Seeking Alpha
About this author:

So now that Sirius and XM have merged, nothing can stop them from becoming a world-dominating satellite hegemon, right?

Well, maybe one thing: They still don't seem to have a hell of a lot of listenership. At least Sirius doesn't. As Silicon Alley Insider pointed out yesterday, Sirius reported greatly slowed growth in its subscriber acquisitions in the second quarter. Nearly 90 percent of those subscribers it did acquire got their subscriptions as part of a new car purchase. In other words, they're Sirius customers in the same sense that they're anti-lock brakes customers.

And there's reason to think those subscribers aren't using their Sirius tuners as much as you might think -- not to listen to some of its putatively more high-profile programming, at any rate. The company doesn't release public ratings figures for its channels or shows, and I was somewhat shocked to learn, from a Sirius insider, that it didn't even have internal audience data until quite recently -- just a few months ago.

Among other things, the new data showed that Sirius Stars -- the talk channel featuring Barbara Walters, Deepak Chopra, Candace Bushnell and other well-known hosts -- attracted fewer than 30,000 listeners in a week. Assuming that number wasn't an absolute fluke, it seems likely Sirius will see fit to reevaluate its talent roster in the near future with an eye toward who is -- and isn't -- paying the bills.

Print this article with comments

This article has 55 comments:

  •  
    be patient. the merger was just finalized. everything will be attended to based on importance and at the right time. the company is probably prioritizing all these things right now.
    2008 Jul 30 03:22 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    your analogy is ludicrous--equating satrad in cars as the equivalancy to brakes shows your level of understanding to be as sharp as a brake pad--radios in cars, whether satrad or terrestrial have been mainstays for the last 50 years-- wouldn't any standard equipment in a car fit your analogy? what a boob--makes statements without having the guts to reveal his sirius insider"source"--evide... you are shorting the stock or lobbying for the NAB--what a boob
    2008 Jul 30 06:17 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Wow, that was a poorly written cheapshot article. Your sight has a feature to add you to my watchlist, but now I would like to suggest you also add a feature to Ignore any further articles an auther ever composes.
    2008 Jul 30 06:50 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Please add ignore feature for an Author's work
    2008 Jul 30 06:52 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    This only means that there is a lot of upside to this stock, Because while the shares my be diluted, the market for satellite radio isn't. That being said, we are now on are way to the holiday season and sales should pick up. If you own sirius xm, I would stop looking at it everyday and sell in "May go away".
    2008 Jul 30 07:00 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Great post statik! When did this "sputnik" come crashing down on us? First of all, since when has 18.5 million listeners been considered a small audience?.....By what standard?.....And why do you think sub numbers are a little thin?.......Gee, could it possibly be related to slumping auto sales and our economic crisis? I guess since auto sales are down substantially, that must mean consumers are simply not interested in vehicles anymore. Would you like to buy a clue Jeff? (It's the economy, stupid). And what about this concept Jeffy - do you think the long delay in merger approval may have exacerbated the problem SatRad is experiencing? You got any "in depth" analysis on that? Now get on outa here with your alleycat coat, wearing Hush Puppy shoes........cuz you're dismissed!!!

