Seeking Alpha
About this author:

The long awaited merger of Sirius (SIRI) and XM Satellite Radio (XMSR) is near FCC approval and investors would do well to jump in while the stock is down.

The deal was approved by the DOJ with no conditions attached and now awaits approval by the FCC. If BellSouth and AT&T (T) were allowed to merge back together after a painful divestiture, there is no way this deal can be blocked. It is going to happen. That is why both companies are putting off the Q1 stockholders meeting and have no intention of calling the deal off.

Yesterday, two senior House democrats sent a letter to the FCC reiterating that Sirius and XM be held to their already self imposed conditions of holding subscription costs at pre-merger levels and offering a la carte programming packages. They also want OEM radio makers to be able to manufacture Sirius and XM radios which are now only available through Sirius and XM.

These conditions will not be a problem as the two companies, like Microsoft (MSFT), would rather not be in the hardware business anyway because the manufacturing and distribution costs are high and the margins on the equipment are low. They would rather concentrate on subscription revenue and programming.

The true synergies of the merger have been underestimated in the stock price but will be well understood by the market after the merger is approved. The greatest benefit will be in the leverage over the programming suppliers of the two companies. Programming costs are their greatest expense, but when they become the only game in town they will have better leverage than those ruthless Wal-Mart (WMT) purchasing agents. This should make the combined company profitable by year-end. After that, the sky is the limit for profits.

The two companies have also not been sitting still when it comes to new product ideas. They will come forth with new, as yet unannounced, content offerings that will produce new revenue streams not being looked at by the FCC. Watch out, cable television providers, newspapers, Apple (AAPL) and Google (GOOG).

Finally, millions of potential customers have been waiting on the sidelines for the final ink on the deal before signing up and buying a receiver. Once that confusion is over, the subscriber base could rise by up to 40% in 2008 and that revenue will start rolling in. Then, anyone who has been worrying about the financial viability of satellite radio can worry about why they did not jump on the stock when they could have.

Disclosure: Author has a long position in SIRI

Print this article with comments

This article has 80 comments:

  •  
    Wholey moley! Exactly what I am talking about ! Sky is the limit!
    2008 May 02 08:38 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Perhaps Stan should peruse the balance sheets of these two stellar companies. Lots of debt, loads of Capex for Sirrus to replace their ageing satellites, and no profits, despite years of operation. Truth is , both of these companies inept managements, grossly overspent for content and now find themselves in dire straights. The proposed synergies from the merger are grossly overstated and will take years to obtain. Stan, step back and get your head out of the clouds. This merger is a last ditch attempt to avoid bankruptcy. If, and I do mean if, they make it the diluted three billion plus share count will ensure their status as a penny stock for years to come.
    2008 May 02 09:07 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The Oracle speaks and sounds like a real downer. He must have bought at $3.80, or gets out of bed on the wrong side - everyday. This stock has gone up, and will continue to go up. Family's want a device that they can filter adult content, Young adults want to hear more than "F-that" on their current radio stations (dc101 in dc) - they want smut and good smut at that. ...and they will pay for it. I know a number of people that have said,"not now, but once they bring football and baseball to one device, I may go buy one of those things for my car".

    Oracle, could you look into the future and tell us how many folks will pick up a subscriptions after they announce the merger? Please look into your ball and keep looking, see the crack? Time to get a new crystal ball.
    2008 May 02 09:33 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The Oracle has lived up to his name. He is exactly right on almost all points. This original article was written by yet another Sirius shareholder who sees the merger as a way out of what can only be described as a financial nightmare. Unfortunately, when you merge these two losers, you end up with? One bigger loser.

    The fixed costs in these operations are huge. That was the great attraction to them -- that you could serve a large number of customers without increasing fixed costs. What has happened, of course, is that the customers aren't showing up to buy the service, and at the same time, variable costs have also increased.


