EcoGeeks: Invest Out of Knowledge, and Be Careful of What You Admire
As lovers of green gadgets, EcoGeeks probably know as much about what's new in clean technology (a.k.a Cleantech) as anyone on the web. So if you're an EcoGeek thinking about investing in companies which make the technology you know and love, you will probably take comfort in the old adage that you should invest in what you know.
An EcoGeek investing in clean technology companies will have an advantage understanding how a company makes money, and what is a needed innovation with a large market, and what is simply a bizarre curiosity. More importantly, an EcoGeek knows that any maker of EVs will have to cope with endless competitors, and they're the first to know when LED bulbs are bright enough for general use.
While knowledge of cleantech is the great strength of the EcoGeek investor, this knowledge most likely arises from a love of clean technology. Just as "geek" implies technology expertise, it also connotes an obsession with technology which might interfere with the geek's social life. Unfortunately, an obsession with cleantech has the potential to blind the unwary EcoGeek investor to the pitfalls of investing in a cool technology which might not turn out to be such a great investment.
Investing in what you know is not the same as investing in what you admire. People who invest in something just because they admire the brand often find themselves buying at the top. Our aspirations and wants are in large part cultural, and others will be excited about the same things we are, at the same time. When many investors are all buying at once, none are likely to get a good price.
To the extent that EcoGeeks are ahead of the curve with fashion, we can get in ahead of the crowd. The rising popularity which follows can work in our favor, driving the price higher as other investors pile in. To the extent that we live up to the geek stereotype, and what we think is great turns out to be hopelessly un-cool, we'll find ourselves investing in things which never catch on. Many innovations which help the environment are also quite unpopular, so it is very difficult to know if we're blazing a path for others to follow (as turned out to be the case with hybrid cars), or simply lost in the woods (think Segway.)
That said, the EcoGeek who decides to invest in cleantech need not end up going EcoBroke. The trick lies in distinguishing between when we're on the environmental cutting edge, and when we're on the environmental lunatic fringe. Most people on the lunatic fringe think that they're the only sane ones, and the rest of the world is confused. That may well be the case. After all, those of us who were worried about Climate Change before 2003 or so were on the lunatic fringe, even though most people now accept that we were right. But if we were investing in cleantech companies back then, we probably had a lot more losers than winners. Anyone remember Astropower? Or, if you're impressed by the recent successes of Capstone Microturbine (CPST), you probably didn't buy it in 2001.
The key to EcoGeeky investing is to know that we're investing out of knowledge, rather than just buying a stock because we're excited about the company's green technology. In the end, the key to all successful investing is to know ourselves at least as well as we know the companies we're investing in.
DISCLOSURE: Tom Konrad owns CPST.
This story is cross-posted on EcoGeek.org.
Get Seeking Alpha Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
ETFs In Focus
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- Housing Prices: Bottom or Temporary Bear Break?
- McCainomics: What Can He Do?
- ETF Insights: The New Hard Assets Producers ETF
- Why Airline Stocks Are So Often Bad Investments
- The Chinese Oil Problem
- Wildfires, Financial Crises, and Type Conversions in Markets
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
- Three Reasons the Solar Sell-off May Be in the Early Innings »
- Five Reasons Steve Ballmer Thinks Apple's a Buy »
- What's in Store for the Fertilizer Industry? »
- Why Commodities May Be Nearing a Turning Point »
- Apple to Reveal Mysterious Product Transition on September 9th »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Precious Metals Manipulation: Lawyers Prepare for Battle »
- Oil: The Inconvenient Truth »
- Sarah Palin: Wall Street's Candidate »
- 2 Top Energy Sector Bets »
-
Long Ideas
-
Short Ideas
-
Cramer's Picks
- Altria's Last Legal Hurdle Should Be Settled This Fall
- How Wal-Mart Really Beats Expectations
- Corning: Looking Very Cheap
- Leucadia's Key to Success
- China Natural Gas: Growth Appears Certain
- Can TRW Automotive Escape the Michigan Mess?
- Things Aren't Good - Fast Money Recap (9/4/08)
- ETFs That Help You Sleep Better at Night
- ETF Update: Alternative Energy and the Power Grid
- ETF Update: Healthcare Has a Heartbeat; A Good Time for Muni-Bond ETFs?
