Seeking Alpha

Hard Assets Investor

From HAI:

By Brad Zigler

U.S. oil refineries are still sluggishly producing fuels, at least by industry analysts' expectations. In fact, refining activity seems to have actually slowed over the past two weeks. Yesterday's Energy Department oil inventories report indicated domestic refiners utilized only 88.6% of their productive capacity last week. Insiders had expected refining capacity to top 90%, a 0.3% increase over the previous week's rate.

Crude oil stocks, which were expected to increase by 100,000 barrels this week, instead fell 4.6 million barrels. At 302.2 million barrels, oil inventories in the U.S. are below average for this time of year. For the week ending June 6, though, a quarterly backwardation of only 14 cents a barrel in the NYMEX term structure indicated oil's supply isn't considered all that tight by market participants.

Expectations about gasoline stocks were largely met by a 1 million barrel increase, though inventories are still below seasonal norms. Insiders anticipated a 1.1 million barrel uptick going into the week. Gasoline demand is still showing signs of slowing from last year's levels. According to the Energy Department, demand for motor fuel is down 1.3% from the same period last year.

Inventories of distillate fuels, including diesel and heating oil, surged 2.3 million barrels, well ahead of analysts' predictions of a 1.5 million barrel increase.

Both the U.S. Energy Department and the International Energy Agency lowered their forecast for global oil consumption for the year, but cautioned that demand continues to accelerate in developing nations like China.

Crude oil prices were higher ahead of the U.S. inventory report as the market adjusted to some of the week's volatile trade. Over the past week, an 8.3% hike in crude oil futures prices pressured the November/December NYMEX crack spread down to $10.91 a barrel, for a gross refining margin of 8.2%. The previous week, the gross profit margin was 9.7%.

The profit squeeze was reflected in a 9.7% decline in the share price of Valero Energy Corp. (NYSE: VLO) this week. Unlike larger oil companies like Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) and ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM), Valero's a pure refining play; the company isn't in the exploration and development business. Exxon's and Chevron's share prices rose 2.5% and 2.9%, respectively, over the past week.

NYMEX Nov./Dec. Crack Spread

NYMEX Nov./Dec. Crack Spread
 
Print this article with comments

This article has 16 comments:

  •  
    Seems like big oil is fudging their oil stock numbers. In stead of raising taxes and creating windfall taxes, Congress should pass laws that make executives criminally libel for misinformation on their oil stocks. If speculation is driving prices, and speculators use these numbers to buy and sell, seems to me Big Oil has a opportunity to keeps prices high if they fudge these numbers. These numbers above don't make sense.
    2008 Jun 12 08:41 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    This may be the impact of the growing net (oil) export problem. Imports are down significantly from Venzuela and Mexico; and the turn around time for shipping from the Middle East is 5 times longer than from the Carribbean. Just a hunch........ It would be worth while checking where the shortfalls are occurring. If it is in the Gulf refineries I am not surprised.

    This is what is known as the Export Land effect - oil exporting countries have rapidly growing domestic consumption and stagnant or declining production dealing a double blow to net exports. Globally exports of oil are down some 2m barrels since 2005.
    2008 Jun 12 08:44 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Is it possible for Big Oil to fudge their stocks by 4.6 million barrels? Why would they do that? If they could keep the price of a barrel of oil high, that's why they'd do that. Speculators keep the prices high based on these numbers being reported. Instead of windfall taxes and things like that, Congress needs to pass laws making Oil Execs criminally libel for reporting misinformation, intentionally or otherwise. These number are too important, and they make no sense. Things aren't apples-and-apples its seems to me.
    2008 Jun 12 08:48 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The lower utilization number from refiners seems significant. It supports the theory that oil companies are expecting the demand to slacken in face of the high retail prices. Seasonal norm may not hold when people (in CA anyhow) are looking at the approach of $5/gallon gas.
    2008 Jun 12 08:54 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I love the idiot out there who use the term "Big Oil" as an answer to all the problems. Here's one for all of you...first, the federal govt recieves royalty of 12.5% (minimum) on all revenues from oil and gas on federal lands or waters. That number today is immense at these crude prices. Second, all of the off-limits oil and gas (80+ billion barrels estimated recoverable)...what is the value of those resources that our liberal friends won't allow us to obtain. Thried, if we were to tap into those resources, consider what might be done with the federal royalties in terms of expenditures for research and development of alternative fuels, etc. Or, what about gas price relief. For all of you morons who want to attack "Big Oil" as the problem, why don't you spend a little time investigating what the values are that I've just described. Then you will see where the problem is.
    2008 Jun 12 09:05 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    RKoo-

    Astute observation about the refinery utilization rate. The notion that refiners expect a slackening of demand, or more particularly, a surfeit of supply, is bolstered by the shrinking backwardation and emergence of a contango in NYMEX spreads.


