Yale's Shiller: Housing Decline Could Be Worse Than Great Depression
Robert Shiller from Yale is quoted in this WSJ Marketbeat post (and elsewhere too I'm sure) as saying the decline in housing prices on this go around could be worse than in the Great Depression.
If so, that would be more than 30%. He said that so far, prices are down 15% from their 2006 peak.
Part of the reasoning attributed to Shiller is that housing prices went up by 85% from 1997-2006.
If you have done any reading on this you may have seen that prices in the Baltics, Spain, Ireland, Sacramento and Riverside county have all dropped precipitously, more than 30%.
The 85% number is a tough one for me to wrap my hands around. Based on comps of three sales within a mile of our cabin, prices here almost quadrupled from 1998 to September 2006. One of my brothers lives in Iowa, and as you know many places in the Midwest have practically sat out the boom. Hawaii started slowing down or rolling over or however else you care to describe it a little earlier than many other markets (my perception anyway).
There is no doubt that if Shiller turns out to be right it would create a nasty headwind for the economy. We can debate whether he will be right or not and we can debate what the magnitude of consequence would be but if correct it would be rough going for a while.
All of that is beyond our control, and so as a matter of philosophy I tend not to worry about things beyond my control. I do think it is worth remembering that there is value in having a place to live, there is psychic value in enjoying the place where you live and that if you have no plans to sell anytime soon and no plans to raid your equity (assuming you have equity) the decline in prices may not have to impact you in a meaningful way.
I do not deny the whistling-past-the-graveyard element to this - but there is a kernel of truth to it too.
Related Articles
|
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »




This article has 9 comments:
- CarlosSlim
- 120 Comments
My Website
Apr 23 02:36 PM"The harder they come
The harder they fall
One and all"
- Jumboloans
- 6 Comments
My Website
Apr 23 03:32 PM- phil dewey
- 19 Comments
Apr 23 03:46 PM- Hugh
- 51 Comments
Apr 23 06:20 PM- Roger Nusbaum
- 400 Comments
My Website
Apr 23 10:29 PMphil,I agree with Hugh that I don;t think 5% a year for years on end is normal but i might have this whole thing wrong.
- GKM
- 173 Comments
Apr 24 12:28 AMIf nominal wages increased by only 2.5% for 10 years, then that means that wages to cover the increased housing prices (and everything else that has gone through the roof - pun intended) have only gone up by about 28%. That creates a spread that has to contract in one way shape or form. Go ask your boss for a 57% wage increase so you can pay for that overpriced house and he will likely tell you to buy a cheaper house. Then tell him you don't want to live in the trailer park anymore...
- svkoho
- 96 Comments
My Website
Apr 24 12:19 PM- WAKEUP
- 462 Comments
Apr 24 07:10 PM- swaps
- 72 Comments
Apr 25 01:05 AMWhen home prices drop, home owners are less likely to bid up shares in the stock market.
More by Roger Nusbaum