Seeking Alpha
We cover over 5K calls/quarter
Profile| Send Message| ()  

Executives

David L. Brown – Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Kevin Carney – Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

Analysts

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Web.com Group, Inc. (WWWW) Citi Technology Conference Call September 6, 2012 9:30 AM ET

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

I’m Walter Pritchard, Software Analyst with Citi. Happy to have with us, Web.com, got Kevin Carney; who is the CFO, and we’ve got David Brown, the CEO. I’m going to go through some questions, I think probably are common to what the audience has on their minds, open it up with about 10 minutes left, and anybody who have questions we’ll circulate the microphones as we have been doing in this room.

So I guess just to start off the discussion, the company has been growing through acquisitions aggressively in the last 2.5 or so years, could you just give us an update on such as the Network Solutions acquisition, you quadruple your customer base through that acquisition, so you get to parts and support, where you are with that, and what we should be looking for the next few quarters as we assess the targets along that.

David L. Brown

Sure. The Network Solutions transactions has gone extremely well. It follows the game plan that we rolled out, when we did Register.com acquisition, which was about a year prior to that. From an integration perspective, where half or haven’t scheduled, in achieving our cost synergy. That’s terrific we are also performing very well from a customer churn perspective, we’ve actually outperformed our own expectations there and we’re clearly integrating that company in a way that it’s not impacting our customers negatively, and so we’re seeing very low churn in the business.

We are also very pleased with the cross sell and up sell that we’re seeing into that base, very similar to the Register deal where we had very effective cross sell and up sell opportunities. We are actually seeing better opportunities in Network Solutions, the customers are more receptive, it’s frankly just much larger opportunity, and that’s one of the key reasons, why we see revenue growth in our business, given in this scale, as we add more sale resources and began to work with that customer base, we’re able to drive revenue growth at higher rates of growth than we’ve seen historically.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Can you talk about just the profile of the two customer base of the Net Sol customer base versus what you had on what pre-Register and what are sort of the low hanging fruit that are driving the up sell and the ARPU increases and then how do you look at so sustaining that beyond that initial period?

David L. Brown

So Network Solutions besides the fact that it’s just far and larger than Register.com, its multiple seven multiples larger, so remarkably similar customer base. Very oriented towards small businesses, about 70% of the Network Solutions customers were small businesses, the remaining 30% are spread over the consumers, a category we called international, which could include small businesses, but we don’t necessarily know because they come to us quite accidently through the Internet, and a very, very small group of enterprise customer.

So 70 plus percent small businesses, Register was even greater small business. So not perspective, it gives us really good visibility into what to expect, where we’re having the most success today selling our value added products through the Network Solutions customers. What we found is in both these companies, Register and Network, they were wonderful domain companies, but they had very limited product portfolio outside of hosting and some Do It Yourself products. So we brought to them products like online marketing products, it helps your website, get found in a local search.

eCommerce products that help you sell things online. Social media products like our Facebook products. We brought the mobile products, so you can be found in mobile searching. Those are the products right now that are having the greatest attraction, those plus one more; we believe that as mass adoption occurs and we believe that we are right in the midst of the early stages of mass adoptions, by small businesses even our Do It For Me website products is very valuable.

If you think about a product typical customer that would be a plumber, an electrician or restaurant or someone who has a six day week job, probably a 11 hours a day kind of work patterns and they not even have a website today, it’s just that the website doesn’t got any traffic, so it was build by their son, their daughter, or a friend or a local ad agency that since moved on and their website wasn’t optimized, it’s not been submitted to the search engine, it has no traffic, and so our Do It For Me, product which is $94.50 a month product, to solve that tough case for these customers. I would tell you that’s the number one, selling product we have right now, but all those other categories are also growing at very, very fastly.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

That’s number one. Overall, is that number one came to that phase.

David L. Brown

Into that phase. You would see a company wide perspective we’re using domains as a new customer acquisition channel and we just effectively taken two companies that we are shrinking and turn them around, and we’ve done that because we are able to sell approximately $100 in average order value in the first year to a domain customer irrespective of the price that we sell in the domain now.

