CIBER, Inc. Q1 2008 Earnings Call Transcript

CIBER Inc. (CBR)

Q1 2008 Earnings Call

April 24, 2008 11:00 am ET

Executives

Jennifer Matuschek - VP IR

Mac Slingerlend - President and CEO

Peter Cheesbrough - Chief Financial Officer

Analysts

Anurag Rana - KeyBanc

Tim Brown - Roth Capital

Ed Caso - Wachovia

Presentation

Operator

Welcome to the CIBER first quarter 2008 Earnings Call. During today's presentation all parties will be in a listen-only mode. Following the presentation, the conference will be open for questions. (Operator Instructions). This conference is being recorded today, Thursday April 24th 2008.

I would now like to turn the conference over to Jennifer Matuschek, VP Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Jennifer Matuschek

Thank you Nicole, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining CIBER's first quarter 2008 earnings call. With me today are Mac Slingerlend, CIBER's President and Chief Executive Officer and Peter Cheesbrough, our Chief Financial Officer. We distributed CIBER's first quarter 2008 earnings release before the market opened this morning. A copy is available is on the company's website. This morning we also published our quarterly financial score card on the website which provides selected metric information as well as revenue and income for our operating segment for those of you that are interested.

During today's call, the discussion may include certain non-GAAP financial measures in an effort to provide meaningful comparisons to investors. A reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to the related GAAP measures is provided in the investor relations section of our website. Lastly, I'd like to remind you that certain comments today may constitute forward-looking statements for the purposes of Safe Harbor Provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Please refer to the Safe Harbor language in today's press release and in CIBER's other public filings.

Now, I will turn the call over to Mac Slingerlend. Mac?

Mac Slingerlend

Thank you, Jennifer. Operationally, from a top-down perspective first quarter of 2008 revenue of $295 million exceeded our guidance and earnings of $0.12 per share hit the high end of our guidance. There was strength in most all of our business model and in our first quarter results overall. At this point, we will have Peter Cheesbrough go over the numbers for the quarter before my delving into operational accounts. Thank you.

Peter Cheesbrough

Thank you Mac, to everyone for calling in and joining us today. I would first like to outline a few of the financial highlights of the quarter that I will be covering this morning. Solid growth in several divisions resulted in revenue exceeding our guidance. We were also pleased to report progress towards our ongoing goal of improving margins. Gross profit and operating income margins improved both quarter-over-quarter, as well as sequentially. Much improved cash flow from operations helped build our cash position and reduced debt. We also continued the program of buying back our convertible debentures as we saw attractive prices and also continued our stock buyback program. Now, I will discuss some of the details. Revenue.

For the first quarter of 2008, revenue was $294.5 million, representing growth of 13.6% quarter-over-quarter. This was a record for CIBER. Of the 13.6 total revenue growth, organic growth contributed 6.9%, foreign exchange 4.6%, and acquisitions 2.1%. Several divisions showed strong organic growth in the quarter with Europe organic growing at 21.5%. State and local practices 7% and U.S. commercial posting organic growth at 2.2%. These increases were slightly offset by lower revenues in the federal sector, which is working through the repositioning process to facilitate bidding as a prime contractor, which we believe will drive growth in the future.

We have also seen steady increases to our average billing rates, and in the first quarter this was $86.25 per hour, an increase of 6.6% over the first quarter of 2007. Gross profit for the quarter was $81 million. This was an increase of $11 million or 15.6% quarter-over-quarter. Driving this improvement was strong contributions from the European and U.S. commercial segments.

Overall gross margin for the quarter improved by 50 basis points to 27.5% over the first quarter of 2007, and sequentially improved 180 basis points. Selling, general administrative expenses at $64.5 million or 21.9% for the quarter, increased as a percentage of revenue by 30 basis points quarter-over-quarter. This slight uptick was largely attributable to increased investment in the federal as well as the CES practices. In addition, the European division with a slightly higher SG&A than the U.S. operation, represents a greater proportion of the mix.

Operating income was $14.9 million, a 17.7% increase over the prior year's first quarter. As a percentage of revenue, operating income was 5.1%, representing a quarter-over-quarter improvement of 20 basis points over the 4.9% in the first quarter of 2007. And an improvement of 50 basis points sequentially. This performance was driven by strong contributions from the European and U.S. commercial segments. Both contributed about 130 basis point improvement.

