1990 All Over Again? 30 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
In the aftermath of the crisis in the credit markets, many economists have said that the US economy is facing the worst recession in the post WWII area. While the ultimate outcome of the current period is anyone's guess (many are now doubting we will even end up with a recession), we wondered whether investors and economists tend to think every recession (or even period of economic weakness) is the worst ever as they are going through it, and then once it's over say, "Oh that wasn't so bad after all."
For example, the 1990 recession is considered by most to have been pretty mild. But at the time, people thought it was a lot worse. For example, in February 1992 - almost a year after the recession ended - US News and World Report said that,
The current downturn is different. Many cash-strapped homeowners whose houses have fallen in value won't be able to take advantage of the refinancing bonanza promised by the Fed's rate cut. So far, unemployment remains lower than it was a decade ago, but this recession isn't over yet, and the economy's glaring structural problems will stifle growth and new jobs.
US News went on to say that the recession would be "unlike any the country has experienced in the post-World War II era, the result of years of profligacy and irresponsible government policies." Sound familiar? For those interested, we highly recommend reading the entire article to see just how negative sentiment was leading up to one of the greatest decades of growth in American history.
In fact, if we were to compare the 1990 period to today, there are many similarities. As just an example, in each period, the dollar was weak, inflation was on the high side, oil spiked, and credit markets were under stress. In both periods there was even a George Bush in the White House! With these similarities, it comes as little surprise that the performance of the stock market has been similar during both periods.
In the chart below, we overlaid the S&P 500 in the current period (since October 2007) with the period from June 1990 through June 1991. As the patterns show, for the last six months, the two periods have tracked each other closely. While this is not meant to imply that the S&P 500 is poised for a monster rally, the correlation between both periods is certainly worth noting.
Related Articles
|



























This article has 30 comments:
This is not just bad market analysis, it's bad history.
My only problem is that, when this all comes home to roost and there is no longer any way to "spin" the facts, EVERYONE in the world will get dragged down by the greed and corruption of truth, rampant in the US.
They characterized Noah the way you characterize folks that have a glass half full view of our economy. Just because they aren't nuts like GWB suggesting that the economy is getting better doesn't mean that they are proclaiming the end of the world. Why not make money when everything else is losing value (real estate, banks, equities) and everything else is costing a lot more (groceries and fuel)----oh, I'm sorry, enery didn't go up any when seasonally adjusted by the great folks in the government..... right, gas is up 100% Y-O-Y yet inflation is up only modestly at .2%.
Get short, you might be happier.
This could be a great time to scale into REITS and commercial property in the right sectors.
check this out
research.stlouisfed.or...
research.stlouisfed.or...
Talk about the REAL elephant in the room- Balsamo just nailed it. Thanks for posting those- I've seen them before and they are staggering.
Final caveat: I truly, honestly hope you are right H-bomb; I've been saying that all along as I've ridden the dollar all the way down, and gold and Euro's all the way up. However, overwhelming evidence to the contrary has given me no reason to expect anything other than exactly what has happened so far. If you'd like to present evidence to the contrary, such as the author did, I'd be more than happy to entertain it. But saying "do something constructive and jump" doesn't add anything or address any of the fundamental issues we're discussing here.
Expect Basic Materials IYM to pull back. Higher costs for Basic Materials companies due to energy price spike matched with inability to raise prices in a near-recessionary environment.
Good point. That is why it pays to read the footnotes:
Please note breaks in data: Data prior to 2003-01-01 include adjustment, extended, and seasonal credit. Data from 2003-01-01 to 2007-11-01 include primary, secondary, and seasonal credit. Data from 2007-12-01 to 2008-02-01 include primary, secondary, seasonal, and term auction credit. Data from 2008-03-01 forward include primary, secondary, seasonal credit, primary dealer credit facility, other credit extensions, and term auction credit.
This is a graph that has apples up until it has apples and oranges.
The only parallel that seems somewhat valid in the graphs is if you overlay the Oct 90 bottom and the March 08 bottom --- then you'd see a tracing - but what comes next after those short rallies - does this market go straight up like early 91 or does it not - too soon to tell.
It all comes down to the consumer this time - probably led by jobs, the depth of the housing market and finally, the credit availability extended by weakened banks. Those the the key factors.