Seeking Alpha
About this author:
Submit
an article to

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Soaring gasoline prices helped drive up overall U.S. consumer prices during May by the fastest rate in six months, but core prices remained tame, a government report today showed. But 12-month core prices advanced 2.3% as expected (see chart above).

 

Note that core CPI inflation (less food and energy, data here) has been below 3% now for 149 consecutive months, since January of 1996 (shaded area above). Also notice that there is a huge difference between the inflationary 1970s and today - in the inflationary 1970s (fueled by excessive money creation) ALL prices were rising simultaneously at double-digits rates, EVEN the non-energy and non-food items of the CPI. Today, except for energy and food prices, core inflation is contained, low and stable, as is growth in the monetary base, suggesting that the concern about inflation is well... inflated.

Also, compared to a recent peak close to 3% during 2006, the core inflation rate is lower today, and has been generally declining since late 2007.

Rising energy prices alone cannot cause inflationary increases in all goods and services, as the situation today suggests, with core inflation remaining low and stable despite rising energy prices. Keep in mind also that during the double-digit inflation in the U.S. during the 1970s, fueled by expansionary monetary policy, the German central bank demonstrated much greater monetary restraint, and inflation in Germany never exceeded 8% in any year during the 1970s and averaged only 5% during that decade (despite experiencing the same increase in world oil prices as the U.S.).

Print this article
Comments
33
You are viewing the first 20 comments View all »
     
  • One difference between now & the 1970's, the govt. has changed the calculation of inflation so that it is now significantly understated. So a comparison is like apples & oranges.
    2008 Jun 13 05:51 PM Reply
  •  
  • Ah, but we have yet to experience President Obama.
    2008 Jun 13 06:01 PM Reply
  •  
  • Get real Mark Perry. The focus on core CPI is flawed, plus inflation calculations have been changed since 1983 to understate real inflation. Read Kevin Williams' book, Bad Money. Even the bond king, PIMCO's Bill Gross, is questioning the inflation numbers. See his June 2008 investment outlook at www.pimco.com/LeftNav/...
    2008 Jun 13 06:40 PM Reply
  •  
  • Yes, a simple comparison between the way CPI was calculated in the 1970s-80s and now is quite instructive. An ongoing survey I have been making over the past few years, based on products I buy all the time, indicates a real inflation rate of at least 10% and perhaps as much as 12%. Anyone who declares that the core inflation rate since 2007 has been declining isn't working with a full set of tools.
    2008 Jun 13 06:41 PM Reply
  •  
  • Mark may be on to something. In the 70s, everything inflated (with the exception of equities) including wages. Today there is deflation in real estate and electronics and disinflation in equities.
    2008 Jun 13 06:45 PM Reply
  •  
  • Jake--you can't have wage inflation if the CPI is jiggered not to recognize price inflation.

    1. The dollar has fallen against all major currencies.
    2. The price of oil and its products has at least doubled in the past year.
    3. The price of food has nearly doubled in the past two years.

    All three phenomena are another way of saying "the US dollar is suffering from inflation".
    2008 Jun 13 06:56 PM Reply
  •  
  • As for wages, I'm not aware of any upwards wage pressure. In fact, if anything, wages seem to be disinflating a bit. The evidence on my part is anecdotal based on friends and acquaintances, but that's how it seems...
    2008 Jun 13 08:43 PM Reply
  •  
  • PS- As an aside, with unions less prevalent than they were in the 70s, these big collective wage agreements that used to happen which would result in wages ramping up 10% a year or the like are certainly nowhere in sight.
    2008 Jun 13 08:45 PM Reply
  •  
  • Yes, today is a bit different from the '70, but far less so than you claim. Here's a chart that shows the "official" CPI with the CPI if we were still using the same methodology in use during the stagflation era:

    dshort.com/inflation/i...

    We don't yet have wage inflation, which creates an inflationary spiral. But the level of consumer suffering is indeed approaching the '70s.
    2008 Jun 13 10:18 PM Reply
  •  
  • is the lack of wage inflation (which i agree with) to be viewed as a positive in the face of dramatically higher costs of food, clothing and shelter? i don't think so.

    yes, i said shelter...

    one of the great ironies of declining housing prices is that only new buyers benefit but there are far fewer of them today than in the recent past when teaser interest rates and no money down mortgages drew millions into the market. many are now permanent exiles from the market, either having or will having lost their homes to foreclosure or becoming walkaways because the economics now work against them. notwithstanding recent declines, houses are still too expensive for many entering the workforce....partly because of anemic wage growth and loss of many higher-paying jobs to outsourcing but also due to more stringent lending standards which have eliminated many would be homeowners from the market. the bottom line is that declining home prices have helped the few but hurt the many. look for more downside. housing prices are still too high.

    given the choice between rising nonwage inflation only or rising wage and nonwage inflation i'll take the latter. it might not be what the fed would like to see, but since when did the fed ever give a damn about the man on the street?

    a personal note:

    i sold my overpriced house in july 2007. i subsenquently rented an apartment on a 7 month lease but i moved when they tried to increase my rent by about 7 percent when the lease expired. the lease on my new apartment expires in august and i was just informed that my new rent will cost me 15% more. i have lived there a year. i'll move, of course, as much to deny them the privelege of screwing me as any rent i might save. don't count on experiences like mine to be reflected in the consumer price index. the feds like their numbers massaged.
    2008 Jun 13 10:38 PM Reply
  •  
  • icandoitdon, I'm not surprised rents are rising; you're competing for apartments with a bunch of foreclosed ex-owned homers! Still, one wonders why you didn't negotiate a 5-year lease with 4% annual increases - a level I'd consider very reasonable given how closely it approximates the 5-year Treasury note yield.