Operating income margins for the quarter in the state and local divisions was 8%. While this was a sequential improvement over the 7% in the fourth quarter, the slight reduction in margin over the first quarter of 2007 reflects amortization of the capitalized costs in the crime software application for our law and justice communities. In the federal division, operating income of $1.4 million was impacted by an investment in compliance infrastructure made to accommodate the requirements for prime bidding federal contracts. This is the current cost that is necessary to pave the way to playing in the major prime contract arena. Operating income in the U.S. ERP division reflects investment in domestic SAP delivery procedures and a small decrease year-over-year in the IBM hardware commissions business.

Moving on to other income and expenses. Other expenses of $3.1 million for the quarter were about $1 million higher than the prior year's first quarter, driven by several items, including the U.S. dollar lost 8% against the Euro in the first quarter. While this helped us when translating already strong results from our European division, there is an offset from the reduced value of forward foreign exchange contracts that we held.

In addition the British pound lost 7% against the Euro, which hurt us on translation of some intercompany debt with the Euro. Higher interest costs, driven by the higher proportion of bank debt and in addition, minority interest expense increased by about $200,000, which generally is a good thing.

Income tax. Our income tax rate for the quarter was 39% compared to 37.5% for the same quarter in 2007. This higher rate reflects the mix of income from various jurisdictions as well as the lack of benefits so far this year from the federal research and experimentation tax credit. This credit, which has being extended numerous times by Congress last expired at the end of 2007. And until Congress extends it again, we and others are unable to take any benefit from it.

Net income for the quarter was $7.2 million, a 9% increase over the $6.6 million in the first quarter of 2007. EPS of $0.12, also a 9% increase over the first quarter of last year. Cash flow. Net cash flow provided from operating activities were $25 million, a significant improvement from the negative $8.7 million in the first quarter a year ago, and the $900,000 positive in the fourth quarter of 2007. Improvements in receivable collections, which I will discuss in a moment as well as payables management made this improvement possible. Taking the $25 million of net cash provided in operating activities and reducing this by the $3 million of capital expenditures left $22 million of free cash flow per quarter.

Moving on to our balance sheet. Here we made progress on a number of fronts. We repurchased $61 million of debentures in the quarter. This brings the total that we have brought back to $84 million or 48% of the issue and leaves $91 million of debentures outstanding. We reduced our total debt position $210.9 million at the year end to $195.8 million at the end of the first quarter, a reduction of $15 million. Debt to capital ratio improved to 2.9 from 3.1 at year end, and our debt to EBITDA was 2.5 versus 2.8 at the end of the 2007. We also repurchased an additional 800,000 shares of our common stock into treasury which helped reduce the weighted shares outstanding for the quarter to $60.3 million. In addition, we increased our cash position by $6.8 million to $38.5 million.

DSOs. Our services DSOs were 70 days, an improvement of 2 days from the 72 days at the end of 2007. Overall, DSOs were 75 days versus 78 at the end of the 2007. An improvement of three days. You may recall that at the end of the year we had a large receivable outstanding of about $17 million due from the city of New Orleans, which resulted from work we did for the city during the devastating hurricane Katrina. More than half this balance was reimbursable to the city from FEMA, and they had been waiting to receive those funds before paying us. We are pleased to report that $9.9 million of this balance was received during the quarter, significantly reducing the outstanding balance.

In conclusion, clearly the European and U.S. segments turned in outstanding performances with both revenue growth as well as margin improvements. We are very pleased with the revenue growth and those margin improvements as well as a strong cash flow generation in the quarter. We've now bought back $84 million or 48% of the outstanding debentures, leaving a balance of $91 million, and expect the balance to either be put to us in December or repurchased before then if we see opportunities for us to do so in the marketplace at favorable prices in the intervening period. That concludes my comments.

Now back to you, Mac.

Mac Slingerlend

Thank you, Peter. Sounds good. Had more time, but haven’t taken so much time. I find it best to look at our current operating group results compared primarily to their first quarter of 2007 results. That is, on a year over year basis, rather than purely sequential because of the different productivity rates from quarter-to-quarter. Starting with our U.S. commercial division, which focuses on custom applications, software development and maintenance for corporate America. We had a very solid first quarter. The leadership change we put in place in October is working. Organic growth was both year over year and sequential. In comparison, this group shrank in the third quarter of 2007 but has been growing ever since.

