Back to Breakeven for Equities? 2012-2013. 3 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
20% bear market declarations are pretty much useless, but they give journos and TV types something to sell ads with. Mathematically speaking, the hurt starts at 13% losses.
Losses over 13% require gains of greater than 13% for recovery. The graph below highlights how this works. The blue line approximates the intuitive relationship of losses equaling gains. The red curve is the reality. Click to enlarge:
Rule #1 in all investment allocation decisions is don't lose money. Risk management is the name of the game at the asset and portfolio level. If you are a European and invested in US shares you have lost 50% of your money after the currency conversion. You would need a 100% return to break even.
The acceleration point for losses requiring greater gains is around a 13% loss. Think of it as inverting the power of compounding returns. Currently the S&P is 26% below its highs. To get back to the previous high point for domestic investors the S&P 500 needs to gain a little over 35%. The long term 80+ year historical average return for equities is around 7-8%, so back to break even then in around 4 years. Based on historical average return would be 2012-2013.
The ex dividend annual return for the S&P for a dollar based investor since 1998 has been roughly .3%. When one factors in an inflation estimate of 2.5% per year, one ends up with an effective loss of purchasing power of 25% over the last decade. Welcome to the lost decade. Download returncurve.xls
P.S. I am not such a buzzkill in real life. I am just pointing out some facts.
Related Articles
|





















I think that far too many in the 'buy&hold'-'stocks for the long term' crowd fail to realize that a 50% loss can ONLY be made up by a 100% gain, and those are difficult to come by!
Cash is a VERY valid position... there is more to life than LONG and SHORT!
(confession: long QID, SKF, REW, SRS; with stops set daily)