Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Cowen & Co is out with a positive call on solar stocks, saying most of the U.S. solar names look undervalued relative to growth and earnings, in their view, reflecting four areas of investor concern: uncertainty about the next phase of subsidies in Spain, Germany and the U.S.; and the tension between silicon supply/cost and module ASP/demand. Each of these is likely to be clarified in the next two to six months, underpinning a group rally. Firm reiterates Outperform on ENER, ESLR, FSLR, HOKU, SPWR, STP, and TSL.

1) Cowen believes a bill to extend tax credits for renewables may be introduced in the Senate on Earth Day, April 22nd. Details must still be worked out. However, they see improved chance of passage.

2) Spain, Then Germany. Zapatero's Socialist Party retained control in the recent election, so support for renewable energy should continue. With new feed-in-tariff rates due to take effect in October, they believe legislation should be settled by July. And, the final bill is likely to be more favorable than the last draft, with a higher FIT (33-35c vs. 31c) and increased cap (perhaps 2GW vs. 1.2GW). While the new German FITs are likely to be in line with expectations (down about 9% in 2009, then 7% and 8% in 2010/11), this major market should also be more certain by Q3.

3) Investors are skittish about potential supply disruptions, and there is a wide range of views regarding module ASPs in H2:08 and 2009. By the Q2 earnings cycle, the firm expects: more output from new poly plants, silicon prices to be past their peak, modules to be essentially sold out for H2 at firm prices, and much more confidence regarding 2009 ASPs.

Notablecalls: As you can remember, SunTech (NYSE:STP) has been Cowen's favorite Solar play lately. They have good exposure (50%+) to Europe, especially Spain, and the valuation is just so low here. I have been positive on STP around current levels and continue to be so.

 I think Cowen's call is very buyable here. Would not be surprised to see STP around $35 in a week. Be early.

Print this article with comments

This article has 28 comments:

  •  
    Where do these guys get off making calls that these stocks are undervalued? Their P/E ratios are astronomical SPWR is at nearly 600. I guess these guys believe in the Easter bunny also that this P/E ratio is sustainable. Even with continued subsidies, you stand a beter chance that these stocks will go down rather than up.
    2008 Mar 24 09:59 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Valuations astronomical? Not all of them

    TSL PE 19 Forward PE 7 PEG 0.3
    STP PE 33 20 PEG 0.53
    LDK PE 17 12 0.6


    2008 Mar 24 11:23 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    How do you get a P/E of 600 for SPWR, Supershort? 2007 earnings were $1.26 giving a trailing P/E right now of about 53 and of course the forward P/E is even lower (around 32). These may not be low, but they're no where near 600. What numbers did you use to get your 600 P/E for SPWR?
    2008 Mar 24 12:33 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Jim, look at E*Trade, Yahoo, MSN ets under the P/E ratio. All of these stocks are trading at a high multiple. Forward earnings doesn't mean anything. It may make that in the future but thjese companies are all having difficulty with forward earnings and if they say they can't meet them, these will crash. Given the way the economy is and the whole outlook of financing, these big ticket items are not going to do well. For anyone to recommend them as "cheap" and basing that opinion on forward earnings is setting you up for a fall. Look at the insiders, they are all selling. If it was cheap, they would be buying.
    2008 Mar 24 03:54 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    TSL P/E = 24x is comparable to other companies in the Semiconductors industry. TSL's Gross Margin is less than 77% of other companies in the Semiconductors industry, which means it has less cash to spend on business operations as compared to its peers.

    Trina is a China company. I am sure that they could fudge the numbers if they wanted to, just by pegging their currency to some other arbitrary thing they pick out of the sky. Why would you want to own a company that is owned by the government, a communist one at that?

    STP P/E Ratio is greater than 94% of other companies in the Electric Utilities industry. STP's Gross Margin is less than 78% of other companies in the Electric Utilities industry, which means it has less cash to spend on business operations as compared to its peers. Another China company. Enough said.

    LDK's P/E Ratio is comparable to other companies in the Semiconductors industry. LDK's Gross Margin is less than 61% of other companies in the Semiconductors industry, which means it has less cash to spend on business operations as compared to its peers. Another China company? It also has a heavy short interest 24%.

    So why would anyone think these are cheap?

    Just think of me as Daedalus and these "anallists" as Icarus, trying to get you to fly too close to the sun.
    2008 Mar 24 05:02 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Well, I guess it depends on whether you use the GAAP or non-GAAP numbers. $0.11 vs $1.26 per share makes a big difference on the P/E ratio.

