Seeking Alpha
About this author:

My advisory has put forth a terrible possibility: A CRASH.

Here are Mike Turner's words:

There have been 4 consolidation periods in the market over the past 107 years, where the Dow has traded in a fairly well-defined trading range. These consolidation periods lasted, on the average, about 12 years. There was one that ran from 1906 to 1925; another one that lasted from 1937 to 1950; one that existed between 1966 and1982; and, the last one that started in January of 2000 and (maybe... more on this, below) ended in October of 2006.

No one ever knows, for sure, when a consolidation begins and ends until enough time has elapsed to be able to look back and then identify starting points and ending points.

If you make the assumption that the most recent consolidation began in January of 2000 and ended in October of 2006, when the Dow moved above that level and turned it into a support level from a resistance level, then the current situation in the market is that the Dow is now getting very close to its last support level of 11,722.

But, if the Dow closes below the 11,722 level, one of the 3 following conclusions could be made:

The Dow closing below 11,722 would be a harbinger of the 1929 crash, which triggered the only time in history that the Dow ever closed below its previous consolidation period. The actual event of crossing below the upper range limit of the previous consolidation, which occurred in 1931.

THE question is, then, are you a Bull or a Bear? Hamlet?

If you're a Bull, then you'll also believe:

The Dow is still in a consolidation period that started in January of 2000, except the actual upper limit of the consolidation is 14,093 (the highest weekending close of the Dow since January 2000) and a low of 8,000 (the lowest low since January of 2000).

Give me a break. Does anyone seriously believe that, as the Dow keeps moving lower, past 11, then 10, then 9 thousand, it's still in a 'consolidation' period? No.

Besides, it makes no sense to hold long positions (except for puts) if you believe that, yes, we could see the DJIA at 7,998 but that 'it's only temporary because it's within a consolidation range'. You'd be losing your IRA, your 401K, and your kids' and their kids' college fund in the process!

Let's all give advisories a round of applause. They've put in some good time picking apart all the data and info for a small fee. I just need to pay more attention to my cash balance as small as it might seem at any given time.

Let's Go

I've come up with a good catch phrase in these times of severe Fed induced rallies: Sell the news, buy the rally. Yep. If you're long puts, news is usually bad and it's a good time to take some profits off the table. But, along comes Fed to prop up markets. That's a good time to buy some MORE puts at a big discount. Would this strategy have worked since July '07? Like a charm.

A good question is: which puts would you consider owning in the coming weeks given the fact that we're looking to test the aforementioned support level? I'd have to go with financials and maybe some NASDAQ companies. More likely, I'd stay away from straight mortgage lenders because they're the ones who have been severely punished of late. A good bet would be a bank, like BofA (BAC), because they have a lot of exposure and its share price is still relatively high. Another good bet might be a reinsurer who's likely going down anyway, like XL Capital (XL).

As for NASDAQ, I'd have to go with Apple (AAPL). Not only has the stock split in the past but it's also run up like wildfire. At 200, it couldn't hold up. I don't claim to know why, precisely, but I'm certain that it has something to do with the technology.

Having been a hardcore Mac user since the late 80s, I remember a good Mac, one which would mold itself to your will and wants and one which provided a real, tangible, albeit spiritual connection to other Mac users. It was like being taken on a cosmic ride by a wave of knowledge and pleasure. Whew! Those were the times when Apple would bring all races and all nations together. The thing was electric. When OS X "ten" came out, something was not so right. Everything seemed to work right, but the learning curve was gone. You could no longer make your own Mac, as it were. It was prebuilt for you and you had to comply with the given framework. I stopped using the Mac then and haven't touched one since.

I could go on and on, but my point is that the platform ain't all there. Jobs stole the guts and left only a framework, which he filled with other people's chips and some sort of nonsense software. Tiger, Jaguar, Leopard - all nonsense. Where's the Apple menu? That was the HEART of the Mac. I'm dead serious. From the Apple menu would come food for everyone, worldwide. Besides, it's clear that there are a lot of counterfeit iPhones in circulation and that the schematics must have come from someone at Apple. Keep in mind that it's a global marketplace and phones are sold in just about every continent.

It has great support , nowadays, at 120, but at some point it's gonna get busted. However, naked puts are expensive, especially the longer out on the calendar you go. Looking at the daily chart (from Oct 05 out), I'm looking for the stochastic indicator to cross the 75 line (on the uptrend) before really entering into a serious short position. As for the MACD, it needn't cross the zero line for the stock to tank. It spent so much time above it that it could spend a lot of time below that level.

