Defining Alternative Asset Classes
What would you include in alternative assets? What would you like to see that does not already exist in the way of accessible alternative assets?
I think getting too hung up on definitions is the wrong approach. I would say to focus more on the result a particular thing delivers and how it gets the result.
First I would say things like wine and art and even my 1971 Roberto Clemente card (I have a collection of like 20 baseball cards) are not really investments easily accessed by a lot of people. I am not saying you can't make money in these things, and I think there is an Art Fund of some sort that exists in Europe, but to the extent these are investments, that is beyond the scope of this discussion.
Dexion Absolute is a publicly traded fund of hedge funds that is listed in the UK under ticker DAB.L but is available in the US (DXALF.PK).
If you look at a two year chart compared to the S&P 500, there is plenty of zig versus SPX's zag. Maybe there is enough for you or maybe not, but there is clearly some zig. If you find some sort of long/short product, regardless of what it trades, that consistently delivers an non-correlative result, it would likely fit my definition of alternative assets.
The few that I use -- so stressing moderation -- generally deliver a non-correlative result. Obviously you can drill (or bog?) down in more detail but at some point it becomes counterproductive (subjective opinion).
If you think about all the types of products that you know of in this realm like commodity, currency, strategic, toll roads (do these count?) and I'll include hydro funds (I do not own any of these), I can tell you there are plenty more out there that you have never heard of (I seem to find a new one every few days). The chance to find and learn about these is vast. No one will likely be an expert in all of these things. Even if you can come up with a dozen different categories of what you term as alternative, it is doubtful you need more than two or three in your portfolio and even that may be too many.
If you are going to swim in this pool I would suggest being cognizant of the issue of hedging an equity portfolio with a few alternative ideas versus hedging a portfolio of alternative strategies with a few equities.
I'll finish with alternative ideas I'd like to see or see more of. For a while XShares had been on file for the AirShares EU Carbon Allowances Fund. I don't know whether this fund will ever come, but something that accesses the carbon credit market is bound to come, the growth in this market would seem to be substantial and I think the correlation to US equities would be very low.
The concept behind the Macquarie Pastoral Fund is very interesting to me (livestock and farmland down under). This particular product is not exchange traded so I am going to pass, but I believe if it is successful (it is a little over one year old, I believe) there will be similar products that do list on an exchange somewhere.
I like the idea of products tied to economic indicators. The correlation to stocks of this sort of thing is probably high, but some sort of product tied to GDP growth of a basket of emerging markets or frontier markets would be very interesting.
Since 2004 I have talked about the extent to which investment products will evolve to offer the chance for much more sophistication to do-it-yourselfers (this has always been obvious) and I think the pace of this will accelerate. Just because there might be several hundred alternative (assume vague definition) products doesn't mean you need more than two in an attempt to reduce your correlation a little.
Update: After Seeking Alpha ran this morning's post,a reader left a good question. He asked whether international utilities, specifically captured via WisdomTree International Utilities (DBU), are better for reducing correlation than a broader foreign product.
Well, the numbers are in and the reader is correct. According to PortfolioScience.com iShares EAFE (EFA) has a 0.84 correlation to the S&P 500 while DBU has 0.56 correlation. I would note that DBU, although dividend weighted hasn't actually paid much of a dividend which is frustrating. Regardless of the dividend DBU (which I own for a few clients) has done well, has outperformed both EFA and SPY and does have a low correlation.
The biggest risk, in my opinion anyway, would be if interest rates which are generally low start to go up. A rule of thumb is that rates moving up are bad for utilities as fixed income (talking further out on the curve) competes for some of the money that goes into utilities. I think higher rates further out on the curve would be a positive for equities as that might signal a return to normal but it sets up utilities to, at a minimum, lag a little.
Get Seeking Alpha Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
ETFs In Focus
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- GSEs Into Conservatorship: Can Housing Stabilize Now?
- Buying Berkshire: The Ultimate No-Brainer
- PowerShares Dynamic Retail ETF Finds Bargains in Discount Retailers
- Global Stock Markets: We All Fall Down!
- American Capital Agency: Making Money the Old-Fashioned Way
- How Should Policymakers Respond to the Employment Report?
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Apple: Steve and I Have Been Wrong »
- What Will Fannie / Freddie Mean for Monday? »
- Gold Futures' Dirty Secret (Part II) »
- A First Look Inside the Fannie / Freddie Bailout Plan »
- Rescuing Frannie »
- Why Commodities May Be Nearing a Turning Point »
- Bill Ackman's Letter to Paulson On Restructuring Plan »
- Is Gold Getting Ready to Bounce? »
- Corning: Looking Very Cheap »
- Friday Outlook: What Phony Sell-off?! »
-
Long Ideas
-
Short Ideas
-
Cramer's Picks
- $300/Barrel Oil Is Coming - Barron's Interview
- Nokia Is the Smart(phone) Bet - Barron's
- Geologix Explorations: Another Mexican Monster Miner?
