Seeking Alpha
About this author:
Submit
an article to

From the straws-in-wind department: in Minneapolis-St. Paul last month, the inventory of homes listed for sale fell to its lowest level since 2004, while pending home sales in the market were just 7.6% below they were a year ago, less than the double-digit declines seen in recent months. Out in Southern California, meanwhile, the Orange County Register's Jon Lanser notes that the O.C. residential real estate market is going through a bifurcation. Asking prices for homes in the top quartile by pricing have risen for five straight months, while asking prices homes in the bottom quartile keep on falling. Like so:

Orange County Residential Real Estate Listings
Top- and Bottom -Quartile Median Asking Prices



Source: Orange County Register

This is consistent with the fact, illustrated by
maps like this of a neighborhood in Denver , that foreclosures tend to be bunched together in specific newly developed or fringe areas. It's also consistent with another fact, noted here last week , that in Orange County, at least, foreclosures and short sales now dominate home listings at the low end of the market. Possible moral of story: the broad-based, nationwide decline in home prices of the past 18 months may be on the verge ending, and morphing into one that's still occurring in multiple markets, but only within certain lower-priced neighborhoods. As always, accuracy of predictions not guaranteed.

Print this article with comments
Comments
17
Comments 1 - 17 out of 17
You are viewing the latest 20 comments
  •  
    I think it's too early to call an end to the real estate decline. Investors and analysts waste too much time studying charts and reports and data looking for signs that the slide has finally ended. The reality is that the actual prices of homes still haven't come down to reasonable levels because all the people duped by shady real estate agents and appraisers won't let go of the fantasy that their three bedroom rancher built in 1930 located in mediocre school district is worth 500,000. Many Americans still can't afford to buy a house. And Americans are changing. Young people today aren't as willing to work their lives away paying off a mortgage. Why am I going to invest in a crap hole with a 1800.00 per month payment for 30 years in a declining market when I can rent the same place for 1100.00 and not be responsible for repairs or updates or taxes? When the bubble was building an agent told me that housing here in Providence RI would NEVER decline because it was commutable to Boston. But I knew she was full of crap because there's a natural ebb and flow to all market movement. Nothing goes up forever. Our current real estate market has not hit the bottom and when it does it's not going to shoot back up and make everyone pretend rich again. It's going bounce along the bottom. Everything is changing. Adapt.
    2008 Jun 13 12:37 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Listings don't matter. Sales matter. Sales are still well below their year-ago levels, and the ratio of asking/closed prices is a primary indicator of whether homes are properly priced for their markets.

    It would be more informative to show what sales have been in those bifurcated markets. I'm guessing that sales in the lower quartiles have been brisk recently because banks are more willing to unload REO properties than they were 6 months ago. Another thing that might be pushing up asking prices in the upper quartile is homes that went to foreclosure and have now dropped out of that quartile because their asking prices fell. The effect is the same, but the mechanism speaks to weakness, not strength.

    In short, I don't think there's enough data here to make any value judgments. And I still think that the bottom of the RE market is a long way off.

    When median home prices fall to an inflation adjusted pre-bubble level, AND inventory becomes more normalized, AND prices drop so that median income families can afford to purchase, AND foreclosures cease to dominate the resale market, THEN you might conclude that the bottom has been reached.

    Until all those situations occur, keep silent.
    2008 Jun 13 01:17 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Year over year figures are a little misleading because the housing market has been down for more than a year now. How do sales compare to 2 years ago?
    2008 Jun 13 04:26 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    @billddrummer

    I agree with you. And also want to add that the rules of qualifying for a mortgage have gone back to normal and a lot of lenders are being much more strict with their mortgages. This lowers the amount of people that can qualify for a mortgage, and further adds to the lack of demand.
    2008 Jun 14 07:59 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    It seems to me that the stock market still has some head winds but maybe the real estate market is leveling off. I sure hope we see some increase in sales and values.
    2008 Jun 14 09:32 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    From all accounts and research it appears that the real estate market will not pick up until 2012 and probably stay at pre 2004 prices. I suggest that we keep this in mind and adapt to the new realty. It is old supply/demand theiry and that eventually always works.
    2008 Jun 14 09:53 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Like any market, a bounce within a downtrend will deceive! If this is just another bounce, the "bull trap" will only prolong what NEEDS to happen before any hope of a bottom - PRICES STILL NEED TO FALL.
    2008 Jun 14 10:19 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I love all the experts on here making their own predictions (the comments that is). Hilarious. Here in Phoenix the activity sub $300K is unreal, mainly because the bank owned homes that were bought in the $400K range are now $250-300K and selling like hotcakes. The over $1 million range is moving, and the central locations are seeing increased activity as well. The biggest problem here and in most cities are the suburban mcmansions. Big box cookie cutters 3,000+ sq ft in the $500-800K range that nobody wants. Those are the thorn in the market's side.

    There is no national market, and the REO's skew numbers. Take the normal trend line from the early 2000's and we're just about back in that range.

