Brian Logan – Investor Relations
Mike Kramer - Chief Financial Officer
Mike Nuzzo - Vice President, Finance
Kristen Blum - Chief Information Officer
Janet Kloppenburg - JJK Research
Liz Dunn - Thomas Weisel Partners
Jennifer Black - Jennifer Black & Associates
Jeff Klinefelter - Piper Jaffray
Jeff Black - Lehman Brothers
Dana Telsey - Telsey Advisory Group
John Morris – Wachovia
Paul Lejeuz - Credit Suisse
Lorraine Maikis - Merrill Lynch
Christine Chen - Needham & Company
Lauren Levitan - Cowen & Co.
Anna Andreeva - JP Morgan
Kimberly Greenberger – Citigroup
Adrienne Tennant - Friedman, Billings, Ramsey
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) F1Q08 Earnings Call May 16, 2008 8:30 AM ET
(Operator Instructions) Welcome to the Abercrombie & Fitch First Quarter Earnings Conference Call. At this time I’ll turn the call over to your host Mr. Brian Logan.
Welcome to our First Quarter Earnings Call. Earlier this morning we released first quarter sales and earnings, balance sheet, income statement and updated financial history. If you haven’t seen these materials they’re available on our website. This call is being recorded and can be replayed by dialing 888-203-1112; you will need to reference the conference ID #3028248. You may also access the replay through the internet at Abercrombie.com.
With me today are Mike Kramer, Chief Financial Officer, Mike Nuzzo, Vice President of Finance and Kristen Blum, Chief Information Officer. Today’s earnings call will be limited to one hour. After our prepared comments we will be available to take your questions for as long as time permits. Please limit yourself to one question so we can speak with any many callers as possible.
Before I begin I remind you that any forward looking statements we may make today are subject to the safe harbor statement found in our SEC filings. Now to Mike Kramer.
Once again we are proud to report record sales and earnings marking 65 consecutive quarters of year over year earnings improvement. Our performance demonstrates our continued ability to effectively position our brands which gives us a competitive advantage and is critical to producing consistent and sustainable results.
As you all know, the first quarter selling environment proved to be more challenging than many had anticipated. Tough macro economic conditions led by declines in home values, turmoil in the credit markets and a rise in food and fuel prices combined with weaker job and income growth resulted in the consumer confidence index dropping to its lowest level in five years.
In addition the female fashion business industry wide was soft compared to last year, particularly fashion knit tops, our largest selling category. To top it off the two week shift in the Easter calendar pulled the corresponding spring breaks into colder weather period negatively affecting March sales which were not fully recouped in April.
Given this difficult selling environment we are pleased that we were able to produce solid sales results without resorting to promotions to drive top line growth. We believe we were able to produce these results because of our global brand recognition particularly with the Abercrombie & Fitch Brand. Excluding the anniversary of the grand opening period the Abercrombie & Fitch London Flagship and the Abercrombie & Fitch and Hollister Canadian stores all produced positive comparable store sales during the quarter.
More importantly US International Tourist Stores in locations such as New York, Miami, Orlando, Las Vegas and San Francisco were extremely productive during the quarter which was a huge performance driver for the Abercrombie & Fitch Brand. The increase in Tourist Store sales during the quarter was led by the already amazingly productive 5th Avenue Flagship.
The Direct to Consumer channel also remained strong posting a 44% increase in sales over last year, with the International Direct to Consumer business growing 78% over last year. As I alluded to we are benefiting from International tourists traveling to the US to take advantage of a weak US dollar. We were able to realize this benefit because of our global brand recognition.
This is additional proof that there is global demand for our brand and it gives us further confidence that we can be successful with our international expansion initiatives. It also demonstrates the importance of owning a global brand during a difficult selling environment in the United States.
In addition to solid top line performance we also posted a 6% increase in earnings per share despite a 3% drop in comparable store sales and the absorption of incremental expense associated with minimum wage increases and pre-opening related to Abercrombie & Fitch Tokyo Flagship during the quarter. We achieved this result through the strength of our gross margin and by strategically cutting operating costs. Initial markups continue to provide a huge benefit driven by savings and sourcing and logistics, London premium pricing and strategic price increases in select categories.
In addition, our focus on inventory management enabled us to keep markdowns in check. Expense control was also a key driver of our bottom line performance. We were able to control variable costs throughout the organization including store payroll hours, home office travel and other store and home office expenses. We are particularly pleased that we achieved these results without compromising the long term positioning of our brands or jeopardizing our growth initiatives. We continue to invest in stores, merchandise development and home office infrastructure.
