Getting Charged Up About Lithium 4 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
By Julian Murdoch
Coming soon - a new excuse for not going to work:
"Sorry I can't come in to work today; my teenager borrowed the car last night and forgot to plug it in."
With General Motor's (GM) announcement Tuesday of its plans to work with the Electric Power Research Institute and 34 utility companies across the country, the prospect of a plug-in hybrid in my garage gets a little closer. There are still hundreds of details to work out - from the technical issues to business models to my need for 4-wheel drive - but it's starting to seem like a certainty.
One of the main problems to be solved is that right now it costs about $10,000 to buy enough lithium batteries - a little high considering that GM is looking to price its offering around $30,000 to $35,000. To make that price point a reality, the cost of the battery will have to come down. Better batteries have even entered into election-year politics, with McCain proposing "a $300 million prize to improve battery technology for full commercial development of plug-in hybrid and fully electric automobiles." Of course, it only counts if he gets elected.
For this straw man, let's say they solve the cost problem, and the other problems (like safety) that plague lithium batteries. GM is testing newer forms of lithium batteries that should do just that. What does this newfangled jet-pack, electric-car future mean for commodity investors? Are there any opportunities to get in on the coming wave of new technology on a commodity front?
The obvious projection is that lithium demand will increase, even more than it already has. Laptop computers, iPhones and hundreds of other small electronics already use lithium batteries, and currently 20 to 25% of lithium goes for gizmos. If electric cars really take off, lithium will get huge - imagine how many laptop batteries it takes to run a car.
There are only a few ways to play this. FMC Corp. (FMC) and Rockwood Holdings (ROC) are the big plays in lithium production, although neither of them are pure. Detailed information about production is proprietary and therefore not reported in a useful way by the U.S. Geological Survey in its Lithium Report, though there are statistics for other countries. A recent report announced by Research in China, "Global & China Lithium Carbonate Industry Report, 2008-2010 (Updated Version)" puts Chile, Argentina and China as the top three countries in terms of production capacity for lithium carbonate. It also expects China to become a lithium exporter by 2010.
With no lithium futures contracts now, it's pick-and-shovel time. But if electric cars and lithium batteries take off, I'm sure someone will figure a way to create an ETF to take advantage of them. It's all a matter of time.
Links
To read more about one of the possible batteries GM is testing, and how the company got started, take a look at this article in Technology Review; also,
GM Teams With Dozens Of Utilities on Plug-In Cars, WSJ July 22, 2008
How Lithium-ion Batteries Work, howstuffworks.com
Better Batteries, Special Reports/Technology Review
FMC & ROC, Kamal Ahuja, Seeking Alpha.
Related Articles
|


























This article has 4 comments:
In addition to FMC and ROC (both of which have retracted 15-20% from their recent highs), SQM is another way to invest in the impending lithium boom. Incidentally, SQM announced that "its current annual lithium carbonate capacity would increase from 30,000 tonnes to about 40,000 tonnes by the third quarter of this year".
1. While there's no perceived shortage currently, the element is only known to exist in a limited number of locations in S. America.
2. One of the concerns about lithium is that if it were to become a "national security" issue, we wouldn't control our own supplies.
3. Nickel based batteries are a proven alternative, and nickel supplies are abundant. Toyota is planning to offer both lithium and nickel batteries in their electrics.
4. While electric cars look like they may prove useful to commuters, they will have neither the range nor the torque (ie. power) to be effective in many current vehicle applications.
5. Even if successful, owing to price and other limitations, they will only be "boutique" vehicles for the next several years.
6. Therefore, as much as we may like it to be otherwise, electrics cannot be a PANACEA to our current automotive energy dilemma.