Why I Bought Financials (Despite the Mess) 30 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
If you’re going to be a trader, and you don’t have to be and trading is not the core of what I do, at some point you have to pull the trigger. We always want that perfect, can’t lose, super obvious, entry (and exit) point. But it’s not always that easy. At some point, when the risk/reward equation feels right, you have to pull the trigger and put on a position. Otherwise, you’ll never act and you’ll never trade.
I went ahead and bought the financials via the ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) yesterday afternoon for a variety of reasons:
- By my count, Monday represented Day 26 of the selling stampede that began on Friday June 6. These things “tend” to last 17-25 days, according to Raymond James’s Jeff Saut. At some point, stocks take a break from going straight up or straight down. I think we’re close to that point.
- At 1225, the S&P is 15% off its recent high (1440 on May 19th), has pierced previous lows (1255 on March 17th), and should have some support around 1220 which represented the low during the Summer ‘06 selloff (also see the last chart in this post by Tim Knight from yesterday morning).
- The troubles at Fannie (FNM) and Freddie (FRE) have been the catalyst for the latest leg down and Sunday’s intervention by the Feds seem to provide a short term resolution to this issue, thus taking Fannie and Freddie away as potential further downward catalysts in the short term.
- The financials themselves, as measured by the Select Sector SPDRFinancial (XLF), are down 36% from their recent highs (May 2nd), are 35% below their 200 day moving average, and volume is at levels we saw during the climactic Bear Stearns (BSC) selloff (XLF YTD Chart). The selling during the latest down leg has focused on the financials and any bounce should therefore be led by, and strongest in, them.
- Can the news get any worse? IndyMac, the nation’s 9th largest mortgage originator in 2007, failed on Friday and was taken over by the government. The Treasury and Federal Reserve intervened yesterday to prop up Fannie and Freddie. As long as “the system holds together” can things get too much worse short term?
Maybe we get another capitulation day in short order, a huge selloff and a spike in the VIX into the 30s. If so, then I’m early. It’s certainly very well possible that this does happens. Trading is art, not science. Nobody knows exactly what will happen, but I’m willing to put some money to work here.
Disclosure: Top Gun is long the ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG).
Related Articles
|


























This article has 30 comments:
Even if you are right, what makes you think it will be a V recovery and not an L recovery?
Long SKF, FXP
Until we know what is on their balance sheets, no investment for me.
Wow, so if I do this, will I get rich? How do I do that?
Even if financials still have a way to fall (as my gut tells me they do), anything close to dollar-cost-averaging into this very discounted market makes long term INVESTING sense (perhaps the bashers are all short-term traders, or think they can call the bottom). I'm amazed how many of you think you are so much smarter than Benjamin Graham. I also wonder how many of you would have been smart enough to say not to buy financials a year ago, when they were triple the price?
This sounds like recklesness.
Prudence, prudence prudence...
What happened to prudence virtue and modesty.
( From a punter too old to be president)
On Jul 15 10:32 AM glassbox wrote:
> Another way to turn the financials around is tell the current shareholders
> to stop lending their scrips. No need for positive earnings surprises.
> its much easier this way.
everybody knows that financials will go up someday, but not before some serious damage. question is now or after a month or after a year. you have picked the "now" trade.
Also, just because a stock has gone up or down 13 or 15 or 27 days in a row doesn't necessarily have anything to do with it's performance tomorrow (they may very well be independent events, see: gambler's fallacy).
1) Housing has 10% more pricing decline by anybodies assumptions
2) One year of inventory now piled up (setting new records)
3) Election season. October historically looks better in election season to buy lows
4) Have better chance buying several foreclosed homes, use a property manager and rent them out and hold them long in my opinion then investing in the financials recovering anytime soon. Lost confidence by the entire global financial system will not be restored overnight, even when the surviving banks have shored up balance sheets.
4)
Yesterday's "oversold bounce" (as you call it) was driven by financials! In fact, every market summary I've read about yesterday's broad market gains credits the banking sector for lifting the market, not the other way around. So it's hard for me to pay attention to the rest of your post (correct or not) when the first sentence is the exact opposite of what actually happened.
On Jul 17 07:11 AM buyitcheap wrote:
> This is an oversold bounce - and in this case a rising tide is going
> to lift even the financials.
I liked the front page of your website btw, and would invite you also to share any interesting strategies or approaches that are working for you.
Financials can be indeed a very tricky sector.