McDermott International: Better Weather Should Bring Better Results
-
Font Size:
McDermott (MDR), an engineering and construction firm, announced a terrible quarter, sending its stock from 60 to 53. MDR disappointed. The Street expected 69 cents, MDR delivered only 54 cents. The poor results were confined to its oil section; its smaller power and government divisions had strong results.
Oil:
- revenue 550 million (Q1 2007) to 645 million (Q1 2008)
- earnings 121 million (Q1 2007) to 52 million (Q1 2008)
Power:
- revenue 655 million (Q1 2007) to 616 million (Q1 2008)
- earnings 43 million (Q1 2007) to 76 million (Q! 2008)
Government:
- revenue 161 million to 191 million
- earnings 35 million to 38 million

MDR's oil revenues and earnings fell way short because of horrendous weather conditions that prevented them from working for most of Q1. As their CEO explained:
Weather is a regular issue in offshore construction, but what we saw in the first quarter was really beyond anything I've experienced within one fiscal quarter...In the Asia Pacific region, we had to mobilize and demobilize four different times in Australia due to the path of multiple cyclones.
This, he notes, is a one time event which has corrected; except for a $20 million period charge, no orders have been lost and work is moving along apace.
So far in April and May, we have been operating on a much more traditional weather pattern.
E&C firms have "lumpy" quarters. Their revenues and earnings may fall off for a quarter due to execution problems, order changes, and, in this case, the weather. But nothing has fundamentally changed about McDermott. Usually the company targets operating margins of 10-12% but then beats that. Other companies in their peer group, such as Fluor (FLR) and Foster Wheeler (FWLT) have lower margins. FLR just had a blow-out quarter where everything went right but produced only a 5.2% operating margin. MDR, with their worst performance (literally in a cyclone), made an 11% operating margin.
I expect that next quarter, "the weather will be better" and MDR will bring its oil revenues and earnings in. In addition, MDR had an unusually high tax rate this quarter owing to where it made its profits. Its government and power divisions produce income from higher tax locations. As the oil division ramps up, expect a much lower tax rate: this quarter 25% versus last year's 17%.
Further, imagine that the weather pattern had been normal this quarter. Instead of its $52 million oil earnings, MDR "should" have brought in $135 million, an additional $83 million. Take away taxes and I think they would have made 83 cents rather than 54 cents. I say that not because of wishful thinking but rather as a prediction of next quarter.
Disclosure: Long MDR, no position FLR, FWLT
Get Seeking Alpha Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- New Middle East Oil Kingpins ETF: More Concentrated, Slightly Pricier
- Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida: The News We've Been Waiting For
- MEMC Electronic: Glass Half Empty or Half Full?
- What's Behind the Slide in Oil and Commodities?
- In a Vulnerable Bond Market, Two ProShares ETFs To Consider
- AOL To Shutter a Slew of Products
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
- Three Stocks To Be Held To Infinity and Beyond »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Things You Would Never Have Said Eight Days Ago »
- Making Sense of Wachovia's 27% Bounce Amid Record Losses »
- Apple vs. Bank of America: When "Whisper Numbers" Come Home to Roost »
- Four Long-Term Winners Selling at Deep Discounts »
- The Agriculture Boom Goes Bust »
- FCC Commissioner Copps Votes "No" to Radio Merger: No Surprise »
- E*TRADE FINANCIAL Corporation Q2 2008 Earnings Call Transcript »
- Financials: How - And When - We Reached the Bottom »
- AT&T Comments on Apple's 3G iPhone »
-
Long Ideas
-
Short Ideas
-
Cramer's Picks
- Trading Psychology - Cramer's Mad Money (7/25/08)
- Profiting from the Pickens Plan: FAN, Clean Fuels, Fuel Systems
- Happy Days for Panera
- Mechel: Putin’s Remarks Create Opportunity for an Attractive Volatility Play
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.'s Meltdown Was Overdone
- NVIDIA's Long-Term Prospects Mean It's Currently Undervalued
- Time For Wall Street to Get Back on the POT
- Finding Value in the Aerospace and Defense Sector
- Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida: The News We've Been Waiting For
- GeoEye: Interview with the CEO and CFO
- Full list of Long Ideas »
- ESCO Technologies: Bound to Fall?
- The Hardest Trade - Fast Money Recap (7/24/08)
- Collateral Damage From the War on Shorts
- Is the Gold Uptrend Over?
- Response to Raymond James' Q3 Conference Call
- eBay is a Not Com - Cramer's Lightning Round (7/23/08)
- Get True Religion - Cramer's Lightning Round (7/22/08)
- Principal Financial Group Vulnerable to Commercial Real Estate Softening?
- Increases in Shorting, Only for Some
- Is a Ban on Short Financial ETFs on the Horizon?
- Full list of Short Ideas »
- Trading Psychology - Cramer's Mad Money (7/25/08)
- Happy Days for Panera
- TUP Up - Cramer's Mad Money (7/24/08)
- Buy Rent-A-Center -- Cramer's Lightning Round (7/24/08)
- Citi vs XTO Energy -- Cramer's Stop Trading! (7/24/08)
- eBay is a Not Com - Cramer's Lightning Round (7/23/08)
- Buy Costco, Get Sirius - Cramer's Stop Trading! (7/23/08)
- Soup Target; Cramer's Mad Money (7/22/08)
- Get True Religion - Cramer's Lightning Round (7/22/08)
- Copper Down Low - Cramer's Stop Trading! (7/22/08)
- Full list of Cramers Picks »
Most Popular Feeds
-
ETFs
-
US Market
-
Long Ideas
-
Alt. Energy
- Full list of feeds »
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers:
- Search jobs by category
- Get job alerts by email or live feed
- Apply online
Employers
- See all recruitment options
- Get applications online or by email



This article has 2 comments:
MDR fell from $60 in 4/08, well before its qrtly earnings call and well before its warning[both in 5/08, not as result of qrtly report]. several others[eg FWLT] fell from recent highs about the same time. after qrtly results MDR was up[ i purchased more after warning and before qrtly report, so i needed not to refer to charts to verify].
i did not progress into your article beyond its initial statements[discussed above]. i see you're new[no bio yet]. if you wish success in this business, you've work to do.
rosenman