    PS - Say "hi" to your inside source for me, ok?
    2008 Jul 30 07:04 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Jeff, I have to tell you, you make it too obvious that either someone is pulling your strings or you appear to be shorting this stock. I know insider information about my own corporation and the LAST person that I would give information too would be someone who would attack me in an article. Just plain ole common sense. I agree with the others, please add an ignore author button so that I don't have to totally quit looking at Seeking Alpha articles.
    2008 Jul 30 07:48 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    What a short sighted article. do you realize the 17 month FCC wait has almost destroyed these companies? The number of people on the sidelines is astounding. Who PAID you to write this....just another PAID basher...I will not stand for this....SEEKING ALPHA...do you have any standards????????? SIRIUS INSIDER INDEED...WHAT A HACK.
    2008 Jul 30 08:21 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    18 million subscribers divided by roughly 300 channels today equals 60,000 listeners per channel. That is assuming all the channels get equal listenership which of course they don't. 1. The argument that subscriptions are down is BECAUSE OF THE PENDING MERGER FOR OVER A YEAR!!!. Lots of olks on the sidelines. Once the portable radios are combined amd other hardware technology is available, do you really think that those numbers will not start to climb? 2. Can you also give us the point that people don't pay an extra monthly subscription fee for those brakes? 3. Lastly, your readership as compared to your analysis can be pointed back to you for illustrative purposes. For example, the internet has millions upon millions of surfers, how many do you think actually read and care about your article? I only see that 8 of us cared to comment so far. Sounds like based on your argument, your subscriptions are falling too!
    2008 Jul 30 08:24 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    18 million subscribers places them 2nd in the World for media provider subscriptions.... The only company with more subscribers is Comcast. I get what you were trying to say; that not all subscribers are listeners, but using stats on how many people tuned in to Sirius Stars as a gauge is an obvious attempt at magnifying your point... a cheap trick! I Siriously (I know) doubt that the percentage of non-listening subscribers is very large, certainly not large enough to warrant an article. Perhaps you are trying to slant public opinion, but I'm guessing you just got an idea and ran with it without really thinking it out.
    2008 Jul 30 08:34 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    There have been several articles written on the merger, but, this is without doubt the worst article on the subject yet. The author obviously has a hidden agenda. Jeff, you may want to stop writing and cover your shorts.
    2008 Jul 30 08:35 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Your quote and main topic of the article: "They still don't seem to have a hell of a lot of listenership." What about the 18 moiilion folks that are forking out money each month? They are listening to something, right? So, overall, the idea must be a good enough idea for people to PAY MONEY EACH MONTH. Sure somoe channels can and will be removed, so what, that a smart company looking at its products and making adjustments. But a brake owner by way of buying a car versus a satellie radio subscriber who has chosen to continue to pay does not make any sense to me.
    2008 Jul 30 08:36 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Sales are down because of people like me. I just bought a used car when i sold my old car my sat radio went with it. im now waiting to buy a sat radio to make sure i can get all of the combined companies stations. Theres plenty of people like me im sure. Subs. are gonna explode once this co. gets on there feet!
    2008 Jul 30 08:42 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    •  • Website: http://Yahoo.com
    I myself have been waiting for interoperable radios. That will be comming soon. I am sure that is why retail sales have been down. Guess what NAB booy. I will be buying 2.
    2008 Jul 30 08:44 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Wow, you are so ignorant, and a complete idiot. 18 million subscribers is not a lot huh? That's 18 million PAYING subscriptions, it's not like they are the 3-month trial. You are a complete moron, go kill yourself.
    2008 Jul 30 08:58 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I love it when I read these articles from these authors who know it all. I really enjoy the fact that there are so many posts from readers giving valuable opinions and really pointing out how people like Jeff have some motive for making satellite radio sound like a failure. This article is so flawed. I wonder if he ever even used a satellite radio. Anyone who has, certainly can't dispute how entertaining it is. Well, anyway I think about 3 years ago there was a combined subscriber base of about 3.5 million, up to over 18 million now, that must be poor growth according to Jeff. Let us know when you have 18 million people reading your ridiculous articles.
    2008 Jul 30 09:00 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    the antilock brake companies are doing very well
    2008 Jul 30 09:02 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Siri/Xm may have some difficulties , but the future looks a helluva lot brighter to me now ......satrad has definately tested my patience , but I think it is going to pay off in the not too distant future , and if they expand globally ....oh my , I am lickin' my chops just thinking about it !!!!
    2008 Jul 30 09:07 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    It makes no sense to own these shares anymore. The combined company needs to refinance a huge portion of its $3+ billion in debt, and the company is going to do what it takes to make bondholders whole, even if it means breaking the backs of gullible sports-fan mentality equity holders such as yourselves. The convertible bonds just issued will pay their holders more than 6% a year, then they get all the upside if the stock ever recovers (which it won’t). With that kind of a coupon, it’s meaningless to own the common shares.
    Those of you who bought high have my sympathies.

