Here's What Will Happen To Apple's Rivals
Business Week investigates what the iPhone’s impact is going to be on rival high-end phone makers like RIM, Palm, Nokia, etc. I’ll save you the read - the answer is summed up in the image to the right.
It’s true, Apple only sold 6 million iPhones in its first year, out of a billion or so handsets sold worldwide. But remember that they are currently available in only a couple of countries. And in the U.S., they’ve grabbed a 25+% share of the smart phone market. And that was with a slow, no-GPS, expensive device (here’s our side-by-side comparison of the iPhone v. the RIM Blackberry 8820 from a year ago).
Imagine the havoc they will wreak with the twice-as-fast, half-as-expensive, GPS-enabled, Exchange-supported 3G iPhone that they’ll unleash on 22 countries this year.
In short, it must be really unpleasant to be in this business and not be Apple right now.
Related Articles
|
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »




This article has 28 comments:
- ktwalrus
- 7 Comments
Jun 16 08:43 AMAlso, "twice-as-fast&qu... is Apple marketing hype that only applies to use of the iPhone for browsing/downloading in areas that have 3G service available. In the US, much of the country will only have EDGE for a long time. The processor in the new iPhone is exactly the same as the original so for many, the iPhone will not see any speed improvements.
- marek
- 3 Comments
Jun 16 08:53 AM- Toni
- 107 Comments
Jun 16 09:07 AMIdiots asking that to himself will sell the stock, to regret that the following quarters.
- Medici
- 50 Comments
My Website
Jun 16 09:12 AM- VERONICA
- 10 Comments
Jun 16 09:17 AMIt's nice to see a writer who "gets it." Thanks for weighing in. I've seen SO many articles that say something to the effect of, "Yes the iPhone is neat, BUT blah, blah, blah..." and most analysts certainly don't seem to get it.
The iPhone, like the iPod before it, is both a technological AND social marvel that PEOPLE are waiting in line to get their hands on. It's this double whammy and subsequent desire that should be making the investment community pay attention.
Thanks for listening.
Veronica
- Tom B
- 1697 Comments
Jun 16 09:31 AMJobs is the most amazing business innovator than Edison. Blows Gates out of the water. I hope he lives a LONG time and stays with Apple.
BUT-- if that is not to be-- friendly merger with Google? Schmidt's no dummy.
- Tom B
- 1697 Comments
Jun 16 09:34 AMSINCE Edison --typo
- Tommo_UK
- 204 Comments
My Website
Jun 16 09:38 AM- Firestar
- 2 Comments
Jun 16 10:11 AM- .crazylegs..
- 103 Comments
Jun 16 10:57 AMAlso, please consider the $199 price tag is a headline maker. Look deeper and determine how many end users are post paid, contract restricted. This number is actually far fewer than one would believe given that most subscribers outside of the US are pay as you go. What will be the price of the device for them (and those inside the US who aren't eligible for upgrade)? I don't know but my bet is at $500-600, and I could be low.
How many countries is iPhone in on the 3G launch? Around 80. How many countries does RIM sell into? Over 125. How many networks does iPhone sell on? I haven't calculated but it's somewhere north of that 80 number, maybe 90. How many networks does RIM sell into? Try almost 400.
This article is really flimsy stuff. Dig deeper, look at some macro numbers, and then report your findings. And what's funny is that I think the iPhone will just kill it in the coming years...but don't be fooled into believing the hype.
- Texrat
- 33 Comments
My Website
Jun 16 11:28 AMSometimes I am amazed at the slathering naivete that appears in stock analysis articles. But commenter J Lazerow above got it right. Read and learn.
- Tom B
- 1697 Comments
Jun 16 11:48 AMLike, they have a choice? Theyv'e been sitting on their tushes for, like, 15 years. The future of phones = not just a LITTLE smart, but VERY smart. Apple has done it, the others have tried and failed repeatedly.
- Dan W
- 1 Comment
Jun 16 12:19 PM- blah-blah
- 331 Comments
Jun 16 01:23 PMI blame myself, not the author for the 2 mins of my life I just wasted and will never get back...
- samij
- 108 Comments
Jun 16 02:23 PMnice round number :) what about you make an alternative estimations based on the market share iphone achieved in france, germany and the uk. that way you might get an blog post resemling something other than fanboy rambling.
