The Agriculture Bull Keeps Getting Stronger 28 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
The agriculture bull market is in full swing and the prospects for the industry keep growing stronger. Agriculture is entrenched in supporting the basic needs of humans and is vital to the sustainability of a growing population. In fact, 45% of the world's workers are employed in agriculture. Recently, prices for crops have skyrocketed as farmers produced less food last year than was consumed, and stockpiles have been drawn down to 30-year lows.
The primary demand driver has come from emerging markets including China and India as consumers emerge from poverty and move to a protein-rich diet. Each pound of meat produced requires ten pounds of grain for animal feed. Improved diet demand is skyrocketing as the pace of economic development around the globe increases, and there is still a long way to go still.
20% of Asia is living on less than $1 a day and a full 1.5 billion in the region are living on under $2 a day. As incomes rise from the $2 a day level to $10 a day, people tend to initially spend their incomes on more meat, dairy, fruits, and vegetables. Once diets improve, life expectancies will be prolonged and place further strains on food supplies.
The overall population picture is also positive with the world population expected to move from 6 billion today to 8 billion by 2030. During that period, world food demand is expected to double according to the World Bank.
Government mandates for biofuel production have also driven up the values for crops. The 2007 US Energy Bill mandates that 36 billion gallons a year of renewable fuels be produced by 2022, and the European Union has a target for biofuels to supply 10% of their fuel needs by 2020. In the US, 30% of this year's corn crop will be siphoned towards ethanol use. There have been concerns that biofuels do more harm than good by actually using more energy than traditional sources, and also because they take away from the food supply. The fact is that even if biofuel production ceased, the fundamentals are still strong with the growth drivers from the emerging markets. After all, only 5% of the world's grain production goes to uses other than food.
Furthermore, farmland across the world has been steadily declining as urbanization, deforestation, and continued population growth take away about 24.7 million acres a year. The US alone is losing about a million acres a year to development. These figures are alarming and raise the question of how the world's growing food demand will be met.
The answer likely lies in genetically modified seeds produced by Monsanto (MON) and Syngenta (SYT), and also with adequate fertilizer usage. I believe the fertilizer arena presents the most attractive agriculture investment as significant barriers to entry, lack of resource availability, high costs of new plants, and long plant and infrastructure development time make the sector as attractive as oil was several years ago.
Fertilizer is necessary to replace the nutrients that crops remove from the soil, and a proper balance of the main three nutrients (nitrogen, phosphate, and potash) is necessary to maximize the yield and quality of crops. The value proposition for US farmers is $3 back for each $1 investment in fertilizer, $7.60 back per $1 investment in India, and $9 back in Indonesia.
Emerging countries including China and India have long under-applied fertilizer and triple cropped fields, which is not sustainable without chemical inputs. These countries are finally beginning to embrace the necessity of fertilizer. In fact, earlier this year China agreed to rates of $576 a ton for potash, nearly $400 higher than the year earlier and near spot rates. In the past China has commanded steep discounts for the large quantities they import but this year was different as supplies have become too tight. June spot prices have breached $1000 a ton and show no signs of stopping as no new capacity will be generated for at least 5 more years. Even now, farmers are not getting all the fertilizer they want because it's just not available.
Industry giant PotashCorp (POT) has vigorously rallied almost 200% over the last year and now sports a market cap of $61.4 billion. Even though this seems rich for a fertilizer company, PotashCorp is trading at only 12 times forward earnings estimates, and these estimates are likely to be drastically increased moving forward. PotashCorp owns 75% of the world's excess potash capacity and has significantly lower costs than its competitors: $94 cost per ton of potash produced vs. $135 for Mosaic (MOS).
With potash supplies so tight, PotashCorp has embarked on a project to increase its capacity by 70% by 2015. Several analysts on Wall Street have set price targets of $300 for the $200 stock, and these are based on conservative earnings estimates. PotashCorp is also part of Canpotex, an OPEC-like organization that markets and distributes fertilizer.
Mosaic (MOS) has also had a banner year adding 264% of value and now trading with a market cap of $53.2 billion. The company is majority-owned by Cargill and is close to achieving investment-grade credit ratings for its bonds. Like PotashCorp, Mosaic is one of the few companies with the ability to increase its capacity and plans to do so with a 50% increase by 2020. It may seem like these supply increases will flood the market and erode pricing power, but this is not likely as it will take about five years for these production increases to come on line, and by then demand will already be drastically higher.