    It’s not too late, however. If you sell now, maybe you can take what pennies you have left and buy convertibles or an index fund. At least you’ll stand a chance of making yourselves whole again someday. Good luck, it’s a painful lesson. There are too many other investment opportunities out there with more favorable risk-reward profiles than to commit my funds to the flimsy and unsubstantiated hope that these money-losing companies' stocks will someday spike.
    2008 Jul 30 09:30 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    VV-uare so full of shit-u keep posting the same bs every chance u get . Why don't u try and get a life...
    2008 Jul 30 09:48 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Hey Vic Did you copy and paste, cause I know you said that on another article ...oh yeah yesterday. Come on you are not saying anything we don't know,but we unlike you see the potential of this new entity.
    We aren't looking for amazing numbers right now it is going to take a while for the new receivers to hit the market.
    With oil going lower over the next couple of months that will have an impact on the new car market.
    Things take time only panic is immediate.
    I am sure with the 17 months they looked at financing a couple of times,this wasn't a shoot from the hip plan.
    As too this article,and I use that term loosly, the beauty of SATRAD is that it appeals to everybody not only to the hit parade..
    2008 Jul 30 09:52 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Just you wait until the dual subscribers turn off their second radios.
    You're going to see 12 million subscribers at the best possible scenario.
    2008 Jul 30 10:13 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    hey now-

    Mel & Howard had a great conversations today. Mel made a statement that supported the stinkaroo Comcast comment above. The interview also outlined the naivity of Congress about business.

    Bottom line: The combined company is stable, and subscribers base is climbing!


    PS.
    Vicar - If you're so negative about the stock, get out. If you're shorting, get out! It's price not going to get much lower. If you're bitter because you're all-in and need the cash now, HA HA!!! Remember the IRS does allow losses to be deferred against gains. Seeing how pessimistic you are, I'm sure you made a mint in the financial funds, by shorting.
    2008 Jul 30 10:20 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    All I can say is I agree with all the critics regarding this article. The only one who I feel makes sense in his reporting is Tyler. Hold on to your Sirius/XM stock. Many of us have waited for a long time and I say give it a little more time. The stock will eventually take off on the upside.
    2008 Jul 30 10:25 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    He raises a couple of points that I think that Sirius realizes. Do you know anyone who listens to Operah? Barbara Walters? How much was paid for that talent? I think that Sirius needs to pay attention to what they pay for and take some ratings guidelines for content and consider cancelling shows/talent that is unprofitable and adding stuff that will really keep and add more subscribers. Rush Limbaugh (while he is controversial) would be the mother lode. He has 30 million listeners a day. Of course, he would cost a ton and just signed a new long term deal with clear channel.
    2008 Jul 30 10:41 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Very misleading. Compare it to cable TV and perhaps you won't be so shocked. CNBC's Business Day is averaging 83,000 adults 25-54 for 2007, up 32% over 2006 (63,000). In total viewers, Business Day is up 21% from 210,000 last year to 254,000 this year, with its best year since 2002. Now those are small numbers. When Seinfeld went off the air it was averaging 20 million viewers.
    2008 Jul 30 11:24 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    18 million subscribers is as many or more as the "biggest MMORPG of all time" World of Warcraft. It has made millions to billions for the company.

    This is not a small company. It is now the second largest paid subscription company, how is that small? Get the stick out of your ass and get a clue.

    People who were afraid to choose a company can now get the radio they have been waiting for. And the few million die hard sat fans will buy new radios to get the duo programing.

    Not to mention that they are saving 400 million a month now and at least 1-2 million will bump their subscriptions up 4 dollars to get the duo programing. That amounts to another 4-8 million dollars in increased venue A MONTH or 48-96 million dollars a YEAR. This is by no feat a small number.

