Is Meredith Whitney Right About Citigroup? 15 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
You can see Meredith Whitney, an analyst at Oppenheimer & Co., talking with Bloomberg TV about Citi (C) here,
and she also issued a report in which she lowered Goldman's, Lehman's,
Morgan Stanley's and Merrill's earnings estimates last week.
- Citi is passing the point of fixing.
- Citi has no earning power to support its dividend.
- Citi is the most overvalued bank at Wall Street.
- Not even Steven Hawking can pull Citi out of this black hole.
- The current plan is almost identical to the one given by former CEO Chuck Prince about a year and a half ago.
- Citi is 10 years behind in upgrading its infrastructure.
I agree with her on all points. Like Whitney, I have been Citi bashing for a while. In "My Ten Predictions for 2008" article written last December, I picked Citi on purpose to reflect my bearish view on the whole banking sector, with a target price in teens, since I also felt at that time, Citi was a safer bet than others due to its overvaluation.
Of course, even though I sensed risk of Bear Stearn's highly leveraged position compared to its small equity, I didn't expect BSC would be totally out of business. To me, BSC is more like a hedge fund, hard to predict, but Citi is a global bank. Coincidentally, Whitney's latest target for Citi is also $16, and I recall she hasn't lowered it yet.
From the very beginning, my gut feeling has also been that Citi's board picked the wrong guy when they chose Vikram Pandit. A quant guy good at selling structured products at Morgan Stanley's institutional sales doesn't provide the right fit for such a difficult turnaround for a universal bank with everything under one roof. Just as Lloyd Benson said to Dan Quayle, "You are not JFK", I think Citi's board is probably staring to feel he is not Damon James.
Damon James is totally a different kind of quant guy, with heavy number crunching on the business side. Pandit will be given a little more time, and by end of next year, if not sooner, he most likely he will be gone. Then whoever the new CEO is will have to trash the universal model and break up the Company into pieces.
Regarding the whole investment banking sector, is the worst over, as everyone now thinks? Not according to Whitney. "The credit outlooks and the loss assumptions for banks across the board are way too low," Whitney said. "The outlook for earnings across the board is going to be much worse than people expect."
Related Articles
|

























This article has 15 comments:
While the sky has some low clouds, it is not falling, and running around telling people that it is for their own personal aggrandizment is sell fullfilling and irresponsible.
This current success she is having right now, I think, is more of a "right place at the right time" scenario, more than anything else. Hey, good for her, everyone deserves a chance to make a name for themselves.
However, she called a "bottom" in housing 20 months ago on TV, was very adamant about it. She was 100% dead wrong, and had anyone bought a house or stock back then based on that assumption, you got killed.
She, like most "Wall Street" people, came on TV, threw out all sort of recommendations, most of which are just guesses, and can leave the studio knowing she is in no way responsible for the outcome.
I do find it a bit silly that Wall Street treats her like just some sort of no name analyst, when clearly she was a known figure prior to all this, having been on TV for over 2+ years already.
For her sake, lets hope she knows when her welcome has been overstayed, and she goes out on top. Then she can be looked to as an "expert" for the rest of her days, even if she never does a "remarkable" thing again.
Just ask Elaine Garzarelli.
that just for those geniuses who bark at whitney that she "probably heard from the guy at the hotdog stand"
sticking to her theme and continuing to call for further trouble for banks may be common sense and she may not be the only one to do so. however, among the analysts out there i have seen only a handful having the courage to do this. most hide in consensus estimates and "the worst has passed" nonsense
and what do you think, will loan defaults and delinquincies rise as the economy slumps - just look at how municipal govts (and soon state govts) have to cut back massively and lay off people because property taxes etc are not flowing in anymore?
do you really believe, this has been included in any recent writedown at any big bank? certainly not!
what most people overlook is that the second round is starting now: the impacts of a deteriorating economy with an overstretched consumer on baks' loan portfolios, revenues and earnings
citi may not fail, granted, but with dilution and earnings compression you will probably get a decent chance to buy in the low teens again - if not lower
Funny how no one points that out to her.Hey whitney why should we pay ANY attention to what you say when you got it so wrong on Bear Stearns?This is also the SAME Whitney who completely MISSED that Bear stearns was going into the tank the week they went into the tank.So I am afraid that she haas been way off the mark on the single most important event in the financial sector-the collapse of Bear Stearns which happened under her nose,but she didn't see it.
Anyone have a list of her other fails,or is everyone's memories too short?
Meredith is a lucky fool who was in the right place at the right time.
Two years from now no one will remember or care and she'll be back at her crystal ball just trying to get one more prediction correct before she retires or quits.