• Font Size:
  • Print

Homebuilder Executive Pay and Perks

More Firms Are Cutting The Perks. “Many companies have been cutting back on executive benefits… Ryland Group (RYL) lost $334 million [in 2007]… As a result, Chairman and CEO R. Chad Dreier's cash and stock-based pay was slashed to $5.1M last year from $20.9M in 2006. But Dreier’s… other pay increased last year, totaling $9.1M. That included a $4.7M boost to his retirement plans, an $80,000 allowance for "personal health and services," $47,000 in life insurance premiums paid, $15,600 in personal flights on the company plane and $9,136 in medical reimbursements. His "other" pay also included more than $4M in cash to offset income tax Dreier owed on his perks.” (LA Times, May 25th)

Southwest Florida Ceos Feel Pinch After Stocks Take Dive. “Jerry Starkey, CEO of WCI Communities Inc. (WCI), was the second highest-paid executive in 2006 with a salary of $2.5 million. The company has yet to file a proxy statement for 2007. Arletta Banas, a WCI shareholder [who] regularly pores over proxy statements: “Their salaries are comparable to others, but other companies have performed better. I would hope WCI would use integrity when it comes to bonuses and it would do what other companies have done.” The luxury homebuilder reported a loss of $84M in Q1… Starkey’s compensation was heavily weighted in stock and options.” (News Press, May 25th)

Ranking Executive Pay. “LA Times annual executive pay survey: California companies paid, on average, 10% less to its CEOs in 2007. But many of the numbers among the list of 100 are still huge… The CEO at homebuilder Ryland Group took a 55% pay cut, and even Countrywide (CFC) CEO Angelo Mozilo was at $10.8 million, compared with $48.1M a year earlier (although he made a bunch more through stock gains that weren't included). LAT: “State laws and corporate bylaws are being changed to make it easier for disgruntled shareholders to oust directors who are willing to approve outsize pay packages.” (LA Biz Observed, May 24th)



Dear Readers: Read anything you liked on this subject and didn't see it here? Why not post a link or a quote from the article in our comments section. Share the wealth! - Ed.


Get Seeking Alpha's housing market coverage by email -- it's free and takes only seconds to sign up.

SA Editor
Judy Weil

About this author:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article

This article has 4 comments:

  •  
    May 26 08:41 AM
    its about time to get rid of directors of co.'s that dont put the shareholder first.these directors that are in bed with management are weakening the whole system.this is continously overlooked as long as everything is rosy & then it becomes the norm. executive pay &perks &options should be tightly tied to performance in good times & bad.when co.'s have to reset the numbers down from 2 years before the managemet should have to give back the same percentage of the compensation. maybe this would begin to help all this lying & phoniness from topto bottom.
  •  
    May 26 02:09 PM
    This is simply criminal. These CEOs are nothing more than overhead and ought to be treated as such. They over build, lose shearholder value and have their pensions and taxes fully paid?? As a Wealth advisor for the last 30 years I can not recall a decade of such fiscal abuse. We should be rewarding inventors and entrepeneurs not gladhanding corporate cheerleaders skilled in "financial engineering". If you seek old fashioned growth and returens--Sell, sell,sell your US based stock and buy the forgien companies- The BRIC nations get it.
  •  
    May 26 02:22 PM
    Things are tough, all over.
  •  
    May 26 08:47 PM
    Executive pay should be ENTIRELY based on their contribution to shareholder value. If an executive does not contribute to shareholder value, he or she has contributrd nothing and should be paid nothing. I manage investments for a family trust, and in the past 10 years have NEVER had a money-losing year for my investors. I often lose money with my own account, due to excessive risk taking - but it is my money. I manage risk for others in a more restrained way. I would not DREAM of taking money from the trust if I did not get a good return .I feel that is unethical.bb

ETFs In Focus