So they come for $5, we get our $95 to $100, if they come for $10, we still get our $100. So we’re very effectively using domain that’s a way to acquire customers and then we introduce them to value added services like, Do It Yourself website, Do It For Me website, eCommerce website et cetera, et cetera and that’s why you will continue to see our progress in our business for the foreseeable future.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Got it and I guess, Kevin for you one, I mean we’ve been pretty impressed by the ARPU in early this year and I think some of that is you’ve the state to come in and it hasn’t been sold through before, can you help me people’s expectations around sort of ARPU growth this year versus sort of longer term ARPU growth, can you continue to sustain the ARPU growth that you’re seeing right now?

Kevin Carney

Sure. I think as you start the majority of the ARPU growth is coming from the up sell, cross sell and then further, we’re seeing contribution from some of the new product by Facebook as well as Smart Calls as well as some of the new channels like Feet on the Street, DRTV. So all those contributing to ARPU growth.

In terms of expectations moving forward again given that we’ve just acquired 2.7 million customers, we are guiding to more like $0.10, $0.20 a quarter, it’s a dime to dime, I think it’s the way we put it. And I think it’s now to David’s point, I think first half, I think we’ve got a lot of runway in terms of very low penetration in terms of the high ARPU high value products and services in that customer base.

So we talked about just after the acquisition our expectations in terms of revenue growth, and ARPU growth, that was going to come principally from up sell, cross sell, now we are going to further accelerate that due to the fact that we’re growing our subscriber base, we are continuing to invest in sales and marketing. We’ve been guiding up in terms of our investment there, that’s going to drive a combination of new customers of higher ARPU, but principally a lot of customers coming in at low ARPU, which are now new opportunities to up sell and cross sell, so I think we’re pretty confident in our ability to sustain that kind of growth rate around ARPU, dime to the dime in the near term.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Yeah, okay. Got it. Can you talk about what you have been able to do to reverse the tide of subscriber loss, at this point Register, eCommerce is well it’s been a year, but Network Solutions is only been two quarters and you have best and positive faster than you expected. Can you talk about what was the drivers of that trending positive, and what are the prospects as you grow that base into the segment.

Kevin Carney

Yeah, I think we saw to your point following the Register acquisition, you saw quarter-over-quarter projects as we are mitigating loss again, we acquired two companies that we are losing 15,000 to 20,000 subscribers a quarter, most of that was simply due to the fact that they weren’t spending, their strategy was more drive renewals, harvest the customer base, drive cash flow, but they weren’t willing to make the investment to grow the subscriber base and we’re in a very different position of pay off.

They were operating in a very competitive environment in the domain name space, from a pricing perspective. They just weren’t – were in a much different position in that today this point, was that all this other product to sell, was selling, we can be very, competitive from a pricing perspective to entice and acquire new customers and domains in DIY, and hosting category as well, because we have proven now and have high confidence in our ability to do the up sell and the cross sell, some of that in media and purchase products just because we have a lot more product to sell. And then following that through our telemarketing, email marketing, we can generate $100 of year one revenue.

So we turned, we shifted the strategy to invest more in those channels, we have the benefit of the years worth of testing with the Register acquisition, so to answer your question, how we turn it more rapidly with Network Solutions as we hit the ground running. We’ve already done all the testing, we figured out the formula so to speak, and now it’s just a matter of pointing dollars.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Got it, could you talk about just you had, you’ve got a lot of different channels, you used to acquire subscribers actually historically not as many you really I think moving into areas like Feet on the Street, which I get to the question from some investors around about some expenses, sort of more expenses structured than what you pursue historically, how can you get those comfortable with the source of revenue per use and things like that, you’re seeing how that channel just to justify that high level of spending that probably comes to Feet on the Street?