    2008 May 02 09:36 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I think you are right on the money regarding customers sitting on the sideline and the new content satellite will offer. I currently subscribe to both and would like to add units and swap some existing radios, but I’ve decided to wait and see what happens until after the merger. I want to see which way the company leans as far as equipment and programming goes. I know they’ve stated both lines of hardware will be supported and programming will be available on both, but I would rather wait until after the merger. If I'm confused and I'm a subscriber, I can imagine what the non-subscribers are thinking. I'm sure many of them just sitting on the sideline waiting to see what happens before taking the plunge. As far as additional content and offerings go, I am sure they have some very creative ideas up their sleeve. Look at the backseat video, what a great product. I can't wait until my lease expires, then I’ll upgrade to a Chrysler that includes backseat video. I am sure there will be many other new offerings available over time. I’m an investor in SIRI and will be hanging on to my shares
    2008 May 02 09:40 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    All of the above comments have credence. That said however, I have to look back on some of the small businesses I have been involved with over my adult life. For years I struggled with the question, of why the customer share buying my product wasn't higher, since my retail and sale prices were much lower than the competition's. I finally came to the realization that the buying public was mainly interested in convenience,and not low price! For this reason alone, like cable tv before it, the buying public will pony up for the convenience of ad free sports, music, talk shows, and news, despite early resistance to the idea. The marketing people, selling major brand automobiles have seen this as well! They are not prone to making many mistakes in their business, as competitiive as it is. This is the reason for the success of shopping malls as well. The lower prices and alaCarte convenience of the merged satelite company will give that consumer exactly what he wants, needs, and finally demands. The consumer of today, is not one of your grandparents mentality, {If you don"t have the money for the product beforehand, you don't buy it until you do!!!}. The selfish-{I WANT IT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!} mentality at all costs, as evidenced by the maxed out, and bankrupt credit card poison pills that the buying public wants and demands is further proof-positive evidence of this fact. I digress,so to my point-with this evidence of the future success of satelite radio imminent, the downside risk for owning as much Siri stock, at these prices, is very low. The upside is very great!!! Run, you big beautiful blue dog, run!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LONG SIRI!!!
    2008 May 02 11:01 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Excellent article Stan! Greatly appreciated!
    2008 May 02 11:05 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I'm a beleiver in Sat Radio. I think everyone looking at their slow start to date as warnings of things to come will be crying when the synergies are realized and people catch on to how superior this product is. The content is what makes this product superior and I do not think they over spent on it because in the end, it's what will win the war for them. As subscriptions grow, the new subscibers will add to the campaign of telling others how great this is and you can't buy better advertising than word of mouth. I'm convinced that this is here to stay and will become a huge success... and with competing manufactures making radios allowing Sirius to focus on the programming ... its going to be overwhelming how quickly the ship will turn. Oracle and the like are correct about whats happened to date, but I think they have put too much stock on the results so far... tomorrow is approaching fast and Sirius will shine bright!
    2008 May 02 11:13 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    What's up with the haters?! Do these people not understand the capabilities of these companies WHEN they merge? I understand their financials aren't the best right now, but that's because they were spending millions and millions of dollars battling each other getting exclusive rights to MLB, NFL, Howard Stern, Oprah, etc. Of course nobody is subscribing to either company right now, they are waiting until after the merger. Once the merger is complete, there will be a surge in subscriptions and renewals.

    Satallite radio will be a standard option in almost every vehicle that will be made, much like a cd player. Right now Sirius has the rear entertainment with 4 cartoon channels for the kids. Right now XM has real-time navigation with traffic and weather! Add on the fact that you would be able to listen to every NFL & MLB game, not to mention NHL, NBA, NASCAR, and every major college football and basketball game!!! Do people not understand where this could go?

    Yes I am a recent investor of both of these companies, but I've also been an XM subscriber for the last 5 years. Me and my friends (XM & Sirius subscribers) are excited for the merger as customers.

    2008 May 02 11:52 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    how high are you all expecting this to go???? 5.00, 10.00, 50.00????
    2008 May 02 12:09 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    STAN THE MAN!!!! MORE OVER CRAMER AND TYLER....LOL
    THE DEAL IS GOIGN THRU AND EXPECT TO SEE $5.00 SOON. GOOD MANAGEMENT WILL HAVE THIS STOCK $15.00 A SHARE IN 2-3 YEARS
    2008 May 02 12:11 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I have sirius, but don't understand what happens after the merger goes through. Will the issue new stock (SIXM or XMSI)? If so, what happens to SIRI, and XMSR shares?
    2008 May 02 12:25 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I have to say, The two losers into one big loser is a jack ass comment, if I have ever saw one. Dhaaa it cost each of them a billion to exchange their capex, which I think dhaaa cost them 2 billion combined, Which dhaaa now combined will be only a billion dhaaa thats more right, dhaaa. What a retard.

