Seeking Alpha

The Shanghai composite is now down about 45% from its peak.

A quick bit of history on my position on China. I first got in in 2003 with PetroChina (PTR), swapped into China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. (SNP) shortly thereafter, sold the last of SNP last June because I felt it had gone too far too fast, and I was worried about a big drop.

I was four or five months and about 85% too early with the sale.

All along I have assumed I would get back in and although I am not getting back in today it makes sense to start thinking seriously about figuring a way back in. There is no realistic probability of a market going to zero, so after cutting in half what is the risk?

If China is/was a bubble, then should we compare it to the Nasdaq? I'm not sure that is right, but if it is then the risk might be another 25% down from the peak - or put another way, perhaps it could be cut in half again to a total of 75% down from the peak?

The reason I don't think comparing to the Nasdaq fall is right is that (1) the Chinese economy is not rolling over, (2) the companies that are part of the mania are the building blocks of the country (how many non tech stocks dropped by more than 50% from 2000-2002?), (3) the various surpluses make the country very sound - and there are others.

China does have all sorts of issues too. No one seems real comfortable with the numbers from the financial companies, pure capitalism is not their strong suit, if the oil subsidy every gets lifted it could be a game changer for the Chinese consumer, the pollution is awful, they're not scoring points for their ideas on humanitarian issues - and there are others.

Like every theme/investment destination there are pluses and minuses, but now down 45% the minuses don't seem to weigh as heavily. I am not saying it can't be cut in half from here (I'm not that pie in the sky), but I don't think it is the most likely outcome. If I go back in, it would be one company with only a 2-3% weight, so if I am wrong and the market cuts in half I might have a source of lag, but not something ruinous.

The bigger macro for China since before I first bought in is that the country will become more important globally and that a lot of money would be spent to modernize the country as a middle class develops. This bigger macro is no different than it was five years ago, no different than it was at the peak last October and is the same today. Regardless of what direction the next 1000 points is for the Composite, the story on the ground will be the same.

Disclosure: no positions in stocks mentioned

Print this article with comments

This article has 30 comments:

  •  
    Roger - I did the exact same thing. When I heard the brokerages were opening new accounts over there at the rate of 100,000 a day, (it was something like that), I felt it was a bad sign. Although I walked with a little over 30%, I missed another 30% or so. But you raise good points, and I have yet to step back in. I just feel safer in Brazil/Latin America & India for now.
    2008 Apr 17 10:12 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If China would adapt GAAP, the general market could go a lot higher especially if the audited statements came from reputable U.S./international firms.

    This is something that Beijing has known for a long time and has still to get over the fear that the 'West' will know too much about the Chinese economy, especially companies with a government ownership component.

    It will happen eventually, the question is when? When this does become the trend, especially for a serious number of mid-caps, then you will see the real boom.

    For the time being the Chinese are saying that the rest of the world should rely on the Chinese system, but there is limited faith in how the current system works. The 'financial crisis' in the U.S. has sort of pushed things off a bit more into the future.

    Previous highs were just the appetizer, the main course has yet to be served. This could take as much as eighteen months to begin to materialize. The exact timing is directly linked to actions from the centralized government...so it could change overnight.

    Look for accounting transparency and credibility for the next wave. This was the one ingredient that was missing from the first. The rest of the necessary factors, as mentioned in the article, are in place.

    consensus CrossProfit
    2008 Apr 17 10:41 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Actually your opinion on China's standard of living is totally off.

    Living here in China, I am free from visual pollution (i.e. the vandalism of everything and anything in America), cultural pollution (i.e. Oprah and her ilk), political pollution (i.e. the dems and the repubs), social pollution (people here do what they want here and raise their families in the way they want), and all forms of other pollution.

    I am surprised to read that you are so free back in America.

    I live here in China and am not an armchair scholar commenting from another country on the occurences in this soceity. I am a new immigrant but a well treated immigrant, nontheless, here in Shenzhen. I am also a law professor and lawyer licensed to practice law in California, DC and other jurisdictions.

    Maybe in the US they don't want people to know about all the great things happening outside the US particularly in China.

