Seeking Alpha
About this author:
Submit
an article to

On Friday, I was about to write that it appears the continuing bad news makes me want to just go sit in the sidelines and wait for better days. The housing down turn is turning into a 4 year odyssey of pain for homeowners. Gas prices are causing SUV owners to trade in for Vespas. The recession that has been forecast by many actually appears to be arriving.

Every time the stock market makes a modest gain, it gives it up and then some over the next few sessions. Stocks I believe are good values lose 50% of that value. Finally, the floods in Iowa strike close to home both personally and in regards to some of my investment choices. So by market close on Friday I was ready to pack it in for a few months.

Then I started thinking about some the the stocks that have been so disappointing and realized that opportunities like we have now do not come along very often. Many stocks are priced like their entire sector or industry is going out of business.

First, off many energy companies are going to do very, very well in this environment. My exposure is probably a little light here, but some of the stocks in my Income Portfolio should do very well over the next couple of years. Take a look at Penn West Energy Trust (PWE), Inergy (NRGY) and Atlas Pipeline (APL) for growing earnings and dividends. On the growth side, Headwaters (HW) is rolling out technologies to clean waste coal and process oil sludge into extra energy sources.

The market is also acting like every airline will go bankrupt due to high fuel prices. A well run profitable, fuel efficient airline like Copa Holdings (CPA) should pick up market share and continue to be profitable. My big loser so far is the aircraft leasing company, Aircastle, Ltd. (AYR). The stock price has been cut in half on the fears that some of its leasing customers will be turning in aircraft. One is US Airways (LCC), which has indicated it will return some leased aircraft, however, it has not been disclosed who those aircraft are leased from.

At this time AYR stock is trading at 4.5 times last years earnings and is yielding 11% on a dividend that is 55% of net income and 35% of free cash flow. Global air travel would have to have a severe meltdown to make Aircastle worth any less than it is today.

Then in financials you have a company like City Bank (CTBK) of Linnwood, WA. This is a bank with 30+ years of growing profits, is conservatively managed and is in a part of the country that has not been hit badly in the real estate down turn. There is almost no news besides quarterly earnings reports on this stock, yet it has fallen from the low $20s to $12. When was the last time you saw a quality company with a PE of 4 and a yield of 5%, just because of its industry?

I see stocks growing earnings and getting their share prices hammered because the market believes the numerous problems mentioned above will affect all companies the same. At this time it looks to me like we may not see stocks at these bargain prices for a long time.

Note: I have long positions in AYR, CTBK, PWE, NRGY and HW.

Print this article
Comments
40
You are viewing the first 20 comments View all »
     
  • Tim,

    I live in CTBK's area and have been following them for many years. They have substantial exposure to builders and raw land, which has, in some cases, decreased by 50%.
    2008 Jun 18 07:29 AM Reply
  •  
  • From your mouth to investor ears, everyone, altogether, buy PWE which has yet to increase its dividend and has had to sell assets to keep the dividend in place.

    Go PWE!
    2008 Jun 18 08:01 AM Reply
  •  
  • CTBK has less than 3% residential mortgages. Safe to say its loan exposure is unlike most banks who have to raise cash. No dilution from stock offering planned.

    Commercial real estate for the WA area has been relatively stable due to minimal overbuilding and due to thriving businesses (high % of technology and export.) Thus, less commercial construction defaults.

    All in all, the valuation of CTBK is highly appealing for the investor looking to hold for at least 6 months.
    2008 Jun 18 08:53 AM Reply
  •  
  • Oil analyst Kirk Wulff has a buy on PWE, and is not worried about it covering the dividend. Wulff is using oil at $100 for his calculations, which seems rather conservative with crude at $134, and further, he has not disappointed me in over 4 years of following his advice. I go with Wulff. His advice is free at mcdep.com, on a time delayed basis.
    2008 Jun 18 09:03 AM Reply
  •  
  • Remington,

    Not talking about commercial. Pull their Call Report. They have substantial exposure to raw land via single family home builders.

    They are known as conservative lenders and have always been over capitalized, so I don't think dilution will happen. Long term, they will be a great buy, but small banks tend to move in a pack, so adjust your time horizon out to at least 18-24 months.
    2008 Jun 18 09:12 AM Reply
  •  
  • Airlines -- not a good investment in generally every environment...includin... now
    2008 Jun 18 09:22 AM Reply
  •  
  • While the clueless and incorrect bad mouth PWE (David Bui and paulwhatever come to mind) it has now had ANOTHER up week..potential cash flow is extremely high..and...why would the dividend need to be increased when it's already yielding 12.10%???
    PWE was $24 and change in January..now over $34...PLUS dividends...this includes a 14 year plus reserve base. A real dog!
    2008 Jun 18 09:32 AM Reply
  •  
  • Under loans secured by real estate:
    a.
    1. 1-4 family residential construction loans 571,706
    ($0 charge offs as of 3/31/2008)
    2. Other construction loans and all land development and other land loans 300,540
    ($53 charge offs as of 3/31/2008)
    Dollar amount in thousands.

    *from Call report

    Alex, your interpretation of exposure is subjective. Do you know the profile of the borrowers in question? I don't. No one does.