David L. Brown

So, I think the way that’s to look at the company historically, it’s always been a very profitable business, we’ve optimized profitability in the business. Today what you’re seeing in the company is, we are continuing to optimize profitability while we are growing faster.

So one thing to look at is our discipline around our cost of acquisition target and our return on investments. The way we approach Feet On The Street for instance, as we opened one office ran it for six months and when we were satisfied that we added all together, we added two more offices, and then we were satisfied, but we have scaled those two, then we added three more offices. So we’ve gone at this very relatively slowly, we’ve been doing that Feet On the Street for a year and a half now, we are continuing to improve the model. The two metrics that we focused on and almost all of our business, certainly one of these is the universal churn.

Customer churn is fundamental in our subscription model. So in our Feet On the Street business, we wanted to optimize for churn, and as a result our churn in that business is unbelievably low. But we don’t disclose it, but it’s frankly not that far off from the average churn that we report to the company in general, which is surprising to us, it speaks to the desire of customers to get lead flow and grow their business. And the reality is there are thousands and thousands of small businesses that we are spending thousands of dollars a month in the yellow page phonebook that are happy to spend it online, if it do get on an equivalent or better return on investment.

So churn of customers critically important, and then churn of employee and that business model where you’re using real human beings in local markets, turning employee sales people is the cost that will drive that will make that on economics, so we have optimized for employee churn and we got relatively low sales employee churn. We spend more time hiring our people, we’ve really not want it to have a churn and burn model. So that is very much of prove it out and then slowly maturely expended.

So most of our business is done that way. We will test something, if it doesn’t work you won’t hear about it, if it does work we’ll invest more in it and in today’s environment we’ve got more opportunities to invest money than we ever had as we reasonable returns on investment, so that’s one of the reasons why we are so enthusiastic about our prospects is that four years ago, the market wasn’t adopting, and so it was like pushing a string to invest money at towards returns on investments. Today, we’ve got five or six different programs that we’re currently investing in and another five or six that we are eager to test on the back of that that’s a different world for us.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Got it. I guess you said that churn is very low, but it is similar to the overall churn.

David L. Brown

It’s in the range.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

I guess I would expect on one hand it’s a higher touch model for the customer probably getting more touch and less price the churn and on the other hand, these are higher tickets, so maybe it’s a bigger target down to not renew, is that’s the way to think about, why does sounds that way?

David L. Brown

I think so. I think we have a real sales people calling on us real human being and they call multiple times and gets another customer and so that’s enhances the stickiness of the customer. And frankly customers that are willing to spend a $1,000 a month, or $2,000 a month, it’s important to them, they are less, they are engaged. They are less likely to churn. Having said that this online marketing area is full of companies with 6% monthly churns, 8% monthly churns, ours is frankly much closer to our average churn and we think that’s good for the business, very good for the business.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Understood. Could you talk about just in general the returns that you see, I don’t know if you think about the five or six channel that you have, but the good churns that you see on the those different channels and if we were to sort to what it does independently what sort of trends do you see in terms of cost of acquisition and then customer life time value, other few of those that are really separating from the pack that you will double down on here in the next two years.

David L. Brown

I would tell you that in today’s world, all of our channels are operating at or around the one year, average break-even point. In terms of cost of acquisitions to net revenue streams that they receive and that’s how we manage the business. To manage the business and we port on solving for about one year average life, in terms of break-even.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Pay back?

David L. Brown

Payback period. And we think that what we found is in recent quarters, it’s just more opportunity to invest on that basis, so eCommerce is a new area for us. It’s receiving a significant amount of new investments, like operating around that target level. Hosting it’s a product that we really never focused on selling, it’s always been bundled with other things, but we can now acquire hosting customers like it become a feeder system for our value added services, we can acquire hosting customers around that same targets. And that’s in addition to Do It Yourself website domain, Do It For Me website those have been our traditional channels, add a few more new product channels to that, and you see where we are spending some of our incremental marketing dollars.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

It sounds like the messages you have is five or six different channels some are higher cost of acquisition, higher revenue, if they all break-even in your time.