As the Toys

As this option series winds down, the bear grows stronger while the bull grows fatter and dumber. I remember the tech bubble, trust me. Yahoo (YHOO), was, what 250 dollars...(pre-split, I know) but my point is that these companies, for one reason or another, lose their edge and start to WIND DOWN.

Disclosure: none

Print this article with comments

This article has 27 comments:

  •  
    Several good points are being made here, except the odd notion that Apple just doesn't have it anymore. The writer's personal opinion/dissatisfactio... with Apple is clouding his judgement. Since OSX, Apple's market share has increased and continues to do so. Then there are other major drivers, like the iPod, iPhone and whatever is around the corner next from that genius of innovation, Steve Jobs. To claim that Apple is tanking because the writer no longer likes Macs is simply silly.
    2008 Mar 13 07:58 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    output555-
    Well put. But there's more- if the writer can be so incredibly wrong on his assessment of Apple's business based on a misguided personal opinion of their product, how do we take anything he says seriously? Really! Bank isn't missing the ballpark with his predictions for AAPL, he doesn't even know what city he is in!
    2008 Mar 13 08:24 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Hi Steve,
    You couldn't have said it better, right on.
    2008 Mar 13 08:42 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Apple's a great innovative company and it'll grow under the leadership of JOBS !! Its stock price may suffer in the short to medium term, but it'll rebound and rise in the longer term, trust me !!
    2008 Mar 13 09:09 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I feel so sorry for people like this, they try to write an exciting article based on the stupid concept that he doesn't like OSX which is probably the best operating system ever written.
    For god's sake grow up man you are supposed to be advising people not airing your childish prejudices.
    2008 Mar 13 09:10 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    He should just give up and take a dirtnap.
    2008 Mar 13 09:41 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    •  • Website: http://20smoney.com
    What the heck is wrong with this article?

    "At 200, it couldn't hold up. I don't claim to know why, precisely, but I'm certain that it has something to do with the technology."

    What a retarded statement. It couldn't hold up because it was overbought. Even if Apple was not a technology leader (which it is), it wouldnt be the reason the stock price pulled back after a huge run.

    Why is this kind of content being produced here?
    2008 Mar 13 09:47 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    From his BIO -

    "Steve Bank is an independent investor, reviewer, and computer consultant. His broad experience includes self-representation in courts of law, undergraduate major declarations in classics, music, and sociology, and many miles behind the wheel of an automobile on North American highways."

    This BIO gave me a great laugh, basically he is saying he has gotten into trouble with the law ("self-representation"... went to college, used a computer, and drove around the country. Not exactly the pedigree I'm looking for in a person whose advice I would take. This is just a lay person's opinion and really he has about much chance of being right as a monkey throwing darts at a stock table. It his opinion though, and he is free to voice it.
    2008 Mar 13 10:03 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    There is so much trash advice and assessment these days, its difficult to take anyone seriously, even those who are being paid top dollars, cannot get anything straight and can lead investors to make wrong decisions.
    This fellow is one of them.
    2008 Mar 13 10:16 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I have to join the thumbs down crowd here and ask how it is we landed on this kind of article in the first place? I believe it is better suited for Yahoo threads.
    2008 Mar 13 10:35 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Just one statement for this article: - What a unqualified bullshit! Yahoo should check first the qualification of the person who is going to place an article.
    2008 Mar 13 11:03 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    No wonder there is a 'non recession' / 'tough patch' in the USA at the moment. With prats like this posing as economic experts things could get a lot worse. He would make a good replacement for dubbya in the White House.

    God help America.
    2008 Mar 13 11:07 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Seeking Alpha? You should, because right now you are furthest in the rear, at Omega!
    2008 Mar 13 11:07 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    check you guns at the door! His opinion/rant gave him away and now we know to avoid.
    2008 Mar 13 11:08 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    He seemed so rational when he started...
    2008 Mar 13 11:11 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Well. I have been a Mac user since 1999 and it seems pretty fulfilling, electric and quite an actively growing club to me.

    It makes everything ELSE seem incomplete and bothersome frankly.

    And he doesn't even know or comprehend the importance of OSX across desktops, laptops, iPods and iPhones.

