You Can't Solve the World's Problems with Your Portfolio 7 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Lots of chatter here and there about problems with Fannie (FNM) and Freddie (FRE) or, more correctly, an escalation of problems and a question of solvency.
I have to believe that the fear exceeds the reality; that is my starting point going in. Of course I could be wrong, and in the context of managing client portfolios, being right, or wrong, it doesn't really matter.
For now it makes sense to be defensively postured (as I've been writing) and if things get worse I would add more defense as opposed to sell some offense (offense as defined by the stocks held).
To the topic at hand, an outright failure at Fannie, Freddie or both would greatly increase the chance that "normal bear market" turns out to be wrong. In the WSJ article linked to above, there is a mention of increasing the loan limits for the GSEs. I remember when that happened I had the feeling that this was not a good thing (I did not write about it, so no credibility on that point).
There is now plenty of opinion out there that says the GSEs are de facto insolvent. Of course Jimmy Rogers has been saying this, essentially, for many years now.
Were they to fail, and here I'm not sure what that would mean (shareholder equity goes to zero, the gubment bails out the debt one way or another, loan creation is further impeded, as one of many possible scenarios?) I would expect financials to take another big tumble, the dollar to take a big tumble, then one way or another the dollar would have to be defended (wouldn't it?) which would lead to higher rates.
Of course I have been wrong (or early?) about interest rates for a while; I thought they would have started to normalize a long time ago. If the Fed were to raise their rate but the market, fearing slowdown, kept the rest of the curve low, then the dollar would have problems. The Bernanke Fed has done a couple out-of-the-box things, so maybe it could pull another rabbit out of its hat in that scenario.
I don't know how right or wrong any of this will be, and again, it does not matter. Keeping things very simple, if there is call to be defensive I would be defensive. The details of why there is a call to be defensive are less important.
These sorts of things of course matter to the country and society but you can't solve the world's problems with your portfolio. Protecting of assets is paramount.
Related Articles
|




























This article has 7 comments:
razorfangius, SA editors choose the titles.