    I will also guess that, Oracle is (stackpointer, FrontMed, Hypocritical ass) and if you have followed Tyler Saverys articles in Sirus Buzz, know what a biased lunatic he is. Dont believe me just look at how many different names he has used, he actually changed his name so it looked like someone else agreed with him on a arguement.
    2008 May 02 01:51 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    RE: Savage, A realistic bounce could occur equal to the share price at the time of the DOC blessing, or maybe a tad higher. I feel it will then drop back to a price of 4.00-4.50, before starting a slow steady climb. TWENTY DOLLARS OVER THE NEXT 1-2 YEARS IS NOT UNFEASABLE. All of this is of course based on pure supposition!!!!!!!!! LONG SIRI!!!
    2008 May 02 02:07 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    medasin: Holders of XMSR will receive 4.6 shares of SIRI for every share of XMSR they have, and XMSR will go away. Whether or not they change the stock symbol or company name remains to be seen.

    Oracle: I think you're being a little overly pessimistic. I've lost almost half of my initial investment since I bought SIRI 2 years ago, but I'm still there and still buying. While I agree that the management of XM is inept, the same is not true for Sirius. Mel Karmazin is no fool, as evidenced by the fact that Sirius was the smaller fish for a long time, yet is now devouring the bigger fish.

    Once the merger is complete and all the redundancies eliminated, those balance sheets will be displaying far different numbers from what they are now. Look at it this way: You make $55k/yr and your girlfriend makes $45k/yr. You're both struggling to make ends meet, but when you get married and move in to the same house, now you only have one household to support on $100k/yr. It's a bit oversimplified, I know, but that's the basic idea, and with Mel Karmazin running the show, I believe that those of us who weathered the storm will be well rewarded for our patience.
    2008 May 02 02:14 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    RE: 163888, Now, don't hold back, let us know what you really think!
    2008 May 02 02:22 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    RE: Serius Fan, Amen Brother. Mel is the REAL DEAL! Run blue dog run!!!
    2008 May 02 02:29 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    What is taking the FCC so long! What a waste of an education for a young lawyer to spend such an inordinate amount of time on something that should have been decided six months ago. This is why few persons want to go into government service.
    2008 May 02 02:39 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    163888...Thanks for the heads up on "Oracle" . I was just getting ready to blast him and his idiotic analysis of where the merged company will go. You just save me the time..why bother.....

    As far as Stan's article above I agree with most but not his time frames. 40% subscriber growth in 2008 is aggressive to say the least. I believe this might be achievable in retail sales but not in total subscriber growth. True growth in retail will be achieved with the release of new devices.

    Profitable by the end of the year? I seriously doubt it. Even pent up retail growth, released by the new devices, are probably 6-12 months out from the merger date, which has yet to be decided. There may also be some conditions put on the devices by the FCC that could slow the new devices' release dates by some months.

    Short term stock price will be impacted by all the excitement in the merged company's potential. I agree with Savage above that settling in at $4-4.50 even $5 by the end of the year is realistic, with a steady climb up from their as quarterly results show positive management execution in achieving cost reduction synergies and increased FCF to Profitability within a year of the merger, June 09.

    Profitability will ultimately determine the price of this stock beyond a year. But $10-$15 a share in 2 years is not unrealistic provided the stock does not get further diluted in the refinancing of debt and recapitalization expenses beyond what is known.
    2008 May 02 02:46 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Correction in my post above paragraph 4... I wrote.."I agree with Savage... I meant "I agree with killerkaul... Sorry
    2008 May 02 02:54 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Sirius Fan, I dont think you simplified it enough for Doubtful.


