Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Apple’s (AAPL) 3G iPhone appears to be quite profitable. The fully subsidized price from AT&T (T) is $199/$299 for the 8GB/16GB models, respectively- requiring a 2-year contract. If a current AT&T customer has recently purchased a discounted phone, then the price may increase up to $399/$499, depending on how much subsidy AT&T needs to recover on the old phone. Without a 2-year contract from AT&T, the iPhone will cost $599/699.

The actual amount Apple receives per iPhone is uncertain. Wall Street analysts estimate AT&T is paying a $300-$350 subsidy. The AT&T pricing scheme suggests the subsidy may be as high as $400 per unit.

Even though $200 is the industry standard for smart phone subsidies, there are many reasons that support the higher estimates.

1) AT&T is increasing data plans by $10/mo and no longer offering 200 free text messages. Most iPhone plans will increase by $15/mo. This equates to a $360 increase over the life of the contract.
2) AT&T’s average revenue per user [ARPU] is roughly $50/mo, where the iPhone ARPU is north of $90/mo. Thus, iPhone users generate $960 more per 24-month contract.

Therefore, a $350 subsidy is quite reasonable and perhaps conservative. Using this assumption, Apple receives $550/$650 from AT&T.

A recent estimate by iSuppli puts the production cost at $173 for the 8GB unit. The 16GB model adds only $16 more to cost; yet it sells for $100 more than the 8GB device. Gross profit for the 8GB model is $376 at a selling price of $550. The 16GB model has a gross profit of $460 selling at $650. The gross margins calculate to 68% and 71% for the 8GB/16GB, respectively.
The 16GB adds $84 in incremental gross profit, or nearly a $1/share per 10 million units. Thus, the model mix can significantly impact the income statement.

Initial data suggests that consumers are favoring the 16GB model. This is very positive since the $16GB produces $100 more in revenue and has a higher gross margin.

According to the retail store availability information on Apple’s website, the 16GB model has been dramatically outselling the 8GB model. However, one problem is the supply of 8GB versus 16GB is unclear. Early Saturday, Apple’s website reported 20 stores sold-out of 8GB, versus 28 stores sold-out of 16GB-white and 53 for the 16GB-black. This indicates significantly higher demand for the 16GB models.



It’s also likely that Apple had a larger stock of 16GB devices due to higher demand for larger capacity historically. In addition, it’s less advantageous to carry too little stock of the higher-priced model since running out of the 8GB may persuade a consumer to trade up to the 16GB. Conversely, higher supply of 16GB models prevents losing potential sales of the higher-priced model when a stock-out forces one to purchase the cheaper model.

A survey by Piper Jaffray of 283 line waiters this weekend reported that 66% planned to purchase the 16GB model. This ratio of 2:1 would support the data gleaned from Apple’s website regarding iPhone availability.

Disclosure: None

Print this article with comments

This article has 29 comments:

  •  
    What makes you think the subsidy is up to $400?
    I purchased my 1st gen iPhone for $400 (8GB) walked out the AT&T store and never activated it with them. All those phones that were being sold on eBay were actually acquired the same way. It was too comon of a practice and all too evident to AT&T that their iPhone sales are much higher than the activations.
    This is why they changed the game: now you have to activate it in store so they lock you in with a contract. The kickback is the same to Apple, only that they are not simply distributing phones without any comission, now they pocket the service contract fees(the voice plan) and bill you $10 extra for the data plan to cover the subsidy with some interest on it.
    2008 Jul 16 04:25 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Apple's iPhone success and margins were certainly not a given in 2005 when the project started. I detailed the risks Apple took then in:

    iPhone: The bet Steve Jobs didn’t decline
    counternotions.com/200.../
    2008 Jul 16 04:42 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    OF COURSE ITS PROFITABLE
    2008 Jul 16 05:38 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Bashers might have us believe Steve does it out of the goodness of his heart...
    2008 Jul 16 05:54 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Mind you, revenues realized over 24 months for iPhone, so no large impact to bottom line yet...but just wait.
    2008 Jul 16 06:29 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I will NOT be getting an iphone. :)
    2008 Jul 16 07:32 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    At least here in Canada, I can tell you your assumption that
    "It’s also likely that Apple had a larger stock of 16GB devices due to higher demand for larger capacity historically" is not true. Stores have had more 8GB unit vs 16GB units. The Rogers stores I was in yesterday finally got replenished after being sold out....and *all* the new units were 8GB, so I walked out without getting one (again!).

    I agree the demand is higher for 16GB, but at least here, the supply is higher for the 8GB. Maybe Canada is getting the 8s because of higher supply of 16s elsewhere -- who knows?
    2008 Jul 16 08:23 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    The roll out in Canada is both controversial and punitive.
    2008 Jul 16 08:53 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    yes, of course it's profitable! Apple has no debt and huge cash reserves that just keep getting bigger and consumers, in historic numbers, willing to wait in line 12 hours for a new product. Apple of the 80's was financially clueless, but today's Apple is very financially savvy and here to stay.
    2008 Jul 16 09:24 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    molytjm..Apple in the 80's was not financially clueless they always had a large amount of free cash and no debt, wall street ahd most people believe Apple was n the brink of collapse while in reality it was far from it.
    How do you think Steve Jobs funded all the new R&D that gave us the first imac to start??
    Apple in the 80 early 90 was not financially clueless, Apple was technologically clueless , no new ideas and no new interesting products .. the reason is it was run by good money managers but horrible thinkers
    2008 Jul 16 10:35 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    According to geldpress, AT&T is losing money on the iphone data plan, despite the higher charge:
    www.geldpress.com/2008.../
    2008 Jul 16 10:53 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I found this to be a well-written article.
    2008 Jul 16 11:38 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I don't get why Apple is down today at all. Is this a result of option activity?
    2008 Jul 16 12:10 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Upgrades, BIG profits, mac sales growing, iphone a success, stock is not moving, all as usual.