On the merchandise side our IDC and sourcing teams have made great strides in product quality and the use of leading techniques in graphics, appliqué and fabric catch string. In stores, merchandise remained full price and we avoided resorting to promotions to drive top line growth. We also continue to refresh stores such as upgrading sound systems in the chain.
Our store growth initiatives are moving forward as planned. Hollister, the primary domestic driver of new store growth in the near term still has opportunities in many high quality US malls. We continue to find that Hollister stores open less than one year exceed our initial sales targets and produce a store contribution rate better than or equal to that of the existing chain.
In addition, our first Hollister Flagship in New York is still scheduled for an early 2009 opening and will display new and exciting store experience elements. We also plan to open our first Kids Flagship of 5th Avenue in New York in 2010. We believe that both Flagships can further fortify the iconic image of these brands as we look to expand internationally.
Gilly Hicks, a brand that we believe can provide long term domestic growth now operates five stores. We continue to be pleased with the performance of Gilly Hicks and are building both brand recognition and the foundation for a strong everyday bra and underwear business. We are committed to developing this concept into the best in the intimates business as we have done with our other brands.
Internationally we recently announced plans to open a second European Abercrombie & Fitch Flagship in Copenhagen, Denmark in 2009. We are also in the process of securing locations in Italy, France, Germany, Spain and Sweden. Our plan for a late 2009 opening of our first Flagship in Asia located in Tokyo’s Ginsa District remains on schedule. In addition we are on track to open our first of four Hollister mall based stores in the UK in October of this year.
Looking ahead we see a continuation of the difficult selling environment. However, just as in the first quarter we view this as an opportunity to further separate our brand from the competition. In order to do so it is important that we remain true to our brands aspirational positioning by maintaining the highest quality product, a disciplined pricing approach and an exceptional in store experience.
We must continue to improve operating efficiencies to maximize gross margin and reduce operating expenses to generate value for our shareholders. However, we must never lose focus of our brand positioning which is critical to our long term sustainability and global expansion initiatives.
Before I turn it over to Mike Nuzzo I want to take this time to once again reiterate the fundamentals of our business and why we believe we are poised for continued momentum in our business model. One, growth initiatives, we have significant growth opportunities with our existing proven brands. This growth is in the form of higher productivity of existing categories plus introduction of new categories continued domestic growth and significant international growth.
In addition, we have introduced two new brands in recent years that have great potential. Let me note though that our long term strategy of producing double digit EPS growth does not necessarily rely on the latter happening.
Two, brand protection, two sub cut categories under brand protection consistency and sustainability. Consistency, we will not sacrifice quality or promote our new product to buy sales on a short term basis. The second, sustainability, we focus on our core customer and maniacally offer the best experience in the mall. This is accomplished through our six senses approach and our continued investment to maintain our store standards.
Number three, infrastructure, we are investing in IT initiatives that will help us grow internationally and just as important on a leverage basis. These come in the form of a scalable system that will allow us to optimize as we grow in the future. We believe we are being very pragmatic with all of our infrastructure investments with the goal of maximizing return on investment.
These three points separate us from every other specialty retailer. They represent the formula for a strong business model and one that we are very proud of. Now to Mike Nuzzo.
As Mike Kramer indicated when you consider the factors impacting the first quarter of 2008 the relatively unfavorable Easter break calendar, the economic down turn, the lack of a strong female fashion trend industry wide and our own investment initiatives to deliver earnings growth over last year is a significant accomplishment.
Our fiscal 2008 first quarter net sales for the 13 weeks ended May 3, 2008, increased 8% to $800.2 million from $742.4 million for the 13 weeks ended May 5, 2007. First quarter Direct to Consumer net sales increased 44% to $62.5 million. Total comparable stores sales decreased 3%, transactions per store per week decreased 4% and average transaction value was flat to last year.
Comps were strongest in tourist and international stores and weakest in the South and Midwest regions. For the total company, male tops, female fleece tops and denim and fragrance in both genders performed well in the quarter. Female knit tops and knit pants underperformed as did woven shorts in both genders.
