Is VMware the Next Netscape? 12 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
The answer is “yes” and “no”, as we shall see. And this question begs another, perhaps more important, question: How will VMware (VMW) develop its business model going forward? We’ll make a guess at this too.
Why VMware is like Netscape
There is a parallel between VMware and Netscape, which goes beyond the fact that both companies appeared in the stock market with stellar IPOs. Netscape’s initial product was the Netscape browser and its stellar market valuation derived almost entirely from its initial domination of the browser market. Microsoft (MSFT) decided, correctly, that Netscape was undermining its grip on the PC market, so to counter the threat, it developed Internet Explorer [IE] and bundled it with Windows.
It was monopoly behavior, that was officially recognized as such by the DOJ, and it completely destroyed the browser revenue stream that Netscape was planning to develop. However, Netscape’s response to Microsoft’s challenge was exactly wrong. It tried to fight Microsoft on the desktop - a strategy that equates to invading Russia with a small band of volunteers just as winter approaches. It could have been different. Netscape could have realized that it owned the gateway to the cloud (the Internet) and challenged Microsoft with a move towards cloud computing. This is exactly what Google has done and Microsoft is now desperately trying to buy Yahoo! for billions, in a vain attempt to meet the threat.
VMware’s position is slightly different. Its hypervisor occupies a similar position to the Netscape browser, in that it has defined a “new” and important market. Microsoft has responded by providing its own hypervisor for Windows, which seems similar to its Netscape response. And when this was announced, it sent VMware’s shares tumbling, so you could think of that as similar to the launch of IE. But there is a big difference. While Microsoft really was playing monopoly when it released IE (a browser is not a necessary part of the OS), the inclusion of a hypervisor is a legitimate, even necessary, addition to an OS.
If you don’t know what a hypervisor is, click here for a detailed explanation. Basically, it allocates out the resources of a computer, which is something that an operating system does to some degree. Microsoft is not playing monopoly by adding a hypervisor to Windows, it is extending the operating system in a logical and intelligent way. And it is doing exactly what Linux has done by adding the KVM hypervisor to the Linux kernel. It is doing what can be done using the Open Source Xen hypervisor, which both Sun Microsystems (JAVA) and Oracle (ORCL) are using. IBM (IBM) has written its own hypervisor for AIX, its version of Unix, and by the way, it’s been using a hypervisor on the mainframe since Pontius was a Pilate.
The gutting of the hypervisor market
Clearly there will soon to be no revenue in hypervisors, just as for Netscape, there was no revenue in browsers. I’ve covered some of the implications of this in VMware is absolutely not a dead duck , but there’s a deal more to be said.
The first point to note is that the value that VMware delivered initially came from the fact that there were millions of under utilized servers out there in Userland. Some of these servers were running at cpu utilization levels below four percent. Four percent is not so much an efficiency level as an inefficiency level.
The vast majority of companies addressing this problem (and most are) are now running server consolidation initiatives using VMware’s hypervisor. VMware wasn’t chosen because it was better than the competition, it was chosen because it was the only game in town. VMware had the field to itself for long enough to build some barriers to entry. So it built a complementary set of management software for its hypervisor.
It isn’t just the VMware hypervisor that is being used for the server consolidation projects. There are also up to ten VMware infrastructure products and seven distinct VMware management and automation products in use. If I were involved in a consolidation project of this kind I wouldn’t switch away from VMware’s technology just because Johnny-come-lately is offering a free hypervisor.
Microsoft, Citrix (CTXS), Oracle and any other pretenders to the throne are going to have to have competitive infrastructure and management capability in order to make a dent in VMware’s market. They will eventually develop such software, for sure, but not before next Sunday.
In a year or two, VMware will not be the only game in town and most of the “low hanging fruit” of server consolidation will not be there to pick. At that time VMware will need to have developed software, which embraces all hypervisors and markets, or its server revenues will begin to dry up.
The Client Virtualization market
I’ve described the client Virtualization market in another posting (Does Client Virtualization Make Sense?). The main point to understand about it is that it’s not really a client virtualization market at all. It’s a desktop management market.
The problem that companies are trying to solve is that managing PCs is damned expensive. Cost estimates vary, but as a rough rule of thumb, the annual cost of the out-of-the-box-and-onto-the-desktop approach is around 3 times the cost of the PC itself and most of that is support cost and management cost. These costs can be cut back significantly by any of the following approaches:
- Using session based computing, as provided predominantly by Citrix, but also one or two others. This is currently the dominant approach to getting-the-PC-off-the-desk.
