Can We Bury the Middle Class Income Myths?
posted on: March 11, 2008
-
Font Size:
The graph above was created using inflation-adjusted median household income data and average household size data (both from the Census Bureau), and was inspired by an article in today's WSJ - "The Inequality Myth," (see previous CD post here).
Economist Brad Schiller wrote:
The
Census data originate from an annual survey of households. The data
don't track individual households from year to year, but instead just
take a snapshot of the households in existence in March of each year.
From these annual snapshots, we try to infer what's happening to the
typical household over time.
The
"typical" household, however, keeps changing. Since 1970 there has been
a dramatic rise in divorced, never-married and single-person
households. Back in 1970, 71% of all U.S. households were two-parent
families. Now the ratio is only 51%. In the process of this social
revolution, the average household size has shrunk from 3.14 to 2.57
persons -- a drop of 18%.
The meaning? Even a "stagnant" average household income implies a higher standard of living for the average household member.
Bottom Line: As the graph above shows, the average household size has declined by 21% from 1967 to 2006, while real, median household income increased by 31% over the same period. Result? A significantly, much, much higher standard of living for the average household member, i.e. the typical member of the middle class!
Isn't it time that we bury many of the myths forever about the "middle-class squeeze," "the war on the middle-class," "the American middle-class is fighting for its life," "Two Americas," etc.
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- The Importance of Stock Picking, Illustrated in Oil
- GeoEye Looking Up: Confirms Launch Date and Releases Q1 Earnings
- 6 Medical Device Makers Poised for Growth
- Let's Not Write The Fed a Blank Check
- Nationwide WiMAX: Who Benefits?
- Take Two's New GTA Game Sells Well; EA: “Nothing Has Changed”
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
-
Long Ideas
-
Short Ideas
-
Cramer's Picks
- What's the Best Way to Capture a Country?
- The Sun Should Soon Shine on MGM Mirage
- 6 Medical Device Makers Poised for Growth
- Helicopter Shortage: An Investment Opportunity?
- FedEx Fails to Deliver - Fast Money (5/9/08)
- Century Casinos: Interesting Play, Not for the Faint of Heart
- Alliant Techsystems: A Defensive Defense Play
- i2 Technologies' Turnaround: Part II
- United Online's Future Looks Rosy - Barron's
- Be a Pepper - Barron's
- Full list of Long Ideas »
- Why You Should Short Companies Doing Share Buybacks
- SEC Selloff - Fast Money (5/7/08)
- Liquidity Preferences: Molson Coors vs. Starbucks
- Three Short Ideas: Standard Pacific, Under Armour and Trump Entertainment
- Bored with Yahoo's Board - Fast Money Recap (5/6/08)
- Short Sellers Give Microsoft, Yahoo Wide Berth
- Sprint Nextel: A Short on Today's Gap-Up
- What to Do About Yahoo? - Fast Money Recap (5/5/08)
- Summer in the Citi - Fast Money Recap (5/2/08)
- Pacific Capital Bancorp: Evasive Maneuvers
- Full list of Short Ideas »
- Citi's Limits - Cramer's Stop Trading! (5/9/08)
- On the Rails - Cramer's Lightning Round (5/9/08)
- Visteon: From Victim to Victor - Cramer's Mad Money (5/9/08)
- Retail Sale - Cramer's Stop Trading! (5/8/08)
- Call the Koppers - Cramer's Lightning Round (5/8/08)
- Coach is a Winner - Cramer's Mad Money (5/8/08)
- Fannie's Cut-Off Shorts - Stop Trading! (5/7/08)
- Methanex Not the Cat's MEOH - Cramer's Lightning Round (5/7/08)
- 3 Victim Stocks - Cramer's Mad Money (5/7/08)
- Deutsche Treat - Cramer's Lightning Round (5/6/08)
- Full list of Cramers Picks »
Most Popular Feeds
-
ETFs
-
US Market
-
Long Ideas
-
Alt. Energy
- Full list of feeds »



This article has 7 comments:
1. I question the propriety of the deflator used to calculate 'Real' in 'Real Median Income'. If the deflator is not reflective of a typical asset basket the graph becomes a great example of how stats can be used to misinform.
2. The article includes the words "Middle Class"... probably not an accurate description of the composition of those in the analysis.
You're sitting there extrapolating sweeping erroneous conclusions about the people who live in the middle of the bell curve in this country based on how the numbers have been skewed by those like yourself on the upper end.
Earth to Mark Perry, PhD, you're not Joe Everyman. You just make more than him/her. And you're not better than us either.
We don't take trips to Europe, travel far on vacation, drive Beemers or shop at Bloomies and part of the reason is all the money being gamed out of the system by people who make zeros for a living and contribute exactly that to Society.
Remember the old bomb shelter game? Please tell me why you'd be given a spot over someone who doesn't sit on their arse in AC all day?
You sound like the poster boy for 'Piled Higher and Deeper'.