First quarter gross profit rate was 66.8%, 120 basis points higher compared to last year. The change in rate is attributed to a higher initial markup rate and a lower shrink rate partially offset by a higher markdown rate versus last year. Our higher initial markup rate was driven by favorability from London premium pricing, sourcing benefits and select price increases in polo and denim departments.
We ended the first quarter with inventories down 21% per gross square foot at cost versus last year which exceeded our guidance from the fourth quarter call that estimated a reduction in the 17% to 20% range. The reduction was driven by lower basic and spring inventory levels per square foot. We believe the level and timing of spring merchandise deliveries were well managed and on target for the challenging selling environment.
While our spring merchandise strategy limited markdown exposure, increased IMU continued to drive favorable gross profit results. Store and distribution expense for the quarter as a percentage of sales increased 120 basis point to 42.7% versus 41.5% last year. The increase in rate versus last year reflects both a negative 3% comp store sale result and as indicated on our fourth quarter call the impact of higher minimum wage rates and higher direct expense rates specifically related to the Tokyo Flagship lease.
Payroll hours per store were lower than last year in response to the sales trend. Also, Direct to Consumer processing expenses were higher as a percentage of total sales compared with last year since our DTC sales growth rate exceeded the total company growth rate. Our distribution center UPH increased 12% from last year.
For the first quarter marketing, general and administrative expense was approximately $104.7 million in line with the $105 to $108 million guidance range provided on our fourth quarter call. As a percentage of sales MG&A increased 100 basis points to 13.1% from 12.1% last year. While we continue to invest in the infrastructure for growth we were able to control variable expenses in areas such as travel and sample purchases.
For the first quarter, operating income decreased to $90.6 million compared to $92.7 million last year. Operating income as a percentage of sales was 11.3% versus 12.5% last year. Net interest income for the quarter increased to $7.6 million from $3.7 million last year. The increase is attributed to both a higher investment balance and a higher average interest rate compared to last year. The effective tax rate for the first quarter was 36.8% compared to 37.7% for the first quarter 2007.
The rate favorability is primarily attributed to higher tax exempt investment income. Net income for the first quarter increased 3% to $62.1 million versus $60.1 million last year. First quarter net income per diluted share increased 6% to $0.69 versus $0.65 last year. First quarter capital expenditures were approximately $91 million.
In this quarter we opened one new Abercrombie & Fitch store, two new Abercrombie stores, 10 new Hollister stores, one new RUEHL store and two new Gilly Hicks stores. Our end of quarter total gross square footage was approximately 7.4 million. Also note that on the balance sheet issue today we have reclassified $318.1 million in auction rate security holdings from current assets to non-current assets given the current liquidity issues in this market.
Now I’d like to provide updated guidance information. In North America we expect to open a total of 104 new stores consisting of three A&F, 66 Hollister, 13 Kids, 6 RUEHL, 14 Gilly Hicks and two outlet stores. We also plan to open four new Hollister stores in the UK later this year. Our expected square foot growth for the year is 10% provides from the 11% growth rate provided on the fourth quarter call.
Our Flagship construction projects remain on schedule and other capital expenditure estimates provided on our fourth quarter call remain consistent with approximately $15 million for complete store remodels, $50 million in store refreshes and $73 million in home office infrastructure, information technology and distribution center investments. With a slightly lower 2008 new store count our estimated total capital expenditure level is now between $410 and $415 million.
For inventories we expect to end the second quarter 2008 with inventory flat on a per square foot at cost basis versus Q2 2007. Although we expect to end the second quarter with spring seasonal merchandise per square foot down to last year planned earlier back to school merchandise deliveries, necessary investment in Gilly Hicks and the back to school full chain roll out of Hollister body product will also contribute to this expected inventory result.
For EPS guidance we reaffirm our estimate of $1.61 to $1.65 net income per diluted share for the first half of fiscal 2008. This full season earnings guidance reflects the following; a negative 2% comp store sales level in Q2 to achieve the low end of the guidance range. In stores and distribution expense for Q2 around $2.5 million in added expense for store payroll minimum wage rate increases, approximately $2.5 million in pre-opening rent expense associated with the ANF Tokyo Flagship and approximately $2 million in pre-opening rent expense associated with the Hollister Soho Flagship.
A Q2 MG&A expense level of between $105 and $103 million and a total spring season effective tax rate of 37.5%. As we have discussed we are proud of our track record in delivering earnings growth in both good and bad economic conditions. While others may see retrenchment as the only option to weather a prolonged downturn we have the financial strength to invest and maintain our long term growth plan.