Agrium (AGU) is also a large player in the space with a $13.3 market cap and a significant presence in the production of nitrogen. Nitrogen has the highest application rates of the three fertilizers, but faces high input costs from natural gas and ammonia. So far, producers have been able to pass these costs on to customers and should continue to be able to. Agrium is actually involved in the production of ammonia and has benefited from the increase in prices. They are also part of Canpotex along with PotashCorp and Mosaic.
CF Industries (CF) has the best financial position of all the fertilizer producers with cash on hand equal to 12% of its market cap, no debt, and a forward P/E ratio of just 8. CF is not involved in the production of potash but mines phosphate and nitrogen. CF won the rights to build new nitrogen operations in Peru due to open in 2012. The company has also been able to fend off increasing input prices by mark-to-market gains in natural gas derivatives, and through their ownership of phosphate rock mines in Florida. However, they have been negatively impacted by rising sulfur prices along with many other producers.
One of the year's hottest IPO's has been Intrepid Potash (IPI), which went public in April. The company is the largest US producer of potash and benefiting from all the same trends of the industry. In just over one month of trading, the stock is up 46% from its offer price. The company is considered to be speculative since it came to the market at an opportune time to feed investor appetite, but is merely trading at a forward multiple of 12. Intrepid uses solar evaporation technology at its plants and also produces Langbeinite, which could see a bigger market in the future.
The underlying fundamentals of the agriculture industry are very strong and comparable to what oil looked like two or three years ago. Each of these companies will benefit from the bullish trend and multiple growth drivers for many more years, but industry leaders PotashCorp and Mosaic should outperform because of their unique ability to add capacity of a rare good.
The recent limits on rice purchase placed at Costco and Sam's Club, and subsequent hoarding are just a drop in the bucket of what is going to come for the agriculture industry. People will need to eat, and as the PotashCorp motto states, the fertilizer producers will be doing their part "helping nature provide."
Disclosure: Long
Related Articles
|
Find People on SA
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Authors with the largestSee all
increase in followers
in the last 7 days
Fastest Climbers » -
Top Commenters
Top commenters,See all
as ranked by their peers
Top Commenters » -
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most activeSee all
Instabloggers.
Top Instabloggers » -
Top StockTalkers
TopSee all
StockTalkers.
Top StockTalkers »
This article has 28 comments:
Any guess on what analyst price target of IPI is (besides soliel financial) and what there EPS will be on the earnings call on june 2.
IPI has the great potential in following the foot steps of POT in the mid-to-long range performance.
Agricultural stocks make good sense right now, but with people given the opportunity to bail out of ag and commodity stocks (as oil and gold dropped), they're jumping into tech. Ag was a great place to hide and is a long-term winner, but today was definitely a pullback.
BPC (Belarusian Potash Company) has indeed set $1000 prices for July. Canpotex is at $750 because they don't want to shock the market too much with rapid increases. PotashCorp's full year guidance of $9.50-10.50 a share doesn't even take $1000 potash prices into account, but I think we will get there.
A good quote by PotashCorp CEO during the latest conference call on his reasoning: “We’d rather drink out of the drinking fountain than the fire hose”
Oil is the prinicple component of fertilizers and needed for most all farm equipment, as well as for transport of products to retailers.
As long as someone (anyone) can limit or control supply then they can control prices.
Monopolies are illegal in the US. There is a good reason to make monopolies illegal. I support the effort by the US Congress to make it possible to sue OPEC. POT is next on my list. Once the cartel that POT is involved in is made illegal potash prices will come down and so will the overpriced potash producers.
I would also like to add that organic farmers and gardeners use no fertilizer and produce good food. I should know...I have a lovely garden and use no fertilizers, weed killers or bug killers.
Futures in beans, wheat, hogs, cattle and nitrogen etc are all better plays and more profitable. I am also doing well in some local water companies; water will be more important than oil in Asia shortly. Good discussion, but a little out of focus on suggestions and threats.