    +500 million in the pocket of the company will allow them to pay down debt and increase their stock value attracting new investors. HOW ABOUT WAITING A MONTH OR TWO TO GIVE YOUR RATS ASS COMMENTS ON THE ISSUE.

    i only found this horrible article in a stock trading page. But it seems you have about........50 readers. Grats on your "success"
    2008 Jul 30 11:25 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Another NAB shill heard from. You guys lost...cover your short sales and get over it.
    2008 Jul 30 11:58 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    There will be a day in the future where almost every car in America will have Sat/Rad.
    2008 Jul 30 12:08 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Not only am I a Sirius subscriber, I'm a an exclusive listener. That means that since I've had Sirius, I've listened to ZERO minutes of terrestrial radio. NONE! In fact, everyone I know who has satellite radio is the same, avoiding commercial-laden radio as much as possible. Your date is wrong, if someone listens, they keep it. Let me guess, you've been paid off by Clear Channel.
    2008 Jul 30 01:16 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Bababooie !!!!!
    2008 Jul 30 02:10 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I'M WAITING FOR INTEROPERABLE RADIOS TOO. THEN I WILL GET 6 FOR MY CARS AND AS CHRISTMAS PRESENTS FOR THE KIDS.
    2008 Jul 30 03:23 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    300M population in the U.S.-18M current SAT/RAD Subs = 282 MILLION POTENTIAL SAT/RAD SUBSCRIBERS. SIRIUS XM is already #2 as a radio service with huge growth potential. It may take years for profitability to be reached (which may not be a good play for traders). Let's not forget about other areas of the market such as TV and GARMIN. I would not rule out a deal with the APPLE IPOD.
    2008 Jul 30 04:07 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    EVERY CAR IN AMERICA!!
    2008 Jul 30 04:11 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    vicar...i guess you'd argue that NOT getting the refi and losing access to the cash in the short-term was the better of the two options? you think the stock looks bad now, how about if the merger got scuttled because they couldn't refi the debt?

    the fact that they could get someone to sell them debt speaks volumes. you think any old business is having money handed to it, even at these rates?

    btw, you know what rate mel got on the debt he took out when he started infiniti? take a guess...ah forget it, i'll let you in...it was 21%.

    when you put it in context it's not that big a deal...sure, would you have LOVED for it to be cheaper? who wouldn't...but when faced with NOT finalizing the merge because you couldn't even find bookmaker's rates, then i'd take this any day & twice on sundays.

    the size of this subscriber base and the very low churn rates speak volumes about the potential of the business...now you wipe out duplicative costs, play hardball at the negotiating table with the talent/content owners, continue to drive automotive penetration rates higher and drill down on marketing this new tiered pricing to historical fence sitters and you're talking about a much improved business model, no?
    2008 Jul 30 04:12 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    IF the line about not having internal audience data is true, I find that almost negligent. How do you justify paying anyone anything with metrics supporting their worth. Again, IF, that line is true (the only interesting line in the article to me) then things should only get better. Introducing actual audience listening data to the mix can only help the bottom line by allowing management to improve ROI versus the guessing exercise you have to do without data.
    2008 Jul 30 05:09 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    hey guys, just hope GM or Ford does not file for Bankruptsy. That would be a severe blow to sattelite radio....
    2008 Jul 30 05:48 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Jeff,
    Just read your Bio. Interesting.... But, Maybe you should stick to pumps and purses!!!!
    2008 Jul 30 06:01 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Jeff:

    According to Mel on CNBC this morning there's only one subscription service with more than 18 million people today and that's comcast. He also said there is only one radio company with more listeners today and that would be clear channel

    Each year, just based on the OEM auto channel alone they'll add about 2 million subs a year each paying roughly $120. That's an additional 1/4 billion of growth per year.

    Right now, based on the current 18,000,000 subs they bring in over 2 billion a year and this doesn't factor in any of the growth from the following:

    1)

    Look for a Music library from the combined entity that dwarfs the itunes selections with minimal additional royalty arrangements. Look for high end tiers that will include 2 or 3 free downloads / month with your subscription. Library will be open to anybody for $.99 / song.

    2)

    Look for advertising revenues to bump up significantly given the 20 million audience and rising. Also look for 100% penetration, sooner rather than later, as OEM installs increase across the board.

    3)

    Watch for a clear strategy involving branding and a huge retail push across new hardware for the upcoming holiday season.

    4)

    This service will soon be re-invigorated on the desktop with new Operating System software.
    OEM loaded this software will enhance the capture and delivery of streaming across devices such as the iphone and the new handsets from Nokia and Samsung, extending it's reach over multiple platforms.


