PotashCorp: UBS Analyst Cautious Despite Record Quarter 13 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Despite record earnings that beat consensus estimates and strong performances from each of its potash, nitrogen and phosphate segments, shares of PotashCorp of Saskatchewan (POT) declined roughly 3% on Thursday. The company also raised its 2008 earnings per share [EPS] guidance from C$9.50-C$10.50 to C$12.00-C$13.00 and saw cash flow per share [CFPS] climb more than 130% from the second quarter last year.
However, the threat of a possible strike at three of PotashCorp’s mines appears to be causing concern. The company has provided its “best and final offer” but without a settlement, a strike may begin on Friday.
UBS analyst Brian MacArthur maintained his “buy” rating on PotashCorp shares, but cut his price target to $308 from $320 as a result of uncertainty related to the labor dispute. This was done by applying a price-to-cash flow multiple of 11.5 times to his 2009 CFPS estimate of C$24.23, down from 12x previously.
RBC Capital Markets analyst Fai Lee remains far more bullish however, maintaining an “outperform” rating and US$375 price target, which represents upside of more than 90%.
Putting aside the possibility of short-term volatility for PotashCorp shares, he told clients the recent weakness presents an excellent buying opportunity for those with a long-term outlook. The analyst cited its price-to-earnings multiple of 8.9 times and estimated cash flow of $7.3-billion, or $24.13 per share, for 2009.
Mr. Lee also said the market is ignoring the company’s future potash expansion projects that could add as much as $95 per share in value.
His EPS estimates for 2008 and 2009 climb from $12.26 and $21.33 to $12.54 and $21.81, respectively, which is primarily a result of a higher assumed share buyback program.
Related Articles
|























This article has 13 comments:
I am currently going and studying days where there was sector rotation so I can get a better tell. So far i have noticed there is an increase in price fluctuation, irratic stock behavior without news. and failure to make new highs on a stair step climb. In reverse I have noticed that stocks going down exhibit the inverse but simialr behavior, just turn the charts upside down.
Following this I got out of DUG as it failed twice at 38 to hold its 200dma (even on good volume), result Bullish on DIG (oil stocks). Oil services not so much yet.
Also the Financials ETF failed to take out its 50dma on two attemps on very good volume. Also SKF held its 200dma in the selloff and didnt need to retest. Result was that I added to my short financial list. Until I see something different in the charts I am not bullish on the Banks and Financials. Bullish oil stocks not OIL (USO), that chart sticks, bearish Nat Gas, scared to death but long KOL, MOO, UYM, SLX, GLD, SLV.
@mythoughts: Finally somebody had the guts to speak out loudly. The choice between B. Hussein Obama and McCain should be a no-brainer.
agriculture will roll along whether or not the smart money invests in it and where there' ag there is fertilizer.