    Only comparing the P/E and margin to the rest of the industry ignores the growth rate, which is just a little higher than the average.
    2008 Mar 24 07:04 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The key question that should be asked is whether you want to invest in an industry that is entirely dependent on Government subsidies for their very existence.
    Maybe solar makes sense some day - right now it is not even close.
    The goverment giveth and the government taketh away!
    Any change in policy and these stocks will crater.
    2008 Mar 24 08:46 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Well, we give the oil companies billions in direct subsidies each year, and I hear they're at least breaking even. And you don't see us spending 500 billion per year, plus 150 billion in supplementals, on a military and navy in order to secure silicon. So at least some of our huge defense spending is an indirect subsidy. You also don't see us placing any value on carbon emissions - how much do you want to bet we're going to keep that policy in place?

    Right now solar is a victim of its own success. Once the industry actually has the refined silicon to supply it, not just the semiconductor industry, then grid parity's getting close. The industry talk is generally 12-18 months for the silicon, and three to five years for grid parity pricing. There's your horizon.
    2008 Mar 25 09:58 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    2009 will be the year the grid parity is reached in the majority of U.S. states...(states where per kWh costs are $0.12 or greater.)
    2008 Mar 25 11:14 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Grid parity is just one piece of the equation. These stocks are trading at incredible multiples. The average homeowner is having trouble paying a mortgage, and now are financing cars for eight years. There is no market for these high priced panels. Also, the carbon footprint to build these panels and the waste involved is not as eco friendly as you are led to believe.

    Also, the panels are more efficient and produce more electrictity when it is cold out, so it is when there is less sunlight and less time to net-net the power to the grid. In the summer and in the warmer climates like FL and the south, the peak electrical usage is during the hottest part of the day, again at the least efficient time of the panels. So you still need backup power. Solar will play a larger role but it will never be large enough for these multiples.

    Nuclear power is economical, safe, and is the cheapest to run long term. That is a big part of the equation that everyone os leaving out. Once they build more and they will, because we are being stragled here, the government will pull the subsidies on these and go for more self sustaining means os power.
    2008 Mar 25 02:01 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Supershort - thanx for your comments. This sector has had its day probably for some time. It is on the shelf with ethanol, clean energy etc. Most have dropped 50% or more this year and any technical chart shows them still to be buried. imho
    2008 Mar 25 10:35 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Amatteck, federal policy has been to continue with the path we have been going for the last 50 years or so. That is oil, coal and natural gas. Oil was very cheap and so that is why we built our energy system around this particular source. Also, oil is used for other purposes such as asphalt, textiles and powering autos and other vehicles. We have spent a tremendous amount of money on the buildup of this from the refineries, to the pipelines to the plants. So a policy switch to solar is probably not going to happen. Natural gas, since we have a lot of it will play a larger role as the pipelines and delivery system needs to be built. It is also "always on", not like the renewables like solar and wind. For the average person to put solar panel;s on their home is a huge undertaking, even with the subsidies. The home has to face a certain way. The surface area has to be adequate. The biggest hinderance is that you still need to have another alternate source of energy as it doesn't work well as it gets warmer and when the sun isn't out. Also, for companies to buy land or lease building roofs to put panels on them is not possible in this time. Land and homes, even though they have come down, are still too expensive to allow for this scenario. Take NYC or any major city for that matter. The panels would have to be placed very far from the city, cutting down trees and clearing land, more detrimental to the enviornment so there is no saving of a "carbon footprint."

    Like I have said before, SPWR is at over 600x earnings now. No company stays at that level for long. These companies will play a part, but I will wait until they get down to earth in their multiples, say like Exxonmobile multiples.

    Disclaimer: I am supershort on the solar companies, so I have done my research.
    2008 Mar 26 09:59 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    supershot, democrats are coming to power. not texas republicans. even mccain believes in global warming. so it can be anticipated that fed policy will change. these prices are an attractive entry point.
    2008 Mar 26 11:01 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Gebby,

    I agree that global warming is real. We have to limit our use of fossil fuels, but it is inevitable that GW will continue as all nations start to expand their economies. Solar power is just a small piece of the puzzle. The P/E ratios are way out of line. It is people like you who just scream "BUY THESE STOCKS" without looking at the fundamentals that I have issue with. As far as future graowth, most of these companies have lowered their forcast earnings for the near future. So where is the need to go out and buy long?