- Don't Recycle Schnitzer Steel Yet - Barron's
- Antigenics: Insider Buying Alert
- Discover Financial: A Creditable Investment - Barron's
- American Capital Agency: Making Money the Old-Fashioned Way
- Time to Recognize Cognizant - Barron's
- Avoid the 'Group Think' on Melco-Crown
- Safeway: A Safe Way to Invest
- Full list of Long Ideas »
- Nuance Communications: An End to Acquisitive Growth
- Short Interest Rising in Tesoro; Shorts Covering Airline Positions
- Harbinger Capital: Cut Short
- Not Much Meat on Pilgrim's Pride's Bones
- Salesforce.com: Demystifying the Force
- Should We Listen to Boone Pickens on Oil?
- Three Reasons Solar Sell-off May Be in Early Innings
- Is the Market Rolling Over?
- Solar and Oil, Part Deux
- Financial vs. International ETFs: Which Bear is Grizzlier?
- Full list of Short Ideas »
- Fed Should Cut Rates - Cramer's Mad Money (9/5/08)
- Bullish on Wachovia - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/5/08)
- Worst Downgrades - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/5/08)
- Pimco's Bill Gross: Jim Cramer Is 'Courageous' and 'Entertaining'
- Cramer Sees the Light - Cramer's Mad Money (9/4/08)
- Keep Buying Big Brown - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/4/08)
- Don't Buy These Bonds - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/4/08)
- Loss of Integrity - Cramer's Mad Money Recap (9/3/08)
- Not Off the RIMM - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/3/08)
- Unbelievable Moves - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/3/08)
- Full list of Cramers Picks »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »




This article has 12 comments:
Nusbaum
randomroger.blogspot.c...
Nusbaum
Ex; it could be a correlation of 60-minute bars (interval) over the last 22 trading days (timeframe) [yes, a facetious example], it could be daily over the last year, daily over the last two years, etc.
There's nothing to say that what was correlated over the last 22 trading days, year, or two years, has any correlation over the last 10, 15, or 20 years.
If we're talking in general terms about blending non-correlated strategies, it helps to define our terms and get our timeframes of correlation measurement in line with the timeframes over which we execute the strategy ...
In my portfolio:
ARBFX - exposure to arbitarge opportunities
ALD & ACAS - Business development companies
(I also watch PSEC & GLAD)
DBV - currency exposure
(I am going to research the new Widsometree currency funds and potentially add China and India)
EFR & FCO: Floating rate funds
(I also sprinkle in PSAFX)
IGR: International Real Estate
(I have been watching the Wisdomtree one as well)
IRR & GGN: Gold & Natural resource exposure
MIC & MFD: Infrastructure & international utilities
PCL: exposure to lumber & land
(have been watching CUT)
RJI - overall commodity exposure
RYMZX - futures
The I have another category, I term excellence, or great, unique management, exaples: BRK -B, LUK, MKL, LTR, TAVFX, etc.
Well that is a start. Hopefully, I spurred some thought. Please sure your thoughts,ideas or links. Lets build a list of alternative assets.
International REITs - WPS (I have an equal allocation of domestic REITs via VNQ)
Natural Resources - PCL, RYN, PCH (timberland), PRFE (energy), GLD and GDX (gold)
Great Fund Managers who are not closet indexers: PRPFX - (excellent inflation hedge with high Sharpe Ratio - heavy in commodities, currencies, and small-caps) and Ken Heebner's CGMFX and CGMRX.
TIPS. David Swensen strongly makes the case for TIPS as an asset class, which I buy into. Academic research indicates their powerful diversification effect.
I like Granger's ideas above, though one I've already passed on. ARBFX has nearly 2% fees, low net returns and a negative Sharpe Ratio. With five year CAGR of just 5%, it's too volatile for me to hold. I want to get paid for risk. Low correlation isn't enough.
I think a very important question we need to answer is, how much exposure is meaningful? How thin do we slice the pie? How big should our "alternative"... category (or any category) be? How big should any sub-slice within it be to be helpful in moving us toward diversified returns?
Diversifed Income 30%
Equities 30% (20 Domestic, 10% Foreign)
Hard Assets 15%
Alterntive/Real Return/Hedging 10%
Cash/T-bills/TIPs 5%
Speculative 5%
Special Opportunites 5% or held as cash
I then position size everything using %risk
Nusbaum
15% US stock market - mostly index, plus some value-oriented no-load managers (FAIRX, UMBIX)
19% Alpha-seeking (brilliant mutual fund managers who pursue non-correlated strategies)
14% International developed market (mostly EFA, plus some WGRNX)
5% Emerging markets (VWO)
5% US REITs (VNQ)
5% International REITs
7% Natural resources/commodities
15% US Government bonds/insured munis/money market funds (mix depends on yield curve and spread of taxable vs tax free yields)
15% TIPS