    Nevertheless, your point is well-taken; "owner's equivalent rent" occupies an absurdly large portion of the CPI relative to either real rents or the actual price of a house. No one seriously doubts that it understates price increases except perhaps our author; the only real controversy is one of degree. If real prices are rising by 5% a year, we're probably ok (the long bond is rapidly approaching that level). If they're rising by 12% a year, we're in big trouble because the bond and oil vigilantes simply don't have enough market power to force the issue that far.
    2008 Jun 13 11:22 PM Reply
  •  
  • If you are purchaser of electronics, or a washer & dryer, well then I probably agree...there's no inflation

    I.E. the Core CPI.

    However...if you're like me: If you regularly buy fuel, use transportation, need hospital services, eat food at home, pay tuition, require medical care, eat out, drink booze, and pay rent...

    DONT TELL ME THAT THERE IS NO INFLATION!
    2008 Jun 14 12:53 AM Reply
  •  
  • Dr Joke Perry, this is not April fools day as it is now June and the US department of lies has you hook line and sinker with their gov generated figures.

    It might be time to go back to school or at least down to the end of the street.

    Get real, you are being suckered.
    2008 Jun 14 05:55 AM Reply
  •  
  • To the comment -Ah, but we have yet to experience President Obama

    Give me a break, G Bush and a unfiied republician congress during his first term expanded spending more than any administration in history, perhaps more than all combined. Give your comment on that, remember the quote from Bush "I want the prescription bill on my desk now". One thing mr pres- you didn't fund the bill- you passed the cost to our kids. You talk about Obama. I would rather have 'tax and spend' than "tax cut and spend". The latter passes the cost of social programs to our kids. It is the republican way
    2008 Jun 14 08:43 AM Reply
  •  
  • First 6 years, fjd, not just the first term. That Medicare D the Rs broke arms to push through is costing our grandchildren a fortune, giving the health insurers a windfall, not benefiting most seniors very much, and confusing everybody. It's got to be made part of regular Medicare in February.

    This has been a credit card administration.
    2008 Jun 14 09:36 AM Reply
  •  
  • Dr. Perry presents a thoughtful and reasoned concept, based upon the same flawed reasoning as the present process for determining the CPI. Born in the depression and living through a number of economic cycles it is clear those my age can see and understand inflation and the fact the CPI is greater then that which the leadership of our country wish us to believe. The economy has been poorly managed by those who are driven by greed. The common man knows it is time to put in place new and realistic leadership with an honest economic plan.
    2008 Jun 14 10:15 AM Reply
  •  
  • Perry--Ive known that there is little or no inflation but you explain it well. Many believe what they want.

    Gold crashing as well as real estate. We are deflating as Japan did during the 1990s and we did in the 1930s. When debt is removed (what is happening now) its called deflation.

    Most of these people dont beleive the government and are looking for a man on horseback (a Hitler).

    Jakester is right. The rest of these people must be given an F. I'm sure none of them are in your classes.
    2008 Jun 14 10:48 AM Reply
  •  
  • By the "rule of 72" at any inflation rate above 7.2% prices double in 10 years. At 5% prices double in 14 years. At 2% it takes 35 years for prices to double.

    On the other hand, high inflation made it easier to pay off fixed rate mortgages. A 6% fixed mortgage looks cheap when salaries are rising to keep up with inflation.

    An ordinary insured S&L account payed 5%, certificates of deposit (CDs) payed more and money market mutual funds payed much more.





    2008 Jun 14 11:02 AM Reply
  •  
  • fjd10595, "more than all combined" - that would be FDR. I didn't particularly agree with Bush's prescription bill. Still, everyone and his uncle seemed to be calling for it at the time (AARP had bags made up that said "Rx in Medicare NOW"), and I have no doubt that there would be some kind of prescription benefit in Medicare by now anyway. And at least Republicans react negatively when their leadership spends too much. Democrats make big spenders their heros, and I would reference FDR on that.
    2008 Jun 14 11:33 AM Reply
  •  
  • Last week's economic reports were so poor(despite the temporary boost in retail sales due to the tax rebate) that the only good thing I posted was a chart showing how the difference in the 6-month vs 18- month annualized rate in the CPI should start approaching negative territory. This should give the Fed some breathing room.

    2008 Jun 14 11:41 AM Reply
You've only read the first 20 comments