Seeking Alpha
About this author:
Submit
an article to

The agriculture bull market is in full swing and the prospects for the industry keep growing stronger. Agriculture is entrenched in supporting the basic needs of humans and is vital to the sustainability of a growing population. In fact, 45% of the world's workers are employed in agriculture. Recently, prices for crops have skyrocketed as farmers produced less food last year than was consumed, and stockpiles have been drawn down to 30-year lows.

The primary demand driver has come from emerging markets including China and India as consumers emerge from poverty and move to a protein-rich diet. Each pound of meat produced requires ten pounds of grain for animal feed. Improved diet demand is skyrocketing as the pace of economic development around the globe increases, and there is still a long way to go still.

20% of Asia is living on less than $1 a day and a full 1.5 billion in the region are living on under $2 a day. As incomes rise from the $2 a day level to $10 a day, people tend to initially spend their incomes on more meat, dairy, fruits, and vegetables. Once diets improve, life expectancies will be prolonged and place further strains on food supplies.

The overall population picture is also positive with the world population expected to move from 6 billion today to 8 billion by 2030. During that period, world food demand is expected to double according to the World Bank.

Government mandates for biofuel production have also driven up the values for crops. The 2007 US Energy Bill mandates that 36 billion gallons a year of renewable fuels be produced by 2022, and the European Union has a target for biofuels to supply 10% of their fuel needs by 2020. In the US, 30% of this year's corn crop will be siphoned towards ethanol use. There have been concerns that biofuels do more harm than good by actually using more energy than traditional sources, and also because they take away from the food supply. The fact is that even if biofuel production ceased, the fundamentals are still strong with the growth drivers from the emerging markets. After all, only 5% of the world's grain production goes to uses other than food.

Furthermore, farmland across the world has been steadily declining as urbanization, deforestation, and continued population growth take away about 24.7 million acres a year. The US alone is losing about a million acres a year to development. These figures are alarming and raise the question of how the world's growing food demand will be met.

The answer likely lies in genetically modified seeds produced by Monsanto (MON) and Syngenta (SYT), and also with adequate fertilizer usage. I believe the fertilizer arena presents the most attractive agriculture investment as significant barriers to entry, lack of resource availability, high costs of new plants, and long plant and infrastructure development time make the sector as attractive as oil was several years ago.

Fertilizer is necessary to replace the nutrients that crops remove from the soil, and a proper balance of the main three nutrients (nitrogen, phosphate, and potash) is necessary to maximize the yield and quality of crops. The value proposition for US farmers is $3 back for each $1 investment in fertilizer, $7.60 back per $1 investment in India, and $9 back in Indonesia.

Emerging countries including China and India have long under-applied fertilizer and triple cropped fields, which is not sustainable without chemical inputs. These countries are finally beginning to embrace the necessity of fertilizer. In fact, earlier this year China agreed to rates of $576 a ton for potash, nearly $400 higher than the year earlier and near spot rates. In the past China has commanded steep discounts for the large quantities they import but this year was different as supplies have become too tight. June spot prices have breached $1000 a ton and show no signs of stopping as no new capacity will be generated for at least 5 more years. Even now, farmers are not getting all the fertilizer they want because it's just not available.

Industry giant PotashCorp (POT) has vigorously rallied almost 200% over the last year and now sports a market cap of $61.4 billion. Even though this seems rich for a fertilizer company, PotashCorp is trading at only 12 times forward earnings estimates, and these estimates are likely to be drastically increased moving forward. PotashCorp owns 75% of the world's excess potash capacity and has significantly lower costs than its competitors: $94 cost per ton of potash produced vs. $135 for Mosaic (MOS).

With potash supplies so tight, PotashCorp has embarked on a project to increase its capacity by 70% by 2015. Several analysts on Wall Street have set price targets of $300 for the $200 stock, and these are based on conservative earnings estimates. PotashCorp is also part of Canpotex, an OPEC-like organization that markets and distributes fertilizer.