The new leadership from internal promotions has stabilized head counts and grown revenue the highest level since the third quarter of 2005 and operating contributions of 2008 were the highest level since the first quarter of 2003. Plus, they had several very good wins in the quarter. Hence, we are feeling positive about their prospects.

Next Europe, which became our largest singular segment. Europe had another strong quarter driven by continuity of leadership and entrepreneurial approach and a solid relationship with SAP's products and clients. Revenue was up 40% year-over-year. 22% of which was organic. And operating contributions were up almost 80% over the first quarter of 2007. Head counts in Europe grew as well.

Our federal division had a tougher first quarter compared to 2007, but signs of better times are present. Most important in the first quarter was the March notification that a critical piece to our ability to bid more RFPs as a prime contractor had been granted us. More specifically, notification that our accounting system was, and I quote "rigorous as to tracking revenues and costs as required under federal contracts." My thanks to Marsha Kim, division President, Kirk Robins, our Federal controller, and their teams for leading this effort. This certification plus recompete wins in a evolving pipeline and capture process are precursors to sequential improvement, which occur prior to year-over-year improvements.

Our state and local division's most noteworthy accomplishment in the quarter as Peter just referred to is the collection of approximately $10 million from the City of New Orleans. This not only reduces our singular client risk but reduces our borrowing needs and helps our timing differences in our cash flow statement. Plus 70% of this money was from FEMA, which still owes us more and we are continuing to apply pressure on multiple fronts to collect this. In addition, several low margin subcontractors were reduced to this division in the quarter. Hence, we expect to see a gross margin improvement in the second quarter in our state and local division.

Our U.S. ERP business, sometimes referred to as CIBER enterprise solutions had a mixed quarter. This group was again held back by sub-par IBM hardware commission contribution but the month of March results by itself were more like normal. It is our understanding that this is both economic and product-cycle related, but we do expect at least to see a rebound as the year proceeds back to 2007 levels.

Additionally, in part related to our Metamor acquisition last fall, we incurred additional expense in the quarter, working to bring our commercial sector SAP project delivery up to the U.S. rigors of CIBER's product management procedures. We are dedicated to high delivery standards throughout CIBER's model, and want to make sure, post acquisition, that we are following the same rigors here that as we do elsewhere in our model.

Elsewhere in our go to market business units, I would add our IT outsourcing division continues to grow. We have enhanced it. It has very good prospects. We are finding more and more clients interested in outsourcing some of their operations to us both domestically and internationally. We think you will hear more on this division as we proceed. By the way, their activities not only spans the U.S. but also into Europe and India. In eastern Asia and the Pacific we continue to perform well. Australia in the pacific. Albeit not operational per se, and as Peter noted, we bought a substantial amount of our outstanding debentures back in the quarter, subsequent to Wells Fargo's $200 million two year bank facility, and may buy more from spring to fall as opportunities arrive.

Lastly, as to guidance, we have set a revenue range for the second quarter this morning and increased our annual revenue range. And as the EPS, we set a second quarter revenue rage and raised the lower end of the annual EPS range.

With that, Nicole, we would ask, if you would ask if there are any questions for us.

Questions-and-Answers Session

Operator

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, we will conduct the Q&A question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions).

Our first question comes from the line of Anurag Rana with Key Banc. Please go ahead.

Anurag Rana - KeyBanc

Good morning, everybody. Can you hear me, please?

Mac Slingerlend

Yes. We can, Anurag.

Anurag Rana - KeyBanc

Thank you. Congratulations. Good organic growth in the quarter. Mac, please help us understand one thing. Your guidance for the first quarter was revenues in the range of $275 million to $280 million. You came $14 million above the high end of your guidance. Yet we didn't see any upside in terms of EPS compared to your guidance of $0.11 to $0.12. Could you please explain why aren't we seeing the excess revenues fall to the bottom line?