We continue to invest in projects that support our growth plans and drive efficiencies in our operations. These investments will help us generate earnings growth and deliver value to shareholders. Overall we have high expectations for the future in terms of iconic brand development, operating efficiencies and growth opportunities. Now we are available to take your questions.
(Operator Instructions) Your first question comes from Janet Kloppenburg - JJK Research.
Janet Kloppenburg - JJK Research
If you can talk a little bit about the investment spending that’s going on and in light of the tough economic environment that you sighted this morning if you had to scale back on any of that up front investment spending that you think will optimize earnings growth in ’09 and ’10. If you could talk a little bit about if you had to take a haircut on the auction rate securities.
In terms of our investment spending that’s a fantastic question because it really speaks to basically the core of our ability to continue to invest in our business for long term growth. We have not sacrificed any investment spending at all. No scale back in terms of infrastructure, in terms of headcount for our continued ramp up in terms of our international growth.
I’m glad that you asked the question because it gives me the opportunity to reinforce the fact that we can still have up earnings in these kinds of tight macro economic conditions and still invest in future growth in areas that will also optimize future efficiencies. We’re pretty proud of that.
Let me mention some things that we’re talking clearly about this. First of all as you know we do have auction rate securities. We have about 80 million in municipals and the balance is in student loans. Like many other folks out there we have seen liquidity return primarily through calls on the municipal option rate securities and we have seen very little liquidity return in the student loan side.
It’s fair to say that this has been an annoyance for us. We talk about wanting to keep a substantial cash cushion and this of course bites into that. A major benefit for us in the first quarter was a higher interest income driven partially by some of the higher penalty rates that we experienced on these auction rate securities. I would not expect that to continue into Q2 because many of the higher interest rate auction rate securities have been called.
I want to make it clear and as Mike Kramer indicated this situation has not and will not affect any of our investment plans and any of the way that we’re running the business today and into the future. We have reclassified and valued the auction rate securities. We have not taken a haircut as you indicate, we’ve taken a FAS 151 temporary adjustment and we’ve done so again consistent with FAS 157 consistent with the liquidity issues in this market and consistent with our intent to hold on to these auction rate securities until they are either called or liquidity returns to this market.
Your next question comes from Liz Dunn - Thomas Weisel Partners.
Liz Dunn - Thomas Weisel Partners
My question relates to the inventory positioning, very, very lean. How much longer can we see the source of reductions in inventory and is there any fear that that will constrain your ability to comp?
First and foremost we will never sacrifice our ability to generate more sales. We will never constrict our inventory from that perspective. The significant declines you’ve seen in inventory on a gross square footage basis are really all around us optimizing our inventories. As Mike indicated in the script we do not have a go forward basis we do not intend to see these kinds of significant double digit reductions. You’re going to see inventory more in line with our sales performance or our sales likes on a go forward basis.
Having said all that I still believe that there are some areas for optimization in terms of our inventory but you’re not going to see these kinds of declines that you’ve seen. Once again I’m going to reinforce the fact that we have the ability in terms of our time to market to really react with regards to sales both up and down and we will never cut back on inventory to constrain our ability to generate revenue.
Your next question comes from Jennifer Black - Jennifer Black & Associates.
Jennifer Black - Jennifer Black & Associates
I was just curious in looking down the road where would you envision, what percent of your business would you envision to be international say three years down the road or five years down the road and then secondly besides Denmark which of the European countries you mentioned are you most excited about?
As we said before publicly roughly around 13% of our sales, if you include Direct to Consumer you include our non-US dollar generated revenue even in terms of our Tourist stores, our Canadian stores and London stores roughly represents about 13% of our business today. We have just dipped our toe really and really are leveraging this global brand recognition. We’re starting to see elements of that in terms of our other two brands Hollister and Abercrombie Kids. We’re very excited about it.
The potential in terms of international business for our total business is significant. I’m not going to sit here and bifurcate it out in terms of three years, five years, but what I can tell you that over the course of the next seven to 10 years you’re looking at probably roughly around 50% of our business being international. We are looking at ourselves in terms of a global brand and we’re going to leverage that iconic status with regard to Abercrombie and Fitch and the movement in terms of iconic status globally for Hollister and Abercrombie Kids.
Your next question comes from Jeff Klinefelter - Piper Jaffray.