    No, I am not a real estate agent either, but I do own a few homes.
    2008 Jun 14 10:49 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Prices need to fall to 1985 levels I tell you!!!!! How DARE you publish something remotely positive! Argh!!!!!!!!!!!
    2008 Jun 14 11:00 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The housing market is fine for those with money. Housing prices are going up, still. It's the newcomer or person with less money who suffers with the continued high cost of real estate.
    2008 Jun 14 11:00 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Good comments johndough 110. I'm in Phoenix as well and noticing the same trends. Don't know if we are at the bottom given all the headwinds but I smile a little more these days. Too many people like to watch train wrecks so they refuse to acknowledge good news when it comes along.
    2008 Jun 14 11:51 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The author quotes ". Asking prices for homes in the top quartile by pricing have risen for five straight months, while asking prices homes in the bottom quartile keep on falling."

    That's because the wealthy in O.C. can afford to buy homes, while the poor and middle class cannot. I doubt that the real estate market can maintain itself of only sales of high priced homes. I suspect that the Baltic Ave. and Mediterranean Ave. homes are the bread and butter of the real estate business and our economy as a whole. I might add that as Target and Sears get pummeled, Tiffany is doing OK.... Similar?

    Thx jegan ;-)
    2008 Jun 14 12:38 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I am surprised there are so few comments about rent vs. buy. Home prices won’t stabilize until the premium for mortgage payments comes down (there will always be some premium because of tax benefits and life style preferences).

    A drop in mortgage payments could happen in a number of ways: (a) lower home prices (likely) or (b) lower interest rates (unlikely). Stricter lending guidelines have probably had the most dramatic effect thus far on home prices. Simply cutting out all the fake demand created by exotic mortgages (negative equity, interest-only, Alt-A, etc.) has been bringing home prices back to 2004 levels since people can afford much less home with traditional mortgages.

    The next step and bigger unknown will be the impact of excess supply. All these homes on the market (new construction incentives, speculators walking away from their homes, foreclosures) will continue to pressure home prices. How much prices drop depends on the urgency to sell.

    Ironically, as home owners leave the market and become renters, there is a stabilizing effect on home prices. More rental demand drive up rental prices, which cuts the premium on ownership vs. remaining a renter.

    The biggest variable on the horizon, in my opinion, is how much inflation we will experience in the upcoming years. How would high inflation affect our low interest rate mortgages? You can bet that there would be plenty more downside in home prices at that point.

    So where are we now? Fortune says we are on the order of 20% over-valued in the formerly hottest real estate markets. NY Times says that home prices would have to go up 5% a year for 5 years to make buying a home a clear-cut decision. Over-valued? Yes. Grossly over-valued? Not really.

    And to those thinking there is something catastrophic going on in our economy that will hit home prices further, I would add that most of the macro-economic numbers are still fairly strong. GDP Growth is anemic but ok. Unemployment is STILL historically low which is the key to consumer spending (2/3 of GDP). Most likely, we will just kind of bounce around this level surrounded by lots of fear and uncertainty for a few years. Then we’ll just get used to it.
    2008 Jun 14 08:58 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    In the UK house prices have recently begon falling too.

    There is a strange difference between the main stream news in the UK and USA:

    Where in the UK right from the start of this decline in home values folks talked about the relationship between median income and median house price, in the USA you can only find talk like that on more specialized blogs.

    May there is a easy to understand explanation for this:

    When you compare US median income and house prices over the period 1996 to 2006 (when the bubble started to burst) you arrive at a stunning bubble size of 50%!!!

    In home equity this is about 11.5 trillion US$.

    Ok ok, in some places in the USA prices did not rise that much and in other places it was even far beyond a 50% bubble size.

    But all in all the law of gravity will apply and the historical relation between income and house prices will be there again.
    2008 Jun 15 02:52 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Keep dreaming - look at what the Pay Option ARM and Alt-A charts are showing at the higher end:
    bubbletracking.blogspo.../
    mrmortgage.ml-implode..../
    2008 Jun 15 06:57 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To johndough 110,

    Glad to hear that the Phoenix market is starting to move, at least at the ends.

    My question to you is this: How much inventory is there in relation to sales? In Northern NV (admittedly a puny market compared to yours) inventory ranges from an 11-month supply at the low end to a 5+ year supply for homes listed for over $1 million.

    Most realtors I know say a 'balanced' market is 6 months of inventory. How long will it take to bring the market back into balance? Well, as long as more foreclosures are added to the pool than sales subtract from it, it seems that supply will continue to outstrip demand, resulting in even lower prices.

    But again, I'm glad to see a glimmer of light around the storm clouds.

    Bill
    2008 Jun 16 01:31 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    WAKEUP needs to take his/her own name to heart and wakeup. The "dirt is worth more than the house?" What? The reality is the exact opposite!! The dirt is worth nothing, or has a negative value, and the only value is in the improvements. If construction costs (2500 s.f. home) are at (an average SoCal number) lets say 75K for a finished lot, and all in $130 p.s.f for vertical, then you are at 400K turn key, with no land. If this home is selling for $160 ps.f. (or you can purchase a comp for same) where is the value in the dirt???? Even if sales price goes up, there is still no margin to build unless you were given the dirt or have a very very low basis.

    I wish you were right, as I own hundreds of paper lots in SoCal, but you are not. In any price crash, the land always takes the hit, because construction costs are a "relative" constant. Labor might go down (supply and demand) while material might go up....but as a per square foot price for a home drops, the only place that can take the hit is the land.
    2008 Jun 16 01:34 PM | Link | Reply
Viewing Comments 1-17 out of 17