Mac Slingerlend

Thanks, Anurag. We did hit the high end of the EPS guidance. You're correct. We didn't top out $0.01 above that level. One thing I looked at specifically is at the operating income level we were about $0.135 and we reported $0.12. There is an extra $0.01 in other income and charges below the operating line level that, I would probably have to say I didn't anticipate that level of cost at that line item at the beginning of the quarter. And tax rate was also kind of a 0.5% more than I was building in, compared to last our last year or sequential quarter type change. So it's almost as though we lost a $0.015 between operating income and getting it down to net-net income. But I still think operationally it is a very solid quarter. Tend to give back a $0.01 in between the operating income line and the pretax lines. Otherwise we would have been I think $0.01 above the number that we reported.

Anurag Rana - KeyBanc

Fair enough. And just on that going forward, how should we look at the interest expense and tax rate at least for this year?

Mac Slingerlend

Well, I'll let Peter Cheesbrough correct me in a minute. I think you've probably seen the high point on that other income line. I expect some stability in the mid-2s, as above, it was $3 million in the quarter, 3.1, I expect mid to maybe mid to high two. Certainly $0.5 million better. You've got to give us a little slack as we throw a number at you. Tax rate, I think right now we expect to be similar for the rest of the year, unless and until Congress renews the research and experimentation tax credit. That is, again, once again, lapsed and twice before they have renewed it at the 11th hour. So the credit comes at the end of the year. Right now we are assuming that the tax rates are going to be higher than year, not only for us but for all our competitors unless that gets renewed say in a lame duck period or somewhere around the first of -- end of 2008, early '09. Do you agree with those?

Peter Cheesbrough

Yes, agree with that entirely. The other income expense line items, we are probably at a high point for the year. Obviously it is difficult to totally predict foreign exchange rates, but I can't see this category going above $3 million and it's more likely to edge down to $2.5 million as the quarter goes by. Other than that I believe with everything that Mac just said.

Anurag Rana - KeyBanc

Thanks. Lastly, the midpoint of your guidance for the second quarter suggests a slight quarter-over-quarter revenue growth. Now, over the last three years your second quarter has always thrown some growth. Given the strong wins you've had in the first quarter, what could happen that could bring the revenue to the bottom end of the guidance or like always, are you just being conservative?

Mac Slingerlend

First of all, cut me some slack here, Anurag. I think we are trying to be -- I think we are trying to be responsible and conservative. The biggest thing that can hit us would be for some reason a strongly improved dollar and that would be highly related, for example, on the European scene they all of a sudden cut rates which I don't think are currently expected. But if that happens you will see certainly less FX growth in the top-line and that can be material. But I think we are trying to be responsible with respect to the guidance. We are certainly not indicating an anticipated lower performance. I think we are expecting good things, but trying to be conservative with how we put it out there.

Anurag Rana - KeyBanc

Great. Thank you. Congratulations once again on good organic growth rate.

Mac Slingerlend

Thank you, sir. See you soon.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Tim Brown with Roth Capital. Please go ahead.

Tim Brown - Roth Capital

Good morning.

Mac Slingerlend

Good morning, Tim.

Tim Brown - Roth Capital

Just wanted to hit on a couple of areas. First, just looking at the book to bill ratio came in at 1.25. Is there anything that you can give us some color on just in terms of why you saw strength in particular in the commercial area and how do you reconcile that with what we have been hearing? We talk about corporate IT stand going down. Decision making being pushed down. Looks like you put up a pretty good quarter here.

Mac Slingerlend

Tim, first of all, one thing you have in the first part of the year you get a lot of decision making that you don't get in the fourth quarter. So, there is a little bit of seasonality in that number. I.e., the fourth quarter was 0.9 and that didn't bother us and at 1.25 in Q1 that was a little stronger than I may have anticipated, but it also reflects the fact that a lot of companies are making decisions in the first quarter as opposed to the end of the year. That said, we had very good wins in my opinion in the first quarter. Not only sizeable wins. We picked up about 10% more million dollar customers if you will on average than we had at the end of last year or last year or two. So, we got more larger transactions. I believe inspiration in our U.S. commercial division to grow is taking some level of hold. There are some very good wins in that segment. Again, part is seasonal and part is that we are doing a good job.

Tim Brown - Roth Capital

Are you seeing the trends continuing here in Q2?

