Tesoro Corporation: Upside Potential Overlooked
Tesoro Corporation (TSO) engages in refining and marketing petroleum products in the United States. It operates in two segments, Refining and Retail. The Refining segment produces refined products, including gasoline and gasoline blendstocks, jet fuel, diesel fuel, and heavy fuel oils for sale to commercial customers in the western and mid-continental United States. This segment also manufactures liquefied petroleum gas, petroleum coke, and asphalt. As of December 31, 2007, the company operated 7 refineries with a combined capacity of approximately 658,000 barrels per day.
The Retail segment sells gasoline and diesel fuel through company-operated retail stations and third-party branded jobber/dealers in the western and mid-continental United States to wholesale and retail customers, as well as commercial end-users. Its retail-marketing system included 911 branded retail stations operated under the brands Tesoro, Shell, Mirastar, and USA Gasoline. The company was founded in 1968 as Tesoro Petroleum Corp and changed its name to Tesoro Corporation in November 2004. Tesoro Corporation is based in San Antonio, Texas.
Technical Analasyis
The chart above shows TSO for the last seven months (we wanted to show a year to date chart). The stock has been battered along with most of the other companies in the refining sector. Battered is a kind word to describe the pounding they have taken, actually. The 52-week high for TSO is $66 per share. The Relative Strength Index [RSI] and Moving Average Convergence / Divergence [MACD] stochastic lines are both rounding out at low levels, indicating a bounce, at least on a technical basis, could be coming.
TSO Fundamental Data
- Current Price: $19.32
- Shares Outstanding: 137.7 million
- Market Cap: $2.7 billion
- Forward Price / Earnings (avg. Est): 7.1x
- PE/G Ratio (5 Year Expected): 1..4x
- Price / Book: 0.9x
TSO has seen its revenues peaking at around $5.6 billion on a quarterly basis. For the June 2008 quarter, expectations are for the company to have registered approximately $5.8 billion, in line with $5.6 billion from last year in the same quarter. On a yearly basis, expectations are for about $22.8 billion in revenue, a growth of about 4% over last year's $22 billion. The impact to the firm's profitability has been much more pronounced - on a quarterly basis, there are actually losses showing up, with a March 2008 loss per share of $0.80 surprising everyone. the 2008 June quarter which will be released soon should show earnings of somewhere between a loss of $0.25 cents per share, or a gain of $0.28 per share. Kind of a wide range, but the 15 analysts who follow the company are not really sure of where the firm will come in.
On an annual basis, earnings in 2008 will probably be around $0..89, and this estimate has been slashed down from nearly $4.00 per share in EPS some 90 days ago. Now we know why the firm's shares have been decimated. For 2009, estimates are still up in the $3 per share range. We think the estimate for 2009 will change - that is one constant we can bank on. What we do know is that at $20 per share, the share price is discounting any possibility of earnings and profitability growth here. We like the upside potential from a pullback in crude prices and a possible expansion of the crack spread. There is also a meaningful short position in these shares, with 16 million shares short as of June 2008, or nearly 11% of the outstanding float of the company.
We like the small relative size of TSO as well - at under $5 billion the firm makes an outstanding acquisition candidate. At $21 per share of book value, we see an opportunity here for one of the majors to acquire TSO with hardly a flex of their muscles. TSO's balance sheet currently has a cash cushion of just over $41 million. The debt they carry though, amounts to over $2 billion. The firm's EBITDA is $930 million on a trailing twelve month basis. That gives us a solid comfort level that TSO and its cash flows are well managed.
Investment Recommendation
Our recommendation this week is to buy TSO stock at its present price of $19.32. We would also buy a November 2008 call spread in the $20 / $30 strike prices. We would look to acquire the TSO Nov $20 call for $3.00, and write the Nov $30 call for $0.80, for a net cost of $2..20 to this spread. We would look to sell this call spread at a level of $8.00 or higher between now and the future expiration, giving us a return of nearly four times the investment.
We've heard from a few of our readers who just want straight option buy recommendations, rather than spreads. For investors who do not wish to write the higher strike call, a direct purchase of the TSO November $20 call for $3.00 would be an alternative. We would look to sell that call at a level of $9.00 or higher.
Please note: Options trades all involve a high degree of risk and the potential to lose some or all of your investment. These recommendations are general in nature, and you should consult your own financial professional who is familiar with your situation as to the appropriateness of these trade ideas.
Disclosure: Analyst has no position in TSO stock or TSO options.
Get Seeking Alpha Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
ETFs In Focus
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- Housing Prices: Bottom or Temporary Bear Break?
- ETF Insights: The New Hard Assets Producers ETF
- Why Airline Stocks Are So Often Bad Investments
- The Chinese Oil Problem
- Wildfires, Financial Crises, and Type Conversions in Markets
- The Most Important Fact To Know About Oil Investing
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
- Three Reasons the Solar Sell-off May Be in the Early Innings »
- Five Reasons Steve Ballmer Thinks Apple's a Buy »
- What's in Store for the Fertilizer Industry? »
- Why Commodities May Be Nearing a Turning Point »
- Apple to Reveal Mysterious Product Transition on September 9th »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Precious Metals Manipulation: Lawyers Prepare for Battle »
- Oil: The Inconvenient Truth »
- Sarah Palin: Wall Street's Candidate »
- 2 Top Energy Sector Bets »
-
Long Ideas
-
Short Ideas
-
Cramer's Picks
- Altria's Last Legal Hurdle Should Be Settled This Fall
- How Wal-Mart Really Beats Expectations
- Corning: Looking Very Cheap
- Leucadia's Key to Success
- China Natural Gas: Growth Appears Certain
- Can TRW Automotive Escape the Michigan Mess?
- Things Aren't Good - Fast Money Recap (9/4/08)
- ETFs That Help You Sleep Better at Night
- ETF Update: Alternative Energy and the Power Grid
- ETF Update: Healthcare Has a Heartbeat; A Good Time for Muni-Bond ETFs?
- Full list of Long Ideas »
- Short Interest Rising in Tesoro; Shorts Covering Airline Positions
- Harbinger Capital: Cut Short
- Not Much Meat on Pilgrim's Pride's Bones
- Salesforce.com: Demystifying the Force
- Should We Listen to Boone Pickens on Oil?
- Energy Conversion Devices: Ridiculously High Valuation
- Three Reasons the Solar Sell-off May Be in the Early Innings
- Is the Market Rolling Over?
- Solar and Oil, Part Deux
- Financial vs. International ETFs: Which Bear is Grizzlier?
- Full list of Short Ideas »
- Pimco's Bill Gross: Jim Cramer Is 'Courageous' and 'Entertaining'
- Cramer Sees the Light - Cramer's Mad Money (9/4/08)
- Keep Buying Big Brown - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/4/08)
- Don't Buy These Bonds - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/4/08)
- Loss of Integrity - Cramer's Mad Money Recap (9/3/08)
- Not Off the RIMM - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/3/08)
- Unbelievable Moves - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/3/08)
- The Rally was the Real Deal - Cramer's Mad Money (9/2/08)
- Crushed Unnecessarily - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/2/08)
- A Chance to Sell - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/2/08)
- Full list of Cramers Picks »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »



This article has 3 comments:
Daniel, you have made this incorrect statement in several other posts. As Marley points out, risk 2 to make 6 is ** three times the investment ** (not four). I wonder why you continually make the same error in your posts ?