By Charles
This is the first time that I remember hearing a beaten tone in the normally energetic/optimistic voice of Jim Cramer. In a recent video on TheStreet, Cramer said that “the next 4 days are crucial” and that “If it is not ruled on by June, this may go to September.” Not exactly the promising news stockholders were looking to hear.
Jim went on to note that, at this point, a delay is actually worse than rejection since these companies are hemorrhaging money and the possibility of interoperable receivers in next year's automobiles looks grim. What was really depressing is that he mentioned Clear Channel (CCU) as a possible suitor for a freshly bankrupted SATRAD company. What a sad, sad, day that would be.
“The FCC did something brilliant; they may have solved the decision for them, by delaying.”
Related Articles
|



This article has 58 comments:
- losingshirtonsatellite
- 5 Comments
Jun 27 07:56 AM- losingshirtonsatellite
- 5 Comments
Jun 27 07:59 AM- fxtrader07
- 618 Comments
Jun 27 08:04 AM- losingshirtonsatellite
- 5 Comments
Jun 27 08:20 AM- shure46
- 362 Comments
Jun 27 08:59 AM- Disappointed American
- 20 Comments
Jun 27 09:14 AM- jimmydasaint
- 18 Comments
My Website
Jun 27 09:14 AMHow can we SUE the FCC for unethical business practices? Would we have to start with a securities exchange attorney?
The FCC should not be allowed to destroy companies like this!
We need everyone that invested in these companies to pull together on this one and file a class action lawsuit against the FCC if this in fact continues to drag on!
- losingshirtonsatellite
- 5 Comments
Jun 27 09:49 AM- cash money
- 8 Comments
Jun 27 09:56 AM- cash money
- 8 Comments
Jun 27 10:00 AM- jmb476
- 8 Comments
Jun 27 10:09 AM- cos1000
- 1081 Comments
Jun 27 10:12 AM- cos1000
- 1081 Comments
Jun 27 10:18 AM- ace22
- 57 Comments
Jun 27 10:18 AMp.s. Tyler hang in there we need you at high spirits
- JR-Boston
- 4 Comments
Jun 27 10:19 AMXMSR's debt offering is indicative that they think they will receive very, very soon. It also is a frontal repudiation of one of GS' main issues, that the company can't access capital without being very dilutive. Their convertible debt has been trading at this level for the last few weeks, and I would think that this is a very good sign that they can access capital. It does also mean that the convert holders don't expect this debt to convert at its strike price of 20 or 4.35 for siri stock. that's fine. One thing at a time. Merger approved, cut overlapping cost and contracts, refinance early next year with better financial outlook. That's the game plan.
- killerkaul
- 624 Comments
Jun 27 10:25 AM- killerkaul
- 624 Comments
Jun 27 10:35 AM- cos1000
- 1081 Comments
Jun 27 10:40 AM- losingshirtonsatellite
- 5 Comments
Jun 27 10:41 AM- RReagan
- 46 Comments
Jun 27 10:48 AMI would rather Sirius take it off the table now, but if now, just have the FCC vote up or down today, and lose. If necessary, Sirius can find a buyer as has been discussed here in the future. Certainly, XM will be bought by Clear Channel or someone and approved by the FCC in record time! Oh well, here goes Oprah!
- killerkaul
- 624 Comments
Jun 27 10:55 AM- cos1000
- 1081 Comments
Jun 27 10:58 AMI personally am sticking with my earlier posts and am not concerned about June 30th. I have said that I want to see an announcement at or before the July FCC Open Meeting and that I think that the decision will be for the merge. All the speculation at this point about bankruptcy is premature and represents very justified "hand ringing". No one wants to lose their investments in these companies. There are a lot of options available to both companies that do not jeopardize what's left of shareholder interests if the merger doesn't go through. So I will be patient and wait for the decision. My last purchase of 2k shares of Siri was made yesterday at 1.86. I have nothing left to do but sit and wait and wring my hands with the rest of you, but don't PANIC because of CRAMER.
- Tyler Savery
- 58 Comments
My Website
Jun 27 11:01 AMThe above article was written by my partner, Charles, at Sirius Buzz, and not myself. I am sending an e-mail to S.A. alerting them to the situation, as the article is attributed to me even though I did not author it.
Tyler Savery
- cos10000
- 155 Comments
Jun 27 11:09 AMI asked several of you repeatedly, including Mr. Savery, to give me your price ceiling on SIRI, and your rationale for it. None of you could. I firmly believe that few if any of you bother to study their 10-Ks. You were all treating investing as though it's Vegas or American Idol. Everyone loves a winner, right?