Jeff Klinefelter - Piper Jaffray
My question I wanted to focus on Hollister. First in terms of your expansion into England this year could you just touch on how you’re positioning or marketing per se the concept given less visibility than the Abercrombie brand for a lot of those international consumers? Are you doing anything at all or just opening and letting the store speak for itself?
Secondly, in the domestic market as you’re continuing to open Hollister stores that is your biggest division could you address the A versus B volume I know there’s a consideration a while back for two distinct strategies on how to model those stores as you get into more locations could you address that as well.
I’ll take the first part of the question in terms of concept. We’re very excited about Hollister internationally and we’re starting to see, as I’ve indicated, some significant awareness with regards to Hollister globally. One of those that is really intriguing in terms of our Direct to Consumer business as we mentioned we saw 44% growth in Direct to Consumer business and a large portion of that was international.
Interestingly if you break out that 44% by brand roughly Hollister had a 60% growth on Direct to Consumer which is staggering. We’re very excited about that. In terms of positioning Hollister overseas there are a couple things that we’re taking a look at. We’re starting to see that there is, people are correlating Hollister as an Abercrombie brand and we’re going to continue with that. I think that as we continue construction, on some of these sites you’ll see the barricade indicate Hollister with some subtitle by Abercrombie & Fitch.
This is really the first time that we’ve really publicly associated the brands together. We’re pretty excited about that.
In terms of the second part of your question about Hollister domestically we talked about this and mentioned it in the script as well, there are clearly a number of malls out there A volume malls that we have on our targeted hit list and are continuing to look for the right space to be in. We don’t want to sacrifice clearly the layout and the sizing of the store that can make us very successful in these high volume malls. We’re working hard obviously on those.
As far as what you would call the lower tier malls again the plan is very similar to what we’ve talked about. Our approach in that area is really again to look for malls to focus on the planning aspects of going into a market to ensure that we are not saturating the market with Hollister stores. To look for the right economics that continue to deliver four wall profitability that’s consistent with the rest of our chain. As we mentioned in the script that’s certainly what we’ve been able to achieve over the last year of opening Hollister stores and foresee that continuing in the future.
I hope that gives you an idea of the strategy that we’re pursuing on the domestic side.
Let me just add to that, just kind of a reinforcement of our excitement even in terms of domestic growth for Hollister. As we said in the script the new stores continue to perform equal or above from a bottom line perspective in terms of Hollister but the one thing that I want to point out in terms of look at the number of Hollister stores we have today, look at the number of stores domestically that American Eagle has.
Your next question comes from Jeff Black - Lehman Brothers.
Jeff Black - Lehman Brothers
A couple questions related to international. In the IMU how much did London pricing really impact that? Can you just discuss how much if any the dollar is impacting the results over there? Secondly on the Tokyo Flagship on the store to distribution line that’s a big up tick what can we expect to see in terms of percent of sales increases on that line as the year plays out?
I’ll take the first part of your question, the first two questions. On the IMU side for London it has provided between 10 and 20 basis points of benefit to the total IMU over the past couple quarters. Keep in mind though we are anniversaring that to some extent. We obviously have incremental sales growth in London that will continue to add to that IMU benefit but it will not be as significant as the start up part of it go forward.
As far as the benefit of the weakened dollar it’s come about in a couple different ways. If you think about our Canadian stores I think the exchange rate this quarter compared to last year first quarter for the dollar versus the Canadian is roughly 15% strengthening of the Canadian dollar. That has helped us on the sales dollar side of the Canadian business. We account for it and adjust for it out of the comp so you won’t see it impacting the comp base but it certainly does help on the sales dollar side it helps on the four wall profitability side of the Canadian business.
If you expand to the Tourist stores that we’ve talked about some of the benefit is definitely because of weakening dollar. You could certainly see that in the 5th Avenue case and some of our other key Tourist store location like San Francisco Center and Aventura. We’re definitely getting a benefit there. Again it’s tough to quantify that specific benefit. We also firmly believe that the brand has a significant appeal internationally and that’s what the primary driver of those businesses is.
I’ll take the stores and distribution I think you asked this question because it really highlights one our ability to control our business. The one thing that you need to keep in mind again we posted negative three likes for the quarter. That’s obviously going to affect your ability to leverage a highly fixed cost line item. The one thing that I want to tell you about that I’m very proud of even in light of the minimum wage increase that we experienced we were able to leverage our store payroll.