    I tried to short another 1000 shares of SPWR and they wouldn't let me because they say there aren't any shares to borrow. Gebby, can I borrow and short your shares please, pretty please, with sugar on top.
    2008 Mar 26 01:38 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Bought the $55 puts now anyway, in addition to the 2000 short. Will add on any future runup. But I think the runup is done. The last one fizzled at around 80. This one fizzled at around 70. We should see 60 again very soon.
    2008 Mar 26 04:14 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    G44,

    These multiples will come down as the stock prices come down. That is the only way. The groth rate is factored into these ratios and they are not possible in the near future, nor the next 2 years. Durable goods numbers this morning came in worse than expected. We are nowhere near a bottom in this recession we are just heading into. Evenone is hoping that there will be a "V" turnaround bottom but that never happens, look at all the rest of the downturns, there are all "U" shaped. So this volatility will have to end before you go long. This stock will never see 140 again. I know, been burned before by many "profitable" companies that had mickey mouse magical kingdom multiples. If you own these stocks, sell then. There will be a time and place to enter a position. It isn't here or in the next year and a half.
    2008 Mar 27 01:09 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Supershort, whether you are right or wrong with the movements in these stocks shorting the shares outright can be very dangerous. STP and SPWR have had roughly 30% moves in the last 5 days and I believe other solar stocks have followed suit. To limit risk, I recommend that if you are going to short that you do so with puts. You pay a premium but for that premium you limit risk. Plus, there are a lot of people that have bet against these stocks so a move like we have had over the last five days calls for a lot of covering, which may beget more covering. If you are short the last five days have been very damaging.

    These stocks do rely on a great deal of subsidies but it is highly likely that these subsidies will continue. Belief in global warming is there and governments want to combat this aggressively. The next U.S. president, regardless of whom it is, will push for further environmentally sensitive energy policy, particularly if it is Clinton or Obama. Also, the U.S. states are being aggressive as well. Just look at California for a prime example.

    Additionally, the growth rates of these companies is phenomenal. That explains the TTM P/Es and forward P/Es. Nonetheless, you cannot read too much into these numbers as there are many, many low p/e stocks out there that are getting hammered. The selling in the solar sector was overdone and we are probably just getting back to sustainable levels. We will very likely be another 20% higher by summer.

    Obviously, I am biased as I am long STP (in my view the best value in the sector).
    2008 Mar 27 12:43 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Buy STP!
    2008 Mar 27 12:45 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    One last note: If you are truly pessimistic on the solar stocks you could sell out of the money call options to help finance more put option buying but that opens the door to a lot of risk if the sector has a huge run.
    2008 Mar 27 01:14 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Sluce, you are right, I got crushed for a 16k loss of my profits, still up though. The heavy short positions are there for a reason, they see the same things I see. Solar power is one piece of the puzzle. It will not replace fossil fuels. Take California for example. They are trying to get a power plant on 640 acres, that's right 640 acres that hopefully will prduce 177 megawatts. Now even being optimistic, it will be able to be say up 30% efficiency and be able to supply maybe 40k homes. Where is it eco friendly? That is a tremendous amount of wasted land for such little return. I still say nuclear power will be the way to go eventually. At the present it seems to be the only logical choice.

    STP trades greater than 94% of it's peers. The growth isn't that good to warrant the present price. Also it's margins aren't the greatest and with the supply of silicone being scarce, as they say, the margins will shrink. Careful with that type of risk. Just look at Ethanol stocks.

    I will keep my shorts as I fear if I cover, I won't be able to get back in. SPWR will be back to where it was last year, in the 40's.
    2008 Mar 27 03:51 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    One last note. Can I borrow your shares?
    2008 Mar 27 03:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Steve Pluvia,

    You have no concept of anything about fundamentals or tech rallies. Tech rallies once born tend to have this euphoria which isn't justified by the multiples long term. Even if some of these companies are profitable, their earnings would have to quadruple to have a P/E ratio comprable to other stocks in the universe. Tehre would be good reason to buy a stock with good growth at say 25-50 times earnings, but never at 700 to 800. The fund managers that track "emerging growth" stocks will have to unload these stocks if they can't keep up the pace as they won't meet the fund criteria. If they are finisged their growth then the "value" guys pick them up. Or the dividend guys. I don't see that happening in the near term.. Take SPWR, one of the last ones out there with an absurd P/E: They missed their earnings last quarter and stated that there are "difficulties ahead." They will report on April 17th. I cannot forsee them increasing guidance, given that the job claims came in at 407,000. Retailers will be looking to close stores not invest in building out expensive improvements on leased property. Looking for SPWR to lose 50% by that day.

