Shanghai Market Surges 9.3% on Stamp Tax Cut

Last night the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation announced that the stamp tax on the purchase and sale of stocks would be cut from 0.3% to 0.1%. Today, in response, the Shanghai Composite Index surged 9.3%. According to an email earlier today from my teaching assistant Shang Ning, “the index opened up 7.98% today, and closed 9.29% higher. A fucking crazy day, volume more than doubled over yesterday. At 1:30, the index reached its lowest level, roughly 5.6% up, and then it turned, shooting up.” He’s been speculating on warrants and from the excited email message I think he may have made a couple of bucks today. I should see if I can get him to pay for dinner tonight.

The cutting of the stamp tax was a widely-anticipated reversal of the move last year, on May 30, when in order to cool what seemed like a vastly overheated market, the stamp tax was raised from 0.1% to 0.3%. The market fell 6.5% the next day, and lost another 6.5% that week, if I remember correctly, but not for long. It quickly turned around and returned to its dramatic rise, surging another 75% or so to reach 6124 on October 16. Government attempts to manage stock market prices in China do work, for a while at least.

Since its peak in October, however, the market has plummeted to just below 3000 on Tuesday, losing over half its value, and creating a great deal of concern for the government – China’s is the world’s worst performing stock market year to date. The government is afraid both that the continued market slump may anger the newly-emerging urban middle classes and that it may translate into reduced consumption as savings are eroded (although according to Andy Rothman at CLSA at its peak the total market cap of traded shares was only about 36% of GDP, and is much less today).

This was not the government’s first move to try to kick-start a rally. On Sunday night, as I discussed in my Monday entry, the CSRC announced restrictions on the ability of owners of previously locked-up shares to sell their shares in the market. This was designed to address fears of a selling overhang, and although it couldn’t have had much fundamental effect as far as I can see, it was transparently a signal that the government wanted the market to trade up. Sure enough the market shot up nearly 7% in the morning before giving away nearly 90% of the gains over the rest of the day.

Since that announcement was not enough, the government made its next big signaling effort last night and reduced the stamp tax. I have discussed in earlier entries that this was much-rumored during the past few months. Because of the big negative impact of raising the tax last May, there was a very widely held assumption that lowering the tax would have an equally large but positive impact. Actually, and evidence if any was needed that insider information is a main determinant of profitability here, the market was up 4.2% yesterday before the announcement was made. Perhaps just a lucky guess.

No one doubted that this tax move represents fairly blatant signaling by the government. Today’s Bloomberg quotes Wei Wei, an analyst at West China Securities Co, saying “It's a clear signal from the government that it thinks of the decline as overdone.” And according to today’s South China Morning Post “internet chat rooms carried messages praising government officials believed to be responsible for the tax cut.”

This is pretty typical of how most investors view the change in the stamp tax. It has no real fundamental effect but it signals government intentions, and in China the main driver of the stock market is still perceptions of government intentions. This is definitely not a good thing. My friend Mark Williams of Capital international is quoted in today’s Financial Times as saying “The government’s continued efforts to manage the level of prices condemns the equity markets to further volatility.” I am afraid he is right.

But how effective will this move be in keeping the market from sagging further? Sunday’s move created a real frisson of excitement Monday morning, but it quickly fizzled out. Last night’s move has already been far more effective, but the reported doubling of stock trading volume today doesn’t indicate to me that people were excited about holding onto these newly-valuable stocks. I would almost read it as professionals taking advantage of higher prices to shift shares into the hands of retail speculators. Let’s see how firm the rally is over this week and next. If it too fizzles out, government intervention is going to lose even more credibility – something that will surely happen soon enough anyway.

At any rate given how far it has come off since October is the market finally fairly valued? According to Bloomberg the market is priced at roughly 21 times earnings. This is not cheap, but with real interest rates negative (and declining in real terms), and with GDP growth still very high, this might suggest that certainly for ordinary Chinese stocks are a pretty good alternative to bank deposits, and for the rest of us they are a reasonable play on Chinese long-term growth.

