Seeking Alpha
About this author:

As you have read in my previous article last week, I believe LDK Solar (LDK) is in a solid position within the exploding solar industry. It's well on its way to becoming a world leading, vertically integrated wafer and polysilicon producer.

Some people pointed out in my previous article that I didn't include "this or that" aspect of the company, but the truth is that I probably did. However, the article was already quite extensive and would have been nearly twice as long if I wrote about every aspect I have examined in this company. I posted the points I thought were the most relevant and significant. As my first major piece, I am glad it was very well received. I appreciate everyone taking the time to read it.

As an investor/trader in a modern global market, I have found one of the biggest tools at my disposal is my fluency in Mandarin Chinese. I have found that this is very significant when it comes to Chinese companies. Hoping to one day be an accomplished financial analyst, I like to practice my analytical skills. One of the advantages of being bilingual is that it practically doubles your sources for analysis. You read articles, figures, and statistics in Chinese that have never been/never will be mentioned in western media.

This information is not your average day news article either. I'm talking about serious material information that could be a major advantage to those with access and ability. That's why I believe language is one of the strongest tools in the business world.

For example, I was recently researching Chinese news sources and media syndicates for information about LDK Solar. Being a Chinese company, LDK is a lot more likely to appear in Eastern media than in the west.

Interestingly; I came across the official website of the local government where LDK Solar is based, Xinyu City. Looking further into the site, I came across this page. It states:

" 为助推赛维LDK公司发展,实现税收收入,经济开发区国税部门尽可能为LDK公司及光伏产业链提供税收服务便利,通过实行纳税辅导、开展新企业所得税法宣 传、开通税收服务直通车等方式做好全方位的税收服务工作。目前,赛维LDK公司税收出现良好的发展势头,至6月中旬,已入库所得税1.24亿元。"

For those that don't read Chinese, the page is a government tax report stating the tax revenues generated by LDK Solar for the national government. The most important part is the last sentence that translates to:

As of the end of June, LDK Solar has generated a tax revenue of 124,000,000 CNY (Chinese Yuan) [year to date]

This information listed on an official government website which is quite significant on a number of different levels. The most significant is that it gives us the ability to back solve for the net income of the past 6 months. We can then subtract the reported earnings from the first quarter and know the net income and EPS for the second quarter which is not to be released until July 28th.

Therefore, due to government tax revenue reports being released before LDK's earnings reports; we can backsolve for LDK's yet to be released earnings results.

Information such as this would never leak in western media due to the language barrier.

Another page from the government's website suggests that LDK's revenues year to date (1/08-06/08), weighed in at 3.8 Billion CNY ($554,016,620):

"到6月底,预计实现主营业务收入38亿元"

Coming from the Chinese Government website report, I believe the source is very credible. There may be a few rounding errors or exchange issues but we can use more conservative figures.

Analyst Estimates:

LDK Solar is set to report 2nd quarter earnings on July 28th (est). Looking at current estimates, most analysts currently expect $0.42/share on revenues of $282.04 Million. We can simply look at the revenue for the YTD revenue figure and subtract the known figure from the first quarter 2008 earnings report, we come up with:

$554,016,620 - 233,399,000 = $320,617,620 Implied Q2-2008 Revenue

Now Let's Crunch Some Numbers

Because the figure from the government report looks slightly rounded, let's round down to be conservative (let's say 123,000,000 CNY). If we take an exchange rate of 6.859 CNY to 1USD, this would give us a total tax revenue of $17,932,643 to the government. It should actually be more since we rounded down and the fact that the dollar has significantly weakened versus the Chinese Yuan to the tune of about 6% YTD. Heres a 1 year chart of the USD to Yuan:

If you guys recall from my previous article, this is how LDK's ridiculously favorable tax situation stands:

NATIONAL INCOME TAX:

  • LDK will be exempt from national income taxes for 2 years (2006-2007)
  • LDK will pay a 50% reduced national income tax rate for the following 3 years (2008-2010): -12.5%
  • LDK will pay the full 25% national income tax thereafter (2011+)

LOCAL INCOME TAX:

  • LDK will be exempt from local taxes for 5 years (2006-2010)
  • LDK will pay a 50% reduced local tax tate for the 5 years (2011-2015): - 1.5%
  • LDK will pay the full 3% local income tax rate thereafter (2016+)

So to set this into perspective, LDK will only start paying its regular combined tax rate after 2016. Seeing how it is currently 2008, this is the first year LDK will pay its half off national tax rate and is still exempt from any local taxes. This is in contrast to the original 15/30% tax from the old law. 

So since LDK is exempt from all local taxes until 2010, it is safe to assume that the figure on the website is the national tax revenues generated by LDK to the national government.