    APPL will indeed be back over 200 and will make today's prices look like a gift.
    2008 Mar 13 11:27 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Who the hell is Steve Bank? And what's he doing on Seeking Alpha?
    2008 Mar 13 12:01 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I hate people that WASTE MY TIME
    2008 Mar 13 01:43 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Written by a person who is incapable of the same type of innovation that Apple and Job's have consistently provided since the very beginning of the companies inception. When you can no longer grow by learning and adapting, the problem is your own. I find the scope and creativity of my new iMac to be nothing short of amazing. I marvel every time I turn on my I phone and realize that I have an internet connected micro laptop in my hand that is far more powerful that the Star Treck communicators I wanted as a kid. Sorry you don't seem to be sharing the same planet as me.
    2008 Mar 13 01:51 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Oh my god! Someone who doesn't love AAPL and worship Jobs!

    Nooooooooooooooooo!

    Everyone here listen! Go out and buy another Mac to make up for this horrible turn of events. Steve can't know there's someone out there who doesn't love him.
    2008 Mar 13 02:45 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To those in charge of Seeking Alpha,

    I consider this the worst article I've read on your site. Come on guys! Raise your standards.
    2008 Mar 13 03:01 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Alright, so I'm the first to trash a lacking text, one that is short on facts and long on opinion, if anything because even my aunt Lola, the piano bar singer, has an opinion on, well, just about everything. But, versus other articles I've read here (seekingalpha), some written by famous hedge fund managers and others written by multi credentialed professors, this is not the worst folks, in my view. The first part of the article starts off interestingly enough (its history, noth wrong there). And the second part is on shares, which is where perhaps the author is not really qualified to get into the details. But I sense that the extensive discord here is perhaps driven by people who are emotionally connected to Apple. I own Apple shares and consider myself financially connected to Apple. If its got a financial future thats going to get a premium soon Im long if not I blow the position out. Fact: Jobs was lacking on the hype (product pipeline) in Jan but the stock is more likely off in line with just about most of the "large cappers" in the Nasdaq which in noth unusual for the jan - june timeframe. Fact: capex is up at Apple and is a very good leading indicator of product developemet/announceme... going forward. So I'm long apple here. Lastly, I think you guys should let- up on the creditials of the author (like I said solid creditials dont prevent you from making a fool of yourself) and focus on his facts or lack thereof. And last last of all, frankly, most of you guys sound just a little "touchy" when it comes to the Apple subject. Jobs isnt perfect and no company is "creme de la creme" forever. Peace dudes!
    2008 Mar 13 03:42 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    time is wasted when waste is being exported to china
    2008 Mar 13 05:26 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I agree with the down voters on this article. Everyone's got an opinion, but it's telling when a bearish argument on a stock is rooted in complete ignorance of the targeted company. He writes "Tiger, Jaguar, Leopard - all nonsense." Good grief, man. Backup your ignorant assessment with at least a modicum of supporting facts, even if you ignore the increasing market share of Apple computers and Vista's dismal inroads. I'd mention Kleiner Perkins' new $100m iFund for iPhone app development, but I think both the beauty of that phone and the momentum behind apple products would be lost on you. Please do buy plenty of puts on AAPL.
    2008 Mar 13 06:09 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    •  • Website: http://www.opera.com
    naw...I'll stick to Kerberos on Eudora. It all sounds nice - don't get me wrong - i touch itunes . I'm not saying it doesn't work, but I am saying that it's not a Mac. That you can't contest, right? :)

    2008 Mar 14 12:59 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "Having been a hardcore Mac user since the late 80s, I remember a good Mac, one which would mold itself to your will and wants and one which provided a real, tangible, albeit spiritual connection to other Mac users. It was like being taken on a cosmic ride by a wave of knowledge and pleasure. Whew! Those were the times when Apple would bring all races and all nations together. The thing was electric. When OS X "ten" came out, something was not so right...

    ... like, dude, um, maybe like the acid was really starting to fry your brain by then??

    Just a thought -- it really does mess you over time.

    Just say no to drugs... and to Steve Bank.
    2008 Mar 14 01:45 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    i think seekingalpha is more to blame for the low Quality Checks on poster's qualifications... the author of this article does not have the qualifications and by writing such "seemingly professional" advice, it's extremely misleading, and totally disgusting

    this is no longer for a good laugh, this is a serious problem
    2008 Mar 16 04:23 PM | Link | Reply
More by Steve Bank
Other articles by Steve Bank »