- Streaming a PC image to the desktop. Both Neoware (acquired recently by HP) and Ardence (acquired recently by Citrix) can do this.
- Providing a virtualized PC on a server. VMware can do this using its hypervisor and VDI (its Virtual Desktop Infrastructure) and so can one or two other vendors.
- Providing PC Blades. This is where vendors, including IBM and HP provide purpose-designed blades which are PCs and which form a pool of resources to be shared between users.
All of these approaches are competitive to some degree, all cut management and support costs and all have drawbacks of one kind or another. VMware has bought several companies, including Thinstall and Propero, so that it can compete in this market.
This is a completely different market to the server virtualization market and there is no way to know how this market will evolve. It’s kinda new, even though the Citrix session-based computing part of the market is kinda old. I personally expect that virtual machine management of servers will eventually combine with the management of virtual PCs, for the sake of global optimization, to VMware’s advantage, but that won’t happen before next Sunday either.
In the meantime, Microsoft and Citrix intend to spoil VMware’s PC virtualization party and HP (and IBM too perhaps, even though it sold off its PC business) will try to establish themselves as the “desktop savior.” They have the right credentials. All of which means that VMware will meet intense competition on the desktop.
Back to Netscape
The VMware/Netscape analogy is accurate in the sense that VMware will not be able to derive longterm revenues from its hypervisor, just as Netscape could not gather long-term revenues from the browser. But the parallel runs out at that point. VMware’s stock price is no longer as stellar as it was, and it will probably fall back some more if VMware’s growth rate falls back (as I expect it to). However, VMware is not doing anything stupid like attacking Microsoft head-on. It is developing the virtualization market that it established as fast as it can, in an effort to stay ahead of the competition.
There is a requirement for an operating system that runs a whole data center. I wrote about this in a recent posting on Cisco (CSCO). Cisco and/or its competitors are potential providers of such an OS and, from a different perspective, so is VMware. If it remains the lead player in the virtualization market, then it could still have a stellar future providing such software.
Disclosure: none
Related Articles
|
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Authors with the largestSee all
increase in followers
in the last 7 days
Fastest Climbers » -
Top Commenters
Top commenters,See all
as ranked by their peers
Top Commenters » -
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most active
Instabloggers.-
1
David Fry
-
2
TraderMark
-
3
Don Dion
-
4
Cliff Wachtel
-
5
Mike Havrilla
Top Instabloggers » -
1
-
Top StockTalkers
TopSee all
StockTalkers.
Top StockTalkers »
i'm sure that VMware's thinking has moved beyond hypervisor revenues. i think VMware is better compared to an Oracle, where they will shift from technology and move the business to solutions and services. that's when revenues will really take-off.
Oracle - not dead yet
Apache - not dead yet
Apple - not dead yet
Google - far from dead
Intuit - not dead yet
Sony - not dead yet
Yahoo - ironically Microsoft's involvement is what is going to actually kill them. In other words, Microsoft will piss all over the brand to destroy a perfectly working portal.
So the answer is no. VMWare is not the Netscape. At least not by Microsoft's hand.
EMC mothership still controls it in majority. EMC have reaped
the financial rewards from their initial 695M purchase. The kid has grown now to 18B market cap (as of today almost a 25 times undiscounted of the original acquisition).
Now, the kid can cause trouble to EMC's main storage business as the kid has to fight with the friends and neighbors - Oracle, Microsoft, HP, Sun, IBM - who have their own hypervisors or alike - their own babies in-making or crawling around the corners.
EMC is now in a fix. If they release more stocks to the public, the shares dilutes further and the stock price will go down.If they hold on to it, then the value will continue to fall as it battles. Symantec is the new competitor when it comes to security and other data center (storage-centric) virtualization.
VMW years are numbered and it won't be surprising to see the
stocks in late teens or early 20's by the end of 2008. So sell today and don't wait till next Sunday!
you are not "by far" ahead of anyone in the market either. i have tried two other pieces of software and they do the exact same thing you do. and actually, they are better at it. ironically, vmware is crashing harder than my computer did with their software and im content with the smirk it brings across my face.
Are you a betting man? Ill go feature for feature with you publically in this forum. Ill bet you a full dinner with a bottle of wine at the stake house of your choice for you and a partner. Put up or shut up time.
What virtualization product are you using that provides 1/2 of the funtionality of VMware ESX? Hyper-V performace has proven time and time again to be about 50 of what ESX delivers. Have you used V-Motion in VMware? It works. Have you tried the MS version.. it doesnt work!
Lastly, you are using vmware workstation. Corporate customers (that is 100% of the fortune 100 and 90% of the fortune 1000) dont have to pay per use for support.