• Font Size:
  • Print

I'm really surprised that no one has brought up the possibility of Akeena Solar (AKNS) as a merger or acquisition target for 2008. Every burgeoning sector has its window of opportunity for consolidation. The time to pick up great companies on the cheap is when their stock price is depressed. The phrase "this too shall pass" is apropos to the current interim hiatus in retail solar installations in California.

Looking ahead to 2009, there are several converging patterns which place Akeena squarely in the M&A target zone. Sunpower (SPWR) and Akeena are members of the small handful of American solar companies experiencing strong growth (maybe Suntech International (STP), in San Francisco, could be included too). Why wouldn't (shouldn't) Sunpower buy Akeena NOW, while its cheap, in order to augment their downstream offerings later on?

Whoever acquires Akeena doesn't really need their multiple office locations or small army of installers, they need their Andalay panels - hundreds of thousands of them - to sell to contractors and roofers all over the sunbelt of the United States. Akeena's existing branches could be independently ceded as franchises back to their original owners, with the new proprietors given stock in the acquirer and a chance to purchase cheap wholesale panels to start up.

If large solar farms are going to be built in the U.S., Sunpower's subsidiary - Powerlight - one of the world's leaders in large installations - will be a likely candidate to get the nod. There are very few "other" American solar companies (such as Akeena, First Solar (FSLR), Energy Conversion Devices (ENER) and Evergreen (ESLR)) with the skill or scale to be to develop such large scale projects, much less ramp them. General Electric (GE), Chevron (CVX), BP Solar, Tyco (TYC) - that's a different story. They could do these kinds of things.

2009 will usher in some interesting solar investment paradigms.

1) Sufficient poly supply (a glut?) for the first time in 3 years (coming out of Asia) - thus driving down the ASPs of cells and modules and increasing demand - as solar falls ever closer to grid parity costs.

2) The first inkling of a resurrection in new real estate construction. By that time there will be cheaper solar products available (by as much as 25-30% under today's prices) for building-installed residential construction.

3) A new national alternative energy bill (probably modeled after California's) will be in the works - one that highlights solar and wind (ethanol was taken care of last year). Given that all the candidates for the presidency have mentioned the need for a national alternative energy plan, and there's the distinct possibility that Congress will be dominated by one party in favor of it, we're likely to have a favorable demand market for solar installations, powered by subsidies in 2009.

Following the Nixon debacle in 1976, the other party (Democrats) landed landslide victories with the presidency, a 2 to 1 majority in the house, and 61 senators. As long as legislators voted along party lines they were able to pass almost any legislation in 1976-1980. Policy was their's to make. This is why I am so bullish on solar energy for the United States today.

I think a similar thing is afoot for November 2008. The only thing keeping public energy policy in the grip of farmers and commodity providers today has been the political base (red states) of our current administration. When that changes, the pendulum will swing the other way (one just hopes not to "rob the smart and give to the poor"). The Saudis have sworn for 5 years that there is more than enough oil and that too much of it has been locked up in the financial derivatives of speculators.

A national alternative energy act - similar to putting a man on the moon in 10 years in the 1960s - could break the back of the inflation we're now experiencing. Sunlight can do for America what it's done for Germany, Japan and Spain: create jobs and increased energy independence. In some respects our Great Western Desert is an American version of a “Sunlight Saudi Arabia”.

An acquisition of Akeena at $12-$14/share -well above today's depressed and uncertain prices, split between cash, options, and shares in the acquirer - might make for some happy Akeena investors, and give this company it's first crack at taming the elephant in its back office: profitability.

I see the likely candidate as a large technical manufacturer, or chipmaker/solar cell maker, with upstream poly and downstream manufacturing prowess who can apply profitable economies of scale to producing the Andalay panels. As mentioned previously, Suntech, BP Solar, or General Electric are other names that comes to mind. The important thing about the Andalay panel is it's simply the best product in its class for pre-existing commercial roofing installations. It transforms moderately-skilled labor subcontractors into “solar-installers” overnight.

Follow this link to Scientific American's outline of a national solar energy initiative and infrastructure build out.

Disclosure: Author's website portfolio has a small position (long) in Akeena

John Gilluly

About this author:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article

This article has 2 comments:

  •  
    Mar 18 02:31 PM
    I'd say Suntech is the most likely candidate for acquiring Akeena. They just raised a nice chunk of cash - on top of the nice chunk they already have. Their leadership thinks long term, and is no doubt trying to devise how best to position themselves in the American market before it really opens up. They recently opened an American office in San Fran, so you've got geographic convenience there (existing Akeena offices offer a ready made expansion into the US market, along with a workforce with useful expertise). They already have a very strong relationship with Akeena - they're manufacturing the Andalay panel (or 90% of the panels now, with Kyocera doing 10%), and are distributing the panels overseas (the sales expertise will be there by end of year - that's an investment in itself).

    However, Suntech is definitely hedging their bets within a certain range of solar technologies, doing thin film, BIPV, Andalay, and more, as well as purchasing significant minority stakes in various polysilicon refiners (Hoku Sci, Nitol). So this year I'd suggest they might be more inclined to get a large minority stake in Akeena, rather than buy the company outright.
  •  
    Apr 07 12:38 PM
    I would caution anyone considering purchasing Akeena. They do not have the skills to compete with Powerlight, SunEdison, or SPG on the large scale, and seem to be struggling to develop a market advantage on the small scale (sub $1,000,000) projects. They also do not appear to be gaining significant market share in any regional location. They do have good marketing, as would be expected with their CEO's experience in the dot com era.

    As for Andalay, this product may change the way panels are installed, but they are just one of many company's who have products which will speed installation. I believe Andalay is being produced by Suntech currently.

    All of these factors cause me to downgrade the actual market value of Akeena. Until I see some real signs of growth in project margin I will continue to consider them just another service company, which would define a valuation closer to the $3-$5 range. However, Akeena is without a doubt a company to watch.

ETFs In Focus