Seeking Alpha
About the author: From Bespoke:
Submit
an article to

A major argument for the bullish case is that forward P/E estimates for the S&P 500 are very attractive. From Standard & Poor's website, you can download the historical and estimated quarterly EPS and P/E ratios for the S&P 500 at this link.

As shown in the chart below, the estimated P/E ratio based on bottoms up operating EPS is expected to decline throughout 2008 (the yellow line represents the estimates for all 4 quarters of 2008). The P/E ratio for the fourth quarter of 2008 is currently estimated to be all the way down at 13.49. Based on these estimates, the market looks very attractive. As shown, while the index is still very close to all-time highs, its P/E ratio is well below where it stood in the late 90s at similar market levels.

click to enlarge

But are these estimates actually going to play out? The P/E estimates above are based on estimated operating earnings. Below we provide historical and estimated operating earnings as provided on S&P's website.

As shown, earnings for the next four quarters are currently expected to be inline or higher than they were when the economy was roaring in late 2006 and early 2007. While the economy might end up not being as bad as everyone expects, we certainly don't expect it to be as strong as it was in recent years. These earnings forecasts for 2008 seem a little too high to us, and based on its performance recently, the market seems to think they're too high as well.

Print this article with comments
Comments
21
Older > Comments 1 - 20 out of 21
You are viewing the latest 20 comments
  •  
    I think most people are ALREADY pricing in an earnings contraction. Otherwise the stock market would be much higher!

    The weak dollar & growing exports, and the emerging markets will provide a floor to the earning downturn.

    Companies are also much leaner than before. A lot of core administrative tasks are now outsourced to third party providers who can provide economy of scale. Recent labor law changes, also allow more flexibility in the deployment of labor. So they can tune their operations on a much finer scale and react faster to economic changes. Plus advances in supply chain management mean that inventories are much lower than past economic slowdowns.

    The drop in earnings is going to be less than other similar slowdowns in the past.
    2008 Mar 07 04:21 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    VERY close to all-time highs? We are off 20% from all time highs. You seem to think that stocks started in a bubble as they did in 2000-2002.

    This bubble wasn't stocks, it was credit. Financials will be outsized on the negatives this year basically making overall market P/E is meaningless. BUT, if you take tech stocks - which ARE performing, many have a forward P/E of less than 15 with estimates that are decidedly understated.

    2008 Mar 07 10:49 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Wait til we see how much off balance stuff comes back onto the books!Credit bubble will be FAR worse for stocks than a speculative bubble in equities themselves.It will dry up business and earnings growth (read P/E) like a desert wadi in summer.Market IS pricing in lower earnings,but will need to do 10-30% more.
    2008 Mar 07 11:07 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Analyst estimates are more often than not, a lagging indicator. Believing in forward PER estimates is liking believing in Santa Claus.
    If the bulls are relying on this to support the market, then I will enjoy eating bull meat served bloody rare.
    2008 Mar 08 12:54 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    It is not far fetched to envision GDP (that is US revenues) dropping 1.5% over the next year and earnings as a % of GDP dropping
    from 11% to 8.5% (that is earnings). Given the Fed's potentially excessive stimulus, after the flights to safety subside it is not inconceivable to imagine the 10 year bond going to 6% and an overall stock market p/e of 16.5x (versus around 15 as of today). If all of that happens, you should expect to see the market drop by down to almost 10,000 or by as much as 18%. That said, if the 10 yr bond goes only to 5.5% all else equal we only have another 10% to go. If earnings go to 9.5% then we would have another 8% to go. So...how far is the bottom? Best guess is down 8% to 20% from here.

    2008 Mar 08 08:22 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    OK guys try this out for size. Redo your chart to look at cash flow from operations and cash flow from investing. Then try to figure out how many snakes are in the grass for cash flow from investing in AAA securities. Make it easier for the analysis by dissecting only the last three years. "Conventional wisdom" for this mess will occur 30 years from now.
    2008 Mar 08 12:07 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Market goes down 35-40% in a recession. Exports only help big cap, small companies make up the majority of business in the US, but they don't rely on exports, nor do they have the capital funding available to stay afloat, or are able to pass-thru higher costs as easily to consumers, especially of services. Taking out the cratering financials, look at the oils in the SPX that have made the p/e look cheap, earnings for oils are already topped, starting with refiners. The other poster is correct, maybe not 8, but the S&P earnings should go to 10 before basing an opinion of "cheap" on forward S&P earnings estimates.
    2008 Mar 08 12:32 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    anybody expecting a huge rally next week...show of hands....LOL !!!
    2008 Mar 08 01:01 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Ok cheesecake... Our president came on TV last night and said that the downturn is 'under control' and that his 'early' actions will have averted a recession!!! ... Ha! Ha! Ha!... Whew! .. That's really not funny ...

    jegan ;-)
    2008 Mar 08 03:18 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The market will crash through 11,000 when the earnings picture becomes all too clear, and all too bleak as well.
    2008 Mar 08 04:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    What I find interesting is the complete disconnect between S&P500 earnings expectations compared to those of the more than 4000 companies that report on Wall Street each quarter. Here is a chart of the quarterly earnings including more than 3000 companies that have reported Q4-07 earnings so far. ( See tradesystemguru.com/co... )

    Earnings have fallen 54% from Q4-06. How can S&P earnings be so much more positive than the general market? I call the S&P estimates complete bull! Like those who said the subprime problem was "contained" a year ago, it is little more than wishful thinking and analyst hype.
    2008 Mar 08 07:46 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Only the Brazil stock index has a 200 day moving average that is positive and just barely so. How can "The weak dollar & growing exports, and the emerging markets will provide a floor to the earning downturn" stated by VIKRAM truly believe that to be true?