    Also, Goldman Sachs sees broad rebound in the banking sector starting in the 1st quarter of 2009. Well...that is 7 months away. Stock prices reflect what will happen 6 months from now. biz.yahoo.com/ap/08061...
    2008 Jun 18 09:49 AM Reply
  •  
  • To all the PWE fans the prospects certainly seems bright if oil and nat gas stay high.With less than 10% hedged going into 2009 and assuming no production disruptions increasing cash flow should warrant a health increase in monthly payouts even after debt reduction.PWE hasn't raised their divy in some time and would say the unitholders are due for one soon.
    2008 Jun 18 09:51 AM Reply
  •  
  • For those interested in PWE, you should look up the presentation just posted on the PWE website. In it, the CEO shows a graph that indicates that with oil at $120 and gas at $11, cash flow will be $3.2 billion this year. Deducting dividends of $1.2 billion and capex of $1 billion leaves free cash flow of $1 billion--and that DESPITE the company's low hedges.

    I suspect that about $700 million of that billion will be used to retire debt to get debt-to-cash-flow ratio of 1-to-1, and that the other $300 million will be used to slightly increase dividends (which are already pretty high) and to increase drilling program.

    By the way, please note that the second quarter is almost over and that oil and gas have probably averaged close to $120 and $11 this quarter. Therefore, I expect record cash flow this quarter of about $750 million, with record free cash flow of almost $200 million, and a payout ratio of about 42-47%.

    If someone thinks PWE is NOT a buy, tell me what fact or what analysis I have missed above.

    Jack
    2008 Jun 18 09:58 AM Reply
  •  
  • PetroFund was increasing its dividends, PWE has not raised its dividend since it listed on the NYSE. Canetic was increasing its dividend. PWE has been totally stagnant.

    Full disclosure: I have HTE,PGH,PVX and PWE.
    2008 Jun 18 09:59 AM Reply
  •  
  • PWE has not increased its dividend since February of 06, How much has oil gone up in the interim?

    Must be that the projected cash flow continues to be projected.
    2008 Jun 18 10:11 AM Reply
  •  
  • paultaut, please sell your PWE if you really have some and are so upset with it. Probably just a paid basher.


    2008 Jun 18 10:50 AM Reply
  •  
  • Paultaut, I am amazed to hear you hold HTE. Of all the Canroys, I consider that one at highest risk of cutting the dividend because last two quarter's payout ratios were over 100%. yet you complain about PWE, whose payout ratio last quarter was 58%!

    Indeed, HTE cut its dividend last year from 38 to 30 cents per month, whereas PWE has paid the same dividend for over two years.

    Also, HTE's refinery will prevent HTE from recording the same benefits from a high commodity price environment relative to its peers because crack spreads have been squeezed and I think will continue to be squeezed.

    Jack
    2008 Jun 18 11:00 AM Reply
  •  
  • How long can you stay long HW? It's never delivered on its C-T-L/nanotech/catalys... promises, is in the dumper with homebuilding, is down 72% since 8/05, yet attracts new suckers ...based on what: negative cash flow?

    Sorry, Tim: you picked a loser in HW! But then, it made it easier to evaluate the rest of your recommendations.
    2008 Jun 18 12:28 PM Reply
  •  
  • Jack,
    An investment in any of the Can Trusts is a bet on continued high oil/gas prices. If you are convinced that prices will stay high, you will have made a good investment. If prices drop, you probably will not. Why will a drop in energy prices result in a fall in the price of these stocks (as well as Penn)? The dividends include a return of capital and they do not retain enough cash to sustain production on a flat energy price basis. The trusts have to keep issuing more shares to buy more producing properties to keep their production growing or even flat. What investors should always look at with these stocks is the production and cash flow per share. In the near term, there is nothing to worry about as the numbers you present suggest. In the longer term it’s all about the price of Oil and gas. I am not saying you should not buy Penn. I may just do so.
    2008 Jun 18 01:15 PM Reply
  •  
  • Headwaters had years of profitable growth before they were forced out of the Section 29 synfuel business by government rule changes. The company appears to have a plan to develop new technologies and I started discussing the stock at a price near where it is today and hold a profitable position at this time. The next few quarters should tell whether management can follow through on their plans.
    2008 Jun 18 02:14 PM Reply
  •  
  • Tim, Alex& Remington,
    I was very interested in CTBK, read their 10q & K and could not find where their construction exposure is located. I called them and they told me that all of their exposure was local, nothing out of Washington and most in a couple of counties where they are located. I only have a general idea of what is going on in the Washington real estate market, but from what I read it is still one of the best markets in the country with little or no drop in prices due to the strength of tech and aerospace industries. Therefore it would seem that their construction book would be better than most banks in other regions? However, their nonperforming loans have been going up quite rapidly over the past 3qs. On the positive side, they have 17+% capital and a 6% net interest margin. Not many banks like that sell for 80% of book value. Any other thoughts or perspectives on the Washington market?
    Thanks
    2008 Jun 18 03:12 PM Reply
  •  
  • Remington,

    75% of their loan book is construction and land, w/ 65% of that number being 1-4 family. Very high #s. Their primary market is the suburbs and x-urbs of seattle, which are now seeing price drops anywhere from 10-30%, depending on how far away from the city you are. Most of the nation's real estate markets peaked mid to late '06, while our market peaked late summer '07, almost a year later. There will be write-offs, probably by the 4th Q. This downturn will be much more powerful than the one we experienced in 1990. I know for a fact that some x-urbs are seeing lot prices discounted as much as 50% from the peak.

    I do know the profile of their borrowers, a couple are friends of mine. They are leveraged builders. The commercial part of their loan book should be firm, as that market has not seem much price deflation yet and vacancies are low here.

    As far as Goldman's call goes, i really don't think they were talking about small local banks leveraged to the construction industry.

    2008 Jun 18 03:41 PM Reply
  •  
  • Alex,
    Thanks for the local color. I will keep my eye on this over the next few months.
    2008 Jun 18 03:54 PM Reply
You've only read the first 20 comments