Mosaic (MOS) has also had a banner year adding 264% of value and now trading with a market cap of $53.2 billion. The company is majority-owned by Cargill and is close to achieving investment-grade credit ratings for its bonds. Like PotashCorp, Mosaic is one of the few companies with the ability to increase its capacity and plans to do so with a 50% increase by 2020. It may seem like these supply increases will flood the market and erode pricing power, but this is not likely as it will take about five years for these production increases to come on line, and by then demand will already be drastically higher.

Agrium (AGU) is also a large player in the space with a $13.3 market cap and a significant presence in the production of nitrogen. Nitrogen has the highest application rates of the three fertilizers, but faces high input costs from natural gas and ammonia. So far, producers have been able to pass these costs on to customers and should continue to be able to. Agrium is actually involved in the production of ammonia and has benefited from the increase in prices. They are also part of Canpotex along with PotashCorp and Mosaic.

CF Industries (CF) has the best financial position of all the fertilizer producers with cash on hand equal to 12% of its market cap, no debt, and a forward P/E ratio of just 8. CF is not involved in the production of potash but mines phosphate and nitrogen. CF won the rights to build new nitrogen operations in Peru due to open in 2012. The company has also been able to fend off increasing input prices by mark-to-market gains in natural gas derivatives, and through their ownership of phosphate rock mines in Florida. However, they have been negatively impacted by rising sulfur prices along with many other producers.

One of the year's hottest IPO's has been Intrepid Potash (IPI), which went public in April. The company is the largest US producer of potash and benefiting from all the same trends of the industry. In just over one month of trading, the stock is up 46% from its offer price. The company is considered to be speculative since it came to the market at an opportune time to feed investor appetite, but is merely trading at a forward multiple of 12. Intrepid uses solar evaporation technology at its plants and also produces Langbeinite, which could see a bigger market in the future.

The underlying fundamentals of the agriculture industry are very strong and comparable to what oil looked like two or three years ago. Each of these companies will benefit from the bullish trend and multiple growth drivers for many more years, but industry leaders PotashCorp and Mosaic should outperform because of their unique ability to add capacity of a rare good.

The recent limits on rice purchase placed at Costco and Sam's Club, and subsequent hoarding are just a drop in the bucket of what is going to come for the agriculture industry. People will need to eat, and as the PotashCorp motto states, the fertilizer producers will be doing their part "helping nature provide."

Disclosure: Long

Print this article
Comments
28
You are viewing the first 20 comments View all »
     
  • Excellent overview of the industry.
    2008 May 27 10:11 AM Reply
  •  
  • solid, but wait on these stocks CF,MOO, MON are at or below their 50dma and look to go lower s/t
    2008 May 27 11:30 AM Reply
  •  
  • I'm in CF and I'm getting crushed.
    2008 May 27 12:19 PM Reply
  •  
  • If So, why are they all down almost 5% for the day???????
    2008 May 27 12:27 PM Reply
  •  
  • there continues to be apull back from highs, since wheat, etc went hyperbolic. I'm hoping for a bigger correction this summer before this bull heads back up.
    2008 May 27 12:41 PM Reply
  •  
  • Although IPI may be up 46% since its IPO. The stock has seen a downturn the last month ever since it came out on the market. Although i would have loved to got onto the IPO price its just not availbale to the public.

    Any guess on what analyst price target of IPI is (besides soliel financial) and what there EPS will be on the earnings call on june 2.
    2008 May 27 01:02 PM Reply
  •  
  • I think SYT and POT are the best plays of a good bunch. Good article.
    2008 May 27 01:43 PM Reply
  •  
  • The recovery of recent natrual disasters globally leads to higher demand for agricultural related goods.
    IPI has the great potential in following the foot steps of POT in the mid-to-long range performance.
    2008 May 27 01:47 PM Reply
  •  
  • Seems that IPI is riding the coattails of POT. It will be interesting to see what type of earnings they post.