Still, we might need a period of stability and rising prices before Chinese or foreign investors jump back in. It is worth noting, by the way, that B-shares, which have all the rights and dividends of A-shares but trade in foreign currency and can be purchased by foreigners, are trading at discounts to A-shares of 35-45%. One can make a very plausible argument that they are a great medium-term buy, especially if, as is widely expected, the distinction between the two is eventually eliminated and B-shares are converted into A-shares.

Of course before jumping in it is worth noting that the government is still signaling that it is concerned about the need to tighten the economy further. According to today’s South China Morning Post:

People’s Bank of China governor Zhou Xiaochuan has called for further monetary tightening and said the central bank would step up measures to cope with economic uncertainties at home and abroad. In a speech to an internal meeting of central bankers, Mr. Zhou said further tightening was needed despite the current austerity policy already having an impact.

The PBoC’s website, which published the speech, had Zhou saying that the PBoC should make greater efforts to slow overly fast growth in the money supply, although he also called for increased lending to support the agriculture, services and consumers sectors.

Most people believe that attempts at monetary tightening and lending controls will continue, although in my lunch with a senior Chinese banker yesterday I was told that it is mostly the small- and medium-sized companies that are taking the full brunt of loan growth constraints. According to him, many of these companies seem to be turning to the informal banking sector for working capital loans. Loan growth, in other words, may be higher than the PBoC thinks because of non-regulated loan growth in the informal banking sector.

How much more tightening do the authorities want? Although I am skeptical that they have the tools to mange monetary policy, I had suggested in earlier entries that the minimum growth they would accept would probably be determined by the amount of growth needed to keep unemployment for accelerating. I speculated that this might be around 10%. Today’s Bloomberg has an interesting variant on this.

China should stick with its tight monetary policy unless the economy's expansion slows to below 9 percent, a National Bureau of Statistics official said. “Below 9 percent, it means the tightening is overdone and needs to be loosened,” Zheng Jinping, the bureau's chief engineer, said at a seminar in Beijing today.

…China can't afford a sharp slowdown because it needs to create jobs, reduce poverty and continue with urbanization, he added.

Zheng then said “A reasonable combination for this year is 4.8 percent inflation and 9.7 percent GDP growth,” adding that inflation might come in between 4.5% and 5.5%. At the same seminar Fan Jianpang, the State Information Center's economic forecast chief, said “As long as inflation can be kept below 6 percent, there's no need for further tightening measures and economic growth should be able to stay strong.

I don’t know if they are saying this because they believe it or because they are simply observing the official line, but inflation is not going to come in below 6% in 2008. I am pretty sure of that. So apparently are others. According to the same Bloomberg article, and in reference to a 5.5% inflation forecast for 2008 by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, “The central bank’s forecast is ‘more pessimistic’ Wang Yi, an official with the central bank's research and statistics department, said today, without giving a number.” I’ll bet it is.

Comments

[city]

I like to remind readers here; Mr Petti worked for Bear Stearns and also he is working in a State Chinese Communist run school at the moment. Details please visit seekingalpha.com/autho...

[city]

All Mr Petti's pupils and seeking alpha readers here; the story about Mr Petti just does not add up! According to Mr Petti's views (you can read all his articles about China on this site ; strangely he only wrote about China), everything in China is in crisis even the air is filthy so why he is making a living there; getting paid from the red Communist school; why not go back to Wall street to work for Bear Stearns ? Bear Stearns is not dead yet.

It is time for Mr Petti and his loyal pupils to disclose his relationship with the red Chinese government now!!! And all readers on this site should also make such a demand; otherwise it's an insult to the intelligence of all seekingalpha readers!