    Killerkaul, What I cant stand are unrealistic people that spout that kind of crap. As you have seen I do it for both sides. I am a realistic person and only ask for people to be reasonable when making comments. As an example; if Oracle is who I think he is, it took about 30 post from various people to convince him of nothing. Why will because he still thought after 30 comments that SIRI/XMSR compete STRONGLY for each others CURRENT subcribers. Now we all know the DOJ said they dont, and they had all the internal documents to prove this. But any reasonable person already knew this before the DOJ said it, except his dumb ass.
    2008 May 02 02:55 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    You see Killerkaul, Cos1000 had a vary insightful comment. You dont see him saying SIRI will be at 10 gazillion dollars a share after the merger. He also does not say they will file for chapter 13 with in the year. He was vary realistic.
    2008 May 02 03:06 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Hey Cos1000, I think if they dilute to finance the just over 1 billion XMSR dept we would see the chance of a reverse split go way up.
    2008 May 02 03:10 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Sirius Fan
    yours is the best post i've seen all day!
    2008 May 02 03:21 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I'm hoping that won't happen (reverse spit), but until this stock gets above $5/share it does run that risk in securing financing. Over $5/share the big funds will include SIRI as part of their index, stabilizing stock price a bit, opening up new financing facility options at better rates. Post merger the "Blue Dog" needs to run to Free Cash Flow as quickly as quickly as possible.
    2008 May 02 03:54 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The stilleto is the best music device out there!
    You can record live radio.
    I don't use my ipod anymore.
    I just record what I like.
    Half the songs I recorded are songs I never would of remebered or would pay to have.
    Wireless head phones are Kinda wack but it does come in handy at certain times.
    This product is so underated.
    I got the new Nas song when it played for the first time and have had it ever since.
    It does not get any better then this but I heard that they are making a stilleto with TV capabilities. Money baby, Money.
    2008 May 02 05:44 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I'm hoping that accessories and radio sets are more readily available post-merger. As a BBY employee in car audio, I've turned away many SIRI/XMSR customers who wanted accessories for older receivers, only to be told that they're only available directly from the companies online. Giving OEM manufacturers the right to build radio sets will finally unlock potential in auto electronics. People shopping for aftermarket decks don't buy a deck and a radio receiver--they'd prefer to have an all-in-one unit. Post merge, I expect the major aftermarket decks to have built-in satellite receivers. That's where most new customers will come from, I think.
    2008 May 02 06:30 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    •  • Website: http://www.yahoo.com
    lets face it..most of us here want a long term profitable investment. it would be great to see a short bout to put some black or green on the portfolio. i'm here for the long haul. i do not want to be one of those guys on the side saying "i should have" or "if i had only". i wish good luck and good fortune to all on this one as i will be holding on to my shares. i think this will be a fun ride and hope some high fives come out soon but please diversify your portfolio. this is the blue light special days for stocks, especially financials.
    2008 May 02 07:18 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Note to the Oracle, "you can't save fools from themselves". And when it comes to being idiot investors you can't beat the Sirius fan club. And that's what they are by the way, they are fans not investors. I mean what serious investor would go near this pair of lead balloons.
    The companies have lost a fortune, the shareholders have lost a fortune but it's not all doom and gloom. Management and certain on air presenters have made obscene amounts of money. But you can't stop the Sirius fan club. They just keep on pumping.
    2008 May 02 08:26 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I think "The Oracle" and "venividivici" are a couple of sour gusses.
    If you both would look at Siris revenue, you will notice that it has been increasing year after year. I gather that either one of you are no fans of Howard Stern?
    2008 May 02 08:51 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Hey Oracle and venividivici.....inves... in nascent technology companies have to fans, believers in their young aspiring companies. Many of these companies never take off and some years to be profitable or for that matter, understood buy most investors, but when the companies that do make it evolve into solid businesses they change the way we live, work and play.

    One company sold in 1/1/94 for $8.19, 1/1/98 for $4.18,1/1/04 for $11.96 and no one thought this stock would ever pay off. In 1/1/08 it sold for $135/share. That Lead Balloon was Apple Computer. As I remember their inept management's mistake of the time was that they were too proprietary with their hardware and software compared to their major competitor of the time, which believed in a more open architecture. Guess which company that was?....another Lead Balloon for over ten to twelve years...Microsoft.

    No one knows for sure when one of these new technology companies is going to get the "lead out" but it takes fans and believers (current investors) to help these companies change the way we do things. So F...Off with you BS and let us fans enjoy the ride.
    2008 May 02 09:30 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I find it funny that Oracle and venividivici are looking at this blog when they dont even like these two companies!
    2008 May 02 10:28 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Speculating on future price targets for the merged company is great----word of caution targets get raised and lowered by the analysts without warning.

    Suggest letting the market speak---be aware of the popular talk -----but don't lose track of the stock/it's technical movements and fundamentals.


    2008 May 02 11:34 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Venividivici, I will classify you as a dimwit. Why well, for example here are some of the major investors, Apollo Management IV L.P., Oppenheimer, Vanguard, Barclays, ING., and I will not forget George Soros (while I dont believe in his political views) there is one thing we can all agree on, that the man (and all the people working for him) is a master at making himself and others lots of money. All of them Have more more intelligence then you. Hell Because of that comment I feel safe in saying, most here have more intelligence then you when it comes to investing.