    5)

    Look for this desktop software to include a Pandora like option, relative to the new library, that will be delivered via a streaming format. Structure will either be advertiser sponsored or subscription based.

    6)

    Be ready for Sirius to challenge Clear Channel, over time, relative to concert promotion and on demand broadcast of concerts nationwide. Both live and recorded. Look for them to include and share revenues with the artists regarding downloads of entire venues.


    7)

    Watch for expanded video offerings and GPS inclusion in new car installs.


    8)

    Look for expansion in Western Europe beginning with Britain in 2010 / 2011


    IT IS A CASH COW THAT IS ABOUT TO CUT IT'S OPERATING EXPENSE BY JUST UNDER 1/3. IT HAS HUGE AVENUES FOR GROWTH BEYOND THE ALMOST GUARANTEED 10% / YEAR. EACH SUBSCRIBER FLOWS ALMOST COMPLETELY TO THE BOTTOM LINE GIVEN THE NOMINAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH HOOKING THEM UP AND DISTRIBUTING THE NETWORK TO A NEW CLIENT. THIS INCREMENTAL REVENUE WILL JUST PILE UP.

    IF THERE IS ONE GROWTH STORY LEFT YOU ARE STARING IT RIGHT IN THE FACE! AN ABSOLUTE 10 BAGGER. ESPECIALLY BECAUSE EVERYBODY CURRENTLY DOUBTS IT.

    END OF STORY.
    2008 Jul 30 10:45 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Those of us that subscribe and listen to the "Big Blue Dog" everyday need to show others how awesome it is! If you're an investor and avid listener, show off a great product you can genuinely say is great for consumers...as well as us stockholders! I have 5 (maybe 6) people in my office just waiting for interoperable radios...and people always want to mess with my car receiver to check it out....GO SIRI!!
    2008 Jul 30 11:57 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Well said Ripped. Those are the same points I've been waiting for any of these so called analysts to bring up.
    2008 Jul 31 07:45 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    One thing that pretty much everyone ignores when talking about these two is the quality of the music. Had XM for over a year, but could never find a station that wasn't boring--replaying the same old songs over and over, following terradio's lead in playing just the artists that they think people want to hear. I tried tons of stations, only to finally decide to give it up.

    Once I recorded five hours of their "adult contemporary," only to get five Elton John songs, five Billy Joel, four Celine Dion, three Hootie and the Blowfish. . . . you get the idea. Of 120 songs, 85 were white males or white male-led groups, 30 were by women, and 5 were African-American. I emailed the program manager for that station to ask about the disparity (as I've grown up I've heard tons of A-A artists), and he suggested their Urban station. Just another clueless wonder in the entertainment world.
    2008 Jul 31 08:02 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I absolutely agree with ripped on all points. The opportunity for growth here is almost endless. 10-bagger within 5 years.
    2008 Jul 31 10:08 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Dave has a point about the listenership of certain channels. I am a stockholder and customer and feel that both XM and Sirius were throwing programs against the wall to see which ones would stick. Do you think Oprah is pulling her weight also? I hope Mel loks at all of these marginal programs with a jaundiced eye over the next few months and cuts out the laggards. How many subscribers would cancel if Sirius Stars went away? Any programs with a following could be moved eldewhere.
    2008 Jul 31 10:26 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    thanks guys you helped me figure out what the heck is going on in the sirius/xm world been waiting 2 years to subscribe already own the stock my husband wants the best of both so wehave been in a holding pattern watching and waiting thaks ripped for all the info
    2008 Jul 31 10:43 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Sirius XM as a company; eh, might be good. Sirius XM as a stock? Not so much... although at these levels, it could be worth a small buy.
    2008 Jul 31 11:52 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Due respect Mr. Bercovici, but there are generally 3 kinds of liars: lawyers, politicians and those who quote statistics! It MAY be accurate that 90% of all "new" Sirius subscribers in the "most recent quarter" were auto buyers (that's the kind of "cherry-picked" factoid that one might expect of a member of the Bush Administration!), but you fail to mention a) all those who are already XM or Sirius subscribers, b) all those that are new subscribers to XM, and c) the fact that the most recent quarter was a period of unparalleled uncertainty for these two companies. Now, consider the fact that this new fledgling company, Sirius XM, started its first day of business with 18.5 MILLION customers in place and having pre-paid for their service! That's the stuff of the headier days of the dot-com boom. Furthermore, the "churn rate" of both companies has fallen precipitously, suggesting that perhaps more than a few of those new car buyers factored the in-dash satellite radio option into their car purchasing decision! Gosh, could it be that some may have actually decided to purchase a particular make and model, in part, because it came with one of them new-fangled satellite radios?
    2008 Jul 31 12:39 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Those who support satrad at this point are delusional. 22 BILLION of market cap has been lost combined....80% of stock value yet you keep talking happy all the way to chapt 11.
    2008 Jul 31 01:02 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Frisco -- First, Mark Twain might come back from the dead and haunt you for that mangling. There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics. Second, almost every politician is a lawyer, so you are double-counting. Third, I think it should be reformulated thusly, there are two types of liar: anyone asking for your vote and anyone asking for your money. As a lawyer who wants neither, I can afford to be honest (although as an anonymous board poster, I might just as easily be a mentally unbalanced, unemployed malcontent; that said, I assure you I am at least employed).