    Agricultural stocks make good sense right now, but with people given the opportunity to bail out of ag and commodity stocks (as oil and gold dropped), they're jumping into tech. Ag was a great place to hide and is a long-term winner, but today was definitely a pullback.
    2008 May 27 08:56 PM Reply
  •  
  • Also, don't forget that Potash prices are set to rise in July, to $1000 per ton. The russian potash producers made this announcement back in April 23. Canpotex will surely follow suit once this happens.
    2008 May 27 11:29 PM Reply
  •  
  • @Vinson:

    BPC (Belarusian Potash Company) has indeed set $1000 prices for July. Canpotex is at $750 because they don't want to shock the market too much with rapid increases. PotashCorp's full year guidance of $9.50-10.50 a share doesn't even take $1000 potash prices into account, but I think we will get there.

    A good quote by PotashCorp CEO during the latest conference call on his reasoning: “We’d rather drink out of the drinking fountain than the fire hose”
    2008 May 27 11:49 PM Reply
  •  
  • I would recommend you people stay clear of fertilizer companies. Unless you got in a year ago, there is too much downside risk. While I believe they have considerable upside, the problem is that unless you get out in time you will be stuck holding these companies for many years at a loss. Think about it - they are fertilizer companies - nothing special. The economics are being driven mainly by oil. No other factor comes close.
    2008 May 28 02:20 AM Reply
  •  
  • Dhinesh how can you miss the oil link? It's common knowledge at this point. The fact is that the population growth does not offer any problems to food demand, as the growth remains on the curve and thus has been accounted for by the ag industry. The only factor that is remotely relevant is the increased incomes in Asia and (let's not forget) Latin America. While one might tend to think that higher wages would cause a disequlibrium in the supply-demand for food, forcing prices higher, the fact is that higher prices would push down any effects of emerging nations switching to more dairy and meat. As for biofuels, they have added to the problem but not as much as one might imagine. The source of the food problem is with record oil prices.

    Oil is the prinicple component of fertilizers and needed for most all farm equipment, as well as for transport of products to retailers.
    2008 May 28 02:30 AM Reply
  •  
  • POT is an OPEC like cartel? How clever! Just what the world needs...another monopoly. POT is overpriced because the company can control supply and the other potash producers are smart enough to see how this cartel can benefit them...at the expense of others.

    As long as someone (anyone) can limit or control supply then they can control prices.

    Monopolies are illegal in the US. There is a good reason to make monopolies illegal. I support the effort by the US Congress to make it possible to sue OPEC. POT is next on my list. Once the cartel that POT is involved in is made illegal potash prices will come down and so will the overpriced potash producers.

    I would also like to add that organic farmers and gardeners use no fertilizer and produce good food. I should know...I have a lovely garden and use no fertilizers, weed killers or bug killers.
    2008 May 28 04:41 AM Reply
  •  
  • The world population is growing exponentially while the amount of grain produced cannot grow at the same rate (even with massive amounts of fertilizers) thus the demand for potash and other fertilizers will out strip the ability to meet demand.This is known as pricing power.Any one know how long it takes to bring on new potash mines?I'm guessing it's about 4 years to get all the neccessary permits and. equipment in place.You do the math.
    2008 May 28 09:15 PM Reply
  •  
  • Both my comments have been removed. Don't like to hear the truth do you, but its ok to publish jjason's idiotic statements about his little organic garden, like that has anything to do with feeding the entire world. Morons
    2008 May 29 01:34 AM Reply
  •  
  • You actually print this third grade geography bullshit in here? The third world skinnies now want to eat burgers and those cost ten pounds of corn? Save the digital storage. It's not the quantity of articles, but the quality.
    2008 May 29 01:34 AM Reply
  •  
  • Hey calvino, check back tomorrow, I'll bet your comment has vanished like my last two did. Like your tone though.
    2008 May 29 01:39 AM Reply
  •  
  • Good discussion on feed, but I prefer to play the softs, not the production end of things, which is too risky.

    Futures in beans, wheat, hogs, cattle and nitrogen etc are all better plays and more profitable. I am also doing well in some local water companies; water will be more important than oil in Asia shortly. Good discussion, but a little out of focus on suggestions and threats.
    2008 May 29 01:26 PM Reply
  •  
  • interesting that we're hearing so much hostility on companies that making it possible to keep people from starving to death.
    2008 May 29 03:20 PM Reply
You've only read the first 20 comments