    I am interested to know from what great propaganda machine your opinions on China originate from?

    If you really want to be a part of the 21st century (versus some guy in NY or Oklahoma or Cali talking nonsense about it) you should come to China.

    Live here for 2 years and write us back-- China Expert.
    2008 Apr 17 11:02 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Roger, you seemed still not being sure about investing your money into China yet. Why not ask your China Expert Mr petti, the EX Bear Stern guy! I like to advise every readers here; My petti worked in Bear Stern before, the information is on this website seekingalpha.com/autho...
    Thank you Mr Petti for your disclosure! You are a great American
    2008 Apr 17 11:39 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To duder, you must not have gotten out much in the USA since I do not see much of anything you seem to imply is present here. Like where you live but your comments on things in the USA are no more enlightened than the ones you are criticising.

    As to China, some stocks are undoubtedly inflated. But the blue chips like CHL have a ways to go. I sold CHL with a 20% profit and have been kicking myself ever since....
    2008 Apr 17 02:01 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    It's time to get over it...things change. I invest only in China companies which do trumpet transparency, GAAP standards, and western corporate governance standards. They are there. You just have to do your homework....
    2008 Apr 17 06:47 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To duder,
    I am really surprised about your logic as a law professional.

    As a former auditor in big four auditing Chinese public companies listing in US, HK, Singapore, UK and China exchanges, I really worry about the transparancy issues. Even audited by the prestigious firms, you could not trust the statements without any enforcement system. Let's say, what if you become one of victims in those accounting shenanigans. If they happened in one Chinese listing company, I would not expect there will be another Anthur Anderson. If you say you have the experience to handle that, I would say you now have tremendous opportunities to file class suit. When I used to be a lawyer practising in China, I didn't find there were any. So Law professor, do give me a call when you find some.
    2008 Apr 17 07:14 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Let's look how good we are in the West with 100% transparancy; citi, bear stern, Merril, countrywide, Enron....the list I suppose can go on more than 100s. Longshort, are you a bit shamed of the above lists with your quality accounting work?
    2008 Apr 18 12:01 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    1. Chinese stocks were in a bubble that has burst. There was some kind of expectation (misplaced) that the Chinese Govt. would somehow intervene and prop up the market. The reason always was cited ‘Chinese image before the Olympics’. That whole concept is of course is debunked. Now- today (again) Shanghai hit a new 52 week low, down almost 50% from its highs. Likely more pain to come.
    2. Chinese Accounting: There is reason to be suspicious – the general fear of the unknown. We have not yet seen any specific example of bad accounting. We (in US) have had our share of accounting and related scandals, so we should not be pointing fingers at China. Jim Rogers, (the famous investor and author of Bull in China) had once commented (paraphrased) “If you get caught in a scandal in China – you would be summarily shot dead – that puts a lot of fear in Chinese Managers”.
    3. Chinese Pollution etc- I had visited China for a few weeks recently – I did not find any bad pollution. Just lot of economic activity – construction and cranes everywhere (really everywhere). Chinese economic growth is real and would last for some time – it has 1.5 Trillion Dollars in reserves for every possible rainy day.
    4. Chinese Negatives – it is communist country, the govt. controls the economy. They change rules over night and profits vanish. Increasing or decreasing subsidies, export controls etc. The Chinese oil companies (like Petro China etc) can’t make profits because of price controls. Today PTR has gone below its IPO price, Buffet was a smart seller – even though he sold much below the peak.

    Beware of Chinese stocks for now, play Taiwan or maybe Hong Kong.
    2008 Apr 18 12:04 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Here are some things to think about when investing in China. First, China has a big inflation problem right now. Inflation is a problem for the middle class and a nightmare for the poor. The government has to take action to reduce inflation to avoid serious instability. One of the things they're doing is tightening the reserve requirements for banks, i.e., raising the amount of deposits the banks have to hold to lend the same amount of money. This, in turn, depresses growth in the long run.

    Another problem for China is that many private companies would love to go public, and that has the potential to dilute the market to the point where you don't get the huge runups that you saw prior to late last year.