David L. Brown

It’s about right.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Roughly in your timeframe. Got it, could you talk about so social is kind of an interesting area, I think from a stock market perspective from a consumer perspective, there is sort of where the world rest today, where do you seen in terms of your customers and how they are engaging in social channels, and is your social products at this point easy to sell or is it very much the way kind of convincing of what the value of, what you guys just thought and what sort of prospects you see for the driver.

David L. Brown

So the social products, the principal social product we have today is in Facebook. And we were an early pioneer for small businesses in building out Facebook profile pages, and it was really just an accident, a customer asks us for the product. We were capable of doing it, we felt it was easy, we use the same content, the same employee above their website, got the Facebook site, it took us few minutes. It is a $40 a month subscription and we think that’s a good idea. We then started offering it to every customer that would buy our Do It For Me our $94 product, amazingly more than 30% of the customers we offered to wants the product.

So that’s okay, we never seen anything like that before. We would have expected conversion rate at the high end of the 10% range, not the 30% range. So that told us that Facebook phenomena the demand in the market and the appeal was there. To give you a one last data point, we run a variety of direct response TV ad to date, we have two product ads, one is a website ad, one is a Facebook ad. When we run the Facebook ad, we sell more websites than when we run the website ad, relative to all lot of Facebook as well.

So that ad is dramatically now why does that happened, customers when they see the Facebook ad, they hear Facebook, they (inaudible) it, they are interested and they call us. It’s much easier for us to sell them both product at that point in time. It’s a less mature product in the market place. So there is a great deal of demand and great feel of excitement, you will see more from us around Facebook in coming quarters, because it does have so much from sales and advertising…

Kevin Carney

One thing I think a lot of investors trying to get arms around it, how to size your market opportunity and I think you’re probably benefitting from everything from money people might have spend bringing up wires and putting them on boards to yellow pages to doing out down call marketing campaigns, direct mail whatever maybe, how do you look at maybe from talking to customers, you’re doing surveys that you base, the money that showing up in your pockets where it is coming out of, because small businesses in general have a budget for marketing and promotions and interfacing with their customers, I would imagine that’s relatively fixed in a matter of how that…

David L. Brown

So let’s just put in context to begin with, our average ARPU is a laughing $13 and a few pennies, so per month, we’re not exactly extracting a few toll from our customers on average, but when you do get somebody who’s sending $90 a month that is quite imagine starting to get their radar.

Kevin Carney

The way to think about it is that historically a customer would have spend $200, $300 just to have their name in the phonebook, that’s small business. For consumer it’s free, for a small business they get wacked $200 - $300 just to have their name listed. Now ad would have cost them several hundred per month to $1,000 per month. So this in today’s world we are talking about a trough in the pocket relative to that particular medium, studies have been done over the years, that shows that the average small business, spends about $1,500 a month in sales and marketing. So we are at the very earliest stage of utilizing online for sales and marketing, that’s why we believe that we’re in front end, but not adoption.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Got it. Could you talk about just small business condition, we can watch CNIP, we can look at what into puts out around here, on a feel of your one to 10, how healthy are small businesses right now, in your view in the U.S.

David L. Brown

So we monitor things like selling (inaudible) rates. Going out of business over limit we have a variety of different, meet a lot of our customers and we have 3 million of them, and we sell them on a subscription basis, so we have a great data going back for years, we have not seen an improvement and the underlying economic conditions, and the metric that we would monitor don’t reflect an improvement for small businesses, nor did they reflect it getting any worse.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

This is for ’08 or ’09?

David L. Brown

It seems to be slightly better that’s been when why we would call the panic era, but we are in hang on by single nails, more right now from those small businesses, and they may thing to us, they are buying our products, they are buying more of our products and they are going up to value chain, so what that tells us is the positive wind of mass adoption is frankly stronger than the negative wind of a poor economy. And we’ll benefit from that and if the economy improves, we think that relatively further acceleration.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

And you had a lot of product that’s up growing up products are you, how aggressively are you introducing new products at this point. Is this sort of your managing the subscriber base that you stabilize now. Have you really transitioned out to pushing new products, you have to focus?

