Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Bidz.com, Inc. (BIDZ) has recently been scrutinized for its low free cash flow that is responsible for negative net cash balances. In addition, Bidz.com’s inventory levels and appraisal methods have been questioned by publications such as the Los Angeles Times.

The inventory issue is particularly important according to the Joseph T. Wells (Founder of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners). In an article published by the Journal of Accountancy, Mr. Wells wrote that “inventory overstatements made up the majority of asset valuation frauds”. He went on to state:

Dishonest organizations usually use a combination of several methods to commit inventory fraud: fictitious inventory, manipulation of inventory counts, non-recording of purchases and fraudulent inventory capitalization. All these elaborate schemes have the same goal of illegally boosting inventory values.

Inventory Risks at Bidz.com

The Journal of Accountancy report provided 10 questions used to evaluate the probability of inventory fraud. According to Mr. Wells, “the more “yes” answers, the higher the risk for inventory fraud”. The following analysis applies these tools to Bidz.com’s inventory:

  • Is the company attempting to obtain financing secured by inventory? Yes

In July 2006, we entered into a revolving credit line agreement with LaSalle Bank (Bank of America), to provide working capital financing secured by inventories and tangible assets.

Source: Bidz.com Form 10-K Filed on March 12, 2008 with Securities and Exchange Commission

  • Is inventory a significant balance sheet item? Yes

Over the past three years, Bidz.com’s inventory has comprised between 78.3% and 89.7% of its total assets. This compares to 13.0% and 10.6% in 2007 for competitors Blue Nile, Inc. and Overstock.com, Inc. respectively.

Source: Form 10-Ks Filed with Securities and Exchange Commission

  • Has the percentage of inventory to total assets increased over time? Yes

Bidz.com’s inventory has significantly increased as a percentage of total assets from 64.3% in 2001 to 89.0% in 2006. See table below (click to enlarge images):

Source: Bidz.com Forms Filed with Securities and Exchange Commission

  • Has the ratio of cost of sales to total sales decreased over time? Yes

The Company’s ratio of cost of sales to total sales has decreased over time, as illustrated below:

Source: Bidz.com Forms Filed with Securities and Exchange Commission

  • Have shipping costs fallen compared with total inventory? Information not available in Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

  • Has inventory turnover slowed over time? Yes

Bidz.com’s inventory turnover has significantly decreased from 8.5x in 2003 to 3.3x in 2007 (as shown below). In addition, the Company’s turnover is substantially below its most direct competitors of 15.3x and 31.2x in 2007 for Blue Nile, Inc. and Overstock.com, Inc. respectively.

Source: Bidz.com Forms Filed with Securities and Exchange Commission

  • Have there been significant adjusting entries that have increased the inventory balance? Information not available in Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
  • After the close of an accounting period, have material reversing entries been made to the inventory account? Yes

In 2007, Bidz.com’s inventory reserve increased 133.2% over the previous year’s balance.

Source: Bidz.com Form 10-K Filed on March 12, 2008 with Securities and Exchange Commission

  • Is the company a manufacturer, or does it have a complex system to determine the value of inventory? Yes

Bidz.com’s valuation methods for its jewelry have been criticized by numerous groups. The Los Angeles Times had this to say about their “appraisals”:

Bidz.com often offers buyers an "appraisal" of their item for a $33 charge. The reports are invariably produced by Woodland Hills-based American International Gemologists, which acknowledged to The Times that it does not physically inspect every item for which it provides an appraisal.

That raised a red flag for Jeanine Woodling, director of education at the nonprofit International Society of Appraisers. For a solid appraisal, "It's important for them to actually be able to see the piece," Woodling said.

  • Is the company involved in technology or another volatile or rapidly changing industry? Yes

Consumer tastes and preferences for jewelry products can change rapidly, thereby exposing us to significant inventory risks.

Source: Bidz.com Form 10-K Filed on March 12, 2008 with Securities and Exchange Commission

Results: It appears that the answer would be “Yes” for 8 out of 10 questions and inconclusive for the remaining two. According to Mr. Wells’ work, this would indicate a higher risk of inventory fraud.