You treat investing as though it's a sporting event. It takes critical thinking and discipline, friends. You don't become winners through cheerleading and blind allegiance to popular thinking. Many of you still think (or simply want to believe) these stocks are going to go to the moon, but none of you can articulate and quantify why you believe that. It will take losing money to convince you otherwise.
- killerkaul
- 624 Comments
Jun 27 11:12 AM- killerkaul
- 624 Comments
Jun 27 11:15 AM- cos1000
- 1081 Comments
Jun 27 11:31 AM- cos1000
- 1081 Comments
Jun 27 11:34 AM- cos1000
- 1081 Comments
Jun 27 11:35 AM- cos1000
- 1081 Comments
Jun 27 11:36 AM- cos10000
- 155 Comments
Jun 27 11:37 AM- killerkaul
- 624 Comments
Jun 27 11:50 AM- Tyler Savery
- 58 Comments
My Website
Jun 27 11:58 AMI did respond to you, but perhaps you missed it. For the benefit of readers I will repost it here.
Jun 26 07:39 AM
Thanks for the comment. The answer to some of your questions have been written about or discussed in the past, but here is a very brief synopsis:
1. While I do post information about what analysts are saying, I am not parroting them in my own opinion. There are many analysts that I disagree with in several ways, inclusive of Goldman and CITI (the most bearish and most bullish).
2. I have never appointed myself as a "satellite expert"
3. I have stated many times that the upside is a long process, that there would be heavy selling on the way up, and that it would take a "perfect storm" to get to pre-merger levels. That task is even more difficult now. I do not give "buy prices" or "sell prices".
4. This article was not about the accuracy of Goldman, but rather the attention he has received from the street, and will receive again with his next report. Some of the items i disagree with Goldaman about I have expressed in the past.
5. $1.50 is a possible bottom, but it is also possible that the bottom has already happened. A lot depends on the FCC news, as well as what Wienkes does with his next report. He does have the ear of people, so even if someone disagrees with his thoughts, they should listen to what he says, and when he says it.
6. The top. As I have stated in the past, this equity will have challenges getting through the $3's even with everything going swimmingly. Longer term, we will need to see the terms of the merger, how fast synergies can be realized, a few quarters of joint performance, and get guidance.
- killerkaul
- 624 Comments
Jun 27 12:15 PM- connorport
- 52 Comments
My Website
Jun 27 12:25 PMcompare a company to an airline flight, if you see the first officer bail out then things will probably be bad. if you see the captain bail then things are probably about over. in this case the whole flight crew is still intact and we have all just hit a few turbulence, and we're all a little nervous about the couple of people that are negative nancys and making a little noise and remember these people are not "pilots" so they do not know of anything that goes on in the cockpit.
If the crew doesn't look nervious then i don't worry. we will make it to our final destinations. lighten up people..
- Sirius Fan
- 57 Comments
Jun 27 12:42 PMwww.merriam-webster.co...
www.merriam-webster.co...
Investing in speculative stocks often carries a much greater risk of losing your entire investment than it would investing in already established companies, and name-calling, taunting, accusations of thievery, etc., are absolutely pointless and completely unfounded.
Tyler, Stan, et. al., while admittedly being on the proverbial "sunny side" of the speculative street, merely attempt to keep us informed of the comings and goings relating to these companies, and offer their opinions regarding such happenings. I have never seen them claim to be anything other than writers covering the sector.
In short, IMHO, if you have no money invested in these stocks and are merely here to stir the pot, I suggest that you are a miserable human being and need to find something more productive to do with your time. Otherwise, if you're merely looking for someone to blame for your position losing it's value, you need to look no further than your closest mirror. That's the person who invested in a speculative stock. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen, and go find a nice safe annuity somewhere.
- killerkaul
- 624 Comments
Jun 27 01:03 PM- dave010a
- 30 Comments
Jun 27 01:35 PMWhen will they vote? Predictions/speculatio... don't care; I want it! I've got to cling to some kind of hope in this mess.
- dave010a
- 30 Comments
Jun 27 01:40 PMIt's time to stop attacking our own and focus on strategy with this stock.
- MT1257
- 2 Comments
My Website
Jun 27 02:10 PM- MT1257
- 2 Comments
My Website
Jun 27 02:14 PM- PDXPatience
- 6 Comments
Jun 27 02:35 PM