    Are we at 200 yet ?

    Nice rally for the market today.

    Are we at 190 ?

    180 ?

    175 ?

    2008 Jul 16 01:07 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "How do you think Steve Jobs funded all the new R&D that gave us the first imac to start??"

    The first iMac came out shortly after Jobs took over. He may have improved the details and future iMacs but most of the R&D for the first one came before his time.
    2008 Jul 16 01:41 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Nasdaq up 2.6% currently and Apple stock is a turd. Makes you wonder what the F is up with the "behind the scenes market". I like that the SEC is finally starting to crack the whip and put regulations in place to stop market manipulations, just wondering how long it will take before it gets to "anal-ysts" who don't have a clue about journalistic integrity.

    Here we have a story that references websites that guess at the costs of parts, analysts who stand in line and then build some %, a chart that shows the consumer trend between 8g and 16g and what the % of stores that sold out by the day..... I have to ask you, who really gives a sh*t about this info?

    How about a story that reads "APPLE STORES SELL OUT OF ALL IPHONES IN RECORD TIME", how about that, a little REALITY, ever heard of it mr. journalist? Who cares about the overdone, dead on the vine story of how much subsidy ATT is paying, who cares? no one, people who own Apple stock want honest stories about Apple not BS to manipulate the stock.

    I bought 3000 shares in May of 2007 at $94 and at that time decided to hold the stock for at least 3 years based on the projects Apple had in the pipeline at that time. Watch for 3rd quarter 2008 sales to kill the "experts" predictions, Apples 3rd quarter report will be solid, Apples 4th quarter report will be really solid, Apples 1st quarter report will be followed with a stock split at over $200 and a quick jump back to $150.

    Look past the BS stories and remember 50 more countries to come on line for iphone this year, August is school buying time etc.
    2008 Jul 16 03:07 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Weak. And worst is still to come. Brrrrrrrrrrrr.....
    2008 Jul 16 05:26 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    OOOOOOOOOOOOH!

    www.forbes.com/2008/07...
    2008 Jul 16 06:46 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    "Look past the BS stories and remember 50 more countries to come on line for iphone this year"

    Really ? How come ? Probably I missed it.

    Thank you.
    2008 Jul 16 06:47 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Toni you are loser, plain & simple.
    2008 Jul 16 07:04 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    reagan, are we at 200 yet ?
    2008 Jul 16 07:25 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    who is this toni moron? all that is gleemed from that post is 50 more countries coming on line? actually toni is more of a turd than the Apple stock being manipulated. toni is probably one of those 7 dorks who get kicks from trying to screw down a stock because they can't afford to invest in anything so they spend thier time being negative and angry. sad really, kind of a wasted life.
    2008 Jul 16 09:36 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I'd like to know when all this profit will be seen by investors. RIM's estimates were cut today due to potential sales being lost to the iPhone and the stock immediately went up 5%. Amazon announced new Kindles and immediately shot up 8%. Apple supposedly sold 1 million plus iPhones with pent-up demand, saw $330 million in profit from App Store over the weekend, increased it's overall U.S. computer market share and the stock barely budged. We're lucky it didn't drop instead. I'm sorry, but I really do get tired of hearing how much money is pouring into Apple and then see the stock drop. It really does seem a bit tedious. The stock may never see $200 until the end of 2008. Forget those $250 figures. That's just a pipe dream.
    I've held Apple stock for four years and I'm still long, but some of the figures I hear don't make sense in this economy.
    2008 Jul 16 11:05 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Good odo, finally a post making sense. Yes, 250 is a pipe dream.

    And about the "200 by year end"... mhhhhhhhhhhh.... I wouldn't count on it.
    2008 Jul 17 08:42 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    User 227232

    Charming creature, what's about that "50 countries" ? Can you clarify that to me ?

    Thank you.
    2008 Jul 17 08:43 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    To answer the question posed, "Toni" is some juvenile dullard who thinks it's cute to impersonate a well-known AAPL bear. This same moron trolls as many financial blogs as possible looking for articles about Apple where he can spout his idiotic garbage. You might think someone would have better things to do with their time, but it's amazing how many hours there are in the day for unemployed tools with internet cafes near their flophouses.
    2008 Jul 17 10:37 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Well put, JW, PhD! Toni is nothing but a juvenile tool who is quite predictable. The guy is a loser.....
    2008 Jul 17 01:14 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    With all of the negative comments about the virtual keyboard and the non-replaceable battery along with the 2 year contract requirement, iPhone does not appear on my horizon.
    2008 Jul 17 02:18 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    @elderlygeek: strange that your website is devoted to selling a plethora of iphone related accessories. Why did you post here?
    2008 Jul 22 02:18 AM | Link | Reply