    Back on topic, I think 18.5M is only the beginning. The secondary market is going to be huge. There is a large portion of the population that never has and never will buy a new car, and as more OEM installs move to second and third owners, that is a new sub opportunity that costs SIRI nothing. They should consider at some point offering a three-month trial for any first-time subscriber who reactivates a unit. Those are cheap sub adds.
    2008 Jul 31 01:16 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    168287 -- It's much easier just to type, "Duh," if you want to communicate your complete ignorance of business and investing.
    2008 Jul 31 01:24 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I see a lot of chapter 11 posts ...and to be honest , I could see some underhanded BS crap like that a possibility except for one thing .....If the satrad stockholders get screwed by some pseudo Enron debaucle , the blame will fall smack dab on the FCC and possibly DOJ , in an economic climate where people are already pissed at the government , I just do not think that will happen ......the American people are just not ready to get fucked again by the government , or by wall street banks , or CEO's ......I think that would be a very heavy straw in the camel's back ......so I don't think bankruptcy is in the cards .....This nation is getting fed up with getting it in the ass by those in power , so I just think bankruptcy could get very nasty , the press would be all over it , and those in power know it ......just an opinion
    2008 Aug 01 12:45 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    168287: All the bulls on this stock will keep whistling all the way to the executioner's chair because it's too painful for them to admit the obvious, that there is no more upside to this stock. They're flogging a dead horse.

    Satrad: Great idea, bad investment. By diluting the common shareholders by 17% this week, management sent a powerful signal that it's writing off the common shareholders so it can keep the bondholders watered and fed. That's the plan, guys. Why would you want to own the common with such a small chance for only modest upside, when you can get paid 6% to hold the convertibles? Professional portfolio managers won't touch this stock with other peoples' money. Why in the world would you buy it with your own hard-earned dollars?

    There's a reason why individual investors are money-losing one-trick ponies. Like those who perished on the Titanic, they reassure themselves that everything will be okay even as the water sloshes under the door, because it's easier to fantasize about victory than to admit the reality of real, money-losing defeat. I feel sorry for all of you. Oh, have a good weekend.
    2008 Aug 01 03:22 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Those of you who see "potential" for this company probably also see Jesus' image in your french toast, and in salt stains on highway overpasses.
    2008 Aug 01 07:15 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Vicar ;

    "Professional portfolio managers won't touch this stock with other peoples' money. Why in the world would you buy it with your own hard-earned dollars?"


    And we all know how well all those professional money managers do.

    Watch them drive another hedge fund into bankcruptcy.

    Yeh they know what side is up.

    I make a living taking the other side of their sad trades.

    With all their kings horses and all their kings men, oh vicar of viceroy, they can't even beat one man with one computer and a copy of barrons.