David L. Brown

It is not the focus, the focus is serving the customers that we have and interestingly small businesses don’t have a rapacious appetite for to knew a thing coming down the blocks other than Facebook. They are not even jumping on the train right not much on the mobile yet, they see it, they use it themselves, but they are not clambering for it. So the most important product is a website, I think it’s found in search period, if you deliver that and that only you serve the market well, however we have to evolve our business.

So we do have teams that all they are doing is developing new mobile products, our Smart Calls product is an example of that where we work with Google to come out with a mobile quick to call advertising product and we’ve got a variety of other mobile products. We’ve got our Facebook product, we have a Twitter product, we’ve got a video product coming, we have to be in front of this, because you never know when the product you have will become obsolete and so and we this to serve the market.

On the other hand they are products that we stayed away from like shopping services, we are not providing heavily discounted shopping services to our customers because we ask them, do you want to play in coupon, do you want to be in these things, and the answer was no, not really. We’d rather if we want to discount our products we’re happy to do it on our own, and so we stayed away from those products up to this point. So we are always trying to innovate and be in front of the curve in terms of what’s coming next.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Have you look at partnership opportunity product, because it does seem like maybe not Groupon but may be number three or four player in that space, partner with in the economic competition and how do you look at those opportunities.

Kevin Carney

Well, with 3 million customers that are attractive to a variety of different partners, we have a lot of leverage and we almost always enter every product category through partnerships, sometimes multiple partnerships, our objective here is to find the best player in the market to serve their customers in the best possible way. So we have done a number of recent partnerships you’ll see a lot more partnerships in terms of product supply that how we will roll out our new products.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

And should we expect those partnerships did they ultimately turn into acquisitions. And you do own your core products, you pretty much own them all.

David L. Brown

We do, we brought nine product oriented companies in the history and all of them were partners, so that is one avenue that we go down, it’s not the only avenue, but that’s is an avenue.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Got it. Just going to ask little bit Kevin about some of the numbers here, so you have given guidance for free cash flow of $135 million to $140 million for the year, you’ve done about 40% of ad so far in the year I believe.

Kevin Carney

Yeah, I think the number was $71 million correctly I think through the second quarter.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Got it. Okay. So you’ve done half of that, in terms of looking at the second half of the year, is there anything is it just more of the same in terms of choosing that number for the year.

Kevin Carney

Yeah, I think so. The only other thing that we commented on in terms of and I think we got a combination of things like from a we’ve had questions around seasonality, so you have a little bit more seasonality in terms of renewals at the beginning of the year, than at the end of the year. But then you have now the benefit of revenue growth, but then you have that and cost synergy realization.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

So revenue growth is really before you cost synergies are looking for renewals.

Kevin Carney

And de-levering of course.

David L. Brown

And renewals are working slightly it’s more of a front end loaded than the back end loaded.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Correct. Got it, as we look at sort of the cash flow growth rate over time versus the revenue growth rate over time and you’ve talked about investing you’re feeling better about and the returns you’re getting, how should investors think about the margin and the cash flow that you derive from whatever revenue growth and investor.

Kevin Carney

Yeah, I think I mean I would put it, I would probably start by putting it in terms of guidance we’ve given around EBITDA margins – just EBITDA margins, and what we have said there is, we are targeting 30%, we’re very close to that I think 29% in the last quarter, so making very good progress. And we think that 30% is a sustainable number, but the truth is we could generate more than that, but we think that better opportunity for our shareholders is to drive accelerate on revenue growth, so we’ve indicated that we’re going to continue to invest and sell the market, and everything that we generate above 30%, we will reinvest in sales and marketing to further to drive further revenue growth in the business.