    Forget about a recession. We have been in one for at least two quarters. Hope we don't go into a depression. At the very leastthe economy will get worse than what it is now in the next year to a year and a half.
    2008 Apr 03 01:38 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Seems to me the Solar sector has a Sunny future as I read more and more of the expansion of the Solar energy/clean energy as more and more are going green.The interest and use and momentum is building in the Solar sector/Clean energy sector.I remember back in the 80's when the Networking sector began to come to life.Novel was one of the first, then shortly after CISCO Systems came public.At first I remember there were alot of doughters about Networking that it wasnt going to succeed but as we see now Networking has made many investors rich. I started buying CSCO back in the 90's after it came public and we all know the story of CSCO Since then.But as I listened to the negitve news about Networking at its begining on how it wasnt going to make it and even Barrons had some negitive articles on the Networking sector back in the 90's we see they missed it big time at the begining, of course they changed there stories after it was confirmed that Networking sector,CSCO,as the best play, was a success and the wave into the future to make huge amount of money on your investing. If one invested $10,000 in CSCO after it came public and just held the stock today that investor would be a millionaire today.So why Im I talking about the Networking sector you ask? Because as was the Networking Sector born, invented, I now look for another Sector here in 2008 that may have simmular beginings, upside potential.Cautious News, not sure if its going to work or not etc.not everyone is onboard the sector yet, still early , sector up and down then up , like the Networking sector began before its huge surge up ,a sector that may turn out to be big winners big time. Like CSCO ,and the Internet companies.I remember when there was dought that the invention of the Internet had its doughters also and was saying it wasnt going to be successful in the begining. There is allways dought and unbelief in a new investments or new sectors but the ones who believe in it and invest in it for the long term and it turns out to be a winner are the ones who make the big money.So as I look at the Solar Sector it seems to me to have alot of Positive Potential going forward simmular to what the Networking sector had many years ago. So how does one put money to work in the Solar sector? Is there a Solar ETF? Or a Solar Mutual Fund? Im looking but I havnt found one yet. There is the PBW but its not 100% Solar. So that leaves one with the only option of investing in the Solar socks doesnt it. So one would of course want to put there money to work in the best Solar Company stock, that have the most Sunny future.As some networking companies had buy ratings on them ,there where some with aviod on them same probably goes for the Solar stocks. Some will do better than oters.Invest in the best Solar stocks and when the Solar ETF becomes available ,sooner or later, then that will be a good way to invest in the Solar Wave.Recently looking at the charts the Solar stocks made the highs in January 08 and sold off with the broader market correction to the march lows and the charts are showing them as rebounding back up with the over all market from there march lows.So again it seems to me Solar has a bright future so dont knock it, either your in or not ,why not just join in and perhaps the Solar sector will be the top ,best performer in 08 and beyond. If not Solar then what else has more upside potential ?The Solar story, seems to me to be for real, and seems to be at the begining stage,why not invest some money in it?
    2008 Apr 06 04:23 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Super,

    Do you always drive while looking through the rear view mirror? Many of these names (tsl for example) are trading at durt cheap FORWARD valuations. I agree that spwr and fslr are trading at lofty levels, but the solar space is just getting warmed ;o) up and your puts will retire worthless imho. Do some dd about the space and potential for amazing earning potential...... Good luck to you!
    2008 Apr 07 05:00 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Long 660k, average price 38
    2008 Apr 08 02:11 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    STP that is
    2008 Apr 08 02:11 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    supershort, Were you the same guy in the early 80's who was also telling people that PC's and software were a fad, and who would need or want a computer in their home anyway?? Much of what you say is either a 1/2 truth or outright incorrect.

    Also, didn't CSCO, INTC, MSFT, etc. also trade at silly high multiples for many years while they grew like mad?
    2008 Apr 08 11:04 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To all you guys, hold on tight to your longs. SPWR is going to the 30's within the month. Earnings were as expected, but you guys don't want to look at the fundamentals....These stocks trade at very high multiples. These are pipe dreams of people looking for a lottery ticket at these levels.

    As far as investing 10k in CSCO or anyone that "made it" in the 90's....there are hundreds more that crashed and burned. Besides, the early days of MSFT, the insiders weren't selling, they were holding or buying. SPWR, they are selling like mad.

    I am not telling half truths or lies. I only tell it like it is.
    2008 Apr 17 04:25 PM | Link | Reply
More by Notable Calls
Other articles by Notable Calls »