Mark J. Perry, Ph.D.

About this author:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article
  • Font Size:
  • Print

Despite all of the reports about record-high gas and oil prices, we're still nowhere close to record high gas prices adjusted for the growth in per-capita, disposable income.

The chart above shows the cost of 1,000 gallons of gasoline, as a percent of per-capita disposable income in every month from January 1980 to May 2008. During most of 1980 and 1981, it took between 13.50% and 15% of per-capita disposable income ($8,5000 to $10,000 in that period) to purchase 1,000 gallons of gasoline ($1.25 to $1.40 retail price per gallon in that period), which was far greater than the 10.26% that it takes of today's per-capita disposable income of about $37,000 to purchase 1,000 gallons of gas at the May average of $3.76 per gallon.

For gas to reach a record high as a percent of per-capita disposable income, it would have to sell today for about $5.50 per gallon to reach 14.90% of per-capita disposable income, like it did in March of 1981, when gas sold for $1.42 per gallon, and per-capita disposable income was only $9,500.

This article has 11 comments:

  •  
    Jun 30 07:35 AM
    Could you add a graph that shows gas price relative to middle class disposable income? My understanding is that although the USA's total wealth has increased significantly over the time period you show, most of it has concentrated in the wealthy, while lower and middle class incomes have been largely stagnant. I'd like to know how the gas price run-up affects Joe Six-Pack and Susie Homemaker.
    Reply
  •  
    Jun 30 08:39 AM
    They keep moving the goal post back to make us feel better.
    I'd guess we will reach this benchmark around October. I concur with fourwinds, these price rises will hit hardest on the working class, not so much for the investment class.
    Reply
  •  
    Jun 30 08:51 AM
    you should use median household incomes instead of average, the millionaires skew the average.
    > jack
    Reply
  •  
    Jun 30 09:02 AM
    One way to avoid being concerned about high gas prices, is to buy into some of the oil companies stocks. I did so several years ago, and I see it different now, than those that are complaining. We here in the US are still paying less than those in Europe, and many other places in the world. We complain about gov't subsidies in China and India, while subsidizing both ethanol and oil/gas companies ourselves in this country. And all the while, we continue to use cheaper gas than many others, and ignore the growth in global energy demands from other countries.
    Reply
  •  
    Jun 30 10:05 AM
    Great post, Mark.

    Of course, higher gas prices will have a disproportionate impact on "working" Americans. So do higher food prices.

    I used to hear such wonderful speeches from the Liberals in Congress about how they looked out for the "little guy." Obviously, now they're looking out for the big money from their Green lobby friends, instead.

    The AFL just endorsed their new, "Hope they can believe in," for President. Indeed, his was the ONLY NAME on the ballot. At the very same time the D's in Congress are selling them out for higher and higher gas prices... Amazing!!!

    Reply
  •  
    Jun 30 10:18 AM
    But don't worry, the "Hopers" have big plans in store for the investment class, too. Like their already announced DOUBLING of capital gains taxes, with much more to come down the road.

    And they'll take care of the little guys, as well. They'll be WORKING FOR THEM when they take over the industries that failed due to their energy
    Reply
  •  
    Jun 30 10:19 AM
    ...failed energy policies.
    Reply
  •  
    Jun 30 10:24 AM
    Well, the numbers are outdated. It's now $4.09/gal. So the cost for 1000 gallons as a percent of PCI is 11.05%. Furthermore, like john s gordon said, PCI is not a good indicator because of the outliers.

    The point of this article is going to be moot in the not-too-distant future.
    Reply
  •  
    Poll: 74 percent support offshore oil drilling in U.S.

    Zogby International
    11:42 a.m., Thursday, June 26, 2008

    Three in four likely voters – 74 percent – support offshore drilling for oil in U.S. coastal waters and more than half (59 percent) also favor drilling for oil in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge, a new Zogby International telephone poll shows.

    SEE:

    www.strategicnine.com/...
    Reply
  •  
    Poll: 74 percent support offshore oil drilling in U.S.

    Zogby International
    11:42 a.m., Thursday, June 26, 2008

    Three in four likely voters – 74 percent – support offshore drilling for oil in U.S. coastal waters and more than half (59 percent) also favor drilling for oil in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge, a new Zogby International telephone poll shows.

    SEE:

    www.strategicnine.com/...
    Reply
  •  
    Jun 30 05:29 PM
    It amazes me when I hear people say oil prices are going to come down. We are at or near out peak, there is no where for prices to go but up.
    Reply
Articles on related themes