Knowing this, we can see the following information from the Q1-2008 income statement press release (figures in thousands of USD):

We can see that the amount of income tax paid was $8,511,000 USD. This is a little more than at the stated tax rate of 12.5% as stated in the earnings release PR. I am still looking into why it's closer to 14.5% but i think it has to do with other gains/losses outside of operating income or the possibility of the tax differences in accounting standards. It is assumed on a national level that the government implemented IFRS accounting standards as of January 1st, 2007. This would take some effort to convert to GAAP and would be even more complicated since we don't have detailed figures. But for the sake of argument we'll use 15% to be conservative.

We can take the adjusted figure from the Xinyu Government website ($17,932,643) and subtract last quarter's income tax expense to see what LDK paid this quarter in national income tax: 

$17,932,643 - $8,511,000= <$9,421,643 in Q2 Income Tax Expense

We then take this income tax expense and divide it by the adjusted 15% tax rate to get the net income for Q2.

$ 9,421,643/.15 = >62,810,953 in Q2 Net Income, Pre-Tax

We can then take the numbers and figure out what net income after tax should roughly be (with a very conservative skew for a generous margin of error) by simply subtracting the income tax expense from the pre-tax income:

$62,810,953 -$9,421,643 = >$53,389,310 in Q2 Net Income After Tax

We can then further solve for the EPS by looking at the outstanding shares as of 3-31-08, which is 106.5M shares. Its hard to say what the outstanding shares is due to the recent $400M in convertible bond offering and $200M buy back plan, but lets just keep it at 106.5M for arguments sake. Therefore the EPS should be:

$53,389,310/106,500,000 = >$0.50/share EPS for Q2 - 2008

Notice how I put the greater than sign in front of all the figures due to the ultra conservative nature of this calculation. Although these numbers may vary from the actual numbers due to rounding/calculation differences, this shows that based on government issued reports:

LDK will blow out Q2 Revenue by nearly 14% and EPS by nearly 20%+

Furthermore, the company is now in the monocrystalline business which diversifies its offerings. Everything I have read (English and Chinese) confirms that the plants are on track and business has never been better. This is quite ironic since the global economy has clearly seen better days.

I've also read material evidence that suggests Mr. Pichel's fears of ramping complications are unwarranted and irrational. Being completely sold out throughout 2009, the next 2 years of LDK are practically set. LDK has next to nothing to worry about.

Some people claim that they "can't trust the LDK management. And that they're a bunch of Chinese crooks that are cooking the books" but they seem to forget that LDK came out 100% clean from the independent investigation. They also seem to forget that Enron and MCI Worldcom were some of the most "American" companies in history. So to claim that LDK is a fraudulent company is more than foolish.

This company is truly a remarkable investment opportunity. It has recently formed a bottom and is a clear steal at current prices. Remember as Warren Buffet once said,

In the short run, the market's a voting machine and sometimes people vote very unintelligently. In the long run, it's a weighing machine and the weight of business and how it does is what affects values over time.

LDK is definitely a heavy-set company. I am actually hoping to visit LDK in JiangXi when I get a chance this summer to further evaluate the company. I look forward to watching this company prosper and grow. Who knows? Maybe I'll have an opportunity to work with them after graduation. The more I study this peculiar company, the more it interests me. LDK Solar is definitely in a great position.

But to the 14M+ Shorts: I Suggest Finding Cover. The Forecast is Looking VERY Sunny for LDK Solar. A Sunburn Would Be Painful.

Disclosure: Long LDK.

Print this article with comments

This article has 25 comments:

  •  
    Very good article, thank you!

    There are so many reasons for why LDK stock price should go up, even though we in a terrible bear market... Can you imagine the effect of people seeing solars as a last shelter and in the solar group seeing LDK as the strongest player... the herd effect would be incredible!
    2008 Jul 11 11:07 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Good work! I'm not Chinese, just speak Mandarin. I notice lots of differences in the analyst conferences between what is said in Chinese and how it is said in English. Chairman Miao of Yingli is my favorite -- when I can get through his accent. The subtle shadings simply do not come through in translation.

    The ability quietly to visit a company site or office and sit there looking stupid and speaking English while reading and listening to the conversations in Chinese is also very useful. Walking around the town, visiting restaurants or locations near the compannies involved, and talking generally to employees also is helpful.

    The other thing -- and it is major -- that the Western analysts miss is the attitude of the CCP and the Central Committee towards Chinese energy policy. They have the usual "The Mountains are High and the Emperor is Far Away" problems with the provincial officials, and they need (and will have) a central Energy Ministry later this year or early next year, but the commitment to alt-energy in China is tremendous and so are the funds available to support it.

    There is awkwardness in some of the financial structures -- the inability to get financing for the Dunhuang solar PV project, yet, but the solar insolation in Xinjiang and the Gobi is very large, and the primary east/west power grid tie from Shanghai to the west runs just to the north of Dunhuang on its way to Urumchi and the border.

    I like the analysts who follow the companies, and I listen to all of the conference calls, but few of them speak Chinese or read it, and almost no one actually goes to the company sites, offices, plants or walks around the towns where they do the manufacturing, or talks to their Chinese customers. In Chinese.