Mac Slingerlend

I would have to say it is too early. I'm not finding any decreased head count. I'm not getting any anecdotal note of this being pushed that we thought was going to happen last week. So, maybe it is too early in the quarter, but I'm not hearing anything to cause us concern at this point.

Tim Brown - Roth Capital

Okay. And I don't know if you can just kind of give us an idea but when you give your guidance, what kind of revenue visibility do you have for Q2 and for the full year?

Mac Slingerlend

The best answer -- I can sometimes come up with, this is our 57th quarter of being a public company, and I think I have been here for 57 of them. A lot of it is intuition, a lot of it is data we get on a weekly basis and I get some mid-month reports from people running divisions and they are giving me what they see in their pipelines and opportunities. So, a lot of it is just kind of experience and familiarity with our activities. And we get very good confidence out of both the data and perhaps the sniff. The only thing that I'd probably say that we can't predict as well is the FX side. That's been a real wild card. To a great extent, except for pound to Euro, it's been positive for the effect on our consolidated financials.

Tim Brown - Roth Capital

Okay. And then Mac, on the commercial side, it looks like the operating margins were up substantially versus last year. Can you give us a little color and does the use of offshore play into that at all and do you use subcontractors in that division?

Mac Slingerlend

Offshore, I would say is not material to it at this point although it is probably a plus. It's not material. I was pleased to see that in the quarter we reduced subs and added W2 employees. That would be positive to a GP mix. The real key is that we are not only moving to more and more solutions, we have an architectural group that works with our branches across the country getting involved in the projects earlier on, selling at a higher level, and affecting the way that we are pricing and the opportunities that we are getting. So I think it's real. You see the bill rates that Peter has mentioned, our bill rates went up almost 7% year over year in the first quarter. I think these are all kind of rolling together as selling more solutions at a higher level and getting better bill rates and gross profits from those transactions.

Tim Brown - Roth Capital

Mac, are the bill rate increases across the board or is there an element to the mix of business and that?

Mac Slingerlend

There was four of the five divisions were up. The only one that was down was federal, down like $0.50 an hour. I can't figure that out. It isn't intuitive to me that Federal would be down year over year even $0.50 an hour. I haven't had a chance to look at why that statistic is there. Otherwise, 4 of the 5 showed increases.

Tim Brown - Roth Capital

Okay. Hoping, if you could you give us a quick update on the debentures out there. As you continue to plan to buy those on the open market, and are you going to look to move that to long-term debt at some point this year? Is that something the credit markets probably won't be there this year for that?

Peter Cheesbrough

For replacing it, you mean?

Tim Brown - Roth Capital

Yes. It looks like your revolver is going up. At some point, I was curious if you going to replace that and what the market looks like?

Peter Cheesbrough

I don't know that much has changed, Tim, since we were here in February, when we put the revolver in place, the $200 million three-year facility. We wanted to make sure with that facility that we had the wherewithal to either withstand the flood or be able to purchase debentures as we saw opportunities, we've been able to make progress in that regard. It also buys us time until we find, perhaps a better long-term solution in terms of capital structure for the company, which obviously based on the credit markets and the capital markets today don't look very apparent. But we are confident that as the performance of the company improves and we can improve the share price other alternatives might present themselves. We don't have any burning need to go out and do anything. We can certainly sit there for a period of time with the revolving credit. We are able to be patient and we will keep our eyes and ears open for an opportunity to do something but we are in no rush to do it.

Tim Brown - Roth Capital

Thank you for taking my questions.

Mac Slingerlend

Thanks, Tim.

Peter Cheesbrough

My pleasure. And congratulations.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ed Caso of Wachovia. Please go ahead.

Ed Caso - Wachovia

Hi. Can you talk about the impact at Easter that came earlier this year and you had good numbers outs of Europe despite it being a big issue in Europe and how that may have affected your Q2 guidance?

Mac Slingerlend

Ed, hi, good morning. I could argue that it could have a $0.5 million swing quarter-to-quarter. I don't know that it's that material overall but I do think it is material. And yes, the fact that it was in the first quarter probably not only impacted the -- it could have even impacted the federal bill rates, but some of our commercial accounts have what they call Good Friday and Good Monday. So, that even affects you from a gross profit standpoint in the first quarter. It certainly is not a negative and can be a plus for Easter to have already been accomplished, if you will, in the first quarter. But the only other thing I would add and I feel like I'm being redundant here is I take a look at my forecast for April. I don't have to forecast Easter in April. So net-net, it is obviously part of my consolidated looking at the quarter.

