China: Minimum Reserve Requirements Jump to 16% 14 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
“Now, we not only have to prevent a sharp downturn of the economy, but also a rebound in investment,” Li Xiaochao, spokesperson for the National Bureau of Statistics, said in his comments yesterday. He also said in the same release that “the top concern is still inflation.
He’s right. Not only were the inflation numbers pretty grim, as I see them, but fixed asset investment is up pretty substantially to RMB 2.185 trillion, for a 24.6% increase year on year, versus an already-high 23.7% increase over the same period one year ago. Yesterday the State Council, which is chaired by Premier Wen, released a statement in which it said: "We need to closely watch the latest development of the economic situation, and strike a balance between promoting economic growth and curbing inflation.”
As regular readers know I am skeptical about the availability of policy tools that will permit a striking of this balance. I think we have already passed the point of no return on inflation and monetary growth, and by now the only way to rein these in will almost certainly involve sacrificing employment in the short term. The longer they wait, the greater will the needed sacrifice be.
Given attempts to cool things down what explains the jump in investment? Credit Suisse says it is a new round of local government-driven infrastructure investment, which makes sense given that typically every five years, when the new leadership takes up their positions, their first actions tend to involve a significant jump in spending. I am also hearing that some of the hot money inflow is showing up in the informal banking sector and being lent out. I noted, but did not comment on, an article in the South China Morning Post five days ago that was titled “SMEs turn to underground lenders for cash.” According to the article:
Beijing’s credit-tightening policy could have sent some cash-strapped small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to seek costly funding from alternative financing channels - the underground.
“If their loan demand cannot be satisfied by the banking sector, companies will look to the non-banking financial sub-sector for funding,” said David Kiang, a vice-president for international corporate banking at Shenzhen Ping An Bank, a subsidiary of Ping An Insurance. Mr Kiang added that some hard-pressed businesses might have borrowed from mainland pawn shops, which lend sums against collaterals at high funding costs just as Hong Kong's money-lenders do.
…Beijing's policy to limit banks' loan growth also makes it harder for SMEs to borrow. Big banks traditionally prefer to lend to larger firms and have become even more selective now that the lending cap is in place.
This isn’t surprising at all and in fact several times over the past few months I have speculated that the informal banking sector would be taking up the lending slack. I wish I knew of some way to track the sector.
At any rate, and as everyone knows (they slipped it in after I finished yesterday’s blog entry), the PBoC raised the minimum reserve requirement rate again, by 0.50% to 16%. I expect that they are going to do this several more times this year. Since most other “market-based” policies don’t seem to work or may even exacerbate weakness in the banking system or increase monetary inflows, this is likely to be one of their favorite solutions, although of course raising the minimum reserve does strain banking sector profitability and I think banks desperately need profits with which to help dig them out of their non-performing hole. There are no easy solutions – every thing they give with one hand they take away with the other.
But I am not sure the raising the minimum reserve requirements will anyway make that much of a difference. Each reserve hike drains about $20-25 billion from the system, but with currency reserves growing by about $50-90 billion a month so far this year (the wide range exists because we are not sure exactly by how much headline reserve growth needs to be adjusted to account for the full impact of net inflows, as I explained in my April 12 entry), we’re going to need a much more aggressive stance to reduce underlying liquidity, and with so much worry about excess slowing, I don’t expect we’ll get that level of aggressiveness.
By the way in today’s Wall Street Journal Asia I have an Op-Ed piece explaining why I think the low but rising inflation in the non-food part of the Chinese CPI is so worrying. The basic argument is that if food prices were rising so quickly because of a supply problem, the fact of their rising would put so much downward pressure on the non-food sector that we would see severe deflation, or at least disinflation, in non-food prices.
In fact we are seeing low, but rising, inflation, which is inconsistent with the idea that this is just a food-supply problem. It suggests that inflation is caused by excess money, and that the sudden partly coincidental jump in food prices has simply absorbed most of the inflationary pressure, thus keeping it from showing up in the non-food sector – until food prices stop rising. You can find the full article at:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120838835562221079.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries
Related Articles
|
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Authors with the largestSee all
increase in followers
in the last 7 days
Fastest Climbers » -
Top Commenters
Top commenters,See all
as ranked by their peers
Top Commenters » -
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most active
Instabloggers.-
1
David Fry
-
2
TraderMark
-
3
Don Dion
-
4
Cliff Wachtel
-
5
Mike Havrilla
Top Instabloggers » -
1
-
Top StockTalkers
TopSee all
StockTalkers.
Top StockTalkers »
I wonder how accurate r/e occupancy statistics are in China. There are so many new, big, and empty construction projects around. Difficult to make a decent real return from an empty, and quickly deteriorating, building but I guess that's why China is an economic miracle.
I like to advise every reader here; Mr petti worked in Bear Stern before, the information is on this website seekingalpha.com/autho...
Thank you Mr Petti for your disclosure! You are a great American
China has many problems on its own; but it's very ironic the red communists do not mind Mr Petti (who is paid salary by the Chinese communist run school) being so critical of everything in China even the air he breathes every day.
But...keep it up!!!! You are good for a laugh even if you are disgracing yourself in the process. Just be thankful that some of us do not judge the rest of your countrymen by your bizarre conduct. One would hope that you do not represent the average members of China's great people....
And for the record, when Mr. Pettis speaks, people should listen....
It is time for Mr Petti and his loyal pupils to disclose his relationship with the red Chinese government now!!! And all readers on this site should also make such a demand; otherwise it's an insult to the intelligence of all seekingalpha readers!
Uhmmmm, isn't the air so filthy in Beijing that the Olympic athletes are concerned for themselves? Isn't it a good idea for a university to allow its students access to all ideas? Isn't the reason that Mr. Pettis writes about China today because he lives and works there?
Frankly, you sound crazy!
It is time for Mr Petti and his loyal pupils to disclose his relationship with the red Chinese government now!!! And all readers on this site should also make such a demand; otherwise it's an insult to the intelligence of all seekingalpha readers!
China has many problems on its own; but it's very ironic the red communists do not mind Mr Petti (who is paid salary by the Chinese communist run school) being so critical of everything in China even the air he breathes every day.