Question-and-Answer Session

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Got it. Maybe I’ll open it up here, see if there is any questions, I’ve got a couple of handful myself, but we’ve got a pretty good crowd, I’m bringing the microphone over there.

Unidentified Analyst

Two other questions on competition in general, the first one is from large product providers, do you mention that you have partnered with Google in the past and maybe now partnered with Facebook as well, given some of the pressures, let’s say Facebook is facing why do you think that they would be interested in continuing this partnership as against having their own product, which is almost similar to yours which are completely probably cannibalize yours, is the first question.

The second is about competition from developing economies, does there is very high chance that some there other from the developing economies, could be China, India anywhere may come up with some of the products like yours, they may not have sales staff like you do over here, or marketing staff or they may not have the bright initiation strategy like you do because you own Network., the Network company as well as bunch of other companies. How do you plan to deal with that. Do you plan to have officers or staffs over there so that you compete as and when it happens?

Kevin Carney

So first off major competition the Google’s, the Facebook’s of the world, we do our business, if we step away from our business, we view ourselves as kind of middle ware. We sit between large technology company and small businesses and help translate and communicate how that’s going to work. And good news for us is that they don’t want to do it. Google stop leaving post their phone number on their website to offer help to you, and Facebook even if they wanted to do it, it’s growing so rapidly and has so many different switch to apply right now that they welcome company like us that can actually help a small business, use their product and then you have to put yourself in the shoes of the customer.

If you actually had a full time job, which were serving customers, let’s say you are a plumber, the last thing you want to do at the end of the day is hop on the Internet to spend the evening maybe every evening and weekends trying to research how to master web services, social media, mobile and whatever the next new thing that’s coming down the pipe. So we actually very fortunate, but there are Google’s and Yahoo’s and Facebook’s and companies like this because, we exist to help small businesses, use our stuff and as a result there is a very symbiotic relationship between Web.com and all of these names. We are actively working with all of the largest technology companies in the country, helping them to figure out how they are going to sell their services to a small business customer, and how it’s going to be serviced, and good news is that’s what we do.

Now from that geographic perspective, offshoring, we have over the history of 15 years of the company, had operations in Philippines, Colombia, India, Romania, and so we tried a number of times to replicate what we do for U.S. small businesses offshore. We have not been successful at it, it’s not to say that it can’t be successful, but we’ve not been successful, and so we build a different model. We built a model that allows us to operate within North America so efficiently that frankly there is no cost advantage from going overseas.

We use a different manufacturing process, our process for fulfilling products is quite unique, gives us a competitive advantage and the real competitive advantage is when you’re talking about our U.S. business and the nuances of that business. That’s what determines what you get high ranking in Google. The relevance in the site is determined by how specific you are to the nuances of the business, the uniqueness of the business. Our U.S. based employee whether it’s customer support or sales people are just better equipped today to be able to understand the nuances of a U.S. small business and translate that into an outcome that gets you a first page Google. The thing is perhaps down the road that will be equalized but right now we have a real competitive advantage there and we intend to continue to use it.

Unidentified Analyst

So just question is how many net customers did you add quarter-over-quarter for the domain business for Network Solutions and Register?

Kevin Carney

The metric that we report is to just net subscriber additions and we don’t break it out in terms of the product categories, but it was 14,000 net subscriber additions in the last quarter, and I think that based on what we’d said previously that we were losing customers and because of the acquisitions that we did of course that was all coming in the domain name customer category, so that’s where we made the most significant progress over the last couple of quarters, following the Network Solutions acquisition.

Unidentified Analyst

So quarter-over-quarter it was positive net customer growth.

Kevin Carney

Correct, 14,000.

Unidentified Analyst

Domain business.

Kevin Carney

Correct. That was positive.

Unidentified Analyst

So then second question that is why did deferred expenses not grow kind of at the same rate that your net customer?