    China is still growing rapidly, and there is still demand for stocks, since the alternatives are real estate, which is falling in my area (Shenzhen) and bank deposits, which don't offer a negative return viz a viz inflation.

    Lack of transparency in financial statements, endemic corruption and theft of company assets, and government involvement in both regulation and ownership of the companies are all factors to look out for.

    On the other hand, the RMB is rising vs. the US dollar, which gives American investors a hedge, and there is an arbitrage opportunity to investing in shares listed on the Hong Kong index (Hang Seng Index, or HSI) and one of the China exchanges (Shanghai and Shenzhen).

    It's all to complex for me. BTW, my guess is that Duder is Chinese. No pollution in Shenzhen? Check out the river, the bay, and the sky the next time you're outdoors, Duder. Nasty stuff. And Shenzhen is way better than most Chinese cities. I've been here five years.
    2008 Apr 18 12:19 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I like to remind readers here; Mr Petti worked for Bear Stern and also he is working in a State Chinese Communist run school at the moment. Details please visit seekingalpha.com/autho...

    China has many problems on its own; but it's very ironic the red communists do not mind Mr Petti (who is paid salary by the Chinese communist run school) being so critical of everything in China even the air he breathes every day.
    2008 Apr 18 04:42 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    All whinners here; buy citi and sell china. ask your red expert Mr petti.
    2008 Apr 18 04:43 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    nickgogerty.typepad.co...

    The iron rice bowl may crack. Historically govt cycles in China run for 15-20 years and there is current economic and social pressure which is increasing the probability for a significant political shift in 12-18 months. The outcome and implications for Chinese citizens is uncertain.
    2008 Apr 18 08:30 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Wishful thinking! how you guys are so shallow minded? wishing ill for other nation is not going to help get over your credit crisis, plus your government only lasts 4 years and your next president in waiting Mr Mcain is going to lead you stay in Iraq for another 100 years. Good luck and good night!
    2008 Apr 18 09:54 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    China's stock market has fallen far. It will fall even farther as SOEs - the backbone of the Chinese economy - reveal their poor earnings in 2008. Taking losses on cross holdings will be very, very painful.
    2008 Apr 18 11:38 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    A quick note: "SOE" = "State-owned Enterprises." Putting a ceiling on commodities prices certainly didn't help the U.S. in the 1970's.
    2008 Apr 18 12:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Everybody would be unsatisfied with what he did before. When one new financial inovation comes to the market, I guess there is no guarantee we have the auditing tech in place.

    Just like the new medicine, FDA approval is a dilemma. Shall we use this medicine? For this, we must wait. Just like the patent dilemma, shall we wait years to get through approval procedure. this is not necessary.

    My opinion is that we should not wait years to use those financial tech or inovations until every enforcement is in place. Otherwise, we can't get an efficient market, which costs more. So when there is situations, what would be the remedy? I think I havn't seen any in China.

    BTW, people don't have to be perfect to criticize. If the prequalification for criticizing others is that you should be perfect. I think only GOD could do so.
    2008 Apr 18 01:59 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To chinesepetti:
    There are people working on getting through credit crisis.

    But as you said, wishing ill for other nation is not going to help get over your own problems. Don't waste your time arguing with others. If you could, please work out the plan to help China out, especially for those potential middle-class and ordinary working class. I really hope so because I am a Chinese
    2008 Apr 18 02:20 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Duder has some good points. As a Chinese-American I visited Shanghai for the first time last year and talked to some random people for an uncensored view of the country. I saw less homeless than in S.F., and the people were generally content. The vast majority agree with such laws as 1 child per family which has outraged many Americans. Additionally, even my uncle's housekeeper seemed to be more knowledgeable of politics than the average American.

