Saying Research In Motion (RIMM) is having a tough time is an understatement. If things continue the way it is, RIMM just may end up just like Eastman Kodak (EKDKQ.PK). NOK may be in a slightly better position because of the partnership with Microsoft and the adoption of Windows but it is still behind Android and iOS.
I work at Samsung (OTC:SSNLF) as an engineer for mobile devices, so I get to see first hand the trends of the mobile industry and how quickly technology changes and witness the extremely competitive landscape. The industry is cut throat and RIMM’s lack of innovation is adding to its own downfall.
In any industry, it is usually dominated by a number one and number two. From numbers three, four and onwards, it’s a death battle and RIMM has found itself in this situation.
Coke (NYSE:KO) and Pepsi (NYSE:PEP), NY Yankees and Boston Red Sox, AT&T (NYSE:T) and Verizon (NYSE:VZ), and of course Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Google (NASDAQ:GOOG). Monsters in their respective industries. You will find it difficult to name a clear #3 and #4.
On a quick note, RIMM dropped another 19% to end June and is now down 50% for the year. Whether the current price factors everything in, I don’t know, but let’s go through a simple balance sheet analysis techniques to see whether RIMM is heading in the right direction.
Receivables do not look too good and I don’t see how intangibles could be that high. More impairments could be on the horizon as mentioned in their latest quarterly report. I would seriously wipe out a minimum of 50% goodwill and intangibles if you are going to adjust the assets for a NCAV or balance sheet reproduction analysis.
2007 was the beginning of the peak for RIMM, so from hindsight, the huge increase in accounts receivables and inventory from 2006 is understandable.
Not knowing what the iPhone was capable of, the market continued to love RIMM throughout 2008 and then the financial crisis hit and everything went down with it but RIMM continued to do well as there was still some doubt about whether the iPhone would be a legitimate competitor.
With the ideal scenario being sales increasing at the same rate as inventory, in 2007, finished goods inventory increased 115% and sales closely matched the growth with a 98% increase. On the money.
The iPhone proved itself for sure in 2009 onwards. The first big sign showed up because RIMM was expecting huge sales in 2010 which is evident from the mega increase in raw materials and finished goods in 2009.
The problem was that RIMM needed 2010 sales to be in excess of 100% compared to the previous year to justify the 284% increase in finished goods shown on the 2009 balance sheet.
RIMM needed more than 100% growth and the market was expecting something huge. You can see how a 35% sales increase was a huge disappointment. And so 2010 was the start of the decline.
The important thing to note here is that for the years 2009, 2010 and 2011, total inventory is fairly consistent. By just focusing on the total inventory value, a lot of information is missed as it tends to hide what is really happening deeper down at the operational level.
Following 2010, the 2011 finished goods increase of 450% was another huge warning sign and shows that management must have been in some form of denial.
Fast forward to today. That denial is still evident with a 134% increase in work in progress and will require some extraordinary work by the new management to handle the inventory. The delaying of products and launches is not helping contain inventory either.
You could run a whole lot of other valuation techniques and compare ratios, but a quick look at the balance sheet does not inspire much confidence in RIMM.