Despite all of the reports about record-high gas and oil prices, we're still nowhere close to record high gas prices adjusted for the growth in per-capita, disposable income.
The chart above shows the cost of 1,000 gallons of gasoline, as a percent of per-capita disposable income in every month from January 1980 to May 2008. During most of 1980 and 1981, it took between 13.50% and 15% of per-capita disposable income ($8,5000 to $10,000 in that period) to purchase 1,000 gallons of gasoline ($1.25 to $1.40 retail price per gallon in that period), which was far greater than the 10.26% that it takes of today's per-capita disposable income of about $37,000 to purchase 1,000 gallons of gas at the May average of $3.76 per gallon.
For gas to reach a record high as a percent of per-capita disposable income, it would have to sell today for about $5.50 per gallon to reach 14.90% of per-capita disposable income, like it did in March of 1981, when gas sold for $1.42 per gallon, and per-capita disposable income was only $9,500.
Related Articles
|
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »



This article has 11 comments:
- fourwinds
- 3 Comments
Jun 30 07:35 AM- pockyclips 2020
- 140 Comments
Jun 30 08:39 AMI'd guess we will reach this benchmark around October. I concur with fourwinds, these price rises will hit hardest on the working class, not so much for the investment class.
- john s. gordon
- 580 Comments
Jun 30 08:51 AM> jack
- redbaron
- 156 Comments
Jun 30 09:02 AM- paulk8756
- 922 Comments
Jun 30 10:05 AMOf course, higher gas prices will have a disproportionate impact on "working" Americans. So do higher food prices.
I used to hear such wonderful speeches from the Liberals in Congress about how they looked out for the "little guy." Obviously, now they're looking out for the big money from their Green lobby friends, instead.
The AFL just endorsed their new, "Hope they can believe in," for President. Indeed, his was the ONLY NAME on the ballot. At the very same time the D's in Congress are selling them out for higher and higher gas prices... Amazing!!!
- paulk8756
- 922 Comments
Jun 30 10:18 AMAnd they'll take care of the little guys, as well. They'll be WORKING FOR THEM when they take over the industries that failed due to their energy
- paulk8756
- 922 Comments
Jun 30 10:19 AM- Globe199
- 1 Comment
Jun 30 10:24 AMThe point of this article is going to be moot in the not-too-distant future.
- Peter Sterling
- 19 Comments
My Website
Jun 30 01:40 PMZogby International
11:42 a.m., Thursday, June 26, 2008
Three in four likely voters – 74 percent – support offshore drilling for oil in U.S. coastal waters and more than half (59 percent) also favor drilling for oil in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge, a new Zogby International telephone poll shows.
SEE:
www.strategicnine.com/...
- Peter Sterling
- 19 Comments
My Website
Jun 30 01:40 PMZogby International
11:42 a.m., Thursday, June 26, 2008
Three in four likely voters – 74 percent – support offshore drilling for oil in U.S. coastal waters and more than half (59 percent) also favor drilling for oil in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge, a new Zogby International telephone poll shows.
SEE:
www.strategicnine.com/...
- srs
- 10 Comments
My Website
Jun 30 05:29 PMMore by Mark J. Perry