    As soon as I got home I purchased a bunch of FXI. I've since sold it all as I feel alternative energy is a much better investment.
    2008 Apr 18 06:53 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Long short I never wish American ill; I love america, it's history and landscape. However I am against aggression and occupation in Iraq for oil.
    Long short, I do not care you are a Chinese or not; if you intend to wish ill for China and taking the news for truth before verifying them yourself ; You are shameful!
    2008 Apr 18 09:50 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    All Mr Petti's pupils and seeking alpha readers here; the story about Mr Petti just does not add up! According to Mr Petti's views (you can read all his articles about China on this site ; strangely he only wrote about China), everything in China is in crisis even the air is filthy so why he is making a living there; getting paid from the red Communist school; why not go back to Wall street to work for Bear Stern ? Bear Stern is not dead yet.

    It is time for Mr Petti and his loyal pupils to disclose his relationship with the red Chinese government now!!! And all readers on this site should also make such a demand; otherwise it's an insult to the intelligence of all seekingalpha readers!
    2008 Apr 18 09:50 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To Duder - I do not know which part of Shenzhen you live that has clean air. Air pollution is so great in Southern China that the pollution zone is spreaded from Hong Kong (next to Shenzhen) to Xiamen (400 miles).

    Like Jimmy Rogers says China is a great place to invest. There is a lot of money to be made here. China now is like Hong Kong in early 1970's.

    In 1973 The Hang Seng index was in 150. Now the Hang Seng Index is 24000! China will go through the same process with lots of growth and pain along the way.

    When you invest you invest in places where there is economic growth. The Chinese economy has averaged an annual growth rate of 9.6% in the past 26 years.

    But be sure to spread your investment over many companies because some of them will blow up.
    2008 Apr 19 01:21 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    All American working in China should get out of China right now !If there are filthy air and pollution there ,I just do not get it what you guys are doing there!
    2008 Apr 19 11:37 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To Chinesepetti
    Neither do I wish China ill. If you like American history, please appreciate its tolerance of different opinions. I definitely agree with what you said about truth and news. What my points are based is what I experienced during recent 10 years. So please don't just call anybody shamful. Present your points based on the truth and logic. Did you verify the truth anyway? How? The obvious conflicts of interests doesn't mean Mr. Petti lies. I didn't see your logic. But you always taking something for granted. Criticizing the system in China doesn't mean getting out totally. Don't be so absolute. Actually the world doesn't exist in 1 or 0. It should be something else between 0 and 1. Filthy air and pollution is the price. If you'd like do business with China or travel in China, you should tolerate it. If you feel the risk not worthy, you could get out. But everybody has different tolearance of risk. As you can't tolerate the criticize. That's OK. But learn your logic.
    2008 Apr 20 08:48 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I think this is a temporary measure till the Yuan revalues against all major currencies - especially the $US.

    I see a currency crisis coming at the end of summer 2008.


    On Apr 18 12:53 PM User 142738 wrote:

    > A quick note: "SOE" = "State-owned Enterprises." Putting a ceiling
    > on commodities prices certainly didn't help the U.S. in the 1970's.
    2008 Apr 24 03:19 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    There's been a bit of talk on State-owned Enterprises suppressing commodity prices in China. While that is true, I tend to believe that this is a temporary measure till the Yuan revalues against all major currencies. I see those of us in the US holding FRN to loose big time.

    Word has been going around that there is a high possibility of a currency crisis at the end of summer 2008.

    Any advice on protecting against currency crisis?
    2008 Apr 24 03:23 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Silver-Bullet, I assume you mean the dollar going much lower from here? Just to clarify that is what you mean?
    2008 Apr 24 09:19 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Folks! Take a look at China:

    youtube.com/watch?v=JO...

    The 19th century belongs to England, the 20th century to USA, can the 21st century belong to China?
    2008 May 05 12:18 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Roger - Yes, I was specifically referring to the US$. Suggestions on crisis hedge?

    Since I have silver positions, I am contemplating gold as it underwent a recent correction.
    2008 May 05 12:29 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    SB, just to set where I am coming from I don't think crisis is the right word. The dollar is down a lot without triggering panic and I doubt further declines would come at a faster rate. More weakness? Yes, Accelerating from here? No.

    Clients own a little gold, foreign debt from Oz, Norway and the UK, FXA and quite few foreign stocks/ETFs.
    2008 May 05 09:41 AM | Link | Reply
More by Roger Nusbaum
Other articles by Roger Nusbaum »