We actually brought our payroll down in terms of in line with the variable portion related to the sales decline but we were also able to find some efficiencies in our store payroll. I want to point out that al of these were all the cuts related to store payroll were confirmed efficiencies or related to the variable flex related to sales. We are not cutting headcount in our stores or hours in our stores. We will not cut into bone during these times.
In terms of occupancy another area that I’m very proud of again the pre-opening regards to the Ginsa really hurt us we’re not generating any revenue or margin related to that so that’s just sheer negative pressure to my line item. All other line items are really in line in terms of the variable percentage. You did see an increase in terms of our real estate depreciation but in total our occupancy on an average store is up 2% year over year so I’m very proud of that.
Your next question comes from Dana Telsey - Telsey Advisory Group.
Dana Telsey - Telsey Advisory Group
Can you talk a little bit about men’s and women’s what you’re seeing in terms of in each of the different businesses and bottoms and tops just to give us sense of product and how you’re positioned for back to school and lastly Gilly Hicks, any update what tweaks given obviously new business what tweaks are you making and what’s the outlook?
Looking forward we don’t give a lot of detail as you know on merchandise strategies looking forward but looking to back to school generally I can tell you that we’re hoping that, and anticipating that the shorts business and the female fashion tops business improves certainly from where it was in Q1. There was a weather factor that we think was part of the issue in both of those areas.
We feel really good about our denim positioning for back to school. We feel like we’ve got the washes and the fits in the right mix that should position us well for back to school and again it’s always a wild card about the timing of it and again it can be weather related. We feel really happy about the fleece business and in terms of the texturing and the appliqués and the graphics we really feel like we’re becoming that destination for fleece.
To really highlight the fragrance and body business will be an area that we’re very excited about for back to school and into fall. Our men’s fragrance business comp was stellar in the first quarter driven primarily by the ever increasing popularity of Fierce. As you know we rolled out the Hollister body care in 90 stores last year. We’ll be rolling it out again for all stores for back to school. We’re very excited about that. We really feel like this is an area of the business that because of our brand strength we can really grow and develop over the next couple of years.
In terms of Gilly Hicks to be honest with you it’s still too early to give too much detail. Obviously we’re monitoring it very closely at a very detailed level. We take a look at how Gilly Hicks is performing as a percentage of our other brands in those malls as a percentage of competition within those malls. The one thing that I can tell you as our logo merchandise is selling extremely well which is really helping the brand awareness and our conversion rates are really good for new brand.
We’re very, very excited about this brand. As anticipated the focus is continually building an everyday bra and underwear business so we’re very excited. One thing I want to add to the answer which you didn’t really ask but I think it gives me an opportunity to really point out is if you remember the last quarter call we talked about what I call our two embryonic brands and how are they impacting our P&L.
With the major improvement that we’ve made on the cost side with regards to RUEHL if you combine those brands in terms of their performance for Q1 and compare that to RUEHL’s performance in Q1 last year the net impact was only $0.01 EPS year over year. I’m very proud of our performance in terms of managing the cost side of the business while still growing on these two embryonic brands and investing in them.
Your next question comes from John Morris – Wachovia.
John Morris – Wachovia
My question on gross margin being up 120 basis points you mentioned the components higher IMU shrink offset by markdowns. Can you give us direction on magnitude of this component how much each benefited? Within your IMU comment specifically you said it was coming from better sourcing. If you could elaborate there where that’s coming from and would we expect to see that continue on a go forward basis it sounds like a lot of these are continuing to help drive gross margin.
I’m not going to give you the detailed breakout of the gross margin side. Everything you mentioned is true. We had a lot of things working in our favor from a gross margin standpoint in Q1. We talked about select price increases, the London IMU benefit. The sourcing which you highlighted is really a continuation of the effort on our sourcing team.
We’ve got a number of levers that we know we can pull and work on the sourcing side. Its really nothing new, its just a continuation of the good work that the sourcing teams do in conjunction with our merchants to really find out the best way to make the product to get it hear to work through the logistics to generate as much savings as possible which again goes to the IMU.
A really important point to make clear go forward some of these benefits will continue to be in place and some of them won’t. The shrink benefit for example is the residual from the anniversaring of the soft sensor last year that will not continue on to the future. I talked about the London IMU benefit being less go forward. Also keep in mind that in Q2 our gross margin historically has been the highest that it would be throughout the year. To expect to have that kind of increase in Q2 is just not going to make sense.
