DryShips: Look Out for Those Forward PEs 11 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
[Update below] Time to reprise a very old, mothballed feature of The 'Wart: Arbitraging Barron's, wherein I look past the Barron's pay wall link to some of the more interesting items of the weekend. With godspeed, I'll try to keep it up every weekend. From this past weekend:
Friendlier Waters Ahead For Cargo Carrier DryShips (DRYS):
Global trade might slow this year, but it will come back eventually, and DryShips' profits -- and shares -- should move up over the long term, even if 2008 growth turns out to be lower than Wall Street expects. At its recent quote of 64, DryShips stock was trading at a price/earnings ratio of 3.5 times consensus analyst earnings estimates of $18.18 a share this year and about 5 times the $12.22 forecast for 2009. DryShips also trades at a more than 50% discount to its peers, although rivals generally seek long-term contracts, which are less volatile. DryShips sports a healthy balance sheet, with net debt equaling about 40% of total capital.
Update: In the comments on the article above mentioning DryShips, commenter Mark leaves a very insightful comment on the global shipping industry. I thought I'd promote it here, as it's more than I could offer.
This article fails to mention that dry bulk spot rates are extremely volatile and forecasting where they will go is subject to massive room for estimation error, even for industry veterans. Thus forward PE can be very deceptive and is a silly way to look at the companies. Last year, Clarksons research surveyed a large collection of readers to forecast where rates would go in 2007 and EVERYONE was wrong by a large margin (they spiked massively). They can also spike massively downward in the same fashion... If forward earnings ends up being 80% lower, which historically isn't a crazy notion at all if you look at a rate chart, your PE will be 5x what you thought it was. Thus using forward PE is pretty silly given its forecast error range is so wide as to be near meaningless.Also, the capacity for shipbuilding yes is indeed "tight", but for bad reasons. It is fully booked to the max and the industry is about to see the largest supply growth ever, for multiple years, going forward. If demand falters in any way and this supply comes on, it will be a slaughter for these companies as they undercut each other gruesomely as they have in the past, since ships must essentially be utilized at all times else they are losing money, and it's a very fragmented market. Not saying that it's all clear cut as to where things will go, but this Barron's article barely touches on the most important issue/risk of massive supply growth which is basically the entire swing factor. They should do their homework a little better.
Related Articles
|























This article has 11 comments:
Even if rates dropped 80% from where they are today DRYS forward earnings would drop anywhere near 80% because current rates are more than double the year ago rates and more importantly, the company hedged (locked-in) a large portion of it's contracts at the very high rates being offered in the fall (at the top of the spike).
If you think "... using forward PE is pretty silly given its forecast error range is so wide as to be near meaningless" then you must think there is no meaningful way for an analyst that follows DRYS to do his job (to forecast earnings). THAT'S silly.
Even with spot rates far lower DRYS will be undervalued because their business is so very profitable.
As they diversify into deep oil drilling, their profits will be even better.
The comments mostly idiotic