- Firestar
- 2 Comments
Jun 16 02:34 PMYeah right. Phones that are lighter, faster and smarter than the iphone are already available in mature markets.
HTC will see a projected revenue of $5 billion. If you've been anywhere near Asia you'll have heard of them. Please take a look at HTC.com and tell me why would anybody living in Japan, Singapore, China... or the UK for that matter (Orange, O2, T-Mobile and Vodafone sell HTC) switch to the iphone?
- .crazylegs..
- 103 Comments
Jun 16 03:39 PM- Texrat
- 33 Comments
My Website
Jun 16 04:23 PMOf course they have a choice, especially Nokia with its 40% global market share. Apple isn't infallible (google 'apple failures') so this hyperbolic talk implying Jobs walks on water and the iPhone will be completely destroying all comers is sheer nonsense (if the latter were true, Apple would have made enough iPhones for every current cell phone user). Yes, the product is successful and will be going forward (assuming Apple doesn't turn it into a RAZR) but claiming it's enough to obliterate established giants is beyond naive.
Nokia certainly has the breadth and depth to survive the iPhone, and then some. Take your rose-colored shades off and watch.
- LifeSentence
- 2 Comments
Jun 16 04:34 PMBoth Apple and RIM have a huge space to grow into. Just because one company has spectacular sales, it doesn't necessarily come at the expense of the other. And to be perfectly honest, RIM and Apple really only compete with eachother except in that fringe where the two niches collide. RIM dominates the business segment and Apple dominates that non-professional one. To think that either of these segments will collapse under the pressure of one company or another is foolishness.
- tom1234
- 175 Comments
Jun 17 08:10 AM- mollytjm
- 213 Comments
Jun 17 08:45 AM- monrio
- 3 Comments
Jun 17 08:54 AMTying iPod success to iPhone success is superficial.
- Jon T
- 296 Comments
Jun 17 09:15 AMThe iPhone is going to clean up and in 5 years time we'll still be looking for that illusive iPhone killer.
Just as no MP3 maker has produced an iPod killer.
- Brewer
- 344 Comments
Jun 17 11:43 AMFolks, there is no such thing as a real keyboard on any of these devices. The iPhone screen keyboard is immensely more adaptive. What RIMM and others call a 'real' QUERTY keyboard is a joke. Of course, if you hunt and peck, it might make no difference, but if that is the case, then you can use an on screen keyboard just as well because you know you are slower than a snail at typing anyway. I'm quite slow when having to type this way myself, but I find that the iPhone is very smart at how it presents the correct keys in context. You can't exactly pull up a new keyboard of symbols on your 'real' keyboard, can you?
The internet isn't a 'real' experience. When we say we 'go' to a web site, that implies something virtual. Would you think the internet is a significant technological development? How smart is that 'real' keyboard when you are shoving it into your pocket?
- PK de C'ville
- 88 Comments
Jun 17 05:36 PMCan you spell p o c k e t c o m p u t e r?
How about T o a s t?
Sorry. Like Mike says, the game's over.
- Brian Bober
- 12 Comments
My Website
Jun 17 09:26 PMSteve Jobs noted the number of Fortune 500 companies participating in the iPhone version 2. This is directly related to a desire to eliminate the RIMM servers they currently maintain to support Blackberry's proprietary e-mail software. I'm actively looking for a good entry point for a APPL / RIMM pair trade.
- .crazylegs..
- 103 Comments
Jun 18 02:06 PM- It uses a tremendous amount if precious device resources like battery power.
- It is not totally secure.
- The device pings the mail server. What large security minded corporation wants to open their firewalls to incoming pings?
This is just the tip of the iceberg. Don't believe the hype. The iPhone will kill it, no doubt, but so will RIM, and even some others, as the market for smartphones explodes. Good luck on your paired trade...
- Texrat
- 33 Comments
My Website
Jun 18 05:34 PMThanks for the acknowledgment, monrio.
It helps that I'm heavily involved in the industry. ; )
More by Michael Arrington
Articles on related themes
PCs & Servers
iPods and Other Portable Music and Video Players
Cell Phones
Enterprise Storage