IStar's Dividend Appears to Be in Jeopardy
Is IStar the Canary in the Coal Mine, or is this Just Fremont Coming Home to Roost?
IStar (SFI) saw the need to issue interim estimated earnings estimates for the second quarter on Friday, and it wasn't encouraging. As a result of loan losses and impairments uncovered during the Company's quarterly risk review process, IStar said it now expects net income per share to be in the range of $0.05 - $0.15, and that it will book an adjusted earnings loss of between $1.45 and $1.55 per share when its second quarter results are announced at the end of the month. There was no update on guidance for the full year. In the first quarter, IStar reported adjusted earnings of .87/share, which was down from .93/share for the first quarter of 2007.
The tone of the conference call was business-like, but Sugarman only amplified concerns with respect to the health of the Company's operating environment, saying he was "shocked" and "stunned" that the general credit environment had deteriorated so rapidly as a result of the rumors swirling around Fannie (FNM) and Freddie (FRE).
Significantly, the Company said it had alerted the ratings agencies to the revised guidance on Thursday, but the agencies hadn't yet had time to "process" the information. However, management thinks that its leverage ratio would still remain "flattish" despite the asset write downs, so perhaps IStar can hang on to its rating for the time being. Nevertheless, the margin for error in this regard has disappeared; everything has to go right from here on out.
IStar's policy is to pay out 100% of taxable income in the form of dividends, but when asked about the ability to maintain the dividend, CEO Sugarman was circumspect. I would expect nothing more even in the best of circumstances, but it's obvious that taxable earnings are heading in the wrong direction, which suggests that that the dividend will soon follow suit.
The adjusted losses stemmed from loan loss provisions of approximately $275 million, including $215 million of asset specific provisions. In addition, the Company expects to record approximately $50 million of mark-to-market impairments and approximately $50 million in write-offs of goodwill and certain intangibles. The Company said about two thirds of the losses were in the Fremont portfolio, and that all of the asset specific losses were "expected".
I have heard this sentiment expressed from management before with respect to the Fremont deal, usually going something along the lines of "the assets are perfoming in-line with our original underwriting". Translated, that means that the deals they thought would be underwater when they priced the acquisition are in fact face down in the lake, and the deals they thought would be ok are actually doing ok.
But sometimes it helps to be a simpleton when wading through all this Park Avenue puffery, so the obvious simple question is this: if these losses were expected, then why the unexpected loss?
Disclosure: None.
Get Seeking Alpha Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
ETFs In Focus
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- Global Stock Markets: We All Fall Down!
- American Capital Agency: Making Money the Old-Fashioned Way
- How Should Policymakers Respond to the Employment Report?
- Don't Believe the Gold Bears' Hype
- Freddie/Fannie Plans In Motion; Why Are They Being Underplayed?
- Hedge Funds Are Getting Their Butts Kicked Too
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Apple: Steve and I Have Been Wrong »
- Gold Futures' Dirty Secret (Part II) »
- Rescuing Frannie »
- Why Commodities May Be Nearing a Turning Point »
- Corning: Looking Very Cheap »
- Is Gold Getting Ready to Bounce? »
- Friday Outlook: What Phony Sell-off?! »
- The $64 Trillion Question: What's the Dollar Really Worth? »
- Fannie, Freddie Headed for Conservatorship »
- Bill Ackman's Letter to Paulson On Restructuring Plan »
-
Long Ideas
-
Short Ideas
-
Cramer's Picks
- Antigenics: Insider Buying Alert
- Discover Financial: A Creditable Investment - Barron's
- American Capital Agency: Making Money the Old-Fashioned Way
- Time to Recognize Cognizant - Barron's
- Avoid the 'Group Think' on Melco-Crown
- Safeway: A Safe Way to Invest
- A Rustbelt Revival: From Doom to Boom
- Forget the Moral Outrage: Just Restore the Mortgage Markets
- The Weak Short Case Against Jos. A. Bank
- eCommerce Stock Pair Trade: Amazon vs. eBay
- Full list of Long Ideas »
- Nuance Communications: An End to Acquisitive Growth
- Short Interest Rising in Tesoro; Shorts Covering Airline Positions
- Harbinger Capital: Cut Short
- Not Much Meat on Pilgrim's Pride's Bones
- Salesforce.com: Demystifying the Force
- Should We Listen to Boone Pickens on Oil?
- Three Reasons Solar Sell-off May Be in Early Innings
- Is the Market Rolling Over?
- Solar and Oil, Part Deux
- Financial vs. International ETFs: Which Bear is Grizzlier?
- Full list of Short Ideas »
- Fed Should Cut Rates - Cramer's Mad Money (9/5/08)
- Bullish on Wachovia - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/5/08)
- Worst Downgrades - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/5/08)
- Pimco's Bill Gross: Jim Cramer Is 'Courageous' and 'Entertaining'
- Cramer Sees the Light - Cramer's Mad Money (9/4/08)
- Keep Buying Big Brown - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/4/08)
- Don't Buy These Bonds - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/4/08)
- Loss of Integrity - Cramer's Mad Money Recap (9/3/08)
- Not Off the RIMM - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/3/08)
- Unbelievable Moves - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/3/08)
- Full list of Cramers Picks »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »



This article has 8 comments:
they can ride this crisis out I will continue buying until as much as I can
C
C