    Cos1000, Here is another DISH. I have some personal experiences with that and Directv. I heard some of the same crap on those also. You know though I didn't see them posting after 2001 anymore. I wonder why? Answer = THEY WERE WRONG. They had thought that after the merger failed, that that was the end and they had got out. If only they would have stuck it out for another few years. Now if they did that, they would not care if they had over 90,000 tied up in SIRI/XMSR right now.
    2008 May 03 12:59 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    the sourpusses come on here to vent. i am neither a cheerleader, nor basher, but i agree with the poster who says that these fledgling companies need fans. should they profitable right out of the gate?should they experience no growing pains?is there NO hope in sight for this product? the answer is a resounding YES, there is hope. sat radio is the future. people are sick of endless commercials on terrestrial radio and content providers having the FCC's foot on their necks. clearchannel is scared s-less, which is a good sign, too.
    2008 May 03 08:31 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    No Pains, No gains. Everybody please relax. These guys are light weights compared to waxon on the google blogs. You have to see what kind of asswholes I am dealing with over there. These stocks will rock and destroy. Do you think that the NAB and others are investing so much time and money because they have niothing to fear. Even Apple and google are secretly antimerger for vaious reasons. LOL (in a very spooky and creepy way)! The real pain will come when these stocks take off and everyone on the sidelines didn't jump in! Keep blogging homies! They told me to switch my style up but if they hate then let them hate and watch the money pile up.
    2008 May 03 08:51 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    You can be on the train when it leaves the station or you can stand there and watch it pull away.
    sr
    2008 May 03 10:18 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Amen to all supporters! To the gallows with the other 2 clowns.
    2008 May 03 11:22 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    163888- What are your thoughts on an interest in say an aapl, goog, or other interested party buying Siri after the merge?
    2008 May 03 11:23 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I bought into siri a few yrs ago when it was in the 6.60 range.I became discusted when it continued to show poor results so I sold it for some other risky stock.My $39k is now worth over $89k (rtp)three yrs later.Maybe some of you loyalist should take the advice of my late father
    :"Never fall in love with anything that can't love you back"..The diamond is nothing without a DeBeer's so siri needs a powerful cartel and lots of advertisements to make it attractive for subscribers to pay for something that has come through the airwaves for free,up to now.I wish them luck on their merger and please don't put more than 5% of your portfolio into any one stock,don't take wooden nickels,look both ways befor..............pca...

    2008 May 03 12:17 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    pcat is obviously not aware of kelly criterion. if you put 5% of your portfolio on a stock you are betting 10-9 that it will go up. if that is the confidence you have in your analysis, you are better off investing in S&P500.
    2008 May 03 02:25 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Killerkaul, If that were even a remote possibility, I believe that it would be better to merge with something like DISH or Directv. The Synergies would be almost a good as the ones between SIRI/XMSR. It is alot less expensive to add capabilities to satellites then to launch a totally seperate one. Capabilities that may already be there. Think about this XMSR said that its two newer satellites can support SIRI spectrum. The work on those satellites was done well before any serious talk of merger between them. On top of that ( I am not even going into the savings on content that there would be), what has Mel always worked with, media. He most likely will stick with what he knows. Plus XMSR already deals with Directv and SIRI already deals with DISH, on content distribution. Now while I do not believe another merger with anyting else would happen. I also do not pretend to be even close to as intelligent as Mel on media/mergers, and I think it is safe to say vary few know what he is thinking when it comes to other mergers. So unless you are close to Mel it is all wide wide wide speculation.
    2008 May 03 04:16 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    KillerKaul, You see what I mean about Venividivici comment being not reasonable, I mean you would also have to add all the auto industry too, because basically they are big time investors in the satellite industry and they keep signing up for longer commitments. I mean hell I would not be so strong on my comment about him being a dumb ass if he kept it reasonable. He could have said we are dumb to be in right now, that we should have waited for the merger to be approved and see what the actual synergies would be. That would have been reasonable, you can argue it, but you really cant say it is unreasonable.
    2008 May 03 04:42 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Killerkaul, here is a perfect example how I might be wrong on that merger issue. Look at DRYS, they are in the dry bulk shipping industry, yet are now getting in to deep water oil drilling. The only thing that there is in common there, is that they are still dealing with ships. In the beginning investors thought George was nuts, but now more and more, think it might not have been a bad deal.

    I like the company DRYS, I dont like George's "Take it or leave it" and "If you dont like it you dont have to be a share holder" attitude. It is like he has forgotten his company is now a publicly traded company now.
    2008 May 03 05:07 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    163888, you should check out Navios (NM), that is gonna blast off and it is still cheap.
    2008 May 03 05:11 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I already own it, for that reason.
    2008 May 03 05:49 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    DSX also, more for the stability and its dividend though. I own DSX, DRYS, NM.
    2008 May 03 05:52 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Whether you are pro or con, tell me why satellite radio won't adopt commercials, like everyone does? Do you have a written 100-year contract to that effect?
    When the great advertising machine gets to them, they too will crumble. Even if it's just for another scorekeeper (money) for those running it.



