Exxon Mobil: An Unwise Investment For Now 14 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM) (alt.1, alt.2)
Below are some highlights from the above linked analysis: XOM earned two Stars in this section for 3.) and 4.) above. It has paid a cash dividend to shareholders every year since 1882 and has increased its quarterly cash dividend payments for 26 consecutive years. The 1-Yr. > 5-Yr Growth metric indicates that dividend growth has been accelerating. XOM earned no Stars in this section, and had one Star deducted for a negative NPV MMA Diff. In effect, if you invested equal amounts in a MMA earning of an average of 4.61% for 20 years and XOM stock with a dividend yield of 1.81% and growing at 6.4% annually, you would end up with $3,288 less in XOM stock per $1,000 invested. Other: XOM is a member of the S&P 500, is an Achiever and an Aristocrat. XOM is a strong player in the volatile, cyclical and capital-intensive energy sector. XOM is one of the few companies with sufficient resources to pursue deepwater, liquefied natural gas [LNG]. Conclusion: XOM lost a Star in the Fair Value section, earned two Stars in the Dividend Analytical Data section and lost a Star in the Dividend Income vs. MMA section for a net total of 0 Stars. This rates XOM as a 0 Star-Avoid stock.
Company Description: Exxon Mobil Corp. is engaged in the exploration, production, and sale of crude oil, natural gas, petroleum products and petrochemicals. XOM is the world's largest publicly owned integrated oil company.
Fair Value: I consider four calculations of fair value, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
XOM is trading at a premium to all except 2.) above. If I exclude the high and low valuation, and average the remaining two valuations, XOM is trading at a 19.8% premium. A Star is deducted since XOM is trading at such a large premium.
Dividend Analytical Data: In this section I consider five factors, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
Dividend Income vs. MMA: Why would you assume the equity risk and invest in a dividend stock if you could earn a better return in a much less risky money market account [MMA]? This section compares the earning ability of this stock with a high yield MMA. Two items are considered in this section, see page 2 of the linked PDF for a detailed description:
Cutting to the chase, XOM is overvalued and not currently a good dividend investment. Using my D4L-PreScreen.xls model, I determined the dividend growth rate would have to average 15.1% for XOM to generate a $3,000 NPV of MMA Differential that I look for from a company that is both an Achiever and an Aristocrat. That is more than double the 6.4% historical number.
Disclaimer: Material presented here is for informational purposes only. The above quantitative stock analysis, including the Star rating, is mechanically calculated and is based on historical information. The analysis assumes the stock will perform in the future as it has in the past. This is generally never true. Before buying or selling any stock you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion. See my Disclaimer for more information.
Full Disclosure: At the time of this writing, I do not own shares of XOM (0.0% of my Income Portfolio).
Related Articles
|





















Because of the potential for capital appreciation, of course. Also, dividends aren't the only way XOM returns capital to shareholders. XOM also buys back a significant amount of shares.
> jack
> jack
I agree that XOM is undervalued... not overvalued. Management needs to be more aggressive in large oil field finds for sure!
Everyone go out there and check any other market cap against ExxonMobil.
ExxonMobil Market Cap 445.47B ...Solid.
Have you seen what this MegaCorp is into?
Sarnoff To Commercialize ExxonMobil's Nano Materials In Non-Petrochemical Markets
www.azonano.com/news.a...
..............
"...Most prototype hydrogen vehicles on the road today are powered by highly-compressed or liquefied hydrogen that is delivered to distribution points and then stored at high pressures on-board the vehicle. For these vehicles to be widely adopted a significant hydrogen generation and delivery infrastructure must be developed.
As the ExxonMobil system uses conventional fuels and produces hydrogen on demand, no such infrastructure or on-board storage would be necessary...."
www.bgu.ac.il/indcat/h...
...............
Sarnoff Enters Into Multi-Year Agreement with ExxonMobil to Develop Company’s Nanomaterials for Non-Petrochemical Markets
www.nsti.org/news/item...
...............
ExxonMobil technology developments
www.exxonmobil.com/app...
...............
Symyx Reels In Big ExxonMobil Contract
In a huge deal, high-throughput experimentation specialist Symyx Technologies has inked a five-year alliance with ExxonMobil worth more than $200 million.
pubs.acs.org/cen/topst...
................
This is the second year that ExxonMobil has participated in Idol Gives Back, which raised over $76 million for charity in its first year in 2007. During that program, ExxonMobil provided a $3-million “challenge grant” that matched donations by viewers to Malaria No More.
ExxonMobil has donated more than $121 million to organizations working in and benefiting Africa that are engaged in important community and social development projects, including $40 million through ExxonMobil Foundation’s Africa Health Initiative.
growthstockanalyst.com...
If you think the other majors are making a big jump into alt-en, look at the numbers in their finances. ITS TINY, just a PR campaign so liberal america will buy their products instead of big-bad exxon, who make everyone's gas prices higher by making the most money per gallon, and getting the best ROI of any chem or Int-oil.
Well thats not a very financially minded comment...
During the clean up effort XOM hired any willing local person to put their boat and equipment into service at rates of a thousand dollars a day or more. They hired local clean up people at $17/hr and up-- very high pay at the time for their efforts.
Fishermen that were affected by the oil spill were given a chance to be compensated the equivalent of 10 times their average yearly income for the highest 3 years in the prior decade to the spill. So every fisherman that was affected was paid 10 times what they were making unless they opted to seek higher compensation than that at a later date. Seems like a pretty fair deal to me.
Exxon made millionaires of a lot of people there. They were fairly compensated, or had a chance to have been fairly compensated. Cordovans called themselves spillionaires.
In 1989 Exxon paid 300 million to fishermen and in 1994 they paid an additional 287 million. Clean up and related costs were about 3 billion dollars.
www.tickerspy.com/go.p...