1)
First, you have to make sulfuric acid as an intermedeary. The raw materials needed is "sulfur" air, and water. Air and water are free. The sulfur is burned to for a gas and the entire process is a gas phase reaction, until the last unit where water is added and the H2SO4 is produced. Sulfuric plants generate large quantites of 'waste heat' which are capture in boilers, super heters and turned into steam. The steam turns a generator, we make power for the plant, and we send it to the mines to operate the large mining equipment. We make more power than requred and sell the difference to the power company.
2.
The sufluric acid is mixed with phosphate ore to for "phosphoric acid". The acid is refined, strengthened, and sent to the "fertilizer plant".
3)
Phosphoric acid is mixed with ammonia (NH3) and MAP/DAP is formed depneding on the Ph. These are process until the desired size is reached and then shippe to the warehouse.
The entire process ony has 2 raw materials, 1: phosphate ore 2: sulrur.
Electricity is free form the waste heat generated form the sulfuric plants.
Since the company owns the mine, the price for ore is extraction costs only.
A typical "fertilizer plant" has 3 sulfuric acid plants, 2 phosphoric acid plants, and 2 granular fertilzer plants.
On Jun 23 09:47 AM carl martin wrote:
> This ongoing blog series amazes me.For those of you so against investing
> in fertilizers, I think that you should at least know what it is
> you are so against. I don't know of any fertilizers produced from
> oil,although obviously high oil prices have a negative effect on
> the whole industry.Nitrogen,&... an element, which makes up about
> 80% of that stuff you breathe now what's that called? gets processed
> from natural gas. Potash is called potassium chloride "KCL"- that's
> a compound. The "K" stands for Kalium. That's German for Potassium,also
> an element.The word Kalium comes from the word Alkali which comes
> from Arabic "Al Kali" which means "The Plant." It refers to what's
> left over after you burn plants and trees.That grey stuff that's
> left after YOU SMOKE YOUR POT is mostly Potassium.The Dutch call
> it "Potasche" - the stuff left in the pot under your woodstove.If
> you piss on the ground, stinging nettles will soon grow there,because
> they thrive on Potash. In this case, it comes from the plants you
> eat, which need Potash to grow. Do you get it? Potash is a naturally
> occurring mineral. Phosphates are also naturally occurring minerals.
> They are found in limestone formations which consist of Calcium,an
> element,carbon,an element,and phosphorous,also an element. Do I need
> to say that all elements are also naturally occurring? Phosphates
> are limestone rock laced with Phosphorous, nothing more.To process
> Phosphates you need Sulfuric Acid. Are you guys also "Acid Heads"?
> It certainly seems like that. You might consider thinking about it.
> There are also three other minor fertilizers - Calcium,Sulfur,and
> Magnesium-all elements. It's all so elemental. Sulfur shows up in
> SOP,Sulfate of Potash,as oppossed to MOP,muriate of Potash or KCL.Back
> to the beginning.
On Jun 25 09:39 AM AlTrades wrote:
> Potash is not KCl, it is K2O
On Jun 26 04:41 AM guliamo wrote:
> I don't want to spoil everyones party and I used to own potash myself
> until a few weeks ago. I would like to share my rational for selling.
>
> potash isn't a new and emerging company.
> Potash isn't a software company.
> Potash isn't a biotech..
> Potash is a $74 billion company that mixes fertilizers and industrial
> acids, puts them in sacks and sells to farmers around the world.
>
> It's a great business, it's a great company with excellent financials
> and what appears to be excellent management.
> But hold your horses everyone .. no company of this nature can justify
> a 190% gain in a year. This isn't a small cap hidden gem..
> So fertilizer prices my be sky high, but at a P/E of 52.. Potash
> could take a serious dive, Be advised..
Sometimes, you can get K2SO4--a different material.
Similarly, diammonium phosphate contains ammonia and phosphate, but is expressed by its chemical equivalents of N and P2O5.
There are many other materials that contain ammonia and/or phosphate.
On Jun 27 07:25 AM carl martin wrote:
> There is certainly room for confusion and/or disagreement here. I
> call it KCL because Potashcorp does, as their deposits consist of
> Muriate of Potash. There are good explanations at their website,
> as well as at wikepedia.com. Be sure to scroll all the way to the
> bottom. They explain why K2o is NEVER used in fertilizers, but then
> contradict themselves in the introduction, just to confuse you, me,
> and everyone else. I suppose one should never say never!