    2008 May 03 09:17 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    163888- Venevidi's comments are so much spittle running off of my chin. They don't even warrant a quick scan, let alone a read. I search for intelligent analysis, backed up by fact if possible, common sense at the very least. I have waaaaaaaaaay too much $$$ tied up in Sirius stock to waste my valuable time reading fifth grade mentality comments such as his. For my money, I would rather read, and study comments from the likes of- NotVerySmart, Cos1000, and yourself. My technical knowledge{or lack thereof} of the dance involving the political factions, the shorts, lawsuit games, and FC of@/>'{} C, etc. has been much bolstered by your inputs. Thanks, it is much appreciated. I also own DRYS, will look into NM. WE'VE GOT YOUR BACK--- RUN BLUE DOG RUUUUN!!! LONG SIRI!!!
    2008 May 03 09:36 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The Oracle raised several points that all of you SIRI fans have not even bothered to address. one of you has, haha, way too much money invested in SIRI to bother asking/answering questions such as ...

    1. both companies have Lots of debt
    2. loads of Capex for Sirrus to replace their ageing satellites
    3. no profits, despite years of operation.(siri)
    4. both, grossly overspent for content
    5. proposed synergies from the merger are grossly overstated and will take years to obtain

    Do you have any answers to any of these points are are you going to start calling me names now?
    2008 May 04 01:32 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Hi All... backed up the truck on GOOG shares Friday, just didn't buy the YHOO - MSFT merger going through. Was really worried untill last night. News release sez the deal is off and MS is pulling i'ts bid.

    Long GOOG - 908 shares

    YEEEEHAW!
    2008 May 04 09:01 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Abcema...first off nobody has called anybody names because of their disagreements. Second..your points are well made. However, these points have been introduced over and over again to this forum. We know there are downsides to these two companies. If you will notice Siri revenue has been increasing year over year, while operating expenses have been decreasing. The bottom line indicates that siri is
    is still running in the red, but not as badly as in previous years. However, I think think things will improve dramatically for both these companies once have been approved by the FCC to merge.
    2008 May 04 09:56 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Abcema, I will agree these are good points.
    1) This is a problem, thousands (dare I say all) of successful companies have delt with when they first started and is not news to any speculative investor that gets in for the low price of a stock when the company first starts. I have gone into this before, most of the cost that is happening at this point is due to the amount of growth they have gone after. Right now for instance it cost SIRI arround 100 in chip subsidy for about 65% of the cars that roll of the production line. 300 million in cost for people that dont sign up. Now there are some that say SIRI would have been better off not to have penitration rates so high and should basically, have mainly dealer instull to only get the people that request it. Those same people, 3 and 4 years ago were not projecting the growth that has happen. They had thought back then 100,000 and 200,000 a quarter was great, but still did not think SIRI/XMSR would be profitable till 1010, 2011, or 2012 (depending on which analyst you looked at).


    2,3,4) This is the same for dish and Directv and if you think the content for radio is expensive, TV. cost for content is a multiple of radio (all be it so is their ARPU). The growth rate for radio has been by far better then TV. Is radio profitable yet no, but if we are counting the years from the time both started, then radio still has more then 3 years to get to that point before they fall behind TV.


    5) Most people know the first year synergies will be eaten up by the cost of the merger. The second year synergies will mainly be in the savings in SAC, consolidation of labor (you dont need 2 boards, 2 sets of ceo's cfo's, ect., ect.) you cut the fat at the top and you would be suprised at how fast the millions start adding up, and merging of departments. As for beyond that, who knows how fast other things can take place. You say SIRI needs to replace its ageing satellites, those satellites still have a life span that takes them into 2015. Now as we know, they pushed back the 2008 launch to 2009 and if what XMSR says is correct, that their satellites are able to take on both spectrums. Who knows we may see them push back that launch date again, or maybe SIRI new satellite has some new capibilities that they want now (Thats why I think synergies a vary debatable and differ so much.).

    The fact is these two were, 4 and 5 years ago a real gamble, Now they have become a more stable investment. Few would think these companies would go out of business today compared to back then. At this point, most in it are speculating on how high and fast the stock price will go. Me I think it is better to get in now at 2.7 then a year after the merger at 4.5 to 5.5, or two years after at 10 to 12, or four years after the merger at 40, 50, or maybe even 70. I know you think that is crazy right. Well I heard the same crap with DISH back in 98 and 99. I did not hear it anymore in 2000 and 2001. Was I lucky, yea, that doesn't mean it cant happen again. I will also say this, Satellite TV. and satellite radio are looking alot alike. I see the same kind things (radio is gowing at a much faster pace now) and even the same thing being said about both. But I guess in the end we will see. If I lose what I have in satellite radio thats still ok, because I made just over 30 times that because of DISH. You win some and you may lose some. It is my opinion I have another winner.
    2008 May 04 02:08 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    You see I can be reasonable when commenting on others. He had brought up reasonable points. Now if Oracle would have left it at those specific points, He would not have been berated.
    2008 May 04 02:24 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Alone, they have a long tough road, but together they have real prospects for growth, and profits. They both hurt each other, but together with pricing 'bundles' they make a ton of cash.