Again, we’re excited about what we’ve done on the gross margin side. We’ve told you not to factor in growth on the IMU side we’ve certainly seen it but again I would not anticipate the level of benefit that we got in Q1 going forward Q2 and so on.
Your next question comes from Paul Lejeuz - Credit Suisse.
Paul Lejeuz - Credit Suisse
How should we think about the operating margin on the Direct business with that piece growing much faster than the stores should we be looking at that as a boost to operating margin or a drag? Second, how should we think about the cost to build these Flagships, I don’t know if you can provide anything on the cost per square foot basis on the those costs.
The answer to the first question is definitely a boost. The second one in terms of the Flagship I’m not going to really give specific details. I can tell you obviously that the cost per Flagship on a square footage basis is higher than our average store. We are focusing on a jaw dropping experience with regard to the Flagship. The return related to these are highly accretive to the rest of our business so we’re pretty excited about it.
Your next question comes from Lorraine Maikis - Merrill Lynch.
Lorraine Maikis - Merrill Lynch
Going forward it sounds like some of the gross margin tailwinds in the first quarter are going away and some of the store and distribution headwinds are picking up. Can you talk about margins going forward, if you do comp negatively how long can you continue to maintain this type of margin level? Secondly, can we just have an update on RUEHL?
You were indicated gross margin you can expect the same increase then in stores and distribution you’ve got some. I would just say that we’ve factored that into the guidance that we’ve provided to you and again we are targeting the lower end of the guidance tied to a negative 2% comp for the quarter. We feel like that should be achievable under the following circumstances.
One, we feel like the Easter break probably hurt us by about one comp point. With the weather getting better hopefully see continued progress in the performance of shorts and female knit tops. The assumption that the Tourist business that we’ve seen continues to go along as it is and that the economy doesn’t get any worse.
Factoring all those elements in I can really just tell you that the Q2 prognosis is reflected in the EPS guidance that we’ve given you.
I’ll just add to that in terms of the gross margin piece. Everything that Mike said is absolutely true in terms of Q2 but take a look at our international expansion long term and the impact that will have in terms of our IMU. Again, I’m not going to give you details but that is definitely some up side with regards gross margin long term.
In terms of RUEHL, we are very committed to this brand first and foremost. We believe strongly in this niche. Secondly, we believe that we have not done a very good job in terms of distinguishing the product or differentiating the product between RUEHL and Abercrombie & Fitch and asking for that premium in terms of the price point.
This is a huge focus on our design team, our merchant team, and Mike Jeffries and Chad Kessler with regards to focusing on the differentiation. You should start to see some of that in terms of late back to school and definitely into 2009. Again, we’re very excited about it and I’m personally very excited about our ability to reign in the costs related to RUEHL both on a CapEx perspective and an operating expense perspective.
Your next question comes from Christine Chen - Needham & Company.
Christine Chen - Needham & Company
Just a piggy back on that question with respect to RUEHL, would you expect RUEHL to break even in ’09 or be profitable in ’09?
I guess the answer to that question is again it depends on what we think we’re going to see in terms of fall. I really don’t want to be any more precise with regard to that. I’m just really pleased in terms of the direction that we’re going from an expense perspective and we’re really counting on continued differentiation top line.
Your next question comes from Lauren Levitan - Cowen & Co.
Lauren Levitan - Cowen & Co.
I was hoping you could give us an update on the myriad IT initiatives that are obviously underway many of which we’re already seeing some of the impact of it. If you could give us a sense of what more we should see rolling out in ’08 and ’09 and the timeframe against which we should be expecting to see some of those incremental benefits falling through?
We have a lot of stuff in the pipeline and obviously as we talked about before a lot of this is longer term transformation initiatives starting really with getting rid of our legacy COBOL applications that as Mike alluded to earlier don’t provide us with leverage as we move forward in our international efforts. We feel very strongly about our positioning and what we have been doing over the past two years to prepare for international as well as just growth that this company will see.
Starting with core merchandising, so we have a core merchandising system initiative that basically replaces 150 COBOL programs and gets us off the mainframe. It is the core foundation of what we’ll be doing going forward. That’s critical for our success and that will be completely rolled out and in production by mid next year.