[Vladimir Senkov]

can you drop an f bomb here? i guess you can :)

[mzcap]

About this time last year, the Shanghai stock exchange composite index crossed 4000 for the first time. I wrote an article titled "The unbearable lightness of Chinese stocks" predicting the bubble woul burst sometimes before the Olympic. I observed that Chinese investors were too immature and too euphoric. Many of them had blind faith that the government wouldn't let the market fall before Olympic. Judging by their euphoric reaction to the stamp tax cut, I am afraid the correction has yet to run it course.

[J.D]

Wow, up 9.29%, what a terrific time to sell. If the government doesn't like stock market valuations, why doesn't it just impose price controls?

[eb]

I didn't expect the f.. word (3rd sentence ) on a respected site like seekingalpha.com. It was unprofessional and I hope it was just a one-time slip-up. I didn't even want to read the rest of the article.

[DP]

Oh, stop crying all of you.
Great article and good analysis.

[M. Pettis]

The f-word? You mean "fucking"? People in the financial markets actually say that word? Why, I think I am going to stop investing altogether.

[M. Pettis]

Michael Zhuang, I don't think it is that Chinese investors are particularly immature or euphoric (or at least no more so than many US investors) so much as the fact that the market is structured in such a way that it only permits speculative investing. When financial and macroeconomic data are weak or questionable, the regulatory framework keeps changing, corporate governance is murky, and the government constantly intervenes in the market, even the likes of Warren Buffet would not be able to participate as "real" investors since their fundamental models would not work. This is a market in which the only realistic trading strategies are speculative or insider activities. We are all speculators here, and the only profitable stategy is to guess (or ask your powerful friends) what the government will do tomorrow. Many in the government are very aware of this problem and there is a big debate about how to proceed (see tomorrow's entry).

As for EB, sorry about saying the f-word. I was merely quoting one of my Peking University students. I will ask him next time not to be so exuberant.

[city]

All Mr Petti's pupils and seeking alpha readers here; the story about Mr Petti just does not add up! According to Mr Petti's views (you can read all his articles about China on this site ; strangely he only wrote about China), everything in China is in crisis even the air is filthy so why he is making a living there; getting paid from the red Communist school; why not go back to Wall street to work for Bear Stearns ? Bear Stearns is not dead yet.

It is time for Mr Petti and his loyal pupils to disclose his relationship with the red Chinese government now!!! And all readers on this site should also make such a demand; otherwise it's an insult to the intelligence of all seekingalpha readers!

[nickgogert]

Trading activity does not equate to value creation. A Tobin tax puts brakes on speculation, but value shows up eventually. A graceful exit from Chinese equities might be a wise thing at this point.

[nickgogert]

sorry mr. Pettis, i don't know what gets into that boys head.

City was always a bit obsessive as a younger child. I couldn't leave him alone with the cat for a moment.

Now City, step away from the keyboard and do your homework and stop bugging that nice mr. Pettis.

[huangthomas]

Do something about the air in China. The smog was so thick that I could cut it with a scissor. Locals told me it was that way for years.
Last year I was in Guangzhou and I could stare at the sun at high noon without wearing sun glasses. One of my friends thought it was a moon and wondered why China has full moon everyday. To call the air filthy is an understatement, at least in Guangzhou.

While we traveled to Yunnan and Tibet, air is so clean and sweet that we are contemplating settle in Yunnan, especially Li Jiang.

[city]

Huang; you are such a yellow banana! Do not go to China if the air is filthy; it's so simple and stay at your homeless town Los Angeles!

[city]

One thing you guys all must know before you even just like to start looking into Chinese Market is YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO SHORT THE MARKET. So when Mr Petti and all his loyal pupils on this board are trying to tell you everything in China is in crisis; they want you to short the Chinese Market but HOW HOW HOW????? This is another example how Mr Petti is insulting the intelligence of alphaseeking readers; of course if you do not have any intelligence then be Mr Pettis's pupils!!!

[James V]

Its easy to short Chinese Market City
You can short it around 10-15 different vehicles.
In terms of Micheal beign connected, who gives a fcuk?>