Bidz.com Cash Flow Concerns

Partially as a result of its inventory issues, Bidz.com’s operations do not generate cash. The Company’s net cash position is negative and substantially lower than its competitors as illustrated below:

Source: Forms Filed with Securities and Exchange Commission

In addition, the Company’s cash flow from operations and free cash flow are becoming increasingly negative.

Source: Forms Filed with Securities and Exchange Commission

Investment Considerations

Taking the inventory and cash flow concerns into account, investors should be cautious.

Disclosure: Author has a short position in BIDZ

Print this article with comments

This article has 35 comments:

  •  
    Are you kidding me, it is amazing how blatantly obvious the smear campaign the shorts are levying against bidz. You guys have made enough off of this company with your short position. How many times have these extremely questionable hit pieces been leveraged against bidz, and how many times have they turned out to be a non issue. You guys are criminal in you actions.
    2008 Mar 18 07:07 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    you criminals must really be getting desperate
    2008 Mar 18 07:08 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Isn't it also interesting that this is the author's first article and he has yet to post a bio? Obvious short attack
    2008 Mar 18 07:11 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I find it pathetic that this is the company you guys choose to go after. Please disclose if you have received any compensation or incentive to write this article, and if you have a short position, or are in close contact with anyone holding a short position. Any by the way, lying gets you a free trip to jail.
    2008 Mar 18 08:50 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    i find it amusing that they say that over stocks turn over ratio is better then bidz. but yet they still show a negative earning. and for the forth quarter bidz turned a higher net profit than both of those companies. so what is a better buisness model. let the public decide, would you rather own a company that has yet to turn a profit or a company that continues to beat wall street.
    2008 Mar 18 09:50 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    kidding! if company model like bidz has not enough inventory, how could it make sales? in single retail or auction retail company, inventory of course is a significant balance sheet item, and high percentage of its assets. inventory turnover has significantly decreased because bidz has higher inventory, this make sense.
    2008 Mar 18 10:48 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    all they said about bidz inventory is only "maybe". why won't you just simply prove it is fraud?
    2008 Mar 18 10:52 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    your kidding me. your short, your not a cpa and you are wrong. you could take these steps and apply them to any company. It is as if I acted as an MD took ten symptoms of cancer or coronary disease and applied it to people with a chest cold. Guess what half the population according to Stewart would hace cancer or coronary disease. Also it is evident that the Left Wing LA Times has a vendetta against this Company. Baseless sleaze reporting by them as usual
    2008 Mar 18 10:55 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    They are starting to show their faces more cleary:

    See secinfo.com/d12TC3.z66...

    Michael Stewart is the VP of Operations at Builders Fixed Income Fund Inc. From their disclosures:

    "Short Sales. The Fund may engage in short sales against the box, which involve
    selling a security that the Fund owns, or a security equivalent in kind or
    amount to the security sold short that the Fund has the right to obtain, for
    delivery at a specified date in the future. The Fund may enter into a short sale
    to hedge against anticipated declines in the market price of ProLoan
    mortgage-backed securities or to reduce portfolio volatility. If the value of a
    security sold short increases prior to the scheduled delivery date, the Fund
    loses the opportunity to participate in the gain. If the price declines during
    this period, the Fund will realize a short-term capital gain. Although the
    Fund's gain is limited by the price at which it sold the security short, its
    potential loss is unlimited. The Fund will segregate cash or liquid securities
    in the amount of its short position, and the segregated assets will be marked to
    market daily. "
    2008 Mar 18 11:59 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Can this jackass be reported, i.e. will the SEC look into this further?
    2008 Mar 18 12:04 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Let’s go through the erroneous assertions one by one:

    “Is the company attempting to obtain financing secured by inventory?”

    This is often used as collateral and effectively proves nothing against the company. Additionally, as indicated in their conference call, BOA thus routinely sends auditors to physically check their inventory. No accounting fraud can magically make inventory magically exist. If one were to apply this criterion to all businesses, they would think that everyone was fraudulent. At this point in the market, it is extremely hard to get a loan. Yet, Bidz did. This is a testament to the solid nature of their business.
    2008 Mar 18 12:16 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    condemn the jackass,
    2008 Mar 18 12:21 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    “Is inventory a significant balance sheet item?”

