand strong, and turn it back around.
If there's anyone's opinion that you should pay attention to, it's that of the indirect dealer. These are dealers licensed to sell our products, but who can typically sell any OTHER wireless carrier they want also... they get to make comparisons where the wheels meet the road. They interact with the customers and the companies on a daily basis, so they are the ultimate "canary in the coal mine."
I too long to deal with management that knows and cares about the wireless industry. And to all you indirects out there - from over here in Denver, I'm sorry things went to crap. They cut our organization off at the head - the director, the managers, and a few of the supervisors were all brought in from Sprint. They didn't want to know how things worked and almost seemed perverse in making things not work while making the workplace unpleasant. Prior to the merger, there was a certain joy in getting business done on a daily basis. The past year has been a parade of our best people getting the heck out of there while the getting is good.
I would gladly abandon Sprint and get with a resurrected Nextel, especially knowing we were competing with Sprint and every success would be a thumb-to-the-eye for them. As far as I can tell, our customers (and former customers) share the attitudes reflected here.
I have met some good people from the Nextel side and it is a shame that you have to deal with a line drawn in the sand.