    One point, satellite radio on an IPod would multiply the subscriber base immensely, and with 3G you could login immediately and listen. Also, the stock price in the short term will go up, hard to deny that fact, so long or short term there is much to said for owning the stock. I do. I also have XM and love it, so the product is sound and the merger a good one in my book. When the merger goes through the stock will hit $5-6 in month or two, so why not own it?
    2008 May 04 04:43 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Disclosure: A 5 year XM subscriber, no stock position in either.

    I don't see it. XM's ratio of cost of sales vs. revenues actually got worse in 2007 vs. 2006. So the whole 'economy of scale' argument doesn't seem to hold up. Sirius seems to be better run, but not by much. The point is, it seems size (subscriber base) isn't going to help all that much.

    Frankly if I had to take a position it would be short, because a merger doesn't appear to be enough to bail these guys out. However those that are long are counting on it.
    2008 May 04 05:19 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Truth be told, Siri/XM can't rant and rave about how great it will be because we have to hide from the almighty (you know existing monopolies). We must hide our treasures until we are free from the gripes of the existing powers that be. You do not see these companies speaking about all the positive out comes from the merger. But we shall see. Bet on Mel, bet on the future of music, news and talk radio management and disturbution. I am all in. People will pay just like they are all paying for the IPOD right now.
    2008 May 04 06:30 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    163888.... Not only were you reasonable but you showed great patience with ahcema's request. Let me see if I can understand,

    ahcema's request for response to #'s 1,2,3. Lot's of debt, Loads of Capex, no profits yet. These characteristics fit any company that needs to invest in the start up of a business. It takes money to develop the product: Satellites, Launches, Sophisticated plant and equipment, advertising, content, radio chip sets, etc. All before the first subscriber. That's why at this stage most investors are "fans" and "Believers". So far most agree they have a great product with a not so great stock. This is also true of all new businesses that ultimately succeed as we have already noted above.

    #4. Over paid for content? Who knows? Maybe they have, but it's the investment in good content that develops what we all know as a good product, attracting subscribers. After the merger they will be in a better position to negotiate this line item. Where is Howard going after five years that will pay him more, Not XM after the merger? Content costs to this point have been a big part of their start-up expenses. They will come down over time.

    #5. .....Grossly overstated synergies..years to obtain. Again, Use Serious Fan's example above and you can see some synergies are immediate, and others will come over time. In any event regardless of the exact #'s there will be substantial decreases in operating expenses, increasing margin, FCF and Profitability down the road.

    As my reasonable friend has already pointed out, when do you prefer to get in? And do you believe that this stock will go up? If not move on.

    pain... 163888... Thanks for the info on NM. I looked at their website: investor relations, and down loaded their info. Looks like a lot of potential. I'm confused on how NMM figures into the equation though? Any incite?
    2008 May 04 06:31 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I don't think NMM and NM are the same. I own NM and this stock is going to be a beast. The dividends are pretty good as well. I am seeing good money every month from the dividends I collect every month just for holding on to them. Better than a bank savings account.
    2008 May 04 09:05 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Cos1000, Pain was just recommending it as another speculative stock because he saw, I also liked the dry bulk shiping sector, He did not know I already own shares. I like Nm because they not only are positioned for growth, but own a port in south america on the pacific side. Some might have said PRGN is a better play, I think the port is one of the reasons NM is. That is debatable though.
    2008 May 04 09:24 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    VP of Common Sense, Here is a short answer to that problem; Mel Karmazin.
    2008 May 04 09:30 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Pain, and Cos1000, NMM is the parnership that was formed to get more money to start buying more ships. NM owns a large portion of it. It was a way to raise money with out putting it on NM's books. NMM will really own the ships but NM will run them. Kind of like a property management company for NMM.
    2008 May 04 10:18 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I hope that clears the NMM and NM issue sorry about the comment at 9:24, I misunderstood what you were saying, I thought Pains comment was another by Cos1000. So needless to say it was a little confusing.
    2008 May 04 10:25 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    P.S. This is also something like what DRYS has been doing, But with family members, and on a bigger scale. While I like the stock it is why I only have 400 shares. This is the problem alot of investors are complaining about; George doing whatever the hell he wants without regard to shareholders opinion.
    2008 May 04 10:38 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Re: 163888 and Cos1000.................. {Hands Clapping}!!!!!!!!!!! RUN BLUE DOG RUN!
    2008 May 04 11:39 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Yes, now all they have to do is partner up with The All American Home Run Derby and provide their services for free to all their members and this company would start significantly increasing their subscriber base in 2009 & 2010!