Kevin Carney

Okay. This question has come up a couple of times, and you have from a GAAP perspective, you have purchase accounting that’s impacting that, so there’s been a lot of discussion around for revenue and deferred expense, which is domain name related to what you’re referring to. In purchase accounting we wrote down the deferred revenue, we wrote up the deferred asset that’s what purchase accounting required, so what you have there is amortization of that write up as well, so that is coming down, it’s purchase accounting related. It’s masking what you would otherwise see as an increase.

Unidentified Analyst

Okay. And then the last question I have is what percentage of the deferred revenue that you did write off for the acquisition, how do you recognized, it’s a kind of the non-GAAP revenue number that you guys talked about.

Kevin Carney

Yeah, I think I don’t know, hand it’s a metric that we report on I can tell you I think the last two quarters off hand, I believe the first quarter was about 28 million, and about 22 million in second quarter, but if you just look back at the earnings releases, our filings you can see very specifically that’s a reconciling item between GAAP and non-GAAP.

Unidentified Analyst

I was just wondering in the context of M&A kind of what you see in this space, one of your competitors brought an asset into it, in the last couple of weeks. And also in the context of M&A your balance sheet kind of the flexibility that you have there and obviously the debt that you had that coming up on a year in terms of certain type of provisions, within the project remix, kind of what are you looking to do there in the future.

Kevin Carney

Sure. So it’s a very exciting time in our space. There is consolidation beginning to occur, these acquisitions that you hear about including the ones we done, are evidence of some consolidation. It’s exciting for us, because there are very few natural buyers. We happen to have a 15 year history of successful M&A activity. There are very few other players that can stay back maybe only one in the market, so we do have an opportunity to see all the assets.

We have our own approach our cost per M&A is, it has to be strategically a fit either a product we need, or a ad scale that we need customers, it has to be accretive, and we actually passed to understand the risks surround the acquisitions and they have to be mitigated. So that’s how we approach it that means at often times we are not very active. Right now we are very integrating very significant acquisition and we’re de-levering and that’s our prime focus.

So we’re looking at lot’s of things and being aware of and cognizant sometimes these deals may take years to develop, and by that time you know that target extremely well and whether you should face or whether you should cut base. So we are very patient in the business, and we are very focused on our priorities, that’s really the essence of running a company. It’s knowing what your priorities are sticking to them. So we are sticking to our priorities, which is integrate properly and de-lever the business. And that’s really speaks to your second question.

Our balance sheet we have a good amount of debt right now, we actually generate plenty of cash flow, so we are absolutely not concerned about our debt levels. We will payoff the debt as we said within its term, and we began the three times leverage by the end of next year. So that’s just organic cash flow generation capability. But having said that it does creates some constrains for us on the M&A. Fine we’re almost $0.5 billion business today, with 3 million customers, we’re quite large enough now to make our own ways in the mass adoption curve that’s going on in the United States and to grow organically, that’s the level that we said in those teams, and to grow our net income in the high-teens 20% and that’s really our focus right now.

Let’s not to say that we won’t continue to look at M&A and be aware of it, and if there is a real great opportunity, sure we would act on it, but we have to keep in mind that our principal objectives are integrate, de-lever, grow organically, and that’s really the focus of the company today.

Unidentified Analyst

Did you say earlier that small business can sometimes spend $200 to $300 a month or a year, just for a…

David L. Brown

A month.

Unidentified Analyst

A month. And building on Walter’s question before, when you are marketing your products, your services, are you typically having to, are you selling to somebody who is going to spend incremental dollars or are you having a big dollar out of some other avenue like the phonebook or something.

David L. Brown

Yes.

Unidentified Analyst

And if you were having to take dollars something else, where is it coming from the phonebook to primary competition where is it other things like direct mail or…

David L. Brown

So I think most of the dollars that we take today are coming from offline sources, phonebook, newspaper, direct mail, other forms of traditional media. We see this we can see it publicly by watching the U.S. public companies in the directory services business, and the newspaper business, watch their advertising revenue levels over the last eight quarters and you can see, actually an accelerating declines in those categories. We have anecdotal data, we have customers telling us that they are cutting back their spend in the yellow page phonebook, in my case I actually have in the family small business.