Ed Caso - Wachovia

Just trying to get a handle on your ERP business. We continue to hear that ERP implementation is doing reasonably well here yet. It seems like the last two quarters it's been softer for CIBER, and ironically, you're more staffing oriented businesses is doing better which one would have thought it wouldn't. What are your thoughts?

Mac Slingerlend

One thing again, you have got buried inside of our ERP numbers are the IBM hardware sites, so if they have had two back-to-back tough quarters compared to the last few years they tend to depress ERP margins even though they are only tangentially related to ERP services per se. But that's that. We have had some delays in starts in contracting on the ERP side of the house that are not CIBER driven, but I do believe they are somewhere between economic and customer-driven. Things that you hire to the bench, so to speak, for starts, and then the starts get a little delayed and it affects your gross profit. But I'm probably joining you a little bit, but I think that the operating results could be a little stronger and we are looking for them to be stronger. We are also looking for some of these things that are moving out of the pipeline in one through contracting and being real starts. And that will -- it's leaning in our favor but too early to call.

Ed Caso - Wachovia

Several years ago you had some trouble with ERP projects. Is the issue really just delays by clients or do you have any that you're either struggling with performance wise or struggling with staffing wise?

Mac Slingerlend

Your question is a good one. I have asked out there, do we have any ERP projects on which we are losing money? Forget Europe at the moment, because I think the answer is automatically no. Domestically I have also been given the answer of no. So there may be a couple of projects margins are not you up to snuff, we would like to see them, but there are no projects out there that are either losers or material losers. So, there isn't anything out there to disclose in terms of projects that are running at a loss.

Ed Caso - Wachovia

You indicated some delay activity. Have you had any cancellations across your business?

Mac Slingerlend

I don't know of any. The biggest thing we have been experiencing in the ERP side since probably mid-fall, maybe early fall. Certainly fall. Is there has just been, it's like the federal business, kind of like an extended pipeline process that's going on. You say you're going to announce a winner on the 1st of February and now it's the end of April and still hasn't been announced, for example. There continues to be some of that, but there is no cancellations and there are some things, some wins that have even snuck through the ERP side of the house.

Ed Caso - Wachovia

Last question. Congratulations on the New Orleans collections, that's long in coming. But it sounded like most of that money came from FEMA and if I heard correctly, the original receivable was roughly half New Orleans money and half FEMA money. So, does the math suggest that you're now more exposed to the creditworthiness of New Orleans and therefore should we be more nervous about you collecting what's left of the receivable?

Peter Cheesbrough

I will take that, its Peer Cheesbrough. I think we collected -- I don't have the number but it was about 70% of the money we collected in the first quarter was via FEMA and the rest was through the city directly in terms of that and we have continued to receive some funds from the city based on their own, recognizance as opposed to money, they've got from FEMA in the second quarter. I don't see any particular issue with getting it. The issue is, as it has been for a while, is the timing of when we get paid not so much as whether we get paid. And we know the money is -- certainly from FEMA is still filtering its way through their approval process, so I'm confident that more money will be coming.

Ed Caso - Wachovia

Great. Congrats on a good quarter.

Peter Cheesbrough

Thank you, Ed.

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions). And we have no further questions. I would like to turn it back over to management for closing remarks.

Mac Slingerlend

Thank you, Nicole. Thanks to those that called in. We think you can see our model is working. We are continuing to build revenues and post increased revenue and earnings, we are collecting our cash. And we are guiding to a solid yearly result. We look forward to speaking with you in late July and our second quarter results and more and we are here today if you have any additional questions for us. Again, thanks for calling in. And have a good day.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude our conference. If you would like to listen to a replay of today's teleconference, you may do so by dialing 303-590-3000. You may also dial 1-800-405-2236 and enter the passcode number of 11111653. Again, the telephone numbers are 303-590-3000 and 1-800-405-2236. And entering in the pass code number of 11111653.

Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude our conference. Thank you for your participation. And for using ACT. You may now disconnect.

Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited.

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS.

If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: [e-mail]. Thank you!