    Thanks for your comment.
    2008 Jun 12 09:11 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If demand is down, why is it surprising that refinery utilization is lower?
    2008 Jun 12 09:15 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The other reason for decrease refinery utilization is because refiner's crack spread is too low. What is the sense of running their refineries hard, on;ly to increase supply of gasoline as demand is slackening?

    By decreasing refinery utilization (ie, decreasing supply of gasoline made), refiners can boost their profit margins closer to 10% (from about 8%).

    Jack Yetiv
    2008 Jun 12 09:18 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Jack Yetiv -

    EXACTLY! Now you know why we run the crack spread figures on Hard Assets Investor (HardAssetsInvestor.com) every week. If investors would look at the oil business as a business, they can gain insight into pricing.
    2008 Jun 12 09:36 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    You nailed it Jack. And Saildog nailed the reason for declining Crude Stocks. Refiners are slowing down, because gas stocks are rising, demand for US Gasoline is falling (slightly). Why would a refiner pay his guys overtime to work their butts off against that backdrop?

    But even though refiners are slowing down, the supply of oil (in the form of imports) is slowing even faster.

    As Saildog puts it, Ven/Mexico oil is in serious decline, so we are forced to buy more from further away across the Atlantic. That takes more tankers (something like a 5 to 1 ratio or higher - compared to gulf suppliers) to achieve the same flow. Those tankers dont exsist - so instead we just get less of the stuff.

    In addition those suppliers are already selling everything they have to Europe and Asia, so we must compete for that oil - hence pressure driving crude prices higher.

    The concept of Big oil fudging the stock numbers is entertaining. But the SEC strictly checks the books. The risks are too great. If Big oil really had that much power, why did they spend a decade languishing in sub $20 oil and flirting with banckruptcy?

    Whats interesting to note, is that the EIA news last week (Wed June 4th) said much the same thing as the news Yesterday - June 11th. Yet the markets response was very different. Last week the market responded to the increase in gasoline stocks and weakening demand, and overlooked the crude picture. Then Morgan Stanley put them straight with a story about tanker traffic.

    This week you could argue weve got noise from folks moving money around responding to the dollars movement.
    2008 Jun 12 09:41 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Everyone is making the case of supply and demand. The Saudian Oil Minister was quoted as saying actual purchases of OPEC oil does not show a supply/demand situation. The oil stocks figure shows oil co.s are expecting reduced demand. The ones who are claiming high demand are Lehman and Merrill Lynch who benefit from hedge fund purchases of futures and Gazprom who wants to talk up the price.I believe we are looking at a possibility of another hedge fund blowup that can sink Lehman and Merrill as well as put the financial markets in another crisis. The govt had better reign in the hedge funds before chaos reigns.
    2008 Jun 12 09:50 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Does someone have demand numbers for India and China? Reports last month indicated China demand was down 1% year over year. US driving down 4.5% in first quarter. Master Card said service activity down over 7% in May. The Saudis appear to have it correct: speculation is driving the price not demand. Not hearing any more about the investigations that were in the news two weeks ago. Anyone know what is happening?
    2008 Jun 12 11:14 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If you are a supplier - you control how much you supply.
    You can only control demand by the prices you charge which are determined by the price the consumer is willing to pay.
    I remember all the bullshit about - well, as supply increases the price will go down. Draw your own conclusions. We will pay whatever we have to and the suppliers now realize that and also realize they do not have to compete to make money. Ever wonder how it is or was that all the stations increased their prices the same amount and at the same exact time ? And when the price of oil went up gas prices immediately followed but never went down the same way ? Now it just goes up no matter what oil does. Remember LIFO & FIFO, competition, free markets, etc. ?
    Miraculous how ALL those stations took delivery simultaneously the night before the prices changed the next morning. The whole process is very carefully orchestrated, is a monopoly and always has been especially since the independents have been forced out by the oil companies. I watched them doing it starting back in the 70's and they finally succeeded. Anybody have any numbers on how many independents are still around ? We know it, they know we know it, they have us by the balls and there's NOTHING meaningful we can do about it - at least in the short run.
    And they know that too.
    I'm having a hell of a time trying to figure out which one of my 5 Hummers I have to sell - gotta do my part as a good American - you know - like me & Arnold.
    2008 Jun 12 01:30 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Until the regulations that apply to the rest of the commodities marketeers are put back on the books for the hedge funds, pension funds, endownment funds for colleges, etc, we'll continue to see undue rises in price of gasoline, corn, wheat, soybeans, diesel, etc. These entities have been given the keys to the vault and are greedily emptying all of the available cash that they can while George is still in the "Big House" on Pennsylvania Avenue. Hopefully Barack or John will put an end to this raping of the American consumer.
    2008 Jun 12 01:31 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Gas demand really isn't down all that much. Most are touting figures that Mastercard reported gas sales down 4%+ but the reality is many people are switching over to paying by cash. This because many stations are offering discounts for cash.
    2008 Jun 12 07:06 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Who are these "analysts"? their names, please.
    Moreover, who is paying them?
    and why are they not yet unemployed?
    2008 Jun 12 06:51 AM | Link | Reply