Ballmer on Newspapers: Wrong Again 9 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
There’s lots of buzz out there about how Microsoft (MSFT) supremo Steve Ballmer figures the newspaper will be dead in 10 years — oh yes, and magazines too. Here’s what he said to the Washington Post:
Here are the premises I have. Number one, there will be no media consumption left in 10 years that is not delivered over an IP network. There will be no newspapers, no magazines that are delivered in paper form.
The former basketball coach and Peter Boyle (as Young Frankenstein) lookalike immediately qualified his comments, of course, saying that “If it’s 14 or if it’s 8, it’s immaterial to my fundamental point.” So there you have it. The end of the newspaper, as foretold by the guy whose company completely missed the importance of the Internet, not to mention the importance of Web-search, and about a dozen other things I don’t have time to go into. No doubt Microsoft will help out with Newspaper 2.0, a piece of shrink-wrapped software that only costs $350 and takes a Pentium Quad Core and 3GB of memory to run.
Seriously though, this is the kind of thing people say to get attention — and I’m not just saying that because I happen to be employed by a newspaper. If anything, I am even more convinced of the digital revolution than Steve is. But will newspapers as we know them disappear in 10 years? No. And not in 14 years either — or 20 for that matter. Will a lot fewer people be reading a printed paper than read one daily now? Undoubtedly. I got asked about the future of papers as part of a panel discussion on recommendation engines at Mesh 2008 a few weeks ago, and I said what I always say: I think lots of people will continue reading papers — just not as many as are reading now.
People still listen to the radio, don’t they? Many of them listen to talk shows, and “radio plays” that consist of actors in a studio somewhere reading their lines. Lots of people still go to live theatre, and to the opera for that matter — heck, people still read books, and that technology is hundreds of years old. But not as many people do those things as used to do them when those forms of entertainment were at their peak. I think it will be exactly the same with newspapers — I fully expect to see people reading them for the remainder of my lifetime; they will just be fewer in number, and younger folk will see them as quaint.
Related Articles
|
Find People on SA
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Authors with the largestSee all
increase in followers
in the last 7 days
Fastest Climbers » -
Top Commenters
Top commenters,See all
as ranked by their peers
Top Commenters » -
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most activeSee all
Instabloggers.
Top Instabloggers » -
Top StockTalkers
TopSee all
StockTalkers.
Top StockTalkers »
This article has 9 comments:
The real reason most of the fluff bits are written is to get more click through to blogs and sites.
Why not just write a please click here to boost me thanks ...
The author used to be a respected tech writer but this is some of the worst Micro-bashing I've ever read.
Is there anyone involved in technology a little that doesn't believe that print will end up in niche markets at best?
The author clearly has decided that his integrity and professionalism as a writer is worth throwing away to jump in with the crowd and write a bunch of bias crap.
Print vs Screen is not as valid as PC vs Typewriter
if you go into a large bookstore, you'll see people loading up on magazines to read and you'll see the kids reading those 'adult comics' and magazines AND books. they ALL have computers, often with them, but they still read the word printed on paper.
i design special zoo exhibits and i always include books the kids can look through...and they go straight to them, holding them close when they leave, not wanting to let go of them. This bodes well for the printed word at least through the next 2 generations!
and have you noticed that there are a lot more magazines these days?
there's a reason.