    Let me post this again for you:

    There's only one subscription media service with more than 18 million people today and that's comcast (from Mel's lips). There is only one radio company with more combined listeners today and that would be clear channel

    Each year, just based on the OEM auto channel alone they'll add about 2 million subs each paying roughly $120. That's an additional 1/4 billion of growth per year.

    Right now, based on the current 18,000,000 subs they bring in over 2 billion a year and this doesn't factor in any of the growth from the following:

    1)

    Look for a Music library from the combined entity that dwarfs the itunes selections with minimal additional royalty arrangements. Look for high end tiers that will include 2 or 3 free downloads / month with your subscription. Library will be open to anybody for $.99 / song.

    2)

    Look for advertising revenues to bump up significantly given the 20 million audience and rising. Also look for 100% penetration, sooner rather than later, as OEM installs increase across the board.

    3)

    Watch for a clear strategy involving branding and a huge retail push across new hardware for the upcoming holiday season.

    4)

    This service will soon be re-invigorated on the desktop with new Operating System software.
    OEM loaded this software will enhance the capture and delivery of streaming across devices such as the iphone and the new handsets from Nokia and Samsung, extending it's reach over multiple platforms.


    5)

    Look for this desktop software to include a Pandora like option, relative to the new library, that will be delivered via a streaming format. Structure will either be advertiser sponsored or subscription based.

    6)

    Be ready for Sirius to challenge Clear Channel, over time, relative to concert promotion and on demand broadcast of concerts nationwide. Both live and recorded. Look for them to include and share revenues with the artists regarding downloads of entire venues.


    7)

    Watch for expanded video offerings and GPS inclusion in new car installs.


    8)

    Look for expansion in Western Europe beginning with Britain in 2010 / 2011


    IT IS A CASH COW THAT IS ABOUT TO CUT IT'S OPERATING EXPENSE BY JUST UNDER 1/3. IT HAS HUGE AVENUES FOR GROWTH BEYOND THE ALMOST GUARANTEED 10% / YEAR. EACH SUBSCRIBER FLOWS ALMOST COMPLETELY TO THE BOTTOM LINE GIVEN THE NOMINAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH HOOKING THEM UP AND DISTRIBUTING THE NETWORK TO A NEW CLIENT. THIS INCREMENTAL REVENUE WILL JUST PILE UP.

    IF THERE IS ONE GROWTH STORY LEFT YOU ARE STARING IT RIGHT IN THE FACE! AN ABSOLUTE 10 BAGGER. ESPECIALLY BECAUSE EVERYBODY CURRENTLY DOUBTS IT.

    2008 Aug 03 11:03 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    According to Forbes online today, "Sirius ended the second quarter with 8.9 million subscribers, up from 7.1 million. Revenue soared to $283.0 million from $226.4 million. The company said the increase was driven by a $56.9 million rise in subscriber revenue, representing the increased user base.

    Another bright spot for the company was that its second-quarter net loss narrowed to $83.9 million, or 6 cents a share, from a shortfall of $134.1 million, or 9 cents a share, a year earlier, slightly better than analysts’ forecasts of 7 cents a share.

    At the same time subscriber acquisition costs fell 23.0%, to $81.4 million, down from $105.7 million for the second quarter of 2007."

    Mr. Bercovici, don't you think that terrestrial radio would wet themselves for a $56M increase in advertising revenues in a single quarter? After all, that's the equivalent metric in an industry that's basically devolved into an advertising delivery venue.

    I must confess that I'm a subscriber of XM and have been for over 3 years now. It is today what terrestrial radio once was; a purveyor of quality entertainment. Face it, Sirius XM will soon become the HBO of radio. As long as it continues to deliver quality radio without 27 minutes per hour of commercials, I'll continue to shell out to subscribe to it. Want to buy a car? Want to buy a mattress? Want to buy insurance, male enhancement products, questionable investments? Then terrestrial radio is for you, Jeff!

    And, Mr. Blah, Blah, Esq.: I'd LOVE for Mark Twain to come back from the dead to school me on his quotations (massaged, as they were, intentionally, but still without attribution - my bad!). I can think of few other dead scholars with whom I'd rather have such a discussion!
    2008 Aug 07 12:50 PM | Link | Reply