    Great article. Glad you posted it and did the maths -- I never thought to read the local government handouts, but what you did feels right. Great work!
    2008 Jul 11 11:17 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Thanks Michael!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    2008 Jul 11 11:50 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    This would probably be a lot of work, but I would love to see the same information for all the chinese solar stocks, especially CSIQ and SOLF which has been hit hard by other analysts lately!
    2008 Jul 11 11:56 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Micheal, how about YGE?
    Can you give us similar report?
    Thanks
    2008 Jul 11 12:18 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Mike,
    If I was working for an investment firm, I would hire you today and pay for your education. You're right on the money with both articles. I've been accumulating LDK for a year. I believe it will be at 100 in 2 years. Keep up the great work!
    2008 Jul 11 01:47 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Can you give us similar report on JASO and SOL?
    2008 Jul 11 01:51 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Dear Mr. Michael Lu

    Nice rising hair cut.
    2008 Jul 11 03:05 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Can chinese people/funds living in China invest on NYSE or not, just on local exchanges?
    2008 Jul 11 03:36 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Try Wangvest.com
    2008 Jul 11 04:28 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    What about other Chinese solars such as Trina Solar, CSIQ etc.
    2008 Jul 11 04:56 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    if you can just post the numbers from the chinese reports we can crunch the numbers that are implied, using your method.
    crunching numbers to all these companies is too much to ask from you especially as we can't paste excel spreadsheets to the posts.
    thank you in advance, but even if you can't thanks for LDK, one of my favorites.
    2008 Jul 11 06:15 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    CSIQ will bet the estimate all the way to next year. Do your own research.

    Long CSIQ.
    2008 Jul 11 09:50 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Great article. I own long-term call options on LDK. I did some research a while back and came to the same conclusion as you. (Though my own research paled in comparison to yours posted here). Many thanks!
    2008 Jul 12 02:39 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Very good article - Many thanks.

    Geoff Mathews
    2008 Jul 12 09:43 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Michael, excellent job, keep up the good work.
    2008 Jul 12 10:41 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Michael, liked your first LDK article and love this one even more. Keep up the good work!
    2008 Jul 12 11:57 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Michael: you misread the original Chinese article. The 3.8billion CNY rev refers to the solar sector in Xinyu City, not LDK only. There are a couple of small solar companies with combined $20-40m rev. So LDK's Q2 rev should be around $280-$300. Your caculated (from tax payment) LDK Q2 net income of $62.8m is also questionable. More accurate caculation should be around $56m-$59m.

    By the way, many posters ask Michael to post #s for other Chinese solar companies... he can't. The reason is that LDK is an exception. Up-to-date and reliable information for most other Chinese solar cos are not readily available. It takes a lot of hard work and extensive search (Chinese media, internet blogs, forums, QQs, etc) ...
    2008 Jul 12 01:05 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Buystocks wrote and I quote:

    "CSIQ will beat the estimate all the way to next year. Do your own research.

    Long CSIQ."
    ======================...

    I agree with your assessment in the fundamental aspects of CSIQ that it will beat the revenue and earning's estimates for at least the next two years. There are four underpinning driving forces in favor of the solar sector in general, but have yet to come into play: (1) Expected decline in Poly-Si prices. (2) The ITC or PTC for renewable energy will become the law of this land (USA) - if not this Bush's administration, it will be the next. (3) The potential decline of ASP of PV products that will cause the exponential rise in demand. (4) The sure increases in the electricity rates across all regions over time will further fuel the demand for solar systems.

    The solar sector is the most promising one in all sectors in terms of growth prospects. And the CSIQ is the strongest stock in this sector. There is one school of thoughts that says to invest in the strongest stock of the strongest sector.
    2008 Jul 12 08:22 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    CSIQ's UMG products can compete with thin film for performance and price.. It is the only chinese company can do that so far.
    2008 Jul 13 12:09 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Big big grain of salt. Taxable income and financial reportable income are not the same. Many many different factors, elements, adjustments go into the two separate reports. Reconciling the two types of income can be a pain. One can have taxable income and a financial loss, and another can financial income and a taxable loss. Unless you have both sets of books from prior years and can understand the adjustments that went into constructing such reports in prior years, and can apply such adjustments into current year / projections, then I would not presume to make any assumptions.
    2008 Jul 13 03:29 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Excellent analysis - well done Michael - if you are right then some AUG calls would be in order - RB
    2008 Jul 13 05:22 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    beautiful work michael you have a bright
    future. keep up the good work .thanks
    here we go LDK all the way up to 154.00
    2008 Jul 14 12:24 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    So far the best P/E is TSL and CSIQ, I like CSIQ better due to it has the ability to scale up fast and its UMG product which TSL dosn't have yet.
    2008 Jul 14 01:31 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    michael have you looked into what big swing and nojke have said? are you revising your estimates? Thanks for the intense work you have done on this.
    2008 Jul 14 07:59 PM | Link | Reply
More by Michael Lu
Other articles by Michael Lu »