    This one is funny. Note that the author uses an outdated figure and ignores the fact that their inventory has actually gone down as a percentage of assets from 89.0% to 78.3% from 2006 to 2007. In reality, for a growing business, this is not an abnormal quantity of inventory. The author shows his face on this by intentionally cherry picking the facts that he uses.
    2008 Mar 18 12:23 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Has the ratio of cost of sales to total sales decreased over time?

    See above. One again note the author's cherry picking of facts.
    2008 Mar 18 12:26 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    “Has the ratio of cost of sales to total sales decreased over time? “

    This is an odd one to use to claim fraud given that it’s also the hallmark of a successful business and the goal of any business. This is effectively trying to use the growth and success of their business as innuendo. It’s completely ridiculous.
    2008 Mar 18 12:27 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Has inventory turnover slowed over time?

    As Bidz have grown, they have become more able to purchase inventory. As a result of this, they have opted to purchase more. They are clearly able to sell whatever they purchase. Bidz is probably more easily compares to say Zales than Blue Nile as Blue Nile takes a lot of inventory on consignment. Zales turnover averages around 2.5 or 2.6, a number that Bidz has always been above. Additionally, they had cash of roughly 60 million, debt of roughly 165 million and negative cash of around 125-130 mil.. Maybe we should start to short Zales as they’re clearly fraud using the authors ridiculous criteria.
    2008 Mar 18 12:32 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    • "After the close of an accounting period, have material reversing entries been made to the inventory account? Yes
    In 2007, Bidz.com’s inventory reserve increased 133.2% over the previous year’s balance."


    This is a daft attempt by known shorter Stewart if I’ve ever seen anyone. This was not the result of a reversing entry. They have more inventory now. Consequently, by applying the same logic to a higher quantity of inventory, they have a larger reserve. To claim that this involves a reversing entry, is both erroneous and slanderous. If Steward has to use a lie as bald faced as this, it’s clear that he doesn’t have much for ammunition.
    2008 Mar 18 12:36 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    why in G-ds name does barron's allow these felon's to post their nonsense to drive down stocks they are short. I thought that was illegal and something called front running. FINRA were are you
    2008 Mar 18 12:40 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    “Is the company a manufacturer, or does it have a complex system to determine the value of inventory?”

    This one is just dumb. Hedge fund honcho Stewart claims that the LA Times, quoting Citron, trashing their appraisals means that their inventory valuations are wrong. I could dispute the erroneous allegations about their inventory appraisals, but that’s for another time and another day. In reality, their inventory valuations have nothing to do with the appraisals. The inventory is valued at lower of FIFO cost or market. So, this has nothing to do with the appraisals as they are based on the actual worth of the item, not the lower of cost or market.
    2008 Mar 18 12:41 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    “Is the company involved in technology or another volatile or rapidly changing industry? Yes
    Consumer tastes and preferences for jewelry products can change rapidly, thereby exposing us to significant inventory risks.”

    That’s a standard disclosure that any consumer company has to make some form of. In reality, the jewelry business is more constant than most. That statement was meant to refer to tech businesses and things along those lines. Anyone can take anything and twist the words. A good person does it well. Stewart, the VP of Operations at Builder’s Fixed Income Fund, is not good at this. His assertions do not even remotely stand up under the light of day. He is nothing but a huckster and a charlatan attempting to make a quick buck by bending the truth to the point of outright lies.
    2008 Mar 18 12:46 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "Disclosure: Author has a short position in BIDZ"