- Full list of Long Ideas »
- Nuance Communications: An End to Acquisitive Growth
- Short Interest Rising in Tesoro; Shorts Covering Airline Positions
- Harbinger Capital: Cut Short
- Not Much Meat on Pilgrim's Pride's Bones
- Salesforce.com: Demystifying the Force
- Should We Listen to Boone Pickens on Oil?
- Energy Conversion Devices: Ridiculously High Valuation
- Three Reasons the Solar Sell-off May Be in the Early Innings
- Is the Market Rolling Over?
- Solar and Oil, Part Deux
- Full list of Short Ideas »
- Pimco's Bill Gross: Jim Cramer Is 'Courageous' and 'Entertaining'
- Cramer Sees the Light - Cramer's Mad Money (9/4/08)
- Keep Buying Big Brown - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/4/08)
- Don't Buy These Bonds - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/4/08)
- Loss of Integrity - Cramer's Mad Money Recap (9/3/08)
- Not Off the RIMM - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/3/08)
- Unbelievable Moves - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/3/08)
- The Rally was the Real Deal - Cramer's Mad Money (9/2/08)
- Crushed Unnecessarily - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/2/08)
- A Chance to Sell - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/2/08)
- Full list of Cramers Picks »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »



This article has 17 comments:
alternative
Solar is more difficult to figure. It's had plany of opportunity to become a major contributor to our electric grid, but we've always been left waiting for the NEXT "breakthrough&quo... for it to prove itself economically worthwhile. Indeed, the contrast between wind and solar is an excellent example of your thesis.
SATC
CPST
CPTC
ZOLT
PWR
HYGS
ESLR
It's hard to believe that any one of these Green companies won't hit a home run somewhere in the near future, you think???
alternative
Thing is, every HVAC contractor says they can do it, and then for their written estimate, they try to talk you into a nice, new, energy-efficient oil burner at only half the price of the geothermal. Hah! But I've found two experienced contractors who've done a lot of these, and I've sold some investments to pay for it. So as soon as we get the final formal estimate from the second contractor, we're good to go. (BTW, both say they've got more work than they can handle. The other shoe dropping in Tom Ridge's electricity deregulation in Pennsylvania will push prices up, maybe way up, in 2010.)
My friend who's getting the windmill had the same problem. She contacted a bunch of contractors whose advertising said they install windmills, and then they tried to push her into solar (on her 10 acres of heavily forested mountaintop in the Poconos, i.e., no sun). Finally, she thinks she's lined up someone who can and will do what she wants.
Regarding solar, my husband's been following it closely for a couple of years (stockwise and personally) and figures solar shingles of some sort will be workable about the time our home inspector predicted we'd need a new roof, 5 to 10 years. Our neighbors intended to install solar panels for hot water last year, but decided it was too much of a capital expenditure for too little return. YMMV if you live someplace constantly hot and sunny.
We're looking at under $20,000 for the geothermal; I don't know what my friend is spending for the windmill or what my neighbor decided was too much for solar hot water panels.
what are your cost assumptions for evaluated alternatives to GEOTH? what is your anticipated payback date? what is your contingency on GEOTH? have you visited several sites your vendors have installed? how long in business? what other lines of business are they successfully performing?
alternative
alternative
Too many variables to bother with realistic payback dates. One in the literature was 6-8 years---but that was with $2/g oil! So will it be $3 or $5 next year? Dealers, having been burned, don't sell guaranteed annual contracts anymore.
Contingency? Do you mean continuing with oil?
No, I'm not into site visiting. Both prospective installers are established HVAC contractors recommended by the manufacturers.
(And now I'd better go make a little money!)
something in your description seems odd. what heats the 50 degree earth source to your winter room comfort level?. seems like you could get same result using the 50 degree air in basement, but still require warming air. would you buy a $25,000 auto without diving?
a pair[or single] independent consultants might be worthy $1,000 investment before you spend $20K plus with no known successes. do you invest this way?
have fun.
alternative
Why would I pay "independent consultants" with no known successes to advise me? And, yes, that's how I invest. I do not pay any investment advisors, just that $7/trade with my online broker, and I've done quite well, thank you.