    Go to letsgodeep.com to see what I'm talking about! See where I'm going with this?
    2008 May 04 11:46 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    re; ahcema,.............me... mania, cos1000, NotVerySmart, and 63888 said it all............. However, You are right about one thing, I generally have to ask very few questions, as they have already researched all points in some depth. You must look past face value, or you are just part of the herd. Something about not being able to see the forest for the trees....... I prefer to piggy-back off of their knowledge and to take advantage of their hard work ,and hours of homework for what I feel will be a positive outcome. From the information obtained from their comments, I feel that the future of this merged entity should be quite bright and profitable. One does not often get a chance to get in on the ground floor of a goog or an aapl. Do your homework and be ready. Girlymen stay home. Also, it doesn't hurt to have my mentor, James Cramer solidly behind the stock. Long Siri!!!
    2008 May 05 01:07 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    killerkaul... Thank you for you kind words....you are correct in your understanding that investing in speculative stocks is not for the faint hearted and that doing your homework is the only tool to keeping your sanity when the doubters swarm.

    183888... Thanks for clearing NM and NMM. I saw the reference to NMM in NM's company info and saw that it also traded independently on the market but couldn't see their role. Financing makes sense. I will be waiting until after the dividend distribution mid May, hope for a pull back, and start to move in. Thanks again.
    2008 May 05 07:49 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Cos1000, That would be true most of the time with NM, but China is finally rapping up its Iron ore negotiations. The price of about 150% increase means bulk rates will go up. Now normally Feb. is the time all this is done and they have a rise all the way to Sep./Oct. then start droping again.
    2008 May 05 09:18 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    RE: my May 5th comment -I forgot to mention Tyler Savery in my listing of notables, If one wants unbiased, dedicated, indepth thought and knowledge on all aspects of the proposed siri /xm merger. He's #1!!! Thank you for your hard work.
    2008 May 05 11:50 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    killerkaul, you will love the comments on the next article. I have to admit, I am back to the insults. I couldn't help myself.
    2008 May 05 12:33 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    pain & 163888:

    Thanks for the heads-up on NM. I got in yesterday @ $12.17
    2008 May 06 11:04 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If you guys are interested in real growth long-term (10-15 years), take a look at SSL.

    Financials come out June 30, and the CE has said it's going to be a "shocker".
    2008 May 06 11:09 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Sirius Fan, you basterd, I should have looked back here before now you are right. But now I have to think about getting in now after that big gain or wait to see if it drops. Hell you said real growth long term, I see alot of growth in the last year. I think it is a good call, but I am only going in for 200 and see what happens.

    Thanks ether way it gos. You watch though as soon as I buy Wed. morning it will go down. Whats that old saying; easy come and easy go.
    2008 May 07 03:31 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    At this point I'd wait for a pull-back, perhaps after the inevitable profit-taking this stock seems prone to. Watch the oil prices, too; if oil dips, SSL will as well. If you're patient you can probably still get in below 60.

    Happy hunting!
    2008 May 07 04:20 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Or not...Do whatever you gotta do!
    2008 May 07 10:26 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Sirius Fan, thanks again. I had put a 62 buy order in, it is now off. I 'll wait and see, I always hated buying stocks on Highs.
    2008 May 07 01:50 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    No problem. I've been watching the patterns on this one for a while, and although I'm in for the long haul, the day to day and week to week volatility is pretty high...a veritable Daytrader's Playground. Wait for a good dip to jump in, and then forget about it for a few years. I think you'll be pleased.
    2008 May 07 03:51 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    SIRIUS Satellite Radio to Announce First Quarter 2008 Results
    NEW YORK, May 7, 2008 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX News Network/ -- SIRIUS Satellite Radio (Nasdaq: SIRI) today announced that it plans to release first quarter 2008 financial and operating results on Monday, May 12, 2008.
    2008 May 07 04:26 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    WHAT ARE THESE PIGS WAITING FOR,THERE ARE INVESTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS OUT THERE.

    WHAT A BUNCH OF PIGS.

    OINK OINK OINK
    2008 May 12 05:00 PM | Link | Reply