The Evolution of Terrestrial Radio 6 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
I received an email from a SA reader who shared his skepticism about the radio market “coming back”. A very valid opinion, but I offer this brief take to others in the financial community with similar beliefs that I shared back with him.
Terrestrial radio is evolving into a wholly new form of media, less about music and more about audio entertainment. Internet subscription services like Napster (NAPS), satellite services like XM (XMSR) and Sirius (SIRI) and nonlinear devices like Apple’s (APPL) iPod are all much better suited to be the key music sources going forward for consumers- no dispute there, whatsoever.
For radio companies that can’t afford to develop and own their own content, companies like Westwood One (WON), Clear Channel’s (CCU) Premier Networks, and Citadel’s (CDL) ABC Radio Networks, as well as a number of the smaller independent radio syndicators, will be crucial. We saw this same pattern happen in the independent television sector in the decade following the mid 1980’s, and guys like Rupert Murdoch and Roger King made a fortune from it.
Back then, “indie” television stations were hooked on movies and sports as their primary programming offerings, and those rights eventually all went to upstart cable networks. This left broadcast stations with no programming and no ratings to sell. Some ramped up their local news offerings, but for those who could not afford investments in news, in stepped the Fox Network (NWS), King World (CBS) and lots of other syndication companies.
Later, we saw the creation of the WB and UPN networks which eventually merged to form the current CW Network, co-owned by Warner Bros. (TWX) and CBS (CBS). Everyone involved came out a winner as the values of the broadcast stations skyrocketed throughout the latter 1990’s. This was on the heels of a horrible downturn in advertising spending in the early part of the decade and the hot new sectors being cable and satellite television.
Something else to keep in mind about the impact from internet radio- currently, research shows that fastest growing sector of internet radio is actually retransmission of terrestrial signals. Please see my two SA articles recently on the subject for more information there.
Finally, I would offer that while the stock prices of radio broadcasters have definitely plummeted, it is an over-reaction as the underlying business has not significantly degraded. Larger markets have suffered, but the vast majority of middle and small market broadcasters have been doing just fine.
Radio companies with diversified portfolios or that focus on smaller markets where local advertisers are a much larger component are able to utilize their deep, long standing relationships to weather the storm. They are also finding ways to be the facilitator of new media advertising opportunities at the local level, an area most large tech companies have not yet been able to tap.
As always, I welcome all comments and thoughts from SA readers- particularly those with divergent points of view.
Disclosure: None
Disclaimer: This article reflects the individual views of Mr. Hannan and may not be attributed to any person, company or other entity with whom Mr. Hannan is affiliated.
Related Articles
|























This article has 6 comments:
Thank God for XM and college radio.
As for CCU, I always find it interesting that the industry gets painted with that one very wide brush. There are a lot of good radio companies out there doing a complete 180 from the CCU model. CCU just happens to get all the attention.
I enjoy spirited discussions on the subject and have a thick skin. Hearing from the critics forces me to sharpen my positions, and frankly makes me better at what I do.
No one has the answer, but everyone has good ideas.
Regards,
Roger