    We sneeze, the world markets catch cold. All a mater to time, and I see no way out. Sorry about that. Better get liquid while you can and hang on to your hat! It will be a long hard trek down the mountain of CDO's and CMBS defaults.

    In that environment, forword or trailing PE's will make no difference, even to my dog.
    2008 Mar 08 09:17 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    John the Bear:

    Economies are becoming decoupled, not the markets. Markets are 85% psychological and trends repeat everywhere.

    The cold/sneeze adage is reaching the end of its useful shelf life. The emerging economies will continue to grow; perhaps a 1-2% less than what they would have if we hadn't sneezed.

    Check out El-Erian's interviews on CNBC's video collection. The guy is an expert on emerging markets apart from being one of the most respected investors out there (Harvard/PIMCO).
    2008 Mar 09 12:53 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Vikram, you got all backwards! The markets are tanking in every index all over the world except Brazil, not their economies...yet, but that will come. Check your facts bud. The 200 day moving average is an important indicator of future trends, and the markets lead the economy, not the other way around.
    2008 Mar 09 12:11 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    What exactly are we debating ? Every upturn, and every downturn, eventually ends and reverses. We all have to play the factors affecting the market against our specific investments. The old factors are there, and every few years some new ones: Global Warming, Innovations, bigger Natl debt, or curves from left field like the sub prime sludge, or whatever the RTC thing was a few years back.

    Here's what I know.

    My crystal ball has always been reallly fuzzy. I have no clue what's going to happen next month, so I invest accordingly. I don't care about short term results, 90 day trends and can't imagine what signal I could find to pick the bottom better than everybody else.

    What I do know is BAC is a strong company with good management that has performed year over year, it has more cash than others, and pays a great dividend.
    I know BA has 750 orders, now delayed a year, for aircraft it will deliver over the next decade. It will make money, and my stock will rise.
    AT&T and VZ pay a 5% dividend to sooth the pain if they moves up or down a bit. NAT has paid a 7% dividend for 10 years, but it's stock is down now, pushed down from a rediculous high based on one bad quarter..

    Apple is innovative, has preserved cash. I believe in the company, and plan to hold because I think it will grow a little, or a lot, in the next few YEARS.

    I've watched mine yo-yo from $70 in 2006 to $199, and nearly back.
    Though it doesn't pay a dividend, I continue to protect myself, earn income and play the "banker" by selling options to folks who play the timing game. somebody just paid $27 for a $150 call for Jan10. My net for shares purchased at $126 this month is $99. Two years from now, if it expires I get to sell a new option, or, if I'm "unlucky" will be forced to sell at $150 for a 50% profit.

    So, you guys keep betting the farm on the timing thing. I'll stick with looking for companies with solid management, 5 and 10 year track records of revenue and earnings growth, conservative cash management, dividends, and enough volitility to allow me to sell options over and over and over.

    2008 Mar 09 06:12 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If financials represent X% of the S&P (21%?), would it be a more revealing analysis to factor them out?
    2008 Mar 10 09:32 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    at current multiples with no grwoth and the current risk premium over 10 yr trsy. Stocks are only 25% over historical average. gogerty.com
    2008 Mar 10 02:15 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    More of this type of stuff!

    More I say!

    Thank you.
    2008 Mar 10 06:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Sorry about my first entry, I thot I'd be able to edit it.

    We need more of this type of charting because 1) it is not
    the type of thing you see on TV (hint hint - clicks "Mute"
    button) and 2) it sparks good ideas that let one project into
    the future and may encourage some people to buy SPX
    puts (or whatever) to hedge their longs.

    The fly in the ointment for bears (that's me, since I exist
    in the real world) is the global situation. Chindia have tens
    of millions of people constantly joining their version of our
    middle class. They will demand western-style networking
    (CSCO etc.) and housing (will LEN or TOL or HOV go
    international?), equipment for raising animals for food (CAT,
    DE etc.), fertilizer, and phones by the barge-load.

    It's hard to figure how it all plays out when you combine it
    with the fact that our entire financial system is deleveraging
    itself into oblivion.
    2008 Mar 10 07:01 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    It would be great to revive this discussion.
    2008 Jul 01 08:36 AM | Link | Reply
Viewing Comments 1-20 out of 21 Older comments >