Another critical initiative for us is our business intelligence efforts which are really taking all of our disparate reporting systems in the organization and putting them into one version of the truth if you will. That is continuing to be rolled out in multiple phases. We’ve had a couple roll outs last year, we’ve got a couple roll out this year and we are basically prioritizing what goes into that data warehouse structure based on the business needs in the critical focus and where we get our biggest bang for our buck.
We did go live with our new allocation system in a phased roll our approach so we’ve got one brand live on that. Our other brands will go live this month so we’ll start to see benefits from that later this year. We also have our visual merchandising system that we talked about which is really the automation and customization of the floor step process for each and every single store in our chain that will also go live later this year that we’re very excited about in terms of providing us huge benefits from just hitting the store experience perspective and nailing that from a perfection point of view because that’s such a huge focus of ours.
I could go on and on but everything that we’re really focusing on again a lot of transformational things, we’ve got a store systems initiative that’s critical which is really just taking all of our systems that reside in the stores including point of sale back office, central office and that will be a phased roll out approach that starts later this year. We’re working on the pilot for that right now.
We just continue on with other improvements in some of our already existing programs that we’re working on but the huge focus for us is just making sure that we create a store infrastructure, systems infrastructure that is sustainable, that is leveragable so that once we get through probably the course of the next couple years we’ll just be working on continued improvement.
Your next question comes from Anna Andreeva - JP Morgan.
Anna Andreeva - JP Morgan
Your second quarter guidance of down two you’re assuming deceleration in the trend even though comparison is a few points easier and it sounds like you guys are hopeful on a couple of categories that the weather improves and the Tourist business is still very robust. Could you maybe comment on that basically why tweak down that comp guidance. Also as a follow up on Hollister Flagship pre-opening expenses should we expect roughly the $2 million per quarter going forward?
The first quarter comp was a negative three so the negative two guidance that we give is actually anticipating a slight improvement in our business. Originally when we provided our guidance for the spring we had talked about being able to hit the bottom end of the range with a negative one comp. Basically what we’re saying is due to the management of our business and our financial infrastructure we now believe we can hit the bottom end of the range with a negative 2% comp for the second quarter.
Again, we’ve talked about some of the assumptions that drive that negative 2% and we’re also all anticipating that the economy doesn’t get significantly worse than what it is. I hope that provides you some more clarity on that question.
Your second question was about Hollister pre-opening.
It will be roughly around $2 million a quarter on a go forward basis. Negative P&L pressure up until we open that store which is schedule for late 2009.
Your next question comes from Kimberly Greenberger - Citigroup
Kimberly Greenberger – Citigroup
I wanted to find out when do you anniversary the select price increases that you’re taking and then secondarily as you look at the difference in performance between Abercrombie and Hollister is the entire differential due to international and other tourist locations or are there some things that you’re focused on at Hollister to get that business humming.
The first part of your question if I understood it correctly was about when we would anniversary price increases. We had talked about price increases in the current quarter in the polo and denim department, select price increases so obviously they’re going to be a go forward pricing positioning for us. We did those price increases primarily to properly position those departments within our global brand positioning for Hollister and the Kids business.
We are always looking at pricing strategies and we’re always looking to make sure that we’re consistent not only with the market but primarily with the positioning and our brands. We will continue to do that.
On the second part of your question I can tell you that the international business is a substantial or has been this quarter a substantial help to the A&F overall comp performance. If you adjust for these international store businesses the comp that we would show in A&F doesn’t differ that substantially from the comp that we produced in Hollister and the Kids business.
Your next question comes from Adrienne Tennant - Friedman, Billings, Ramsey.
Adrienne Tennant - Friedman, Billings, Ramsey
My question goes back to the sourcing and I was wondering what your relationship if any I think you disassociated from mass in the fourth quarter and I was wondering how much of your sourcing was going through them and how much of that benefited the IMU the sourcing piece of it in this quarter.
We’re not going to get into specifics. I will tell you that obviously we discontinued our relationship with mass. Not a large piece of our business was going through mass. We had been working that down strategically over time even though we accelerated the separation if you will.
In terms of how much that relationship, keep in mind that business that we had through mass portions of it we went direct, portions of it we moved to another broker. I don’t want to get into the level of detail in terms of how much that actually impacted our IMU one way or the other. All that was strategic, the mass situation really did not have an impact on us what so ever.
That will conclude today’s question and answer session. That will also conclude today’s conference for today. We do thank you for joining Abercrombie & Fitch First Quarter Earnings Conference Call. Thank you for your participation everyone have a wonderful day.