So I guess to hear about it every night, when my wife tells me that she had eight phone calls from the yellow page companies and she is had it, she wants, she don’t know what she gets from that, she loves her website. She knows exactly what she gets from a website because you can measuring state of sales you get, so I can see the human behavior we hear anecdotally, you can see it published and if you want to come to my, (inaudible) you can hear about it, right after we talked about how the kids are doing, and then we talk about the business is doing.

Unidentified Analyst

(inaudible).

David L. Brown

Yes, that’s the right way to think about it. There is a maximum amount of money being send by small businesses, historically for marketing. The business that does $500,000 a year in sales, its spending few 1,000 a month to market themselves, they just used to have one or two ways to do it. It was the local newspaper and it was the yellow page phonebook, now they have got an entire panoply of products in the internet.

Unidentified Analyst

Thanks. I kind of new to the story, so forgive me. Most relevant questions maybe, I guess the first is going to be as we think about the up sell opportunity you guys have, is there way to quantify maybe number of customers and domains that might be kind of to able to trend to demand (inaudible) traders, maybe not wholesaler that will be on the demand.

David L. Brown

I think first off, the business that we acquired Register and Network historically were not oriented towards the domain of industry. They were at the high priced players in the market, and therefore they didn’t attract people that products lots and lots of cheap domain to try to see if they could make a living office domain business. So we are fortunate not to have a lot of that in our product portfolio and we also shield against it, when we do our introductory pricing, now if we drop our price we limit the number of domains you an buy that introductory price to keep those domains out of those. We are interested in real small businesses that we can have a direct relationship, it’s a relative small percentage, very small percentage of our business.

The way we think about the upsell opportunity is that there is not yet double-digit penetration in online marketing, social marketing, mobile, eCommerce, and those are all value added products that we offer, none of those has even double-digit penetration in the small business marketplace today. In most cases it’s low single-digit market penetration, so huge opportunity irrespective of whether the customer what they have with us many customers are going to one upsell online, have a Facebook site, have a mobile website since that’s where you’re going to find them, that’s going to be on your mobile phone, so we think that opportunity is huge, and those categories and that’s why so much of our emphasis is in the value-added services category.

Unidentified Analyst

Got it. And could you help me think about economics of just the domains?

David L. Brown

Sure, a domain the cost, all in cost for a domain is in the $7 to $8 range per year and our average price is in the mid 20. Our NSRP is actually in the high 30s and often times you might see an introductory price as low as $5 for the first term, and it would then reprice at the renewal to our NSRP, so those are the units economics that we have in our business in the domain business.

Unidentified Analyst

And this $7 is like very high.

David L. Brown

That’s I can’t find Peter, there is very little other cost in our business for a domain.

Unidentified Analyst

Got it. And last question, which is the – I guess, is there a way to bucket your customers like presumably if you’re buying shopping software (inaudible) sales which is a much higher price point in the 13 ARPU.

David L. Brown

It is.

Unidentified Analyst

Is there a way to think about like what the pass rate from those products might be today.

David L. Brown

I think it’s early in the game, I wish I could tell you better, but it’s too early in the game. I can’t tell you that half of our revenue is in the domain space category and half of it is in the value-added services product category, and the reason I’d point that out is, we actually have a history of being a value-added player and so we are very, confident in our ability to sell value-added services because that’s what we are ultimately.

Walter H. Pritchard – Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Great. We’re actually, sorry we’re not going to get to the last questioner, there maybe around for a few minutes but we’ve got to wrap it up here, we have a keying up starting back in the Mainroom. David, Kevin thank you very much for coming, thank you all for attending.

Kevin Carney

Welcome.

Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited.

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS.

If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com. Thank you!

Source: Web.com Group's CEO Presents at Citi Technology Conference (Transcript)
This Transcript
All Transcripts