    I think this really says it all. The fact that he's entirely full of it and can't even come up with a cogent argument to support his short position is just gravy.
    2008 Mar 18 12:49 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    craziness, you're genius. keep going!
    2008 Mar 18 01:03 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    are there any methods that can kick the jackass shorter ass?
    2008 Mar 18 01:04 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    these articles are jokes.... the shorts are out in full force trying to take bidz down.. I am long and not afraid...
    2008 Mar 18 01:16 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Actually it seems like you guys are doing more work for Bidz than the author is against it. 18 comments from a handful of guys? Trying to blame a short for a stock going down is idiotic. I believe that is what MBIA tried to do to Ackerman, it did not help their stock, it went from 80 to 10, do you think it did that because of Ackerman? Maybe the company sucked, just like Bidz sucks. Stop defending your stock and look into the company a little closer.
    2008 Mar 18 01:40 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If the stock goes down, shorts make money. This article was written by a short. It was a faulty analysis designed to manipulate. I would love for someone to bring out the truth, but third rate analysis is not it. Stewart, the head fund honcho, is just throwing alot of garbage out there hoping that it sticks, so that he can cover his position.
    2008 Mar 18 01:51 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Hey, drmalaka. Why don't you list some facts to support your claim that BIDZ "sucks"!! It seems to me that the defenders of the company have listed multiple reasons to discredit the article written by a convicted felon. Yet you simply post that the company "sucks"! I'd like to hear why the company "sucks"??????????? I may also remind you that the company's stock price is up almost 100% since it went public in early '07. It would be even higher if the shorts would get lost. I'll be waiting for your explanation as to why the company "sucks". Something tells me I won' get an educated answer!!
    2008 Mar 18 01:52 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    bidz is a small cap and new model company, it is easy to be shorted.

    drmalaka, you said bidz sucks, how? from all the negative articles, they did say clear and couldn't prove it. they just tried to blur people's eyes. if bidz sucks, why it can keep growing every quarter and SEC didn't do any investigation? or maybe SEC did, but counldn't find any problem in bidz.
    2008 Mar 18 01:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    can bidz do any thing to kick the shorter ass?
    2008 Mar 18 02:04 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    IF IT LOOKS LIKE A SCAM, SMELLS LIKE A SCAM, AND TALKS LIKE A SCAM, IT PROBABLY IS.
    I'm going to short this one tomorrow. thx
    2008 Mar 18 04:18 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    drmalaka another short or another name used for stewart. here we go trash comments from these guys just like on the savitz sight. drmalaka what are your credentials? are you an ob\gyn? or an economist?
    2008 Mar 18 05:36 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    the comparison of turnover rates between Nile and Bidz is not a fair comparison IMO since the business models are so different. I think the bulk of BN sales is "brokering" sales from diamonds stocked by wholesalers in the diamond district to the end user at home. That, together with the sale of high-value items (such as 1.5 ct diamonds and ++) will obviously lend itself to a very high turnover rate indeed (COGS/Inventory). Bidz I believe buys and stocks the bulk of what they post on their website and the mean value of the average price sold is waaay below that of BN i'm sure.

    Truth be told I do worry though about any listed asset which is small enough to fit in someone's pocket.....
    2008 Mar 18 08:28 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    what a joke... can you say agenda..... smear and shorting... this stock will soon weed out all the shorts and take off... Strong BUY!!!
    2008 Mar 18 10:10 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Once again, the concept that shorts are cutting down the stock is just wrong. Don't longs artificially inflate a stock then? I have never seen a handful of guys make so many comments to a post on this site. Sounds like it is a conserted effort to keep up the good word.

    If any of you understood how the concept of how markets work you would not care. Since you all love the company I would assume you are long term investors. Short term moves in the stock should not matter to you, in the long run the stock will go to its true value.

    The shorts are creating a buying opportunity for you. If they are so wrong then there will be a short squeeze very soon and you will have been idiots yelling at the shorts and not thanking them for the cheap stock price.

    I have read a lot about the company and all the negative stuff was more convinving. Then you add in the incredibly weakening economy which will probably hit this company hard.

    Everyone has a right to their opinion, don't lambast the author and think you can do anything to help the stock, let the markets do that.

    Good luck being long this one.

    2008 Mar 20 12:00 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    After reading all of the comments, I urge all of the longs in this stock to read my post again. One of the top fraud experts in the country laid out a 10 point test for inventory fraud detection and BIDZ had every identifiable marker. Investors need to focus on free cash flow, because net income is just an accounting concept. It is easy to manipulate net income (see Enron), but cash in the bank is verifiable. The indisputable fact is that BIDZ is burning cash faster and faster. All I can say is buyer beware on this one.
    2008 Mar 27 11:29 AM | Link | Reply
Latest Articles