Seeking Alpha

Bill Gross

In his June 2008 Investment Outlook, Pimco's Bill Gross seriously questions the authenticity of our method of inflation calculation. 

 

Let me reacquaint you with the debate about the authenticity of U.S. inflation calculations by presenting two ten-year graphs – one showing the ups and downs of year-over-year price changes for 24 representative foreign countries, and the other, the same time period for the U.S. An observer’s immediate take is that there are glaring differences, first in terms of trend and second in the actual mean or average of the 2 calculations. These representative countries, chosen and graphed by Ed Hyman and ISI, have averaged nearly 7% inflation for the past decade, while the U.S. has measured 2.6%. The most recent 12 months produces that same 7% number for the world but a closer 4% in the U.S.

This, dear reader, looks a mite suspicious. Sure, inflation was legitimately much higher in selected hot spots such as Brazil and Vietnam in the late 90s and the U.S. productivity “miracle” may have helped reduce ours a touch compared to some of the rest, but the U.S. dollar over the same period has declined by 30% against a currency basket of its major competitors which should have had an opposite effect, everything else being equal. I ask you: does it make sense that we have a 3% – 4% lower rate of inflation than the rest of the world? Can economists really explain this with their contorted Phillips curve, output gap, multifactor productivity theorizing in an increasingly globalized “one price fits all” commodity driven global economy? I suspect not. Somebody’s been foolin’, perhaps foolin’ themselves – I don’t know. This isn’t a conspiracy blog and there are too many statisticians and analysts at the Bureau of Labor Statistics [BLS] and Treasury with rapid turnover to even think of it. I’m just concerned that some of the people are being fooled all of the time and that as an investor, an accurate measure of inflation makes a huge difference.

 

 

He then suggests five global investment solutions to the problem he outlined.

 

What are the investment ramifications? With global headline inflation now at 7% there is a need for new global investment solutions, a role that PIMCO is more than willing (and able) to provide. In this role we would suggest: 1) Treasury bonds are obviously not to be favored because of their negative (unreal) real yields. 2) U.S. TIPS, while affording headline CPI protection, risk the delusion of an artificially low inflation number as well. 3) On the other hand, commodity-based assets as well as foreign equities whose P/Es are better grounded with local CPI and nominal bond yield comparisons should be excellent candidates. 4) These assets should in turn be denominated in currencies that demonstrate authentic real growth and inflation rates, that while high, at least are credible. 5) Developing, BRIC-like economies are obvious choices for investment dollars.

Investment success depends on an ability to anticipate the herd, ride with it for a substantial period of time, and then begin to reorient portfolios for a changing world. Today’s world, including its inflation rate, is changing. Being fooled some of the time is no sin, but being fooled all of the time is intolerable. Join me in lobbying for change in U.S. leadership, the attitude of its citizenry, and (to the point of this Outlook) the market’s assumption of low relative U.S. inflation in comparison to our global competitors.

 

 

 

Print this article with comments

This article has 9 comments:

  •  
    He is right! But, todays employment numbers make it appear that the USA might be in better shape on jobs, and inflation might be moderating from what ever it is to something less, "might" being the operable word. What worries me is that so many well trained economists could get it so wrong. That makes us all wonder about just now corrupt our government might be. "very?"
    2008 Jun 05 01:33 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Although I'm not sure who the author is, I am so glad people like Bill Gross are willing to stand up and call attention to this - not only to his clients, but to the general public as well. I, for one, have a lot of respect for that. Thanks.
    2008 Jun 05 04:18 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If you can't believe their inflation figures why believe the employment figures. Their cooking the books there too. How many people have fallen off the grid since their off unemployment or no longer lookig for a job?
    2008 Jun 05 05:36 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I forgot to mention how moved I was when Bill Gross donated the proceeds of his stamp collection to charity. Bill, if you read this, God is smiling down on you.
    2008 Jun 05 09:50 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Is it true that food and energy prices are left out of the CPI calculations? If so, do other countries leave it out also? Could this be the reason for the wide divergence?
    2008 Jun 06 09:33 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Most Americans don't have a clue on inflation numbers or what it means to them so our Gov't could put out any number and they would believe it. The numbers are intentionally kept low due to social security payout adjustment. What a bunch of pathetic statisticians and analysts at the Bureau of Labor Statistics!!!
    2008 Jun 06 10:40 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "By the rude bridge that arched the flood, here the embattled farmer stood and fired the shot heard round the world."

    Concord, Mass. USA 1776.

    Many men with many rifles ended royal governments around the world and replaced them with massively costly and totally overbearing elected governments throughout the 18 and 19 hundreds.

    The consequences are upon mankind as the 21st century begins.
    The costs of running governments which do nothing but miss allocate resources for wars and roads and space shots and money printing and and set up a multitude of regulations and set up cartels and etc are now reducing real per capita wealth even as most countries chop their populations by one method or another. One child laws in China, abortion in the USA for examples.

    The USA, led by lawyers who now control the three branches of its governments from town to federal level and who enrich themselves by taking money from the corporations they ease into monopoly power positions with permit power and other means.

    Hey, but the good news is that bad governments always crash and burn while the poor inherit the earth and plod on. The western Roman empire crashed and never rose again while a new religion arose. The eastern Roman empire crashed and a new religion arose. The British empire crashed in World War I. The Russian and Germain governments spent the 1900's crashing and burning over and over.

    The individual is alway self educated and will learn what works. Thanks to Bill Gross and others who let the real situation be known.
    2008 Jun 06 12:50 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    disclosure: lg % of my 401 in pimco tip fund

    i don't doubt bill's read on inflation, and especially agree with his call to join him "...in lobbying for change in U.S. leadership, the attitude of its citizenry..." ; but -

    will he do the same if / when deflation is what takes hold?

    absolute returns is what bill advocates (i think), so my guess is...yes

    so i'll hold my tips for now, because, as bill says, "Investment success depends on an ability to anticipate the herd, ride with it for a substantial period of time, and then begin to reorient portfolios for a changing world."

    and the pattern for many hundred yrs seems to be to inflate, then deflate

    even thomas jefferson, in the late 1700's, said:

    "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."

    found on: sonic.net/sentinel/nai...

    maybe bill's saying he's willing and able to help us around that scenario; i hope so :-)
    2008 Jun 06 01:17 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Mofares is close except the folks at BLS just use the formulas that Reagan Adm. gave them. The method for calculating inflation was changed in his first term when it was raging in double digits to protect Corporations from higher pension increases and keep SS COLA costs lower because between them and his tax cuts, the deficit was exploding. GHWBush was right - Voodoo economics were indeed implemented. Now we exclude the price of energy and food, because they decided they were not "core" to inflation. Yet every American pays these costs everyday. How can they not be germane to the rate? Its no accident that under the pre-Reagan method that the inflation rate over the last ten years would have been in the 8-10% range, and under the current method its ranged from 2-4%. Any wonder that the wealth gap has widened substantially since the 80's. A few unaccounted for points of inflation doesn't bother the rich guys much but middle class and lower class Joe keep coming up short no matter what they do.
    2008 Jun 09 03:40 PM | Link | Reply